Annual CO₂ Emissions Growth (abs) 1911
Annual CO₂ emissions growth measures the increase in carbon output. Compare countries, explore trends, and view interactive maps.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | Germany | 13,219,712 |
2 | United Kingdom | 11,618,560 |
3 | Canada | 8,647,040 |
4 | France | 6,294,752 |
5 | Poland | 5,056,320 |
6 | Japan | 4,825,488 |
7 | Mexico | 3,779,038 |
8 | Russia | 2,169,176 |
9 | Australia | 1,819,774 |
10 | Argentina | 1,519,452 |
11 | India | 1,295,108 |
12 | Netherlands | 1,245,760 |
13 | Romania | 956,304 |
14 | Chile | 866,807 |
15 | Switzerland | 820,736 |
16 | Italy | 802,416 |
17 | Brazil | 799,182 |
18 | Ukraine | 688,006 |
19 | Indonesia | 615,552 |
20 | Czech Republic | 526,732 |
21 | Denmark | 479,984 |
22 | Cuba | 432,556 |
23 | Belgium | 399,376 |
24 | Turkey | 344,416 |
25 | Hungary | 318,768 |
26 | Bulgaria | 263,808 |
27 | Finland | 252,816 |
28 | Kazakhstan | 235,364 |
29 | Greece | 186,864 |
30 | Peru | 180,097 |
31 | Slovakia | 169,425 |
32 | Norway | 139,232 |
33 | Belarus | 98,922 |
34 | Uzbekistan | 92,313 |
35 | Zimbabwe | 80,608.03 |
36 | Taiwan | 62,288 |
37 | Trinidad and Tobago | 58,624 |
38 | Serbia | 50,566 |
39 | Azerbaijan | 47,250 |
40 | Lithuania | 36,960 |
41 | Republic of Moldova | 36,525.938 |
42 | Estonia | 35,744 |
43 | North Korea | 34,711 |
44 | Turkmenistan | 30,065 |
45 | Latvia | 23,696 |
46 | Kyrgyzstan | 20,200 |
47 | Croatia | 19,094 |
48 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 17,487 |
49 | Slovenia | 14,481 |
50 | Georgia | 13,089 |
51 | Costa Rica | 12,755 |
52 | Venezuela | 11,908 |
53 | Tajikistan | 11,598 |
54 | North Macedonia | 10,013.008 |
55 | Armenia | 7,844 |
56 | Colombia | 5,792 |
57 | Guatemala | 5,253 |
58 | Dominican Republic | 4,957 |
59 | Haiti | 2,605 |
60 | Honduras | 2,137 |
61 | Montenegro | 1,944 |
62 | South Korea | 1,929 |
63 | Nicaragua | 1,772 |
64 | Paraguay | 385 |
65 | El Salvador | 92 |
66 | Panama | 84 |
67 | Ecuador | -4,779 |
68 | Philippines | -14,656 |
69 | Uruguay | -97,213 |
70 | Portugal | -106,256 |
71 | Spain | -164,880 |
72 | Vietnam | -164,880 |
73 | New Zealand | -293,120 |
74 | Sweden | -324,577 |
75 | China | -378,932 |
76 | South Africa | -637,536 |
77 | Austria | -9,643,648 |
78 | United States | -12,753,408 |
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #78
United States
- #77
Austria
- #76
South Africa
- #75
China
- #74
Sweden
- #73
New Zealand
- #72
Vietnam
- #71
Spain
- #70
Portugal
- #69
Uruguay
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
Overview of Annual CO₂ Emissions Growth (abs) in 1911
In 1911, the country with the highest Annual CO₂ Emissions Growth (abs) was Germany, registering an increase of 13,219,712 metric tons. The global range of emissions growth varied dramatically, with a minimum value of -12,753,408 metric tons recorded in the United States. The average emissions growth across the 78 countries with data was 605,620.87 metric tons, while the median stood at 47,250.00 metric tons.
Significant Increases: Germany and the United Kingdom
The dramatic increase in Germany's CO₂ emissions can be attributed to several factors, including the industrial boom of the early 20th century. The country was experiencing rapid industrialization, which relied heavily on coal as a primary energy source. This period saw the expansion of factories and infrastructure, leading to a significant rise in carbon output. Similarly, the United Kingdom reported an increase of 11,618,560 metric tons, driven by its established industrial sector and growing demand for energy. The combination of industrial growth and urbanization in both countries contributed to their substantial emissions increases.
Countries Experiencing Decreases: The United States and Austria
Conversely, the United States recorded a significant decrease of -12,753,408 metric tons in emissions growth, a reflection of economic fluctuations and potential shifts in energy policy during this period. The decline may also indicate a temporary reduction in industrial output or shifts towards more efficient technologies that were emerging at the time. Similarly, Austrian emissions fell by -9,643,648 metric tons, likely influenced by the country's smaller industrial base compared to its neighbors and perhaps a transition towards less carbon-intensive energy sources. These reductions in emissions growth highlight the diverse economic realities faced by different countries during this historical period.
Year-Over-Year Changes: The Biggest Movers
The year-over-year changes in CO₂ emissions growth in 1911 reveal stark contrasts among nations. The greatest increase was seen in Germany with a staggering rise of 13,424,896 metric tons, reflecting the extreme growth in its industrial sector. The United Kingdom also experienced a notable increase of 7,972,896 metric tons, highlighting its ongoing industrial expansion. On the other hand, the most significant decreases were recorded in the United States and Austria, which saw reductions of -119,632,128 and -24,786,960 metric tons, respectively. The drastic drop in the U.S. emissions growth is particularly striking, indicating a potential economic downturn or shifts in energy consumption patterns at the time.
Geographic and Economic Influences on CO₂ Emissions Growth
Geographic and economic contexts play crucial roles in determining CO₂ emissions growth. For instance, countries like Canada and France reported increases of 8,647,040 and 6,294,752 metric tons, respectively. Canada’s growth can be linked to its resource-rich economy, particularly in mining and energy extraction, while France's expansion may have been influenced by its industrial sectors focusing on manufacturing and energy production. In contrast, countries like Sweden and New Zealand exhibited smaller emissions growth, with decreases of -324,577 and -293,120 metric tons, respectively, suggesting a more sustainable approach to energy and industrial development.
In conclusion, the data on Annual CO₂ Emissions Growth (abs) in 1911 illustrates a complex landscape of industrial growth, economic conditions, and energy policies that influenced carbon output across different countries. The significant disparities in emissions growth underscore the varying paths nations were taking during this pivotal time in history, setting the stage for future environmental challenges that continue to resonate today.
Data Source
Global Carbon Budget
Just over 20 years ago the Global Carbon Project (GCP) was created to bring together a global consortium of scientists to establish a common and mutually agreed understanding of the Earth carbon cycle.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Annual CO₂ Emissions Growth (abs) data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Environment Facts
Above-Ground Biomass in Forest (tonnes/ha)
Above-ground biomass in forest measures carbon storage per hectare. Explore rankings and compare data across 266+ countries with interactive maps.
View dataBrowse All Environment
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data