Annual CO₂ Emissions Growth (abs) 1930
Annual CO₂ emissions growth measures the increase in carbon output. Compare countries, explore trends, and view interactive maps.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | Russia | 25,273,472 |
2 | Ukraine | 8,019,960 |
3 | France | 3,352,096 |
4 | Romania | 2,751,338 |
5 | Kazakhstan | 2,743,760 |
6 | Iran | 1,491,248 |
7 | China | 1,276,628 |
8 | Belarus | 1,158,646 |
9 | Uzbekistan | 1,076,004 |
10 | India | 691,608 |
11 | Azerbaijan | 553,498 |
12 | Cuba | 438,258 |
13 | Lithuania | 433,956 |
14 | Republic of Moldova | 425,924 |
15 | Turkey | 421,389 |
16 | Estonia | 413,524 |
17 | Portugal | 355,378 |
18 | Turkmenistan | 352,755 |
19 | Latvia | 280,062 |
20 | Kyrgyzstan | 235,704 |
21 | Georgia | 152,786 |
22 | Greece | 150,134 |
23 | Tajikistan | 135,605.97 |
24 | Egypt | 98,427 |
25 | Armenia | 91,889.016 |
26 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 84,243 |
27 | Ecuador | 76,790 |
28 | Taiwan | 51,296 |
29 | Trinidad and Tobago | 51,296 |
30 | Myanmar | 36,640 |
31 | Bolivia | 22,463 |
32 | Philippines | 18,218 |
33 | Nigeria | 7,328 |
34 | Morocco | 7,298.002 |
35 | Dominican Republic | 4,149 |
36 | Barbados | 3,664 |
37 | Algeria | 3,624 |
38 | Honduras | 3,322 |
39 | Aruba | 0 |
40 | Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba | 0 |
41 | Curaçao | 0 |
42 | Iraq | 0 |
43 | Mozambique | 0 |
44 | Paraguay | 0 |
45 | Sint Maarten (Dutch part) | 0 |
46 | Haiti | -305 |
47 | Nicaragua | -413 |
48 | Guatemala | -1,149 |
49 | Panama | -4,301 |
50 | South Korea | -7,521.008 |
51 | Costa Rica | -8,951 |
52 | Montenegro | -10,350 |
53 | El Salvador | -11,865 |
54 | New Zealand | -29,283 |
55 | Vietnam | -51,236 |
56 | North Macedonia | -53,297 |
57 | Slovenia | -77,076 |
58 | Bulgaria | -80,697 |
59 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | -93,072 |
60 | Croatia | -101,626 |
61 | North Korea | -135,375 |
62 | Uruguay | -144,224 |
63 | Zimbabwe | -260,144 |
64 | Argentina | -268,518 |
65 | Serbia | -269,139 |
66 | Chile | -298,978 |
67 | Spain | -333,482 |
68 | Sweden | -437,420 |
69 | Malaysia | -443,344.25 |
70 | Ireland | -447,008 |
71 | Indonesia | -454,308 |
72 | Netherlands | -487,336 |
73 | Brazil | -549,719 |
74 | Colombia | -572,154 |
75 | Finland | -703,190 |
76 | Switzerland | -707,540 |
77 | Norway | -793,978 |
78 | Australia | -1,006,568 |
79 | Denmark | -1,318,951 |
80 | Peru | -1,484,967 |
81 | Mexico | -1,763,330 |
82 | Slovakia | -1,786,495 |
83 | Venezuela | -1,952,142.1 |
84 | South Africa | -2,046,720 |
85 | Hungary | -2,597,479 |
86 | Belgium | -3,282,136 |
87 | Italy | -4,477,348 |
88 | Canada | -4,682,304 |
89 | Austria | -5,309,228 |
90 | Czech Republic | -5,382,148 |
91 | Japan | -8,714,552 |
92 | Poland | -16,124,548 |
93 | United Kingdom | -17,401,184 |
94 | Germany | -77,142,980 |
95 | United States | -218,589,950 |
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #95
United States
- #94
Germany
- #93
United Kingdom
- #92
Poland
- #91
Japan
- #90
Czech Republic
- #89
Austria
- #88
Canada
- #87
Italy
- #86
Belgium
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
Annual CO₂ Emissions Growth (abs) in 1930: A Global Overview
In 1930, Russia recorded the highest Annual CO₂ Emissions Growth (abs) at 25,273,472 metric tons, while the global range of emissions growth spanned from a decrease of -218,589,950 metric tons in the United States to a modest increase in several other countries. The average emissions growth across the 95 countries for which data is available stood at -3,475,322.61 metric tons, indicating a general trend of decreasing emissions during this period.
Economic Factors Driving Emissions Growth
The stark contrast in emissions growth among countries in 1930 can largely be attributed to differing economic contexts. Russia, which experienced a significant increase of 25,273,472 metric tons, was undergoing rapid industrialization, particularly in heavy industries such as coal and steel. This was part of a broader Soviet initiative to boost economic output at the expense of environmental considerations. Conversely, the United States saw a drastic decline of -218,589,950 metric tons, likely due to the economic downturn associated with the Great Depression, which led to reduced industrial activity and energy consumption.
Other countries, such as Ukraine with an increase of 8,019,960 metric tons and Kazakhstan with 2,743,760 metric tons, also reflected similar industrial growth patterns. The focus on heavy industries in these regions contributed to their emissions spikes, highlighting the direct link between economic activity and carbon output.
Geopolitical Influences on Emissions Trends
Geopolitical factors also played a significant role in the emissions landscape of 1930. The interwar period was marked by significant political instability and economic challenges in Europe. Countries like Germany and the United Kingdom experienced substantial decreases in emissions, with reductions of -77,142,980 and -17,401,184 metric tons, respectively. This decline can be connected to the lingering effects of World War I and the onset of economic hardships, which curtailed industrial output.
In contrast, nations such as Iran and China reported modest increases of 1,491,248 and 1,276,628 metric tons, respectively. These countries were at different stages of industrial development and were beginning to tap into their natural resources, which would later contribute to more significant emissions growth in subsequent decades.
Year-over-Year Changes: The Biggest Movers
The year-over-year changes in emissions provide insight into the volatility of carbon output during this period. Russia's impressive increase of 20,251,128 metric tons (a staggering 403.2%) exemplifies the impact of aggressive industrial policies. Similarly, Ukraine and Kazakhstan mirrored this trend with increases of 6,426,198 and 2,195,563 metric tons, respectively, revealing a collective push towards industrialization in Eastern Europe.
On the other hand, the largest declines were recorded by the United States, with a decrease of -351,131,130 metric tons, reflecting the severe impacts of the Great Depression. Other notable declines included Germany at -111,366,820 metric tons and the United Kingdom at -41,153,664 metric tons, indicating that economic constraints can lead to significant reductions in emissions, albeit at a cost to industrial growth.
Conclusion: The Environmental Implications of Economic Trends
The data from 1930 highlights a complex interplay between economic conditions and CO₂ emissions growth. While some nations thrived on industrial output, leading to increased emissions, others faced economic downturns that resulted in significant declines. This period serves as a historical reference point for understanding how economic policies and geopolitical contexts can dramatically influence environmental outcomes. As countries continue to grapple with the legacy of industrialization, the lessons from 1930 remain relevant in today's discussions on sustainable development and carbon reduction strategies.
Data Source
Global Carbon Budget
Just over 20 years ago the Global Carbon Project (GCP) was created to bring together a global consortium of scientists to establish a common and mutually agreed understanding of the Earth carbon cycle.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Annual CO₂ Emissions Growth (abs) data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Environment Facts
Above-Ground Biomass in Forest (tonnes/ha)
Above-ground biomass in forest measures carbon storage per hectare. Explore rankings and compare data across 266+ countries with interactive maps.
View dataBrowse All Environment
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data