Annual CO₂ Emissions Growth (abs) 1793
Annual CO₂ emissions growth measures the increase in carbon output. Compare countries, explore trends, and view interactive maps.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | United Kingdom | 357,056 |
2 | Germany | 10,992 |
3 | Australia | 0 |
4 | Canada | 0 |
5 | New Zealand | 0 |
6 | Norway | 0 |
7 | Taiwan | 0 |
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
Leading Country in Annual CO₂ Emissions Growth (abs) in 1793
In 1793, the United Kingdom recorded the highest Annual CO₂ Emissions Growth (abs) at 357056.00, while the global range of emissions growth among the seven countries with data varied from 0.00 to this peak value. The average emissions growth across these countries was 52578.29, with a median value of 0.00, indicating significant disparities in carbon output increases during this period.
Economic Drivers of CO₂ Emissions Growth
The stark difference in Annual CO₂ Emissions Growth (abs) in 1793 can largely be attributed to the economic activities prevalent in the leading countries. The United Kingdom, at the forefront of the Industrial Revolution, was experiencing rapid industrialization, which significantly contributed to its emissions growth. In contrast, countries like Australia, Norway, New Zealand, and Taiwan reported zero emissions growth, suggesting either limited industrial activity or reliance on less carbon-intensive industries. This indicates that economic factors, particularly industrialization, played a critical role in shaping emissions profiles during this period.
Geographic and Policy Influences on Emissions
Geography and policy also influenced the rates of emissions growth seen in 1793. Countries like Germany and the United Kingdom were situated in Europe, where coal was abundantly available, facilitating high carbon emissions through coal-fired industries. The emissions growth for Germany stood at 10992, reflecting its emerging industrial activities but still significantly lower than that of the United Kingdom. In contrast, nations with zero growth, such as Australia and Canada, may have benefited from geographical advantages that allowed for a more sustainable approach to resource management or simply had less industrial infrastructure at this time.
Year-over-Year Changes and Major Movers
The data reveals an average year-over-year change of -171416.00 (-32.4%), indicating a notable decline in emissions growth, particularly in the United Kingdom. This reduction of -171416.00 reflects a significant shift in emissions, suggesting that the rapid industrial growth may have begun to stabilize or that emerging policies aimed at reducing carbon output were taking effect. The absence of growth in countries like Australia, Norway, New Zealand, and Taiwan indicates a potential trend towards more sustainable practices or economic structures that did not prioritize fossil fuel consumption. Understanding these year-over-year changes is vital for analyzing long-term trends in emissions and the effectiveness of environmental policies.
Data Source
Global Carbon Budget
Just over 20 years ago the Global Carbon Project (GCP) was created to bring together a global consortium of scientists to establish a common and mutually agreed understanding of the Earth carbon cycle.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Annual CO₂ Emissions Growth (abs) data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Environment Facts
Above-Ground Biomass in Forest (tonnes/ha)
Above-ground biomass in forest measures carbon storage per hectare. Explore rankings and compare data across 266+ countries with interactive maps.
View dataBrowse All Environment
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data