Annual CO₂ Emissions Growth (abs) 1914
Annual CO₂ emissions growth measures the increase in carbon output. Compare countries, explore trends, and view interactive maps.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | Japan | 3,700,640 |
2 | China | 2,466,840 |
3 | Australia | 2,121,156 |
4 | New Zealand | 868,368 |
5 | Norway | 791,424 |
6 | Bulgaria | 395,712 |
7 | Iran | 318,768 |
8 | Vietnam | 293,120 |
9 | Egypt | 267,472 |
10 | Zimbabwe | 260,144 |
11 | Denmark | 238,160 |
12 | India | 231,374 |
13 | North Korea | 138,846 |
14 | Indonesia | 117,248 |
15 | Malaysia | 84,272 |
16 | Taiwan | 65,952 |
17 | Trinidad and Tobago | 65,952 |
18 | Ireland | 25,648 |
19 | Venezuela | 17,581 |
20 | Honduras | 15,263 |
21 | Philippines | 10,992 |
22 | Colombia | 8,589 |
23 | South Korea | 7,714 |
24 | Dominican Republic | 4,596 |
25 | Nicaragua | 310 |
26 | Paraguay | 0 |
27 | Panama | -1,913 |
28 | Guatemala | -2,980 |
29 | El Salvador | -3,883 |
30 | Haiti | -11,131 |
31 | Costa Rica | -13,527 |
32 | Ecuador | -23,848 |
33 | Armenia | -26,522 |
34 | Tajikistan | -39,217 |
35 | Georgia | -44,255 |
36 | Kyrgyzstan | -68,302 |
37 | Peru | -76,036 |
38 | Latvia | -80,122 |
39 | Turkmenistan | -101,657 |
40 | Spain | -117,248 |
41 | Estonia | -120,856 |
42 | Republic of Moldova | -123,501 |
43 | Lithuania | -124,968 |
44 | Azerbaijan | -159,761 |
45 | Cuba | -275,445 |
46 | Uzbekistan | -312,128 |
47 | Belarus | -334,476 |
48 | Turkey | -373,728 |
49 | Uruguay | -471,913 |
50 | Portugal | -483,648 |
51 | South Africa | -582,576 |
52 | Kazakhstan | -795,812 |
53 | Switzerland | -824,400 |
54 | Sweden | -968,079 |
55 | Finland | -974,624 |
56 | Argentina | -1,052,769.5 |
57 | Romania | -1,205,456 |
58 | Greece | -1,326,368 |
59 | Slovakia | -1,331,324 |
60 | Chile | -1,349,041 |
61 | Hungary | -1,432,624 |
62 | Brazil | -1,449,273 |
63 | Mexico | -1,670,046 |
64 | Netherlands | -1,725,744 |
65 | Ukraine | -2,326,286 |
66 | Italy | -2,726,016 |
67 | Czech Republic | -4,139,028 |
68 | Russia | -7,334,408 |
69 | Canada | -10,900,400 |
70 | Austria | -11,329,088 |
71 | United Kingdom | -15,139,648 |
72 | Poland | -19,203,024 |
73 | Belgium | -27,439,696 |
74 | Germany | -37,156,670 |
75 | France | -52,761,600 |
76 | United States | -124,911,100 |
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #76
United States
- #75
France
- #74
Germany
- #73
Belgium
- #72
Poland
- #71
United Kingdom
- #70
Austria
- #69
Canada
- #68
Russia
- #67
Czech Republic
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
Overview of Annual CO₂ Emissions Growth (abs) in 1914
The year 1914 saw Japan leading the world in Annual CO₂ Emissions Growth (abs) with an increase of 3,700,640 metric tons, while the global range of emissions growth for the 76 countries with data varied from -124,911,100 to 3,700,640. The average emissions growth across these countries was -4,249,079.27, indicating a significant overall decline in carbon output.
Economic Factors Driving Emissions Growth
The stark contrast between the emissions growth of Japan and the significant declines in countries like the United States and Germany can be attributed to differing economic contexts. Japan's industrialization was in full swing by 1914, driven by a push towards modernization and increased energy demands. This surge in industrial activity resulted in the highest growth figures, with emissions reflecting the rapid expansion of factories and infrastructure.
Conversely, the United States experienced a dramatic decrease of -124,911,100 metric tons. This drop can be linked to the economic uncertainties of the time, including the lead-up to World War I, which disrupted production and trade. Similarly, Germany and France also reported significant declines of -37,156,670 and -52,761,600 metric tons, respectively, as both nations faced geopolitical tensions that impacted industrial output.
Geographic Trends and Emissions Patterns
Geographic factors played a crucial role in shaping emissions growth in 1914. For instance, countries with abundant natural resources and a strong industrial base, such as Australia and Norway, recorded notable increases in CO₂ emissions growth. Australia saw a rise of 2,121,156 metric tons, driven largely by its mining industry, while Norway experienced an exceptional increase of 791,424 metric tons, attributed to its burgeoning energy sector.
On the other hand, nations with less industrial activity or those undergoing economic strife, like the United Kingdom and Belgium, recorded some of the most significant declines. The United Kingdom dropped by -15,139,648 metric tons, reflecting a contraction in industrial output as resources were redirected to support the war effort.
Year-over-Year Changes: The Biggest Movers
The year 1914 highlighted significant volatility in CO₂ emissions growth, with countries showing both dramatic increases and decreases. Notably, New Zealand reported an increase of 1,516,896 metric tons, a change of 233.9%, as it expanded its agricultural exports and increased energy production. The same can be said for Bulgaria, which saw a rise of 395,712 metric tons, likely driven by industrial advancements.
In stark contrast, the largest annual decrease was observed in the United States, with a staggering decline of -224,748,800 metric tons. This reflects not only a downturn in industrial activity but also the broader economic impacts of the impending world conflict. Other notable declines included Germany and France, with reductions of -73,118,880 and -65,296,144 metric tons, respectively, underscoring the broader geopolitical influences on emissions patterns at the time.
Conclusion: Implications for Future Emissions Trends
The data from 1914 illustrates a pivotal moment in global emissions growth, shaped by industrialization, economic conditions, and geopolitical tensions. The sharp contrasts between countries indicate that emissions growth is not merely a reflection of energy consumption but is deeply intertwined with national circumstances and global events. Understanding these historical patterns is critical for policymakers today as they navigate the complexities of emissions reduction in a rapidly changing world.
Data Source
Global Carbon Budget
Just over 20 years ago the Global Carbon Project (GCP) was created to bring together a global consortium of scientists to establish a common and mutually agreed understanding of the Earth carbon cycle.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Annual CO₂ Emissions Growth (abs) data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Environment Facts
Above-Ground Biomass in Forest (tonnes/ha)
Above-ground biomass in forest measures carbon storage per hectare. Explore rankings and compare data across 266+ countries with interactive maps.
View dataBrowse All Environment
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data