Annual CO₂ Emissions Growth (abs) 1910
Annual CO₂ emissions growth measures the increase in carbon output. Compare countries, explore trends, and view interactive maps.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | United States | 106,878,720 |
2 | Austria | 15,143,312 |
3 | Canada | 6,236,128 |
4 | United Kingdom | 3,645,664 |
5 | Belgium | 3,524,768 |
6 | Australia | 3,126,891 |
7 | South Africa | 2,004,208 |
8 | Argentina | 1,460,155 |
9 | Japan | 1,128,512 |
10 | Netherlands | 916,000 |
11 | Brazil | 758,921 |
12 | China | 757,862 |
13 | New Zealand | 637,536 |
14 | France | 516,624 |
15 | Sweden | 447,446 |
16 | Cuba | 381,848 |
17 | Vietnam | 304,112 |
18 | Mexico | 177,761 |
19 | Norway | 175,872 |
20 | Greece | 157,552 |
21 | Taiwan | 128,240 |
22 | Indonesia | 124,576 |
23 | Uruguay | 122,895 |
24 | Malaysia | 65,952 |
25 | Portugal | 54,960 |
26 | Costa Rica | 46,276 |
27 | Trinidad and Tobago | 40,304 |
28 | North Korea | 38,183 |
29 | Italy | 32,976 |
30 | Bulgaria | 29,312 |
31 | Zimbabwe | 21,984 |
32 | Ecuador | 20,408 |
33 | Dominican Republic | 11,819 |
34 | Guatemala | 6,053 |
35 | Haiti | 4,899 |
36 | Panama | 2,224 |
37 | South Korea | 2,121 |
38 | Honduras | 1,954 |
39 | Nicaragua | 497 |
40 | El Salvador | 272 |
41 | Paraguay | 0 |
42 | Montenegro | -251 |
43 | North Macedonia | -1,292 |
44 | Slovenia | -1,869 |
45 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | -2,257 |
46 | Croatia | -2,464 |
47 | Philippines | -3,664 |
48 | Armenia | -4,197 |
49 | Chile | -5,447 |
50 | Tajikistan | -6,206 |
51 | Serbia | -6,525 |
52 | Venezuela | -6,650 |
53 | Georgia | -7,004 |
54 | Colombia | -7,438 |
55 | Kyrgyzstan | -10,809 |
56 | Latvia | -12,680 |
57 | Turkmenistan | -16,088 |
58 | Estonia | -19,127 |
59 | Republic of Moldova | -19,546.062 |
60 | Lithuania | -19,778 |
61 | Azerbaijan | -25,285 |
62 | Romania | -40,304 |
63 | Uzbekistan | -49,399 |
64 | Belarus | -52,936 |
65 | Turkey | -73,280 |
66 | Peru | -111,282 |
67 | Kazakhstan | -125,949 |
68 | Slovakia | -140,891 |
69 | Hungary | -175,872 |
70 | Germany | -205,184 |
71 | Finland | -219,840 |
72 | Spain | -271,136 |
73 | Switzerland | -278,463.5 |
74 | Ukraine | -368,168 |
75 | Czech Republic | -438,016 |
76 | India | -655,340 |
77 | Denmark | -655,856.5 |
78 | Poland | -989,280 |
79 | Russia | -1,160,776 |
- #1
United States
- #2
Austria
- #3
Canada
- #4
United Kingdom
- #5
Belgium
- #6
Australia
- #7
South Africa
- #8
Argentina
- #9
Japan
- #10
Netherlands
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #79
Russia
- #78
Poland
- #77
Denmark
- #76
India
- #75
Czech Republic
- #74
Ukraine
- #73
Switzerland
- #72
Spain
- #71
Finland
- #70
Germany
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
Global Overview of Annual CO₂ Emissions Growth in 1910
The country with the highest Annual CO₂ Emissions Growth (abs) in 1910 was the United States, with an increase of 106,878,720 metric tons. The global range of emissions growth among the 79 countries with data varied significantly, from a decrease of -1,160,776 metric tons to the aforementioned peak. The average emissions growth for this year stood at 1,809,433.51 metric tons, illustrating a substantial disparity in emissions trends across nations.
Economic Drivers Behind Emissions Growth
The substantial increase in CO₂ emissions in the early 20th century can be attributed to rapid industrialization and economic expansion, particularly in the United States. As factories proliferated and the demand for coal escalated, emissions surged to unprecedented levels. The United Kingdom, with its historical reliance on coal for energy, also demonstrated significant emissions growth at 3,645,664 metric tons. In contrast, countries like Russia experienced a decrease of -1,160,776 metric tons, likely due to economic constraints and a less industrialized economy at that time.
Disparities in Emissions Growth Among Developed and Developing Nations
The data from 1910 reveals a clear divide between developed and developing nations regarding emissions growth. While the top emitters like the United States and Austria (with an increase of 15,143,312 metric tons) saw substantial growth, countries such as India and Poland reported decreases of -655,340 and -3,502,784 metric tons, respectively. This disparity can be largely attributed to differing levels of industrialization and energy consumption patterns. Developed nations were ramping up production in various sectors, while many developing nations were still agrarian, limiting their emissions output.
Year-over-Year Changes: The Biggest Movers
In analyzing year-over-year changes, Austria exhibited the most significant increase in emissions, with a remarkable rise of 31,532,384 metric tons. This surge is indicative of a post-industrial boom, where industrial activities expanded rapidly. Similarly, Canada (with an increase of 8,258,656 metric tons) and Australia (with an increase of 5,338,834 metric tons) also showed marked growth, reflecting their resource-driven economies and burgeoning industries.
Conversely, the United States witnessed a decrease of -7,250,500 metric tons, a significant drop that can be attributed to early 20th-century economic fluctuations and possibly the effects of regulatory measures that began to emerge during this period. Similarly, Russia and Poland displayed decreases of -4,329,384 and -3,502,784 metric tons, respectively, likely reflecting the broader economic challenges faced by these nations at the time.
Environmental and Health Implications
The marked increase in CO₂ emissions during 1910 has profound implications for both environmental and public health. Elevated carbon levels correlate with increased air pollution, which is detrimental to health outcomes. The emission spikes in industrialized nations like the United States and Austria serve as a precursor to the environmental challenges that would escalate throughout the 20th century, including climate change and respiratory health issues. On the other hand, countries experiencing declines, such as Germany (decrease of -205,184 metric tons) and Finland (decrease of -219,840 metric tons), may have benefited from lower pollution levels, although the broader socio-economic context must be considered.
In summary, the data on Annual CO₂ Emissions Growth (abs) in 1910 underscores the complex interplay between industrialization, economic growth, and environmental health. The disparities in emissions growth highlight the differing trajectories of nations during a pivotal period in global history, setting the stage for future environmental challenges that continue to resonate today.
Data Source
Global Carbon Budget
Just over 20 years ago the Global Carbon Project (GCP) was created to bring together a global consortium of scientists to establish a common and mutually agreed understanding of the Earth carbon cycle.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Annual CO₂ Emissions Growth (abs) data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Environment Facts
Above-Ground Biomass in Forest (tonnes/ha)
Above-ground biomass in forest measures carbon storage per hectare. Explore rankings and compare data across 266+ countries with interactive maps.
View dataBrowse All Environment
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data