Annual CO₂ Emissions Growth (abs) 1918
Annual CO₂ emissions growth measures the increase in carbon output. Compare countries, explore trends, and view interactive maps.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | United States | 74,785,920 |
2 | Netherlands | 5,873,392 |
3 | Mexico | 4,915,266 |
4 | India | 4,339,472 |
5 | Canada | 4,275,888 |
6 | Japan | 4,059,712 |
7 | Italy | 2,857,921 |
8 | China | 2,724,516 |
9 | Australia | 2,030,152 |
10 | Denmark | 1,242,096 |
11 | Sweden | 1,211,728.5 |
12 | Norway | 956,304 |
13 | Spain | 883,024 |
14 | Romania | 674,176 |
15 | Iran | 648,528 |
16 | Egypt | 443,344 |
17 | Taiwan | 344,416 |
18 | Bulgaria | 282,128 |
19 | Trinidad and Tobago | 241,824 |
20 | Uruguay | 239,616.94 |
21 | Nigeria | 175,872 |
22 | Turkey | 65,952 |
23 | Venezuela | 64,876 |
24 | Greece | 32,976 |
25 | Malaysia | 18,320 |
26 | Philippines | 18,320 |
27 | Algeria | 10,992 |
28 | Tunisia | 10,992 |
29 | Dominican Republic | 4,632 |
30 | Bolivia | 1,529 |
31 | El Salvador | 89 |
32 | Paraguay | 5 |
33 | Nicaragua | -646 |
34 | Haiti | -1,190 |
35 | Guatemala | -1,818 |
36 | Panama | -1,969 |
37 | Indonesia | -7,328 |
38 | Colombia | -7,354 |
39 | Ireland | -10,992.016 |
40 | Honduras | -12,365 |
41 | Costa Rica | -22,319 |
42 | Ecuador | -30,724 |
43 | Finland | -47,632 |
44 | Vietnam | -47,632 |
45 | New Zealand | -73,280 |
46 | Cuba | -90,597 |
47 | Austria | -113,584 |
48 | Armenia | -132,919 |
49 | Zimbabwe | -142,896 |
50 | Brazil | -183,475 |
51 | Tajikistan | -196,544 |
52 | Peru | -212,741 |
53 | Georgia | -221,790 |
54 | Kyrgyzstan | -342,302 |
55 | Switzerland | -362,736 |
56 | Latvia | -401,543 |
57 | Chile | -465,891.25 |
58 | Turkmenistan | -509,462 |
59 | Portugal | -560,592 |
60 | Estonia | -605,685 |
61 | Republic of Moldova | -618,939 |
62 | Lithuania | -626,289.94 |
63 | Azerbaijan | -800,659 |
64 | Argentina | -842,076 |
65 | Hungary | -1,066,224 |
66 | South Africa | -1,117,520 |
67 | Uzbekistan | -1,564,262 |
68 | Belarus | -1,676,262 |
69 | Slovakia | -2,022,399 |
70 | Belgium | -2,524,496 |
71 | Kazakhstan | -3,988,303 |
72 | Czech Republic | -6,287,552 |
73 | Ukraine | -11,658,442 |
74 | France | -13,153,760 |
75 | Poland | -19,356,912 |
76 | Germany | -21,155,968 |
77 | United Kingdom | -34,320,670 |
78 | Russia | -36,757,190 |
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #78
Russia
- #77
United Kingdom
- #76
Germany
- #75
Poland
- #74
France
- #73
Ukraine
- #72
Czech Republic
- #71
Kazakhstan
- #70
Belgium
- #69
Slovakia
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
Leading Countries in Annual CO₂ Emissions Growth (abs) in 1918
In 1918, the country with the highest Annual CO₂ Emissions Growth (abs) was the United States, which saw an increase of 74,785,920 metric tons. This figure is part of a broader global range where total emissions growth varied dramatically among the 78 countries with available data, ranging from a minimum decrease of -36,757,190 metric tons to the aforementioned peak. The average emissions growth across these countries was -652,717.32 metric tons, highlighting a significant global trend toward reductions in emissions during this period.
Economic Context of CO₂ Emissions in 1918
The economic landscape of 1918 was heavily influenced by the aftermath of World War I, which had profound effects on industrial output and energy consumption. The United States led in emissions growth due to its rapid industrialization and post-war economic expansion, reflecting a shift toward increased production and energy use. In contrast, countries like Germany and Russia experienced substantial decreases of -45,037,920 and -31,464,230 metric tons, respectively, driven largely by war-related destruction and economic instability. These contrasting trends illustrate how the war's end created divergent paths for industrialized and recovering nations.
Geographic and Policy Influences on Emissions Growth
Geographic factors also played a crucial role in emissions patterns. For instance, Canada and Australia reported emissions increases of 4,275,888 and 2,030,152 metric tons, respectively, as both nations expanded their resource extraction industries, particularly in energy sectors like coal mining. Conversely, the United Kingdom and Germany, with their mature industrial bases, were more likely to implement policies aimed at reducing emissions, resulting in decreases of -34,320,670 and -21,155,968 metric tons. This contrast highlights the varying approaches to industrial growth and environmental responsibility across different nations.
Year-over-Year Changes: The Biggest Movers
Examining the year-over-year changes in Annual CO₂ Emissions Growth (abs), notable fluctuations reveal significant shifts in emissions behavior. The Netherlands experienced an extraordinary increase of 19,617,056 metric tons, likely driven by a recovery in industrial production post-war, making it one of the largest emitters in terms of growth. However, this was contrasted by the dramatic decrease in emissions from the United States, which saw a reduction of -77,305,480 metric tons, likely due to economic shifts and a pivot towards more efficient energy practices. Other countries, such as Italy and Belgium, also reported significant increases of 10,248,210 and 7,020,224 metric tons, respectively, suggesting a broader trend of post-war industrial recovery across Europe.
The data from 1918 underscores the complex interplay between economic recovery, geographic factors, and national policies in shaping emissions growth. While the post-war period spurred industrial growth in some nations, others faced declines due to economic hardships or strategic shifts towards sustainability. As we analyze these historical trends, it becomes evident that understanding the roots of emissions growth is crucial for addressing contemporary environmental challenges.
Data Source
Global Carbon Budget
Just over 20 years ago the Global Carbon Project (GCP) was created to bring together a global consortium of scientists to establish a common and mutually agreed understanding of the Earth carbon cycle.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Annual CO₂ Emissions Growth (abs) data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Environment Facts
Above-Ground Biomass in Forest (tonnes/ha)
Above-ground biomass in forest measures carbon storage per hectare. Explore rankings and compare data across 266+ countries with interactive maps.
View dataBrowse All Environment
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data