Annual CO₂ Emissions Growth (abs) 1916
Annual CO₂ emissions growth measures the increase in carbon output. Compare countries, explore trends, and view interactive maps.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | United States | 151,788,290 |
2 | Germany | 37,790,496 |
3 | United Kingdom | 17,590,880 |
4 | Canada | 15,341,168 |
5 | Poland | 14,033,120 |
6 | Belgium | 11,373,056 |
7 | France | 6,455,968 |
8 | Japan | 5,756,144 |
9 | China | 4,710,112 |
10 | Russia | 4,103,052 |
11 | South Africa | 3,301,264 |
12 | Czech Republic | 2,741,792 |
13 | Mexico | 2,630,074 |
14 | Spain | 2,553,808 |
15 | Ukraine | 1,301,384 |
16 | Slovakia | 881,902 |
17 | Sweden | 830,252 |
18 | Chile | 770,553 |
19 | Indonesia | 732,800 |
20 | Iran | 604,560.1 |
21 | Cuba | 507,007 |
22 | Kazakhstan | 445,198 |
23 | India | 375,782 |
24 | Taiwan | 370,064 |
25 | Malaysia | 344,416 |
26 | Peru | 252,358 |
27 | Zimbabwe | 197,856 |
28 | Belarus | 187,115 |
29 | Uzbekistan | 174,612 |
30 | Bulgaria | 161,216 |
31 | Vietnam | 109,920 |
32 | New Zealand | 106,256 |
33 | Azerbaijan | 89,375 |
34 | Egypt | 87,936 |
35 | Bolivia | 84,366 |
36 | Trinidad and Tobago | 80,608 |
37 | Finland | 73,280 |
38 | Lithuania | 69,910 |
39 | Hungary | 69,616 |
40 | Republic of Moldova | 69,089 |
41 | Estonia | 67,609.94 |
42 | Turkmenistan | 56,869 |
43 | Nigeria | 47,632 |
44 | Latvia | 44,823 |
45 | Greece | 43,968 |
46 | Kyrgyzstan | 38,210 |
47 | Venezuela | 29,852 |
48 | Ecuador | 25,191 |
49 | Georgia | 24,758 |
50 | Tajikistan | 21,939 |
51 | Dominican Republic | 15,206 |
52 | Armenia | 14,838 |
53 | Ireland | 14,656 |
54 | Colombia | 11,216 |
55 | Panama | 2,647 |
56 | Nicaragua | 1,552 |
57 | El Salvador | 21 |
58 | Paraguay | 0 |
59 | Haiti | -1,167 |
60 | Honduras | -2,888 |
61 | Philippines | -3,664 |
62 | South Korea | -5,400 |
63 | Costa Rica | -13,883 |
64 | Guatemala | -18,320 |
65 | Portugal | -95,264 |
66 | North Korea | -97,192 |
67 | Denmark | -238,160 |
68 | Italy | -267,472 |
69 | Uruguay | -418,609 |
70 | Switzerland | -443,344 |
71 | Brazil | -476,666 |
72 | Turkey | -523,951.9 |
73 | Norway | -553,264 |
74 | Argentina | -1,306,495 |
75 | Netherlands | -2,136,112 |
76 | Romania | -2,147,104 |
77 | Australia | -2,415,794 |
78 | Austria | -26,256,224 |
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #78
Austria
- #77
Australia
- #76
Romania
- #75
Netherlands
- #74
Argentina
- #73
Norway
- #72
Turkey
- #71
Brazil
- #70
Switzerland
- #69
Uruguay
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
The country with the highest Annual CO₂ Emissions Growth (abs) in 1916 was the United States, with an increase of 151,788,290 metric tons. In contrast, the global range of emissions growth among the 78 countries reporting data varied dramatically, with a minimum value of -26,256,224 metric tons and an average growth of 3,233,162.42 metric tons.
Drivers of Emissions Growth in Major Economies
The sharp rise in CO₂ emissions in 1916 can be attributed to several key factors, particularly in industrialized nations. The United States experienced a staggering increase of 151,788,290 metric tons, driven largely by its expanding industrial base and the ongoing effects of World War I, which created high demand for military and industrial production. Similarly, Germany saw substantial growth of 37,790,496 metric tons, as its war economy ramped up production to support military efforts.
In contrast, countries like Canada and France also reported significant increases of 15,341,168 and 21,573,632 metric tons, respectively, as they too mobilized resources for the war. This period marked a pivotal moment where global industrial output surged, leading to higher fossil fuel consumption and increased emissions across many nations.
Geographic Disparities in Emissions Growth
Geographic factors played a crucial role in the discrepancies observed in emissions growth. For instance, Poland reported an increase of 14,033,120 metric tons, reflecting its industrial activities during the war, while nations like Austria faced a stark contrast with a decrease of -26,256,224 metric tons. This decline can be attributed to the war's devastation, which severely impacted its industrial capacity.
Additionally, Australia and Brazil showed decreases of -2,415,794 and -476,666 metric tons, respectively, likely due to their limited industrialization compared to their European counterparts. The variance highlights how the war reshaped economic activities in different regions, with industrialized nations experiencing surges in emissions while others faced reductions due to economic decline.
Year-over-Year Changes: The Biggest Movers
The year-over-year changes in CO₂ emissions growth reveal significant fluctuations among the top and bottom performers. The United States not only had the highest absolute growth but also marked a year-over-year increase of 102,280,960 metric tons, reflecting an astonishing growth rate of 206.6%. This explosive growth underscores the nation's pivotal role in industrial production during the war.
On the other end of the spectrum, Austrian emissions plummeted by -11,944,640 metric tons, a decrease of 83.5%, showcasing the detrimental effects of the war on its economy. Similarly, countries like Romania and Norway reported decreases of -1,505,904 and -1,293,392 metric tons, respectively, as they faced economic challenges that limited their industrial output.
Long-term Implications of Emissions Growth
The data from 1916 provides a crucial lens through which to view the long-term implications of emissions growth patterns. The significant increases in CO₂ emissions from industrialized nations set a precedent for future environmental challenges, as the impact of fossil fuel reliance began to take root. The rapid industrialization observed in countries like the United States and Germany foreshadowed ongoing emissions growth that would contribute to global climate change.
Moreover, the contrasting experiences of countries such as Austria, which faced decreases, highlight the fragility of economic structures during wartime. The emissions data not only reflect industrial activity but also the broader socio-economic consequences of global conflicts, emphasizing the need for sustainable practices as nations rebuild and recover.
Data Source
Global Carbon Budget
Just over 20 years ago the Global Carbon Project (GCP) was created to bring together a global consortium of scientists to establish a common and mutually agreed understanding of the Earth carbon cycle.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Annual CO₂ Emissions Growth (abs) data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Environment Facts
Above-Ground Biomass in Forest (tonnes/ha)
Above-ground biomass in forest measures carbon storage per hectare. Explore rankings and compare data across 266+ countries with interactive maps.
View dataBrowse All Environment
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data