Annual CO₂ Emissions Growth (abs) 1833
Annual CO₂ emissions growth measures the increase in carbon output. Compare countries, explore trends, and view interactive maps.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | Germany | 930,656 |
2 | France | 567,920 |
3 | United States | 505,632 |
4 | Poland | 40,304.062 |
5 | Russia | 2,240 |
6 | Ukraine | 711 |
7 | Kazakhstan | 243 |
8 | Belarus | 102 |
9 | Uzbekistan | 96 |
10 | Azerbaijan | 49 |
11 | Lithuania | 38 |
12 | Republic of Moldova | 38 |
13 | Estonia | 37 |
14 | Turkmenistan | 31 |
15 | Latvia | 24 |
16 | Kyrgyzstan | 21 |
17 | Georgia | 14 |
18 | Tajikistan | 12 |
19 | Armenia | 9 |
20 | Canada | 0 |
21 | New Zealand | 0 |
22 | Norway | 0 |
23 | Spain | 0 |
24 | Taiwan | 0 |
25 | Australia | -521 |
26 | Hungary | -21,984 |
27 | Austria | -84,272.03 |
28 | Belgium | -150,224 |
29 | United Kingdom | -633,980 |
- #1
Germany
- #2
France
- #3
United States
- #4
Poland
- #5
Russia
- #6
Ukraine
- #7
Kazakhstan
- #8
Belarus
- #9
Uzbekistan
- #10
Azerbaijan
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #29
United Kingdom
- #28
Belgium
- #27
Austria
- #26
Hungary
- #25
Australia
- #24
Taiwan
- #23
Spain
- #22
Norway
- #21
New Zealand
- #20
Canada
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
Annual CO₂ Emissions Growth (abs) in 1833: A Snapshot
In 1833, Germany recorded the highest Annual CO₂ Emissions Growth (abs) at 930,656, while the global range of emissions growth spanned from a minimum of -633,980 to a maximum of 930,656. The average Annual CO₂ Emissions Growth (abs) across the 29 countries with data was 39,903.31, and the median value was 24.00.
Industrialization and Its Impact on Emissions
The spike in CO₂ emissions growth in 1833 can largely be attributed to the ongoing Industrial Revolution, particularly in regions like Germany and France. Germany's substantial increase of 930,656 can be linked to its burgeoning industrial sector, which was heavily reliant on coal as a primary energy source. Similarly, France experienced a significant emissions growth of 567,920, driven by industrial activities and urbanization. This period marked a transition from agrarian economies to industrial powerhouses, leading to heightened carbon output.
In contrast, countries like the United Kingdom experienced a negative growth of -633,980, suggesting a potential shift towards more sustainable practices or a decline in industrial activity due to economic factors. This decline may reflect the early stages of environmental awareness that began to influence policy and industrial practices.
Regional Disparities and Economic Drivers
The data indicates stark differences in emissions growth across regions. Eastern European nations like Poland and Russia also demonstrated notable emissions increases, with Poland at 40,304.062 and Russia at 2,240. These figures can be attributed to their reliance on fossil fuels for energy and lack of stringent environmental regulations. Meanwhile, countries like Ukraine and Kazakhstan showed minimal increases of 711 and 243 respectively, suggesting lower industrial output during this period.
Conversely, countries such as Belgium and Austria reported significant decreases in emissions growth, with values of -150,224 and -84,272.03 respectively. This decline highlights a potential early movement towards cleaner energy sources or economic downturns that reduced industrial output.
Year-over-Year Changes: The Biggest Movers
Examining year-over-year changes reveals that the most significant increases in emissions growth were recorded by Germany, which surged by 2,073,824, a staggering figure that underscores the rapid industrial escalation occurring at the time. The United Kingdom followed with an increase of 1,293,436, while Russia and Norway also posted increases of 6,721 and 3,664, respectively.
On the flip side, the most significant decreases were seen in Belgium with a reduction of -403,040, followed by the United States at -252,816 and Poland at -183,199.88. These reductions may reflect shifts in economic policy, technological advancements in cleaner energy, or the impact of early environmental regulations aimed at curbing emissions.
Conclusion: The Path Ahead
The data from 1833 presents a complex picture of Annual CO₂ Emissions Growth (abs) across various countries. While industrialization propelled emissions in nations like Germany and France, other countries began to reflect early signs of a transition towards more sustainable practices. Understanding these trends is crucial, as they set the stage for future environmental policies and the global response to climate change. As countries navigate their industrial trajectories, the balance between economic growth and environmental sustainability remains a pivotal challenge.
Data Source
Global Carbon Budget
Just over 20 years ago the Global Carbon Project (GCP) was created to bring together a global consortium of scientists to establish a common and mutually agreed understanding of the Earth carbon cycle.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Annual CO₂ Emissions Growth (abs) data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Environment Facts
Above-Ground Biomass in Forest (tonnes/ha)
Above-ground biomass in forest measures carbon storage per hectare. Explore rankings and compare data across 266+ countries with interactive maps.
View dataBrowse All Environment
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data