Press Freedom Index Score 2015
The Press Freedom Index Score measures the level of media freedom in countries worldwide. A higher score indicates stronger press independence, essential for democracy and transparency. Understanding these scores helps highlight the importance of free expression in society.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | Finland | 92.48 points |
2 | Norway | 92.25 points |
3 | Denmark | 91.76 points |
4 | Netherlands | 90.78 points |
5 | Sweden | 90.53 points |
6 | New Zealand | 89.94 points |
7 | Austria | 89.15 points |
8 | Canada | 89.01 points |
9 | Jamaica | 88.82 points |
10 | Estonia | 88.81 points |
11 | Ireland | 88.8 points |
12 | Germany | 88.53 points |
13 | Czech Republic | 88.38 points |
14 | Slovakia | 88.34 points |
15 | Belgium | 88.02 points |
16 | Costa Rica | 87.74 points |
17 | Namibia | 87.5 points |
18 | Poland | 87.29 points |
19 | Luxembourg | 86.39 points |
20 | Switzerland | 86.15 points |
21 | Iceland | 86.13 points |
22 | Ghana | 84.5 points |
23 | Uruguay | 84.06 points |
24 | Cyprus | 83.48 points |
25 | Australia | 82.97 points |
26 | Portugal | 82.89 points |
27 | Liechtenstein | 82.33 points |
28 | Latvia | 81.88 points |
29 | Suriname | 81.8 points |
30 | Belize | 81.46 points |
31 | Lithuania | 81.2 points |
32 | Andorra | 80.13 points |
33 | Spain | 80.05 points |
34 | United Kingdom | 80 points |
35 | Slovenia | 79.45 points |
36 | Cabo Verde | 79.31 points |
37 | France | 78.85 points |
38 | South Africa | 77.94 points |
39 | Samoa | 77.68 points |
40 | Trinidad and Tobago | 77.61 points |
41 | Botswana | 77.09 points |
42 | Chile | 77 points |
43 | Tonga | 76.63 points |
44 | El Salvador | 76.34 points |
45 | Burkina Faso | 76.21 points |
46 | Niger | 76.15 points |
47 | Malta | 75.84 points |
48 | United States | 75.59 points |
49 | Comoros | 75.48 points |
50 | Taiwan | 75.17 points |
51 | Romania | 75.1 points |
52 | Haiti | 74.92 points |
53 | Mongolia | 74.75 points |
54 | Mauritania | 74.73 points |
55 | Papua New Guinea | 74.13 points |
56 | Argentina | 73.89 points |
57 | Croatia | 73.88 points |
58 | Malawi | 73.59 points |
59 | South Korea | 73.45 points |
60 | Japan | 73.05 points |
61 | Guyana | 72.79 points |
62 | Dominican Republic | 72.69 points |
63 | Madagascar | 72.57 points |
64 | Hungary | 72.56 points |
65 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 72.49 points |
66 | Serbia | 72.34 points |
67 | Mauritius | 72.31 points |
68 | Georgia | 72.3 points |
69 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 72.24 points |
70 | Senegal | 72.23 points |
71 | Republic of Moldova | 72.15 points |
72 | Italy | 72.06 points |
73 | Nicaragua | 72.06 points |
74 | Tanzania | 71.91 points |
75 | Lesotho | 71.64 points |
76 | Armenia | 71.57 points |
77 | Sierra Leone | 71.53 points |
78 | Togo | 71.5 points |
79 | Guinea-Bissau | 71.3 points |
80 | Albania | 71.23 points |
81 | Panama | 71.02 points |
82 | Benin | 70.76 points |
83 | Mozambique | 70.02 points |
84 | Côte d'Ivoire | 69.55 points |
85 | Kyrgyzstan | 69.31 points |
86 | Liberia | 69.22 points |
87 | Kuwait | 69.16 points |
88 | Greece | 68.99 points |
89 | Peru | 68.79 points |
90 | Fiji | 68.72 points |
91 | Bolivia | 68.71 points |
92 | Gabon | 68.62 points |
93 | Seychelles | 68.45 points |
94 | Uganda | 68.35 points |
95 | Lebanon | 68.19 points |
96 | Brazil | 68.07 points |
97 | Kenya | 67.93 points |
98 | Israel | 67.91 points |
99 | Guinea | 67.44 points |
100 | Timor-Leste | 67.37 points |
101 | Bhutan | 67.35 points |
102 | Nepal | 67.29 points |
103 | Bulgaria | 67.09 points |
104 | Congo | 67 points |
105 | Ecuador | 66.35 points |
106 | Paraguay | 66.26 points |
107 | Central African Republic | 66.16 points |
108 | Nigeria | 65.91 points |
109 | Maldives | 65.68 points |
110 | Zambia | 65.65 points |
111 | Montenegro | 65.37 points |
112 | Qatar | 64.65 points |
113 | Tajikistan | 63.81 points |
114 | North Macedonia | 63.74 points |
115 | Mali | 63.67 points |
116 | Algeria | 63.37 points |
117 | United Arab Emirates | 63.27 points |
118 | Brunei Darussalam | 63.24 points |
119 | Afghanistan | 62.56 points |
120 | Angola | 62.16 points |
121 | Guatemala | 62.08 points |
122 | South Sudan | 61.96 points |
123 | Tunisia | 61.32 points |
124 | Oman | 61.17 points |
125 | Colombia | 60.92 points |
126 | Ukraine | 60.9 points |
127 | Morocco | 60.81 points |
128 | Zimbabwe | 60.81 points |
129 | Honduras | 60.73 points |
130 | Cameroon | 60.37 points |
131 | Thailand | 59.93 points |
132 | Chad | 59.83 points |
133 | India | 59.51 points |
134 | Venezuela | 59.39 points |
135 | Indonesia | 59.25 points |
136 | Cambodia | 59.01 points |
137 | State of Palestine | 58.99 points |
138 | Philippines | 58.81 points |
139 | Ethiopia | 58.17 points |
140 | Jordan | 57.93 points |
141 | Myanmar | 57.92 points |
142 | Burundi | 57.07 points |
143 | Bangladesh | 57.05 points |
144 | Malaysia | 56.71 points |
145 | Mexico | 56.31 points |
146 | Turkey | 55.84 points |
147 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 55.69 points |
148 | Gambia | 55.5 points |
149 | Russia | 55.03 points |
150 | Singapore | 54.13 points |
151 | Libya | 54.01 points |
152 | Eswatini | 52.72 points |
153 | Iraq | 52.24 points |
154 | Belarus | 52.02 points |
155 | Egypt | 49.83 points |
156 | Pakistan | 49.54 points |
157 | Kazakhstan | 46.54 points |
158 | Rwanda | 43.43 points |
159 | Azerbaijan | 41.59 points |
160 | Bahrain | 41.31 points |
161 | Saudi Arabia | 40.59 points |
162 | Sri Lanka | 39.72 points |
163 | Uzbekistan | 38.86 points |
164 | Equatorial Guinea | 33.77 points |
165 | Yemen | 33.64 points |
166 | Cuba | 29.79 points |
167 | Djibouti | 28.96 points |
168 | Laos | 28.75 points |
169 | Somalia | 27.69 points |
170 | Iran | 27.68 points |
171 | Sudan | 27.66 points |
172 | Vietnam | 27.37 points |
173 | China | 26.45 points |
174 | Syrian Arab Republic | 22.71 points |
175 | Turkmenistan | 19.17 points |
176 | North Korea | 16.75 points |
177 | Eritrea | 15.14 points |
↑Top 10 Countries
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
↓Bottom 10 Countries
- #177
Eritrea
- #176
North Korea
- #175
Turkmenistan
- #174
Syrian Arab Republic
- #173
China
- #172
Vietnam
- #171
Sudan
- #170
Iran
- #169
Somalia
- #168
Laos
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
The Press Freedom Index Score for 2015 offers a comprehensive look into the level of media freedom across the globe. This metric is pivotal as it reflects the degree of journalistic independence, which is essential for fostering democracy and ensuring transparency within societies. By analyzing the scores, we gain insights into how countries uphold or restrict free expression, highlighting the global landscape of press freedom.
Global Leaders in Press Freedom
In 2015, Finland emerged as the global leader in press freedom with an impressive score of 92.48. Following closely were Norway and Denmark, with scores of 92.25 and 91.76, respectively. These Scandinavian countries are renowned for their strong democratic institutions and unwavering commitment to maintaining a free press. This commitment is reflected in their high scores, which signify robust media independence. Other notable countries in the top ten include the Netherlands, Sweden, and New Zealand, demonstrating a pattern where developed nations with stable political climates tend to excel in press freedom.
Challenges in Press Freedom
At the opposite end of the spectrum, Eritrea recorded the lowest Press Freedom Index Score of 15.14, followed by North Korea at 16.75 and Turkmenistan at 19.17. These scores underscore severe restrictions on media and free expression, often resulting from authoritarian governance and stringent control over information dissemination. In these environments, journalists face immense challenges, from censorship to imprisonment, making it difficult to operate independently and impartially. The low rankings of these countries highlight ongoing struggles against governmental crackdowns on free speech and the press.
Year-over-Year Variations: Gains and Declines
Examining the year-over-year changes in the Press Freedom Index Score reveals intriguing trends. Notably, Mongolia saw the most significant improvement, with a score increase of 5.05 (7.2%). This positive change can be attributed to reforms and efforts to enhance journalistic freedom within the country. Similarly, Nepal experienced a notable increase of 3.45 (5.4%), reflecting progress in media independence following a period of political turmoil. On the downside, Andorra faced the most significant decline, dropping by 13.05 points (14.0%), illustrating how even small nations can experience setbacks in media freedom due to shifts in policy or leadership.
Regional Insights and Patterns
Analyzing the Press Freedom Index on a regional basis exposes distinct patterns. Europe dominates the higher echelons of the index, with multiple countries consistently scoring above 85. This regional clustering is indicative of Europe's robust legal frameworks supporting press freedom and well-established media institutions. In contrast, regions like the Middle East and parts of Asia exhibit lower scores, often due to political instability, restrictive laws, and conflicts that stifle journalistic practice. These regional disparities emphasize the crucial role that governance and political stability play in nurturing or hindering media freedom.
The Crucial Role of Press Freedom in Society
The importance of a free press cannot be overstated. The Press Freedom Index Score underscores its role as a pillar of democracy and a tool for transparency and accountability. Countries with higher scores typically enjoy more robust democratic processes and governance, as a free press fosters informed citizenry and a check on power. In contrast, low-scoring countries tend to struggle with corruption, human rights violations, and lack of governmental accountability. The 2015 Press Freedom Index Score serves as a vital reminder of the need to protect and promote media independence worldwide, ensuring that the rights to free speech and information are upheld across all nations.
In summary, the Press Freedom Index Score for 2015 paints a vivid picture of the global state of media freedom, highlighting both advancements and ongoing challenges. By understanding these scores and their implications, societies can better advocate for a freer, more transparent world where the press can fulfill its role as a guardian of truth and democracy.
Insights by country
Bulgaria
In 2015, Bulgaria ranked 103rd out of 177 countries in the Press Freedom Index, with a score of 67.09 points. This position reflects ongoing challenges in the media landscape, where issues such as government influence and corruption have hindered journalistic independence.
The relatively low ranking can be attributed to factors including political pressure on journalists, threats to media personnel, and a lack of transparency regarding media ownership. These conditions have contributed to a climate where self-censorship is prevalent among reporters, limiting the scope of investigative journalism.
Despite these challenges, Bulgaria has a vibrant media scene, with a diverse array of outlets. However, the pressures faced by the press highlight the need for reforms to strengthen media freedom and protect journalists from intimidation and censorship.
Kuwait
Kuwait was ranked 87th out of 177 countries in the Press Freedom Index for the year 2015, with a score of 69.16 points. This position indicates a moderate level of press freedom compared to other nations globally, reflecting both advancements and challenges in the country's media landscape.
The score of 69.16 suggests that while there is some level of journalistic freedom, Kuwait still grapples with restrictions that impact the press. Factors contributing to this ranking include government control over media narratives, laws that limit dissent, and instances of censorship, particularly concerning criticism of the ruling family and government officials.
Despite these challenges, Kuwait has a vibrant media environment with various newspapers and television channels that provide diverse viewpoints. Nonetheless, the legal framework surrounding press freedom remains a significant barrier, influencing the overall atmosphere for journalists and media organizations operating within the country.
Sweden
In 2015, Sweden achieved a remarkable Press Freedom Index Score of 90.53 points, ranking 5th out of 177 countries, demonstrating its strong commitment to freedom of the press. This high ranking reflects Sweden's robust democratic institutions and the legal protections afforded to journalists, ensuring their ability to operate without fear of censorship or persecution.
Several factors contribute to Sweden's exemplary press freedom status, including a long-standing tradition of transparency, public access to information laws, and a culture that values open discourse. The country also benefits from a vibrant media landscape that includes a variety of independent outlets, which fosters diverse viewpoints and encourages investigative journalism.
Additionally, Sweden's strong commitment to human rights and civil liberties plays a significant role in maintaining its high press freedom ranking. The nation consistently ranks among the top countries globally in various indices related to democracy and freedom, highlighting its ongoing efforts to protect journalists and promote a free and open society.
Bosnia and Herzegovina
In 2015, Bosnia and Herzegovina achieved a Press Freedom Index Score of 72.49 points, ranking 65th out of 177 countries. This score reflects a moderate level of press freedom, indicating both positive developments and ongoing challenges in the media landscape.
The country’s press freedom situation has been influenced by its complex political environment, post-war reconstruction, and ethnic divisions. Factors such as political pressure, media ownership concentration, and self-censorship among journalists contribute to the challenges faced by the media in reporting freely and independently.
In comparison to neighboring countries, Bosnia and Herzegovina's score highlights a struggle for journalistic integrity amidst issues such as corruption and lack of transparency in government. Additionally, the media environment is often affected by the influence of political parties and business interests, which can hinder the ability of journalists to operate without fear of reprisal.
Djibouti
In 2015, Djibouti was ranked 167th out of 177 countries in the Press Freedom Index, reflecting a serious lack of media freedom within the nation. The country received a score of 28.96 points, indicating significant restrictions on freedom of expression and press operations.
This low score can be attributed to a combination of factors, including government control over the media, censorship practices, and the harassment of journalists. The Djiboutian government has been known to suppress dissent and limit access to information, which severely hinders the ability of the press to operate independently.
Additionally, media outlets often face pressure to align with government narratives, resulting in an environment where criticism of the government is discouraged. This situation is further exacerbated by the presence of a small number of media organizations that are predominantly state-owned or heavily regulated.
Canada
In 2015, Canada achieved an impressive Press Freedom Index Score of 89.01 points, ranking 8th out of 177 countries. This high score reflects a robust commitment to media independence and freedom of expression, hallmarks of Canadian democracy.
The favorable ranking can be attributed to several factors, including a strong legal framework that protects journalists, a diverse and vibrant media landscape, and a general societal respect for the role of the press. Additionally, Canada has a history of relatively low levels of violence against journalists and minimal government interference in media operations.
Interestingly, Canada’s performance in press freedom is consistently strong, often ranking among the top ten countries globally. This positions Canada as a model for media freedom in the North American region, contrasting sharply with countries exhibiting lower scores due to censorship and repression.
Bangladesh
In 2015, Bangladesh ranked 143rd out of 177 countries in the Press Freedom Index, with a score of 57.05 points. This ranking reflects significant challenges faced by journalists and media outlets in the country, where freedom of expression is often curtailed by government restrictions and societal pressures.
The low score can be attributed to a variety of factors, including increasing censorship, threats to journalists, and the use of laws to silence dissent. The government has been known to impose strict regulations on media content, leading to an environment where self-censorship becomes common among reporters.
Additionally, the political climate in Bangladesh has historically been tense, with instances of violence against journalists and media personnel, making it difficult for the press to operate freely. Despite these challenges, the media landscape remains diverse, with numerous outlets striving to report on critical issues, although often under significant risk.
Comoros
In 2015, Comoros achieved a Press Freedom Index Score of 75.48 points, ranking 49th out of 177 countries. This score reflects a relatively positive environment for press freedom compared to many other nations, indicating a moderate level of media independence and expression.
The favorable ranking can be attributed to several factors, including a history of political stability in certain periods, as well as the presence of a diverse range of media outlets that provide varied perspectives. However, challenges remain, including occasional government interference and limited resources for journalists, which can impact the overall media landscape.
Additionally, the Comorian media landscape is characterized by a mix of public and private ownership, which contributes to a vibrant, albeit constrained, media environment. Despite its relatively high score in 2015, ongoing issues such as political pressures and economic constraints pose risks to the future of press freedom in the country.
Tanzania
Tanzania achieved a Press Freedom Index Score of 71.91 points in 2015, ranking 74th out of 177 countries. This score reflects a moderate level of press freedom within the country, indicating some restrictions on media operations and journalistic practices.
The media landscape in Tanzania has faced challenges, including government censorship, legal constraints, and harassment of journalists, which have influenced the country's ranking. The government's control over major media outlets and the implementation of laws that limit press freedoms have been significant factors in this context.
Despite these challenges, Tanzania's ranking suggests that there are areas of relative openness compared to other countries within the region. However, ongoing concerns about the protection of journalists and the right to free expression continue to be critical issues for the media environment in Tanzania.
Australia
In 2015, Australia achieved a Press Freedom Index Score of 82.97 points, ranking 25th out of 177 countries. This score reflects a relatively high level of press freedom in comparison to many other nations, indicating a robust media environment that allows for diverse and independent reporting.
The high ranking can be attributed to several factors, including strong legal protections for journalists, a generally open political landscape, and a commitment to democratic principles. However, concerns have been raised regarding government surveillance practices and their potential impact on journalistic activities, which may pose challenges to press freedom in the future.
Interestingly, Australia's ranking and score signify its position as one of the leaders in the Asia-Pacific region regarding press freedom, although the country has faced criticism for issues such as the treatment of whistleblowers and the increasing concentration of media ownership.
Data Source
Reporters Without Borders (RSF)
Reporters Without Borders (RWB) is an international non-profit organisation governed by principles of democratic governance. We are neither a trade union nor a representative of media companies. Founded in 1985 in Montpellier by four journalists, RSF is at the forefront of the defence and promotion of freedom of information. Recognised as a public interest organisation in France since 1995, RSF has consultative status with the United Nations, UNESCO, the Council of Europe and the International Organization of Francophonie (OIF).
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Press Freedom Index Score data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Communications Facts
Internet Usage Rate by Country (% of Population)
Discover the internet usage rate by country, showcasing the percentage of the population online. This statistic highlights digital accessibility and connectivity trends globally, emphasizing the importance of internet access in today's world.
View dataBrowse All Communications
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data