Lithuania Annual CO₂ Emissions Growth (abs) 2024: 34,107
Lithuania's annual co₂ emissions growth (abs) in 2024 is 34,107, up 108.8% from 2023. It ranks #106 of 213 countries.
Annual CO₂ emissions growth measures the increase in carbon output. Compare countries, explore trends, and view interactive maps.
Annual CO₂ Emissions Growth (abs) over time
| Year | Value | Change | % Change | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 34.11K | +421.77K | -108.80% | |
| 2023 | -387,662 | +495.37K | -56.10% | |
| 2022 | -883,031 | 1.16M | -417.08% | |
| 2021 | 278.49K | +426.23K | -288.51% | |
| 2020 | -147,736 | 380.65K | -163.43% | |
| 2019 | 232.92K | +95.89K | +69.98% | |
| 2018 | 137.03K | 38.85K | -22.09% | |
| 2017 | 175.88K | +119.58K | +212.41% | |
| 2016 | 56.30K | 143.12K | -71.77% | |
| 2015 | 199.42K | +501.79K | -165.95% | |
| 2014 | -302,371 | +603.59K | -66.62% | |
| 2013 | -905,963 | 1.00M | -1058.81% | |
| 2012 | 94.49K | 63.27K | -40.11% | |
| 2011 | 157.76K | 815.01K | -83.78% | |
| 2010 | 972.77K | +3.06M | -146.55% | |
| 2009 | -2,089,666 | 1.53M | +276.71% | |
| 2008 | -554,713 | 1.83M | -143.40% | |
| 2007 | 1.28M | +945.52K | +284.18% | |
| 2006 | 332.72K | 275.68K | -45.31% | |
| 2005 | 608.40K | +13.69K | +2.30% | |
| 2004 | 594.71K | +601.31K | -9113.52% | |
| 2003 | -6,598 | 78.89K | -109.13% | |
| 2002 | 72.29K | 678.41K | -90.37% | |
| 2001 | 750.70K | +2.36M | -146.73% | |
| 2000 | -1,606,561 | +940.90K | -36.93% | |
| 1999 | -2,547,457 | 3.38M | -405.37% | |
| 1998 | 834.21K | +1.41M | -244.55% | |
| 1997 | -577,117 | 1.26M | -184.54% | |
| 1996 | 682.62K | +1.39M | -196.18% | |
| 1995 | -709,699 | 157.03K | +28.41% | |
| 1994 | -552,672 | +4.30M | -88.60% | |
| 1993 | -4,848,728 | +11.80M | -70.88% | |
| 1992 | -16,651,934 | 18.73M | -899.54% | |
| 1991 | 2.08M | +3.16M | -293.02% | |
| 1990 | -1,079,004 | 1.43M | -408.96% | |
| 1989 | 349.24K | 46.84K | -11.83% | |
| 1988 | 396.08K | +387.29K | +4409.06% | |
| 1987 | 8.78K | +4.46M | -100.20% | |
| 1986 | -4,448,348 | 7.36M | -252.84% | |
| 1985 | 2.91M | +2.55M | +713.67% | |
| 1984 | 357.69K | 204.32K | -36.36% | |
| 1983 | 562.01K | 127.41K | -18.48% | |
| 1982 | 689.42K | +1.31M | -210.78% | |
| 1981 | -622,316 | 2.02M | -144.64% | |
| 1980 | 1.39M | +1.10M | +367.83% | |
| 1979 | 297.96K | 902.04K | -75.17% | |
| 1978 | 1.20M | +63.18K | +5.56% | |
| 1977 | 1.14M | 89.48K | -7.30% | |
| 1976 | 1.23M | 347.13K | -22.06% | |
| 1975 | 1.57M | +421.67K | +36.61% | |
| 1974 | 1.15M | 63.57K | -5.23% | |
| 1973 | 1.22M | 192.88K | -13.70% | |
| 1972 | 1.41M | 139.45K | -9.01% | |
| 1971 | 1.55M | +332.74K | +27.39% | |
| 1970 | 1.21M | +272.39K | +28.90% | |
| 1969 | 942.53K | +311.71K | +49.41% | |
| 1968 | 630.81K | 336.77K | -34.81% | |
| 1967 | 967.59K | 134.83K | -12.23% | |
| 1966 | 1.10M | 22.63K | -2.01% | |
| 1965 | 1.13M | +12.48K | +1.12% | |
| 1964 | 1.11M | 74.01K | -6.24% | |
| 1963 | 1.19M | +405.26K | +51.87% | |
| 1962 | 781.30K | +304.33K | +63.80% | |
| 1961 | 476.98K | 113.42K | -19.21% | |
| 1960 | 590.40K | 108.42K | -15.52% | |
| 1959 | 698.82K | 165.54K | -19.15% | |
| 1958 | 864.36K | 237.33K | -21.54% | |
| 1957 | 1.10M | +65.94K | +6.37% | |
| 1956 | 1.04M | 219.65K | -17.50% | |
| 1955 | 1.26M | +470.25K | +59.89% | |
| 1954 | 785.15K | +315.51K | +67.18% | |
| 1953 | 469.64K | 67.91K | -12.63% | |
| 1952 | 537.55K | 42.23K | -7.28% | |
| 1951 | 579.78K | 131.48K | -18.49% | |
| 1950 | 711.26K | 44.02K | -5.83% | |
| 1949 | 755.28K | +429.78K | +132.03% | |
| 1948 | 325.50K | 553.90K | -62.99% | |
| 1947 | 879.40K | +411.11K | +87.79% | |
| 1946 | 468.30K | +267.59K | +133.32% | |
| 1945 | 200.71K | 936.26K | -82.35% | |
| 1944 | 1.14M | +1.03M | +976.18% | |
| 1943 | 105.65K | +2.11M | -105.28% | |
| 1942 | -2,001,937 | 1.39M | +229.00% | |
| 1941 | -608,491 | 1.44M | -173.05% | |
| 1940 | 832.96K | +782.01K | +1535.04% | |
| 1939 | 50.94K | 167.35K | -76.66% | |
| 1938 | 218.29K | +128.21K | +142.32% | |
| 1937 | 90.08K | 396.01K | -81.47% | |
| 1936 | 486.09K | +99.22K | +25.65% | |
| 1935 | 386.87K | 124.83K | -24.40% | |
| 1934 | 511.70K | +252.09K | +97.10% | |
| 1933 | 259.61K | +15.96K | +6.55% | |
| 1932 | 243.66K | 83.99K | -25.63% | |
| 1931 | 327.65K | 106.31K | -24.50% | |
| 1930 | 433.96K | +348.37K | +407.05% | |
| 1929 | 85.58K | 15.93K | -15.69% | |
| 1928 | 101.51K | 94.44K | -48.19% | |
| 1927 | 195.95K | 53.61K | -21.48% | |
| 1926 | 249.55K | +256.88K | -3504.56% | |
| 1925 | -7,330 | 97.82K | -108.10% | |
| 1924 | 90.49K | +45.70K | +102.05% | |
| 1923 | 44.79K | 32.26K | -41.87% | |
| 1922 | 77.05K | +49.71K | +181.84% | |
| 1921 | 27.34K | +58.61K | -187.43% | |
| 1920 | -31,270 | +29.32K | -48.39% | |
| 1919 | -60,594 | +565.70K | -90.32% | |
| 1918 | -626,289.94 | 536.10K | +594.45% | |
| 1917 | -90,185.06 | 160.10K | -229.00% | |
| 1916 | 69.91K | +164.94K | -173.56% | |
| 1915 | -95,033 | +29.93K | -23.95% | |
| 1914 | -124,968 | 226.84K | -222.68% | |
| 1913 | 101.87K | 36.46K | -26.36% | |
| 1912 | 138.33K | +101.37K | +274.27% | |
| 1911 | 36.96K | +56.74K | -286.87% | |
| 1910 | -19,778 | 73.77K | -136.63% | |
| 1909 | 53.99K | +48.07K | +812.28% | |
| 1908 | 5.92K | 97.52K | -94.28% | |
| 1907 | 103.43K | 2.75K | -2.59% | |
| 1906 | 106.18K | +197.02K | -216.90% | |
| 1905 | -90,834 | 176.44K | -206.11% | |
| 1904 | 85.60K | +102.56K | -604.94% | |
| 1903 | -16,953 | +10.54K | -38.33% | |
| 1902 | -27,490 | 48.38K | -231.63% | |
| 1901 | 20.89K | 71.02K | -77.27% | |
| 1900 | 91.90K | 3.59K | -3.76% | |
| 1899 | 95.49K | +30.85K | +47.72% | |
| 1898 | 64.64K | 7.21K | -10.04% | |
| 1897 | 71.86K | +63.72K | +783.52% | |
| 1896 | 8.13K | 50.48K | -86.12% | |
| 1895 | 58.61K | +51.47K | +720.84% | |
| 1894 | 7.14K | 49.56K | -87.41% | |
| 1893 | 56.70K | +38.49K | +211.33% | |
| 1892 | 18.21K | 10.35K | -36.23% | |
| 1891 | 28.56K | 4.50K | -13.62% | |
| 1890 | 33.06K | +14.59K | +78.92% | |
| 1889 | 18.48K | +8.94K | +93.61% | |
| 1888 | 9.54K | 2.63K | -21.63% | |
| 1887 | 12.18K | +6.95K | +132.84% | |
| 1886 | 5.23K | 11.49K | -68.72% | |
| 1885 | 16.72K | +13.90K | +491.76% | |
| 1884 | 2.83K | 19.59K | -87.39% | |
| 1883 | 22.41K | +14.20K | +173.02% | |
| 1882 | 8.21K | +420 | +5.39% | |
| 1881 | 7.79K | 13.78K | -63.89% | |
| 1880 | 21.57K | +18.40K | +580.75% | |
| 1879 | 3.17K | 25.35K | -88.89% | |
| 1878 | 28.52K | +26.65K | +1424.37% | |
| 1877 | 1.87K | 15.85K | -89.44% | |
| 1876 | 17.72K | +8.09K | +84.12% | |
| 1875 | 9.62K | 1.60K | -14.29% | |
| 1874 | 11.23K | +14.66K | -426.62% | |
| 1873 | -3,437 | 4.89K | -336.87% | |
| 1872 | 1.45K | 12.68K | -89.73% | |
| 1871 | 14.13K | +10.96K | +345.79% | |
| 1870 | 3.17K | 6.61K | -67.58% | |
| 1869 | 9.78K | +15.31K | -276.54% | |
| 1868 | -5,537 | 9.78K | -230.62% | |
| 1867 | 4.24K | 15.39K | -78.40% | |
| 1866 | 19.63K | +20.05K | -4772.62% | |
| 1865 | -420 | 1.45K | -140.74% | |
| 1864 | 1.03K | +649 | +169.89% | |
| 1863 | 382 | +1.26K | -143.46% | |
| 1862 | -879 | 2.79K | -146.05% | |
| 1861 | 1.91K | +190 | +11.05% | |
| 1860 | 1.72K | +1.41K | +463.61% | |
| 1859 | 305 | +267 | +702.63% | |
| 1833 | 38 | +114 | -150.00% | |
| 1832 | -76 | 114 | -300.00% | |
| 1831 | 38 | — | — |
Frequently Asked Questions About Lithuania Annual CO₂ Emissions Growth (abs)
What is Lithuania's annual co₂ emissions growth (abs) in 2024?▾
Lithuania's annual co₂ emissions growth (abs) is 34,107 in 2024, according to Global Carbon Budget.
Is Lithuania's annual co₂ emissions growth (abs) increasing or decreasing?▾
Lithuania's annual co₂ emissions growth (abs) rose by 108.8% from 2023 (-387,662) to 2024 (34,107). Over the past decade (2014–2024) it rose by 111.3%.
How does Lithuania rank for annual co₂ emissions growth (abs)?▾
In 2024, Lithuania has the 106th highest annual co₂ emissions growth (abs) out of 213 countries with data.
What was Lithuania's annual co₂ emissions growth (abs) in 1831?▾
In 1831, Lithuania's annual co₂ emissions growth (abs) was 38. By 2024 it rose by 89655.3%.
Explore additional statistical insights
Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country in Lithuania
Explore the agriculture value added as a share of GDP by country, measuring the economic impact of farming sectors. This statistic highlights the importance of agriculture in national economies and informs investment decisions.
Currently married (Percent) in Lithuania
The percentage of currently married individuals by country highlights societal trends in family structure and relationships. Understanding these statistics can provide insights into cultural norms and demographic shifts, influencing policies and social programs.
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by Country in Current US Dollars in Lithuania
Discover the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by country in current US dollars, a key indicator of economic performance. This statistic reveals the financial health and growth potential of nations, making it essential for investors and policymakers.
Human Capital Index in Lithuania
The Human Capital Index measures a country's investment in education and health, reflecting its potential for economic growth and productivity. This vital statistic highlights the importance of nurturing human resources for sustainable development.
Life expectancy at birth in Lithuania
Life expectancy at birth measures the average years a newborn is expected to live, reflecting a country's health standards and quality of life. This vital statistic highlights disparities in healthcare and living conditions across nations, making it essential for global health assessments.
Median age of population in Lithuania
The median age of a population is a key demographic indicator, reflecting the age distribution within a country. Understanding median age helps assess economic development, healthcare needs, and social dynamics. Countries with a higher median age may face challenges related to aging populations, while younger populations often indicate growth potential.