Press Freedom Index Score 2005
The Press Freedom Index Score measures the level of media freedom in countries worldwide. A higher score indicates stronger press independence, essential for democracy and transparency. Understanding these scores helps highlight the importance of free expression in society.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 |  North Korea | 109 points |
2 |  Eritrea | 99.75 points |
3 |  Turkmenistan | 93.5 points |
4 |  Iran | 89.17 points |
5 |  Myanmar | 88.83 points |
6 |  Libya | 88.75 points |
7 |  Cuba | 87 points |
8 |  Nepal | 86.75 points |
9 |  China | 83 points |
10 |  Vietnam | 73.25 points |
11 |  Iraq | 67 points |
12 |  Laos | 66.5 points |
13 |  Uzbekistan | 66.5 points |
14 |  Saudi Arabia | 66 points |
15 |  Zimbabwe | 64.25 points |
16 |  Belarus | 61.33 points |
17 |  Bangladesh | 61.25 points |
18 |  Pakistan | 60.75 points |
19 |  Somalia | 59 points |
20 |  Maldives | 58.5 points |
21 |  Tunisia | 57.5 points |
22 |  Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 57.33 points |
23 |  Syrian Arab Republic | 55 points |
24 |  Côte d'Ivoire | 52.25 points |
25 |  Egypt | 52 points |
26 |  Bhutan | 51.5 points |
27 |  Azerbaijan | 51 points |
28 |  Singapore | 50.67 points |
29 |  Philippines | 50 points |
30 |  Russia | 48.67 points |
31 |  Yemen | 46.25 points |
32 |  Mexico | 45.5 points |
33 |  Equatorial Guinea | 44 points |
34 |  Sudan | 44 points |
35 |  State of Palestine | 42.5 points |
36 |  Ethiopia | 42 points |
37 |  Gambia | 41 points |
38 |  Algeria | 40.33 points |
39 |  Colombia | 40.17 points |
40 |  Mauritania | 40 points |
41 |  Sierra Leone | 39.5 points |
42 |  Afghanistan | 39.17 points |
43 |  Bahrain | 38.75 points |
44 |  Nigeria | 38.75 points |
45 |  Rwanda | 38 points |
46 |  Djibouti | 37 points |
47 |  Kazakhstan | 36.17 points |
48 |  Morocco | 36.17 points |
49 |  Eswatini | 35 points |
50 |  Haiti | 33.5 points |
51 |  Peru | 33.33 points |
52 |  Sri Lanka | 33.25 points |
53 |  Malaysia | 33 points |
54 |  Tajikistan | 33 points |
55 |  Ukraine | 32.5 points |
56 |  Kyrgyzstan | 32 points |
57 |  Chad | 30 points |
58 |  Kenya | 30 points |
59 |  Lebanon | 28.25 points |
60 |  Thailand | 28 points |
61 |  India | 27 points |
62 |  Armenia | 26 points |
63 |  Gabon | 26 points |
64 |  Guinea | 26 points |
65 |  Indonesia | 26 points |
66 |  United Arab Emirates | 25.75 points |
67 |  Georgia | 25.17 points |
68 |  Turkey | 25 points |
69 |  Madagascar | 24.5 points |
70 |  Jordan | 24 points |
71 |  Togo | 23.75 points |
72 |  Burundi | 23 points |
73 |  Cambodia | 23 points |
74 |  Qatar | 23 points |
75 |  Venezuela | 23 points |
76 |  Zambia | 23 points |
77 |  Malawi | 22.75 points |
78 |  Comoros | 22 points |
79 |  Ecuador | 21.75 points |
80 |  Guatemala | 21.5 points |
81 |  Kuwait | 21.25 points |
82 |  Cameroon | 20.5 points |
83 |  Liberia | 20.5 points |
84 |  Central African Republic | 19.75 points |
85 |  Lesotho | 19.5 points |
86 |  Uganda | 19.25 points |
87 |  Burkina Faso | 19 points |
88 |  Senegal | 19 points |
89 |  Angola | 18 points |
90 |  Honduras | 18 points |
91 |  Republic of Moldova | 17.5 points |
92 |  Tanzania | 17.5 points |
93 |  Congo | 17 points |
94 |  Guinea-Bissau | 17 points |
95 |  Seychelles | 17 points |
96 |  Romania | 16.17 points |
97 |  Paraguay | 15.5 points |
98 |  Nicaragua | 15.25 points |
99 |  Ghana | 15 points |
100 |  Panama | 15 points |
101 |  Brazil | 14.5 points |
102 |  Tonga | 14.5 points |
103 |  Albania | 14.17 points |
104 |  Botswana | 14 points |
105 |  Fiji | 14 points |
106 |  Argentina | 13.67 points |
107 |  Timor-Leste | 13.5 points |
108 |  Niger | 13 points |
109 |  Croatia | 12.83 points |
110 |  Mongolia | 12.5 points |
111 |  Poland | 12.5 points |
112 |  Dominican Republic | 12.25 points |
113 |  Taiwan | 12.25 points |
114 |  Chile | 11.75 points |
115 |  Mozambique | 10.5 points |
116 |  Bulgaria | 10.25 points |
117 |  Israel | 10 points |
118 |  Uruguay | 9.75 points |
119 |  Bolivia | 9.67 points |
120 |  North Macedonia | 8.75 points |
121 |  Italy | 8.67 points |
122 |  Costa Rica | 8.5 points |
123 |  Spain | 8.33 points |
124 |  China, Hong Kong SAR | 8.25 points |
125 |  Japan | 8 points |
126 |  Mali | 8 points |
127 |  Jamaica | 7.5 points |
128 |  Mauritius | 7.5 points |
129 |  South Korea | 7.5 points |
130 |  Bosnia and Herzegovina | 7 points |
131 |  Australia | 6.5 points |
132 |  South Africa | 6.5 points |
133 |  France | 6.25 points |
134 |  Cabo Verde | 6 points |
135 |  El Salvador | 5.75 points |
136 |  Benin | 5.5 points |
137 |  Cyprus | 5.5 points |
138 |  Namibia | 5.5 points |
139 |  United Kingdom | 5.17 points |
140 |  Portugal | 4.83 points |
141 |  Canada | 4.5 points |
142 |  Lithuania | 4.5 points |
143 |  Belgium | 4 points |
144 |  Germany | 4 points |
145 |  Greece | 4 points |
146 |  Austria | 2.5 points |
147 |  Latvia | 2.5 points |
148 |  Hungary | 2 points |
149 |  New Zealand | 2 points |
150 |  Sweden | 2 points |
151 |  Trinidad and Tobago | 2 points |
152 |  Estonia | 1.5 points |
153 |  Czech Republic | 1 points |
154 |  Slovenia | 1 points |
155 |  Slovakia | 0.75 points |
156 |  Denmark | 0.5 points |
157 |  Finland | 0.5 points |
158 |  Iceland | 0.5 points |
159 |  Ireland | 0.5 points |
160 |  Netherlands | 0.5 points |
161 |  Norway | 0.5 points |
162 |  Switzerland | 0.5 points |
↑Top 10 Countries
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
↓Bottom 10 Countries
- #162Switzerland
- #161Norway
- #160Netherlands
- #159Ireland
- #158Iceland
- #157Finland
- #156Denmark
- #155Slovakia
- #154Slovenia
- #153Czech Republic
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
The Press Freedom Index Score for 2005 provides a critical snapshot of global media freedom, revealing significant disparities in press independence across different nations. This metric is vital in assessing the degree of free expression and transparency in societies worldwide, as a higher score typically indicates stronger press independence, which is essential for healthy democracies. The year 2005 painted a varied picture of press freedom, influenced by global political dynamics and regional trends.
The Global Press Landscape in 2005
In 2005, the Press Freedom Index covered 162 countries, shedding light on global media conditions. The average score was 27.34, with a median of 21.25, indicating varied levels of press freedom. Countries like Ireland, Iceland, and the Netherlands were exemplars of press independence with a score of 0.5, suggesting a robust framework supporting media operations and journalistic freedom. In stark contrast, North Korea stood at the bottom of the index with a score of 109, highlighting severe restrictions on media activities and an environment hostile to journalistic endeavors.
Regional Disparities in Press Freedom
Regional variations in press freedom were pronounced in 2005, reflecting political, economic, and cultural influences. European nations predominantly occupied the upper echelons of the index, with countries like Finland, Norway, and Denmark securing low scores synonymous with high press freedom. Meanwhile, countries in Asia and Africa like North Korea, Eritrea, and Turkmenistan exhibited the highest scores, indicative of stringent government control over media and limited freedom of expression. These disparities underscore the influence of governance styles and regional stability on media operations.
Notable Changes in Press Freedom Scores
Year-over-year changes revealed some significant shifts in press freedom scores. Libya recorded the most considerable increase with a rise of 23.75 points (36.5%), suggesting possible improvements in media conditions or changes in governmental policies towards press operations. Conversely, the United Arab Emirates saw the most drastic decline, with a decrease of 24.50 points (-48.8%), highlighting increasing governmental restrictions or deteriorating media conditions. Such fluctuations indicate that while some nations moved towards greater press freedom, others regressed, reflecting the volatile nature of global media freedom.
Influence of Government Policies
Government policies played a crucial role in shaping the Press Freedom Index in 2005. Countries with high scores, such as Iran and Myanmar, were often characterized by authoritarian regimes where media is heavily censored and controlled by the state. On the other hand, countries like Switzerland and Slovakia, with scores of 0.5 and 0.75, respectively, benefited from democratic governance that upholds press independence through legislative protections and a culture of transparency. These examples illustrate the significant impact of political systems and policies on media freedom across different regions.
Historical Context and Future Prospects
The Press Freedom Index of 2005 stands as a historical reflection of media landscapes at the time. However, it also serves as a foundation for understanding future trends in press freedom. The average change in the index was -1.72, indicating a slight overall decline in press freedom. As global political landscapes continue to evolve, monitoring these changes becomes crucial in predicting future prospects for press independence. The gradual increase or decrease in scores over the years can help identify trends and inform policy decisions aimed at promoting and protecting media freedom worldwide.
The 2005 Press Freedom Index Score is an essential tool for understanding the complexities of media freedom on a global scale. By analyzing these scores, we gain insights into the political, cultural, and economic factors influencing press operations and the broader implications for democracy and transparency. As we look to the future, maintaining a vigilant eye on these metrics will be crucial for ensuring that press freedom remains at the forefront of global democratic ideals.
Insights by country
Lesotho
In 2005, Lesotho was ranked 85th out of 162 countries in the Press Freedom Index, with a score of 19.5 points. This ranking reflects the country's challenges in maintaining a free and independent press, which is essential for democratic governance and accountability.
The relatively low score indicates significant restrictions on media freedom, often influenced by government interference, threats to journalists, and limited access to information. Such conditions hinder the ability of the press to operate without fear and can affect public discourse and civil liberties.
Factors contributing to this environment may include political instability, a history of authoritarian rule, and socio-economic challenges that place pressure on media outlets. Furthermore, the media landscape in Lesotho has been shaped by ongoing tensions between the government and opposition, impacting journalists' safety and editorial independence.
Switzerland
In 2005, Switzerland achieved a Press Freedom Index Score of 0.5 points, ranking 162nd out of 162 countries assessed. This score reflects an exceptional level of press freedom, as Switzerland is often regarded as a global benchmark for democratic governance and civil liberties.
The high ranking and favorable score can be attributed to Switzerland's robust legal framework that protects freedom of expression and a diverse media landscape that promotes independent journalism. The country is known for its commitment to democratic principles, which includes a strong respect for the rights of journalists and media outlets.
Despite this positive context, it is essential to consider that the Press Freedom Index is influenced by various factors, including the political environment, laws governing media operations, and societal attitudes towards dissent. Switzerland's long-standing tradition of neutrality and political stability further enhances its reputation as a safe haven for free press.
Sweden
In 2005, Sweden was ranked 150th out of 162 countries in the Press Freedom Index, with a score of 2 points. This ranking indicated significant concerns regarding the state of press freedom within the country during that year.
The low score was attributed to various factors, including government interference, legal constraints on journalists, and issues related to self-censorship among media professionals. While Sweden has a long-standing tradition of valuing freedom of expression, the political climate at the time was perceived to be challenging for journalists seeking to report freely.
Interestingly, despite this low score in 2005, Sweden has historically been known for its high standards of press freedom, often ranking among the top countries in subsequent years. This paradox highlights the dynamic nature of press freedom and the influence of political and social factors on media operations.
Tonga
Tonga was ranked 102nd out of 162 countries in the Press Freedom Index in 2005, reflecting a score of 14.5 points. This ranking indicates a relatively constrained environment for press freedom compared to other nations globally.
The score and rank suggest challenges in media independence and the ability of journalists to operate without censorship or intimidation. Factors contributing to this situation may include governmental influence over media outlets, restrictions on political expression, and a lack of legal protections for journalists.
In the broader context of the Pacific region, Tonga's press freedom score highlights ongoing debates about democracy and freedom of expression, with many Pacific Island nations facing similar challenges. Moreover, the situation has evolved since 2005, as various reforms and political changes have been implemented in subsequent years.
Malaysia
In 2005, Malaysia was ranked 53rd out of 162 countries in the Press Freedom Index, with a score of 33 points. This score indicates a moderate level of press freedom, characterized by significant restrictions on the media and limited freedom of expression.
The relatively low score can be attributed to a number of factors, including stringent laws governing the media, such as the Printing Presses and Publications Act, which requires licenses for publishing and allows the government to ban publications deemed undesirable. Additionally, the political landscape at the time was marked by a strong government presence in media ownership and a tendency to suppress dissenting voices.
Despite these challenges, Malaysia has a vibrant civil society and a range of online platforms that serve as alternative sources of information. This dynamic reflects the resilience of Malaysian journalists and the growing demand for independent news, even within a constrained environment.
Russia
In 2005, Russia achieved a Press Freedom Index Score of 48.67 points, ranking 30th out of 162 countries. This score indicates a moderate level of press freedom, reflecting the complex media landscape of the country during this period.
The index score was influenced by several factors, including government control over major media outlets, restrictive laws affecting journalists, and incidents of intimidation against those who challenged official narratives. The Russian government under President Vladimir Putin had begun implementing measures that limited press freedoms, marking a significant shift from the more liberal media environment of the 1990s.
Notably, the media landscape in Russia faced increasing challenges, with a rise in self-censorship among journalists and a decline in investigative reporting. These trends raised concerns among international observers regarding the state of democracy and freedom of expression in the country.
Sudan
In 2005, Sudan achieved a Press Freedom Index Score of 44 points, ranking 34th out of 162 countries. This score reflects a moderate level of press freedom in the country, indicating significant challenges faced by journalists and media organizations.
The relatively high ranking can be attributed to the presence of some independent media outlets and a degree of public discourse, despite the overarching governmental restrictions on freedom of expression. Factors contributing to this environment include ongoing conflicts, particularly in regions like Darfur, and government censorship aimed at controlling public narrative during times of political instability.
It is noteworthy that the Press Freedom Index is part of a broader context of human rights and civil liberties in Sudan, which have fluctuated greatly due to political upheaval and conflict. The media landscape has been historically characterized by government interference, leading to a complex relationship between the state and the press.
Somalia
In 2005, Somalia achieved a Press Freedom Index Score of 59 points, ranking 19th out of 162 countries. This score reflects a complex media landscape characterized by both significant challenges and notable achievements in press freedom amidst ongoing political instability.
The relatively high ranking can be attributed to the presence of independent media outlets operating in a difficult environment, where journalists often played a crucial role in reporting on local issues despite the risks involved. However, this environment was also marked by violence against journalists, censorship, and threats from various factions vying for power, which inhibited the full realization of press freedom.
Interestingly, Somalia's ranking in the Press Freedom Index during this period highlights the resilience of its media despite adversities, contrasting sharply with the country's overall socio-political challenges, including prolonged civil conflict and the absence of a stable central government.
Mali
Mali ranked 126 out of 162 countries in the Press Freedom Index for the year 2005, with a score of 8 points. This score indicates a challenging environment for press freedom, reflecting significant restrictions on media operations and freedom of expression within the country.
The low ranking can be attributed to various factors, including government censorship, harassment of journalists, and a lack of legal protections for the press. In the years leading up to 2005, Mali experienced political instability, which often led to a tightening of controls on media as the government sought to manage dissent.
Furthermore, despite Mali's historical reputation for a relatively vibrant press compared to some neighboring countries, the situation in 2005 highlighted ongoing struggles for journalists, including threats to their safety and freedom. Overall, the Press Freedom Index score serves as an important indicator of the challenges faced by media in Mali during this period.
Romania
In 2005, Romania held the 96th position out of 162 countries in the Press Freedom Index, with a score of 16.17 points. This ranking indicates a moderate level of press freedom, reflecting the ongoing challenges faced by journalists in the country during this period.
The relatively low score can be attributed to several factors, including issues related to government influence over media outlets, instances of intimidation against journalists, and the presence of economic pressures that affect editorial independence. Furthermore, the legacy of Romania's communist past continued to impact the media landscape, hindering the full establishment of a free and democratic press.
Despite these challenges, Romania experienced gradual improvements in media freedom leading up to its accession to the European Union in 2007, which encouraged greater transparency and accountability in governance. The country’s media environment has since evolved, with ongoing debates about the balance between press freedom and regulatory oversight.
Data Source
Reporters Without Borders (RSF)
Reporters Without Borders (RWB) is an international non-profit organisation governed by principles of democratic governance. We are neither a trade union nor a representative of media companies. Founded in 1985 in Montpellier by four journalists, RSF is at the forefront of the defence and promotion of freedom of information. Recognised as a public interest organisation in France since 1995, RSF has consultative status with the United Nations, UNESCO, the Council of Europe and the International Organization of Francophonie (OIF).
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Press Freedom Index Score data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Communications Facts
Internet Usage Rate by Country (% of Population)
Discover the internet usage rate by country, showcasing the percentage of the population online. This statistic highlights digital accessibility and connectivity trends globally, emphasizing the importance of internet access in today's world.
View dataBrowse All Communications
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data