Press Freedom Index Score 2013

The Press Freedom Index Score measures the level of media freedom in countries worldwide. A higher score indicates stronger press independence, essential for democracy and transparency. Understanding these scores helps highlight the importance of free expression in society.

176 data points•Updated 12/7/2025•World•Reporters Without Borders (RSF)•

View data for:

Interactive Map

Complete Data Rankings

Rank
1	Finland	93.62 points
2	Netherlands	93.52 points
3	Norway	93.48 points
4	Luxembourg	93.32 points
5	Andorra	93.18 points
6	Denmark	92.92 points
7	Liechtenstein	92.65 points
8	New Zealand	91.62 points
9	Iceland	91.51 points
10	Sweden	90.77 points
11	Estonia	90.74 points
12	Austria	90.6 points
13	Jamaica	90.12 points
14	Switzerland	90.06 points
15	Ireland	89.94 points
16	Czech Republic	89.83 points
17	Germany	89.76 points
18	Costa Rica	87.92 points
19	Namibia	87.5 points
20	Canada	87.31 points
21	Belgium	87.06 points
22	Poland	86.89 points
23	Slovakia	86.75 points
24	Cyprus	86.17 points
25	Cabo Verde	85.67 points
26	Australia	84.76 points
27	Uruguay	84.08 points
28	Portugal	83.25 points
29	United Kingdom	83.11 points
30	Ghana	82.73 points
31	Suriname	81.81 points
32	United States	81.78 points
33	Lithuania	81.76 points
34	Slovenia	79.51 points
35	Spain	79.5 points
36	France	78.4 points
37	El Salvador	77.14 points
38	Latvia	77.11 points
39	Botswana	77.09 points
40	Papua New Guinea	77.03 points
41	Romania	76.95 points
42	Niger	76.92 points
43	Trinidad and Tobago	76.88 points
44	Malta	76.7 points
45	Burkina Faso	76.3 points
46	Taiwan	76.18 points
47	Samoa	76.16 points
48	Haiti	75.91 points
49	South Korea	75.52 points
50	Comoros	75.48 points
51	South Africa	75.44 points
52	Japan	74.83 points
53	Argentina	74.33 points
54	Republic of Moldova	73.99 points
55	Hungary	73.91 points
56	Italy	73.89 points
57	China, Hong Kong SAR	73.84 points
58	Senegal	73.81 points
59	Chile	73.76 points
60	Sierra Leone	73.65 points
61	Mauritius	73.53 points
62	Serbia	73.41 points
63	Central African Republic	73.39 points
64	Croatia	73.39 points
65	Tonga	73.3 points
66	Mauritania	73.24 points
67	Bosnia and Herzegovina	73.14 points
68	Guyana	72.92 points
69	Tanzania	72.66 points
70	Kenya	72.2 points
71	Zambia	72.07 points
72	Mozambique	71.99 points
73	Armenia	71.96 points
74	Malawi	71.82 points
75	Congo	71.8 points
76	Kuwait	71.72 points
77	Nicaragua	71.69 points
78	Benin	71.67 points
79	Dominican Republic	71.66 points
80	Lesotho	71.64 points
81	Bhutan	71.58 points
82	Togo	71.55 points
83	Greece	71.54 points
84	Guinea	71.51 points
85	Bulgaria	71.42 points
86	Madagascar	71.38 points
87	Gabon	71.31 points
88	Timor-Leste	71.28 points
89	Paraguay	71.22 points
90	Guinea-Bissau	71.06 points
91	Seychelles	70.81 points
92	Guatemala	70.61 points
93	Côte d'Ivoire	70.23 points
94	Liberia	70.11 points
95	Mongolia	70.07 points
96	Mali	69.97 points
97	Georgia	69.91 points
98	Lebanon	69.85 points
99	Albania	69.12 points
100	Maldives	68.9 points
101	Uganda	68.31 points
102	Peru	68.13 points
103	Kyrgyzstan	67.8 points
104	Fiji	67.31 points
105	Brazil	67.25 points
106	Bolivia	67.2 points
107	Qatar	67.14 points
108	Panama	67.05 points
109	Israel	67.03 points
110	Montenegro	67.03 points
111	United Arab Emirates	66.51 points
112	Nigeria	65.89 points
113	North Macedonia	65.73 points
114	Venezuela	65.56 points
115	Nepal	65.39 points
116	Ecuador	65.31 points
117	Cameroon	65.22 points
118	Chad	65.13 points
119	Brunei Darussalam	64.55 points
120	Tajikistan	64.29 points
121	South Sudan	63.8 points
122	Algeria	63.46 points
123	Ukraine	63.21 points
124	Honduras	63.08 points
125	Afghanistan	62.64 points
126	Colombia	62.52 points
127	Angola	62.2 points
128	Libya	62.14 points
129	Burundi	61.98 points
130	Zimbabwe	61.88 points
131	Jordan	61.53 points
132	Thailand	61.4 points
133	Morocco	60.96 points
134	Ethiopia	60.43 points
135	Tunisia	60.07 points
136	Indonesia	58.95 points
137	India	58.78 points
138	Oman	58.49 points
139	Congo, Democratic Republic of the	58.34 points
140	Cambodia	58.19 points
141	Bangladesh	57.99 points
142	Malaysia	57.27 points
143	State of Palestine	56.91 points
144	Philippines	56.89 points
145	Russia	56.58 points
146	Singapore	56.57 points
147	Iraq	55.33 points
148	Myanmar	55.29 points
149	Gambia	54.91 points
150	Mexico	54.7 points
151	Turkey	53.44 points
152	Eswatini	53.24 points
153	Azerbaijan	52.27 points
154	Belarus	51.65 points
155	Egypt	51.34 points
156	Pakistan	48.69 points
157	Kazakhstan	44.92 points
158	Rwanda	44.54 points
159	Sri Lanka	43.41 points
160	Saudi Arabia	43.12 points
161	Uzbekistan	39.61 points
162	Bahrain	37.25 points
163	Equatorial Guinea	32.8 points
164	Djibouti	32.6 points
165	Laos	32.01 points
166	Yemen	30.78 points
167	Sudan	29.94 points
168	Cuba	28.36 points
169	Vietnam	28.22 points
170	China	26.93 points
171	Iran	26.6 points
172	Somalia	26.41 points
173	Syrian Arab Republic	21.47 points
174	Turkmenistan	20.86 points
175	North Korea	16.1 points
176	Eritrea	15.17 points

↑Top 10 Countries

Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.

↓Bottom 10 Countries

Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.

Analysis & Context

The Press Freedom Index Score, an essential measure of media freedom worldwide, offers crucial insights into the state of press independence in various countries. In 2013, this index was pivotal in highlighting global trends and disparities in media freedom, which is a cornerstone of democratic societies and transparency. By examining the Press Freedom Index Score, we gain a better understanding of how freely information flows, which in turn illuminates the broader sociopolitical landscape.

Global Overview of the 2013 Press Freedom Index

The 2013 Press Freedom Index Score revealed significant variations across 176 countries, with scores ranging from a minimum of 15.17 to a maximum of 93.62. The average score was 67.47, while the median stood at 71.28, indicating a moderate level of press freedom globally. Finland led the chart with the highest score of 93.62, closely followed by the Netherlands and Norway. In contrast, Eritrea scored the lowest at 15.17, underscoring severe restrictions on media freedom. This disparity highlights the diverse environments in which journalists operate, ranging from highly supportive to extremely oppressive.

Top Performers and Their Characteristics

Countries like Finland, Netherlands, and Norway topped the Press Freedom Index Score in 2013, with scores exceeding 93. These nations are characterized by robust legal frameworks that safeguard press independence and a cultural appreciation for freedom of expression. Such environments support investigative journalism, ensuring that media can operate without undue influence from the government or other powerful entities. Additionally, these countries often have high levels of public trust in media, which further bolsters the role of journalism in society.

Challenges Faced by Low-Scoring Countries

The bottom of the list, including Eritrea, North Korea, and Turkmenistan, presents a stark contrast, with scores as low as 15.17. These countries typically feature authoritarian governments that exert tight control over information dissemination. Journalists in these regions face censorship, harassment, and imprisonment, significantly hindering free expression. The lack of independent media in such countries allows for the proliferation of state propaganda, severely limiting the public's access to unbiased news and information.

Year-over-Year Trends and Influences

2013 saw some notable year-over-year changes in the Press Freedom Index Score. Finland and Norway experienced significant improvements, while countries like Eritrea and North Korea saw declines, reflecting ongoing struggles with media oppression. Several factors contributed to these trends, including policy reforms, changes in government, and international pressures. For example, countries showing improvements often benefited from increased international attention and advocacy for press freedom, prompting governments to adopt more open policies.

Regional Disparities in Media Freedom

Analyzing the 2013 Press Freedom Index Score reveals distinct regional disparities. European countries generally fared well, dominating the top of the list due to established democratic institutions and strong legal protections for journalists. In contrast, African and Asian countries, particularly those under authoritarian regimes, often ranked lower. These regions are frequently characterized by political instability and conflicts, which exacerbate the challenges faced by media professionals. Understanding these regional differences is crucial for devising targeted strategies to support journalists and enhance media freedom globally.

The Press Freedom Index Score for 2013 serves as a vital barometer of the global state of media freedom. It highlights the crucial role that independent journalism plays in fostering transparency and accountability. As we continue to monitor these trends, it is essential to advocate for policies that protect press freedom and to support efforts aimed at dismantling barriers to free expression. The pursuit of a more open and informed world hinges on our collective commitment to defending the rights of the media and ensuring that all societies have access to accurate and unbiased information.

Insights by country

Djibouti

In 2013, Djibouti ranked 164 out of 176 countries in the Press Freedom Index, indicating a significant limitation on media freedoms within the nation. The country's Press Freedom Index score stood at 32.6 points, reflecting a challenging environment for journalists and media outlets.

This low ranking can be attributed to a range of factors, including strict government control over the press, a lack of independent media, and significant repercussions for dissenting voices. The government has been known to restrict access to information and impose heavy censorship, which stifles journalistic independence and freedom of expression.

In addition to press restrictions, Djibouti's media landscape is characterized by the dominance of state-owned media, which often serves as a mouthpiece for the government rather than a source of independent news. These conditions contribute to a media environment where critical reporting is rare, further highlighting the importance of international advocacy for press freedoms in the region.

Yemen

In 2013, Yemen ranked 166 out of 176 countries in the Press Freedom Index, reflecting a dire situation for media freedom in the nation. With a score of 30.78 points, Yemen was among the lowest-ranked countries globally, indicating significant restrictions on freedom of expression and press independence.

The challenging environment for journalists in Yemen has been influenced by ongoing conflict, political instability, and the presence of armed groups that impose severe restrictions on media operations. Journalists faced threats, violence, and censorship, contributing to a climate of fear that stifled independent reporting.

Historically, Yemen's media landscape has been shaped by a combination of authoritarian governance and social unrest, leading to a persistent struggle for press freedom. The situation was exacerbated by the Arab Spring in 2011, which triggered widespread protests and unrest, further complicating the media's role in society.

China

In 2013, China ranked 170 out of 176 countries in the Press Freedom Index, highlighting significant restrictions on media freedom within the country. The nation's score of 26.93 points reflects a dire situation for journalists and media outlets, indicating a highly controlled environment where freedom of expression is severely limited.

This low ranking can be attributed to the Chinese government's stringent censorship policies, which include extensive monitoring and regulation of news outlets, internet content, and social media platforms. The state maintains tight control over information dissemination, with severe repercussions for those who challenge official narratives or report on sensitive topics.

Furthermore, the Chinese Communist Party's emphasis on stability and control often results in crackdowns on dissent, including the detention of journalists and activists. In comparison, China’s press freedom situation starkly contrasts with many Western democracies, which typically foster an environment of free speech and a vibrant press.

Latvia

In 2013, Latvia achieved a Press Freedom Index Score of 77.11 points, ranking 38th out of 176 countries. This score reflects a relatively positive environment for press freedoms in comparison to many nations worldwide, indicating a commitment to free expression and a diverse media landscape.

The high ranking can be attributed to several factors, including a stable democratic government and a legal framework that supports freedom of the press. However, challenges persist, such as the influence of political and business interests on media outlets, which can affect journalistic independence.

Moreover, Latvia's media landscape has been characterized by a mix of local and international news providers, contributing to a vibrant public discourse. Interestingly, Latvia has consistently maintained a strong position in the Press Freedom Index, showcasing its dedication to upholding democratic values and human rights.

Australia

In 2013, Australia achieved a noteworthy Press Freedom Index Score of 84.76 points, ranking 26th out of 176 countries. This score reflects the country's commitment to maintaining a free and independent press, which is essential for democracy and transparency.

The high ranking can be attributed to factors such as a robust legal framework that supports freedom of expression, a diverse media landscape, and a general societal respect for journalistic endeavors. However, challenges remain, including concerns over government surveillance and legislative measures that could potentially restrict journalistic freedoms.

Australia's position in the Press Freedom Index highlights its relatively strong media environment compared to other countries, although it is important to note that ongoing debates about media ownership concentration and the role of social media in shaping public discourse are increasingly relevant in discussions about press freedom.

Denmark

Denmark achieved a remarkable Press Freedom Index Score of 92.92 in 2013, ranking 6th out of 176 countries. This score reflects the country's robust commitment to freedom of expression and a vibrant media landscape, which is characterized by a high degree of journalist autonomy and low levels of censorship.

The high ranking can be attributed to several factors, including a well-established legal framework protecting press freedom, a strong tradition of democratic governance, and a culture that values transparency and accountability. Additionally, Denmark's public broadcasting system, which is funded by a license fee, ensures a diverse range of media perspectives without excessive reliance on commercial interests.

Interestingly, Denmark has consistently ranked among the top countries in the Press Freedom Index over the years, underscoring its ongoing dedication to upholding the principles of free speech and a free press as fundamental elements of its society.

Andorra

In 2013, Andorra achieved an impressive Press Freedom Index Score of 93.18 points, ranking 5th out of 176 countries. This score reflects the country's commitment to maintaining a free and independent press, which is essential for the functioning of a democratic society.

The high ranking can be attributed to several factors, including a small population that fosters a close-knit community, leading to less governmental interference in media operations. Additionally, Andorra's legal framework supports freedom of expression and protects journalists from undue pressure.

As a microstate situated between France and Spain, Andorra's media landscape is characterized by a limited number of outlets, which allows for more straightforward regulation and oversight. This unique environment contributes to the country’s high press freedom score, making it one of the leading nations in terms of media freedom in Europe.

Eritrea

Eritrea ranks last globally in press freedom, with a Press Freedom Index Score of 15.17 points for the year 2013, placing it at 176 out of 176 countries. This score reflects a severely restricted media environment where independent journalism is virtually non-existent, and state control over all forms of media is pervasive.

The extreme lack of press freedom in Eritrea can be attributed to several factors, including a long-standing authoritarian regime, the absence of a constitution that guarantees freedom of expression, and the government's systematic crackdown on dissent. The country has not allowed any independent newspapers since 2001, and journalists face harassment, imprisonment, and even torture.

In addition to its poor ranking in press freedom, Eritrea's overall human rights record is also troubling, with widespread reports of forced labor, arbitrary detentions, and restrictions on freedom of assembly and religion. This environment significantly hampers the ability of citizens to access unbiased information and engage in open discourse.

Serbia

In 2013, Serbia ranked 62nd out of 176 countries on the Press Freedom Index, with a score of 73.41 points. This ranking reflects a moderate level of press freedom, indicating that while there are some protections in place for journalists, significant challenges remain.

The relatively high score can be attributed to a legal framework that supports freedom of expression; however, issues such as political influence, threats to journalists, and incidents of violence against the media have posed serious obstacles. Additionally, the concentration of media ownership and the economic pressures faced by news organizations have further complicated the landscape of press freedom in Serbia.

Despite these challenges, Serbia's press freedom score is higher than many of its regional counterparts in the Balkans, highlighting a somewhat more favorable environment for media compared to neighboring countries. Nonetheless, ongoing concerns about self-censorship and government interference continue to influence the operational space for journalists.

Singapore

In 2013, Singapore ranked 146 out of 176 countries in the Press Freedom Index, with an index score of 56.57 points. This ranking reflects a challenging environment for press freedoms, characterized by strict regulations and government control over media outlets.

The relatively low score can be attributed to several factors, including the government's stringent laws that limit press freedom, such as the Newspaper and Printing Presses Act and licensing requirements for online news platforms. These regulations have led to a media landscape where self-censorship is common, and dissenting voices often face significant barriers.

Despite its advanced economy and high levels of internet penetration, Singapore's media environment remains tightly regulated. This situation contrasts with many other nations in the region, indicating a unique approach to governance and information dissemination that prioritizes stability and control over liberalization.

Data Source

Reporters Without Borders (RSF)

Reporters Without Borders (RWB) is an international non-profit organisation governed by principles of democratic governance. We are neither a trade union nor a representative of media companies. Founded in 1985 in Montpellier by four journalists, RSF is at the forefront of the defence and promotion of freedom of information. Recognised as a public interest organisation in France since 1995, RSF has consultative status with the United Nations, UNESCO, the Council of Europe and the International Organization of Francophonie (OIF).

Visit Data Source

Historical Data by Year

Explore Press Freedom Index Score data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.

2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002

More Communications Facts

Internet Usage Rate by Country (% of Population)

Discover the internet usage rate by country, showcasing the percentage of the population online. This statistic highlights digital accessibility and connectivity trends globally, emphasizing the importance of internet access in today's world.

View data

Browse All Communications

Explore more facts and statistics in this category

All Categories

Discover more categories with comprehensive global data