Urban Population Annual Growth Rate 2008
Urban population annual growth rate measures the year-over-year percentage increase in a country's urban population.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Qatar | 16.876 % | |
2 | United Arab Emirates | 11.632 % | |
3 | Uganda | 9.276 % | |
4 | Equatorial Guinea | 9.233 % | |
5 | Bahrain | 7.971 % | |
6 | Burundi | 7.482 % | |
7 | Nepal | 7.149 % | |
8 | Ethiopia | 7.145 % | |
9 | Kenya | 6.289 % | |
10 | Kuwait | 5.566 % | |
11 | Timor-Leste | 5.543 % | |
12 | Mauritania | 5.521 % | |
13 | Tanzania | 5.401 % | |
14 | Mali | 5.346 % | |
15 | Singapore | 5.322 % | |
16 | Angola | 5.203 % | |
17 | South Sudan | 5.171 % | |
18 | Liberia | 5.12 % | |
19 | Kiribati | 5.014 % | |
20 | Zambia | 5.013 % | |
21 | Maldives | 4.94 % | |
22 | Turks and Caicos Islands | 4.866 % | |
23 | Afghanistan | 4.744 % | |
24 | British Virgin Islands | 4.727 % | |
25 | Lesotho | 4.635 % | |
26 | Somalia | 4.621 % | |
27 | Burkina Faso | 4.618 % | |
28 | Sao Tome and Principe | 4.586 % | |
29 | Nigeria | 4.426 % | |
30 | Togo | 4.424 % | |
31 | Yemen | 4.406 % | |
32 | Solomon Islands | 4.392 % | |
33 | Saudi Arabia | 4.3 % | |
34 | Benin | 4.265 % | |
35 | Gambia | 4.24 % | |
36 | Namibia | 4.121 % | |
37 | Syrian Arab Republic | 4.086 % | |
38 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 4.052 % | |
39 | Madagascar | 3.959 % | |
40 | Vanuatu | 3.908 % | |
41 | Ghana | 3.878 % | |
42 | Gabon | 3.873 % | |
43 | Laos | 3.822 % | |
44 | Vietnam | 3.812 % | |
45 | China, Macao SAR | 3.731 % | |
46 | Botswana | 3.721 % | |
47 | Niger | 3.668 % | |
48 | Philippines | 3.657 % | |
49 | Thailand | 3.654 % | |
50 | Cameroon | 3.63 % | |
51 | Congo | 3.588 % | |
52 | Tuvalu | 3.584 % | |
53 | Chad | 3.521 % | |
54 | Honduras | 3.515 % | |
55 | Sierra Leone | 3.453 % | |
56 | Mongolia | 3.414 % | |
57 | Malawi | 3.402 % | |
58 | Guatemala | 3.379 % | |
59 | Guinea-Bissau | 3.363 % | |
60 | State of Palestine | 3.357 % | |
61 | Jordan | 3.349 % | |
62 | Costa Rica | 3.299 % | |
63 | Sri Lanka | 3.291 % | |
64 | Dominican Republic | 3.28 % | |
65 | Guinea | 3.274 % | |
66 | Haiti | 3.241 % | |
67 | Malaysia | 3.222 % | |
68 | Côte d'Ivoire | 3.21 % | |
69 | Pakistan | 3.194 % | |
70 | Oman | 3.176 % | |
71 | Senegal | 3.144 % | |
72 | Mozambique | 3.131 % | |
73 | Turkey | 3.047 % | |
74 | Papua New Guinea | 2.999 % | |
75 | Bhutan | 2.946 % | |
76 | Algeria | 2.936 % | |
77 | Eritrea | 2.934 % | |
78 | Cayman Islands | 2.904 % | |
79 | China | 2.882 % | |
80 | Cambodia | 2.818 % | |
81 | Indonesia | 2.797 % | |
82 | Bangladesh | 2.713 % | |
83 | India | 2.65 % | |
84 | Rwanda | 2.646 % | |
85 | Iceland | 2.618 % | |
86 | Sudan | 2.608 % | |
87 | Comoros | 2.587 % | |
88 | Azerbaijan | 2.544 % | |
89 | Ireland | 2.526 % | |
90 | Central African Republic | 2.428 % | |
91 | Morocco | 2.386 % | |
92 | Bolivia | 2.359 % | |
93 | Cabo Verde | 2.354 % | |
94 | Brunei Darussalam | 2.329 % | |
95 | New Caledonia | 2.298 % | |
96 | Luxembourg | 2.269 % | |
97 | Iraq | 2.225 % | |
98 | French Polynesia | 2.173 % | |
99 | Australia | 2.153 % | |
100 | Seychelles | 2.143 % | |
101 | Panama | 2.14 % | |
102 | Libya | 2.114 % | |
103 | South Africa | 2.105 % | |
104 | Belize | 2.051 % | |
105 | Iran | 2.044 % | |
106 | San Marino | 2.029 % | |
107 | Tajikistan | 1.977 % | |
108 | Turkmenistan | 1.969 % | |
109 | Ecuador | 1.947 % | |
110 | Spain | 1.94 % | |
111 | Djibouti | 1.873 % | |
112 | Lebanon | 1.863 % | |
113 | Egypt | 1.839 % | |
114 | Andorra | 1.835 % | |
115 | Israel | 1.794 % | |
116 | Nicaragua | 1.756 % | |
117 | Saint Martin (French part) | 1.742 % | |
118 | Uzbekistan | 1.7 % | |
119 | El Salvador | 1.699 % | |
120 | Norway | 1.688 % | |
121 | Albania | 1.657 % | |
122 | Isle of Man | 1.535 % | |
123 | Fiji | 1.5 % | |
124 | Bahamas | 1.495 % | |
125 | Venezuela | 1.489 % | |
126 | Mexico | 1.466 % | |
127 | Hungary | 1.444 % | |
128 | Cyprus | 1.408 % | |
129 | Colombia | 1.394 % | |
130 | Tunisia | 1.368 % | |
131 | Canada | 1.357 % | |
132 | Gibraltar | 1.347 % | |
133 | Peru | 1.333 % | |
134 | Switzerland | 1.298 % | |
135 | Brazil | 1.275 % | |
136 | Curaçao | 1.274 % | |
137 | Zimbabwe | 1.246 % | |
138 | Argentina | 1.203 % | |
139 | Japan | 1.2 % | |
140 | Paraguay | 1.158 % | |
141 | Portugal | 1.148 % | |
142 | Belgium | 1.124 % | |
143 | United States | 1.078 % | |
144 | Myanmar | 1.074 % | |
145 | Sint Maarten (Dutch part) | 1.074 % | |
146 | Suriname | 1.068 % | |
147 | Chile | 1.036 % | |
148 | Sweden | 0.969 % | |
149 | Italy | 0.95 % | |
150 | Kyrgyzstan | 0.935 % | |
151 | United Kingdom | 0.919 % | |
152 | South Korea | 0.91 % | |
153 | Finland | 0.862 % | |
154 | Greece | 0.849 % | |
155 | Kazakhstan | 0.841 % | |
156 | New Zealand | 0.832 % | |
157 | Faroe Islands | 0.828 % | |
158 | Eswatini | 0.807 % | |
159 | Jamaica | 0.805 % | |
160 | Marshall Islands | 0.787 % | |
161 | Malta | 0.776 % | |
162 | Denmark | 0.77 % | |
163 | Czech Republic | 0.753 % | |
164 | Uruguay | 0.749 % | |
165 | Montenegro | 0.708 % | |
166 | North Korea | 0.652 % | |
167 | Netherlands | 0.63 % | |
168 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 0.598 % | |
169 | Tonga | 0.555 % | |
170 | Dominica | 0.539 % | |
171 | Georgia | 0.535 % | |
172 | Aruba | 0.508 % | |
173 | Bermuda | 0.459 % | |
174 | France | 0.442 % | |
175 | Liechtenstein | 0.352 % | |
176 | Austria | 0.347 % | |
177 | Guam | 0.321 % | |
178 | Grenada | 0.317 % | |
179 | Belarus | 0.284 % | |
180 | Cuba | 0.21 % | |
181 | United States Virgin Islands | 0.194 % | |
182 | Serbia | 0.148 % | |
183 | Greenland | 0.1 % | |
184 | Russia | 0.088 % | |
185 | Barbados | 0.003 % | |
186 | Monaco | -0.003 % | |
187 | Mauritius | -0.054 % | |
188 | Slovenia | -0.058 % | |
189 | Trinidad and Tobago | -0.067 % | |
190 | Nauru | -0.11 % | |
191 | Croatia | -0.111 % | |
192 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | -0.149 % | |
193 | Germany | -0.158 % | |
194 | Estonia | -0.18 % | |
195 | Kosovo | -0.19 % | |
196 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | -0.19 % | |
197 | Poland | -0.231 % | |
198 | Slovakia | -0.232 % | |
199 | Ukraine | -0.277 % | |
200 | Republic of Moldova | -0.344 % | |
201 | Bulgaria | -0.394 % | |
202 | North Macedonia | -0.495 % | |
203 | Puerto Rico | -0.658 % | |
204 | Samoa | -0.699 % | |
205 | Palau | -0.717 % | |
206 | Armenia | -0.72 % | |
207 | American Samoa | -0.856 % | |
208 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | -0.905 % | |
209 | Antigua and Barbuda | -0.945 % | |
210 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | -0.951 % | |
211 | Lithuania | -0.977 % | |
212 | Latvia | -1.071 % | |
213 | Romania | -1.326 % | |
214 | Guyana | -1.367 % | |
215 | Northern Mariana Islands | -3.005 % | |
216 | Saint Lucia | -4.814 % |
- #1
Qatar
- #2
United Arab Emirates
- #3
Uganda
- #4
Equatorial Guinea
- #5
Bahrain
- #6
Burundi
- #7
Nepal
- #8
Ethiopia
- #9
Kenya
- #10
Kuwait
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #216
Saint Lucia
- #215
Northern Mariana Islands
- #214
Guyana
- #213
Romania
- #212
Latvia
- #211
Lithuania
- #210
Bosnia and Herzegovina
- #209
Antigua and Barbuda
- #208
Micronesia (Fed. States of)
- #207
American Samoa
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2008, Qatar led the world with the highest Urban Population Annual Growth Rate at 16.88%, while the global range spanned from -0.34% to 16.88%. The average growth rate across all countries was 2.53%, providing a benchmark for evaluating urbanization trends worldwide.
Economic Growth and Urban Expansion
The significant urban population growth in countries like Qatar and the United Arab Emirates can largely be attributed to rapid economic development driven by the oil and gas sectors. In 2008, Qatar's urban growth rate of 16.88% was the highest globally, reflecting massive investments in urban infrastructure and an influx of foreign workers. Similarly, the UAE experienced an urban growth rate of 11.63%, supported by its strategic positioning as a global business hub and a tourism destination.
In Africa, countries such as Uganda and Equatorial Guinea also exhibited high urban growth rates of 9.28% and 9.23%, respectively. These figures highlight ongoing urbanization trends driven by rural-to-urban migration as populations seek better economic opportunities and improved living conditions in urban centers.
Negative Growth and Urban Challenges
Conversely, countries like the Republic of Moldova and Ukraine faced negative urban population growth rates, at -0.34% and -0.28%, respectively. These declines can be attributed to economic stagnation and emigration, where populations leave urban areas in search of better prospects abroad. Similarly, Germany and Croatia saw slight declines in urban populations, with growth rates of -0.16% and -0.11%, indicating demographic challenges such as aging populations and low birth rates.
Countries experiencing negative growth often face challenges such as infrastructure underutilization and economic decline, which can exacerbate social issues within urban areas.
Year-over-Year Trends and Notable Changes
Analyzing year-over-year changes reveals significant shifts in urban growth dynamics. Ethiopia saw a remarkable increase in its urban growth rate by 4.96%, representing a 226.7% rise, likely driven by government policies promoting industrialization and urban development. Similarly, the Seychelles experienced an urban growth increase of 1.75%, a dramatic 451.1% surge, as part of broader economic diversification efforts.
On the other hand, Qatar experienced the most considerable decrease, with a drop of 5.11% in its growth rate, representing a 23.3% decline. This reduction could be linked to stabilization following prior rapid expansion and adjustments in labor market policies. Jordan and the Syrian Arab Republic also saw significant decreases of 3.42% and 2.49%, respectively, reflecting regional instability and its impact on urbanization.
Policy Implications and Future Outlook
The wide variation in urban population growth rates across countries in 2008 underscores the importance of tailored policy approaches to urban development. High-growth countries like Qatar and Uganda must focus on sustainable urban planning to accommodate rapid population increases, while countries with declining urban populations, such as Ukraine and Moldova, need strategies to stimulate economic growth and reverse demographic trends.
For nations experiencing significant year-over-year changes, such as Ethiopia and the Seychelles, maintaining momentum through continued investment in infrastructure and economic diversification will be crucial. As global urbanization trends continue to evolve, understanding the unique drivers behind these growth rates will be essential for policymakers aiming to foster resilient and vibrant urban environments.
Frequently Asked Questions About Urban Population Annual Growth Rate in 2008
Which country had the highest urban population annual growth rate in 2008?
Qatar had the highest urban population annual growth rate in 2008, with a rate of 16.88%.
Which country had the lowest urban population annual growth rate in 2008?
Saint Lucia had the lowest urban population annual growth rate in 2008, with a rate of -4.81%.
What was the average urban population annual growth rate across all countries in 2008?
The average urban population annual growth rate across all countries in 2008 was 2.25%.
What was the median urban population annual growth rate in 2008?
The median urban population annual growth rate in 2008 was 1.96%.
Which countries were in the top 3 for urban population annual growth rate in 2008?
The top 3 countries for urban population annual growth rate in 2008 were Qatar (16.88%), United Arab Emirates (11.63%), and Uganda (9.28%).
How many countries were included in the dataset for urban population annual growth rate in 2008?
The dataset for urban population annual growth rate in 2008 included 216 countries.
Insights by country
Sri Lanka
Sri Lanka ranked #63 globally in 2008 with an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of 3.29121764712928 %. This growth rate is notably higher than the global average, reflecting a trend seen in many developing nations. Key drivers of this urbanization include economic development, increased employment opportunities in cities, and a shift in population due to rural-to-urban migration.
Pakistan
In 2008, Pakistan's Urban Population Annual Growth Rate was 3.19446559751646 %, ranking it #69 out of 216 countries. This growth rate is notable, particularly when compared to regional neighbors, reflecting rapid urbanization trends in South Asia. Key drivers include ongoing rural-to-urban migration spurred by economic opportunities in cities and a young, growing population seeking better living conditions.
Mexico
In 2008, Mexico had an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of 1.46579008481135 %, ranking #126 out of 216 countries. This growth rate is lower than the regional average for Latin America, reflecting a trend of urbanization that has slowed compared to previous decades. Key drivers for this statistic include economic challenges, such as limited job opportunities in urban areas, and demographic shifts, including a young population increasingly migrating to cities for better prospects.
Micronesia (Fed. States of)
In 2008, Micronesia (Fed. States of) had an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of -0.905168884241544 %, ranking #208 out of 216 countries. This decline contrasts sharply with many neighboring Pacific nations that experience urban growth due to migration and economic development. The negative growth can be attributed to a combination of limited economic opportunities, high emigration rates, and a relatively small population base, which collectively hinder urbanization efforts.
Cuba
Cuba's Urban Population Annual Growth Rate in 2008 was 0.209856917085505 %, ranking it #180 out of 216 countries. This figure is notably lower than many Caribbean neighbors, reflecting a broader trend of urbanization challenges in the region. Contributing factors include Cuba's economic restrictions and a stable but aging population, which limit migration to urban areas and affect demographic shifts.
Brazil
In 2008, Brazil had an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of 1.2751176413848 %, ranking #135 out of 216 countries. This growth rate is below the global average, indicating slower urbanization compared to many developing nations. Key drivers of this rate include Brazil's diverse economic landscape and significant internal migration patterns, as people move from rural areas to urban centers in search of better opportunities.
State of Palestine
In 2008, the State of Palestine had an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of 3.35705331320282 %, ranking #60 out of 216 countries. This growth rate is notably higher than many regional neighbors, indicating a significant urbanization trend. Factors driving this growth include a youthful population and ongoing migration to urban areas in search of better economic opportunities amid challenging living conditions.
South Sudan
In 2008, South Sudan achieved a global rank of #17 with an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of 5.17057314838136 %. This growth rate is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a rapid urbanization trend. Key drivers include the ongoing conflict and instability, which have led to increased migration towards urban centers in search of safety and economic opportunities.
Australia
In 2008, Australia had an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of 2.15343266105649 %, ranking #99 out of 216 countries. This growth rate reflects a trend seen in many developed nations, though it is notably higher than that of neighboring New Zealand, which has experienced slower urbanization. Key drivers of this growth in Australia include robust economic opportunities in urban centers and a continuous influx of immigrants seeking better living conditions and job prospects.
Romania
In 2008, Romania ranked #213 globally with an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of -1.32550009721903 %. This decline contrasts sharply with many neighboring countries in Eastern Europe, where urbanization rates were generally positive during this period. Key drivers of Romania's negative growth included economic challenges following the transition from communism, leading to population stagnation and emigration, particularly among younger demographics seeking better opportunities abroad.
Data Source
Urban population growth (annual %) - World Bank Open Data
The World Bank Open Data provides comprehensive datasets on various aspects of global development, including urban population growth rates. The "Urban population growth (annual %)" indicator offers country-level statistics reflecting the annual percentage change in the urban population, based on the total population.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Urban Population Annual Growth Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More People and Society Facts
Currently married (Percent)
The percentage of currently married individuals by country highlights societal trends in family structure and relationships. Understanding these statistics can provide insights into cultural norms and demographic shifts, influencing policies and social programs.
View dataBrowse All People and Society
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data