Press Freedom Index Score 2007
The Press Freedom Index Score measures the level of media freedom in countries worldwide. A higher score indicates stronger press independence, essential for democracy and transparency. Understanding these scores helps highlight the importance of free expression in society.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | Eritrea | 114.75 points |
2 | North Korea | 108.75 points |
3 | Turkmenistan | 103.75 points |
4 | Iran | 96.5 points |
5 | Cuba | 96.17 points |
6 | Myanmar | 93.75 points |
7 | China | 89 points |
8 | Vietnam | 79.25 points |
9 | Laos | 75 points |
10 | Uzbekistan | 74.88 points |
11 | Somalia | 71.5 points |
12 | State of Palestine | 69.83 points |
13 | Iraq | 67.83 points |
14 | Sri Lanka | 67.5 points |
15 | Libya | 66.5 points |
16 | Syrian Arab Republic | 66 points |
17 | Equatorial Guinea | 65.25 points |
18 | Pakistan | 64.83 points |
19 | Belarus | 63.63 points |
20 | Ethiopia | 63 points |
21 | Zimbabwe | 62 points |
22 | Saudi Arabia | 59.75 points |
23 | Rwanda | 58.88 points |
24 | Egypt | 58 points |
25 | Tunisia | 57 points |
26 | Russia | 56.9 points |
27 | Yemen | 56.67 points |
28 | Afghanistan | 56.5 points |
29 | Singapore | 56 points |
30 | Sudan | 55.75 points |
31 | Azerbaijan | 55.4 points |
32 | Eswatini | 54.5 points |
33 | Nepal | 53.75 points |
34 | Mexico | 53.63 points |
35 | Thailand | 53.5 points |
36 | Bangladesh | 53.17 points |
37 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 50.5 points |
38 | Djibouti | 50.25 points |
39 | Nigeria | 49.83 points |
40 | Gambia | 48.25 points |
41 | Maldives | 45.17 points |
42 | Philippines | 44.75 points |
43 | Burundi | 43.4 points |
44 | Colombia | 42.33 points |
45 | Kazakhstan | 41.63 points |
46 | Malaysia | 41 points |
47 | Algeria | 40.5 points |
48 | Jordan | 40.21 points |
49 | Sierra Leone | 39.5 points |
50 | India | 39.33 points |
51 | Tonga | 38.25 points |
52 | Bahrain | 38 points |
53 | Peru | 37.38 points |
54 | Bhutan | 37.17 points |
55 | Tajikistan | 37 points |
56 | Venezuela | 36.88 points |
57 | Chad | 36.5 points |
58 | Cameroon | 36 points |
59 | Kyrgyzstan | 33.6 points |
60 | Fiji | 33.5 points |
61 | Guinea | 33.5 points |
62 | Guinea-Bissau | 33.5 points |
63 | Morocco | 33.25 points |
64 | Guatemala | 33 points |
65 | Seychelles | 33 points |
66 | Gabon | 31.5 points |
67 | Turkey | 31.25 points |
68 | Indonesia | 30.5 points |
69 | Lesotho | 29.5 points |
70 | Lebanon | 28.75 points |
71 | Comoros | 28 points |
72 | Uganda | 28 points |
73 | Côte d'Ivoire | 27 points |
74 | Timor-Leste | 27 points |
75 | Malawi | 26.75 points |
76 | Ukraine | 26.75 points |
77 | Angola | 26.5 points |
78 | Paraguay | 26.1 points |
79 | Albania | 25.5 points |
80 | Honduras | 25.5 points |
81 | Niger | 25.5 points |
82 | Cambodia | 25.33 points |
83 | Liberia | 25.33 points |
84 | Brazil | 25.25 points |
85 | Senegal | 25 points |
86 | Argentina | 24.83 points |
87 | Republic of Moldova | 24.75 points |
88 | Congo | 24.5 points |
89 | Qatar | 24 points |
90 | Kenya | 23.75 points |
91 | Armenia | 23.63 points |
92 | Botswana | 23.5 points |
93 | Haiti | 23.5 points |
94 | Mongolia | 23.4 points |
95 | Mozambique | 23 points |
96 | Dominican Republic | 22.75 points |
97 | Central African Republic | 22.5 points |
98 | Bolivia | 21.5 points |
99 | Burkina Faso | 21.5 points |
100 | Zambia | 21.5 points |
101 | Serbia | 21 points |
102 | Georgia | 20.83 points |
103 | United Arab Emirates | 20.25 points |
104 | El Salvador | 20.2 points |
105 | Kuwait | 20.17 points |
106 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 20 points |
107 | Madagascar | 20 points |
108 | Montenegro | 19 points |
109 | Ecuador | 18.5 points |
110 | Poland | 18.5 points |
111 | Tanzania | 18 points |
112 | Panama | 17.88 points |
113 | Benin | 17 points |
114 | Mali | 16.5 points |
115 | Bulgaria | 16.25 points |
116 | Mauritania | 15.5 points |
117 | Togo | 15.17 points |
118 | Nicaragua | 14.25 points |
119 | Cabo Verde | 14 points |
120 | Cyprus | 14 points |
121 | South Africa | 13 points |
122 | Romania | 12.75 points |
123 | Croatia | 12.5 points |
124 | Chile | 12.13 points |
125 | South Korea | 12.13 points |
126 | Japan | 11.75 points |
127 | Uruguay | 11.75 points |
128 | North Macedonia | 11.5 points |
129 | Italy | 11.25 points |
130 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 11.17 points |
131 | Spain | 10.25 points |
132 | Taiwan | 10 points |
133 | France | 9.75 points |
134 | Greece | 9.25 points |
135 | Ghana | 9 points |
136 | Australia | 8.79 points |
137 | Jamaica | 8.63 points |
138 | Mauritius | 8.5 points |
139 | Namibia | 8.5 points |
140 | United Kingdom | 8.25 points |
141 | Lithuania | 7 points |
142 | Costa Rica | 6.5 points |
143 | Slovenia | 6.5 points |
144 | Germany | 5.75 points |
145 | Trinidad and Tobago | 5 points |
146 | Canada | 4.88 points |
147 | Hungary | 4.5 points |
148 | Austria | 4.25 points |
149 | New Zealand | 4.17 points |
150 | Czech Republic | 4 points |
151 | Latvia | 3.5 points |
152 | Netherlands | 3.5 points |
153 | Switzerland | 3 points |
154 | Denmark | 2 points |
155 | Ireland | 2 points |
156 | Portugal | 2 points |
157 | Belgium | 1.5 points |
158 | Finland | 1.5 points |
159 | Sweden | 1.5 points |
160 | Estonia | 1 points |
161 | Slovakia | 1 points |
162 | Iceland | 0.75 points |
163 | Norway | 0.75 points |
↑Top 10 Countries
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
↓Bottom 10 Countries
- #163
Norway
- #162
Iceland
- #161
Slovakia
- #160
Estonia
- #159
Sweden
- #158
Finland
- #157
Belgium
- #156
Portugal
- #155
Ireland
- #154
Denmark
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
The Press Freedom Index Score is a vital metric that gauges the degree of media freedom worldwide. In 2007, this score served as a critical barometer for assessing the independence of press institutions globally, underscoring their role in promoting democracy and transparency. A higher score signifies greater press independence, vital for ensuring free expression and the dissemination of diverse perspectives. Understanding the 2007 global statistics offers insights into the state of media freedom across different regions and its implications for society.
Global Overview of Press Freedom in 2007
In 2007, the Press Freedom Index evaluated 163 countries, revealing a broad spectrum of media freedom. The scores ranged from a minimum of 0.75, indicating near-complete press freedom, to a staggering 114.75, reflecting severe restrictions. The average Press Freedom Index Score was 31.81, with a median of 25.33, pointing to significant disparities in media independence worldwide. Notably, Norway and Iceland achieved the lowest scores of 0.75, illustrating exemplary media freedom. Conversely, Eritrea had the highest score of 114.75, highlighting extensive governmental control over the press.
Regional Trends and Comparisons
Analyzing the Press Freedom Index Score across different regions reveals distinct patterns. The Nordic countries, including Norway, Iceland, and Sweden, consistently ranked among the top in terms of media independence, underscoring their robust commitment to free expression. In contrast, nations like Eritrea, North Korea, and Turkmenistan were at the bottom, reflecting restrictive media environments where censorship and government intervention are pervasive. This stark contrast between regions emphasizes the geographic divide in press freedom, with Western democracies generally securing better scores than their counterparts in authoritarian regimes.
Notable Improvements and Declines
The year 2007 witnessed significant shifts in press freedom across various countries. Tonga experienced the most substantial improvement, with its score increasing by 25.25 points, marking a 194.2% enhancement. This surge was followed by the State of Palestine, which improved by 23.08 points. Such increases often signify positive policy changes or political transitions that favor media independence. Conversely, Nepal encountered the steepest decline, with its score dropping by 19.75 points, a 26.9% decrease. Similarly, Saudi Arabia and Ethiopia saw notable regressions, reflecting growing challenges to press autonomy.
Impact of Policy and Governance on Press Freedom
The variations in the Press Freedom Index Score in 2007 were heavily influenced by national governance and policy frameworks. Countries with democratic governance structures, such as those in Northern Europe, tended to foster environments conducive to press freedom, underpinned by legal protections for journalists and independent media institutions. In contrast, authoritarian regimes often imposed stringent controls on the press, as seen in countries like China and Iran, where media outlets faced censorship and suppression. These policies not only curtailed free expression but also stifled the flow of information, impacting societal transparency and democratic processes.
Future Prospects for Press Freedom
Reflecting on the Press Freedom Index Score of 2007 provides a valuable foundation for projecting future trends in media independence. The persistent divide between regions with varying levels of press freedom suggests that future improvements will likely require sustained efforts in policy reform and international cooperation. As global movements advocating for human rights and democratic governance continue to gain momentum, there is potential for positive change. However, the ongoing challenges faced by many countries underscore the need for vigilance and advocacy to safeguard press freedom and ensure that media outlets can operate without fear or favor.
The 2007 Press Freedom Index Score serves as a crucial indicator of the ongoing battle for media independence worldwide. By examining the global landscape, regional trends, and policy impacts, this year's data highlights both the achievements and challenges in the realm of press freedom, offering lessons and insights for future progress.
Insights by country
Angola
In 2007, Angola achieved a Press Freedom Index Score of 26.5 points, ranking 77th out of 163 countries. This score indicates a challenging environment for media freedom, reflecting significant restrictions on journalism and free expression within the nation.
The low score can be attributed to various factors, including government control over media outlets, censorship, and intimidation of journalists. The Angolan government has historically maintained tight regulations on the press, limiting independent reporting and dissenting voices.
Furthermore, the environment for press freedom in Angola is influenced by its post-civil war context, where political stability often comes at the cost of civil liberties. Despite these challenges, Angola's media landscape has seen some improvements in recent years, with a growing number of independent media outlets emerging, although they still face significant hurdles.
Portugal
In 2007, Portugal ranked 156th out of 163 countries in the Press Freedom Index, with a score of 2 points. This low ranking indicates significant challenges faced by journalists and media organizations in the country during that period.
The context of this statistic reflects concerns over government influence and the limitations imposed on media freedom. Factors contributing to this score include issues such as self-censorship among journalists, the lack of legal protection for reporters, and incidents of intimidation against the press.
Additionally, the political climate at the time may have played a role, as various administrations grappled with balancing press freedom and national security. By comparison, Portugal's press freedom has seen improvements in subsequent years, highlighting the dynamic nature of media rights and governance.
Australia
In 2007, Australia was ranked 136 out of 163 countries in the Press Freedom Index. The country received a score of 8.79 points, indicating a notable concern regarding the state of press freedom at that time.
This ranking reflects a period marked by increasing government scrutiny and legislation that affected the media landscape, including anti-terrorism laws that raised concerns over journalistic independence and freedom of expression. Additionally, the Australian media environment faced challenges related to the concentration of ownership, which can limit the diversity of viewpoints and hinder critical reporting.
Despite being a democratic nation with a history of robust press freedom, these factors contributed to a perception of declining media independence, showcasing the complexities and ongoing challenges faced by journalists in maintaining freedom of the press.
Qatar
In 2007, Qatar was ranked 89th out of 163 countries in the Press Freedom Index, reflecting a score of 24 points. This positioning indicates a significant level of restrictions on press freedom within the country, which is characterized by stringent regulations governing media operations and the dissemination of information.
The relatively low score and rank can be attributed to various factors, including government control over the media landscape, limited tolerance for dissenting opinions, and the prioritization of national security narratives. These factors have often resulted in self-censorship among journalists and media outlets, which may fear repercussions for reporting on sensitive topics.
Despite these challenges, Qatar has made strides in developing its media infrastructure, including the establishment of Al Jazeera, a prominent news organization that has gained international recognition. However, the overall environment for press freedom remains constrained, impacting the diversity of viewpoints available to the public.
Tajikistan
Tajikistan achieved a Press Freedom Index Score of 37 points in 2007, ranking 55th out of 163 countries assessed globally. This score indicates a moderate level of press freedom, reflecting significant challenges faced by journalists and media organizations in the country.
The media landscape in Tajikistan has historically been influenced by government control and censorship, which has stifled independent journalism and limited the diversity of opinions available to the public. Factors contributing to this situation include a lack of legal protections for journalists, political pressure, and the presence of state-owned media dominating the information sphere.
In comparison to other countries in the region, Tajikistan's ranking highlights the ongoing struggle for media independence, as many Central Asian nations exhibit similar issues with press freedom. The 2007 score serves as a critical point of reference for understanding the evolution of media rights in Tajikistan and the broader implications for civil liberties in the region.
Lesotho
In 2007, Lesotho achieved a Press Freedom Index Score of 29.5 points, ranking 69th out of 163 countries. This score reflects a relatively moderate level of press freedom within the country, indicating both challenges and opportunities for media expression.
The score was influenced by factors such as government regulations, the safety of journalists, and the overall political climate, which has historically been characterized by instability and significant political changes. Lesotho's media landscape has been shaped by a mix of private and public outlets, with varying degrees of independence.
Despite the moderate ranking, it is notable that Lesotho's press freedom environment has been affected by issues such as government interference, threats to journalists, and instances of censorship. Comparatively, other nations in the Southern African region have exhibited similar challenges, highlighting a broader trend of press freedom concerns across diverse political contexts.
Namibia
In 2007, Namibia was ranked 139 out of 163 countries in the Press Freedom Index, with a score of 8.5 points. This ranking reflects a relatively moderate level of press freedom in comparison to other nations, indicating challenges in the media landscape that may hinder journalistic independence and expression.
The score and ranking were influenced by various factors, including government restrictions on media operations, instances of self-censorship among journalists, and occasional intimidation faced by reporters. Despite being one of the more liberal countries in Africa regarding press freedoms, Namibia's media environment still contended with issues such as political pressures and the influence of powerful interests.
Interestingly, Namibia's media landscape is characterized by a mix of state-owned and private media outlets, which can sometimes lead to a divergence in reporting styles and editorial independence. This situation highlights the ongoing struggle for a fully free press, which is crucial for a functioning democracy.
China, Hong Kong SAR
In 2007, Hong Kong SAR achieved a Press Freedom Index Score of 20 points, ranking 106 out of 163 countries. This score reflects significant concerns regarding the state of press freedom in the region, particularly in the context of its unique relationship with mainland China.
The low score can be attributed to increasing pressures on journalists and media outlets, including censorship, self-censorship, and government influence over media narratives. These challenges have been exacerbated by the broader political climate in China, where strict regulations and control over information have become more pronounced.
Interestingly, despite its historical reputation for a relatively free press compared to mainland China, the situation in Hong Kong has been deteriorating in recent years due to political developments, including the implementation of the National Security Law in 2020, which has further restricted media freedoms.
North Korea
In 2007, North Korea was ranked 2nd out of 163 countries in the Press Freedom Index, with a score of 108.75 points. This position reflects the extreme restrictions on free expression and the state-controlled media environment prevalent in the country.
The high score indicates a severe lack of press freedom, which is largely due to the government's tight grip on all forms of communication, media, and information dissemination. The North Korean regime, led by Kim Jong-il at the time, maintained strict censorship practices and utilized propaganda to control public perception and suppress dissent.
Factors contributing to this situation include the absence of independent journalism, the criminalization of free speech, and the pervasive surveillance of citizens. North Korea's oppressive political climate has led to an environment where any form of criticism against the government is met with harsh penalties, further entrenching the lack of media freedom.
Poland
In 2007, Poland ranked 110 out of 163 countries on the Press Freedom Index, reflecting a moderate level of press freedom in the country. The Press Freedom Index score for Poland that year was recorded at 18.5 points, indicating significant challenges in the media landscape.
This score was influenced by various factors, including increasing political pressure on journalists, concerns over government influence on media outlets, and instances of self-censorship among reporters. Additionally, the political climate during this period, characterized by tensions between the government and media, contributed to a perception of declining press freedoms.
Despite the challenges, Poland has a rich journalistic tradition and a vibrant media sector, which has historically been a platform for diverse opinions and discourse. However, ongoing concerns about media independence continue to be relevant in discussions about democracy and civil liberties in the country.
Data Source
Reporters Without Borders (RSF)
Reporters Without Borders (RWB) is an international non-profit organisation governed by principles of democratic governance. We are neither a trade union nor a representative of media companies. Founded in 1985 in Montpellier by four journalists, RSF is at the forefront of the defence and promotion of freedom of information. Recognised as a public interest organisation in France since 1995, RSF has consultative status with the United Nations, UNESCO, the Council of Europe and the International Organization of Francophonie (OIF).
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Press Freedom Index Score data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Communications Facts
Internet Usage Rate by Country (% of Population)
Discover the internet usage rate by country, showcasing the percentage of the population online. This statistic highlights digital accessibility and connectivity trends globally, emphasizing the importance of internet access in today's world.
View dataBrowse All Communications
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data