Urban Population Annual Growth Rate 2004
Urban population annual growth rate measures the year-over-year percentage increase in a country's urban population.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Kenya | 10.666 % | |
2 | Nepal | 10.227 % | |
3 | Bahrain | 8.608 % | |
4 | Equatorial Guinea | 8.519 % | |
5 | Uganda | 7.136 % | |
6 | Burkina Faso | 6.849 % | |
7 | Burundi | 6.483 % | |
8 | United Arab Emirates | 6.257 % | |
9 | Andorra | 6.212 % | |
10 | Maldives | 6.202 % | |
11 | San Marino | 5.865 % | |
12 | Turks and Caicos Islands | 5.793 % | |
13 | South Sudan | 5.516 % | |
14 | Angola | 5.502 % | |
15 | Mali | 5.201 % | |
16 | Somalia | 5.096 % | |
17 | Tanzania | 5.079 % | |
18 | Laos | 5.074 % | |
19 | Sao Tome and Principe | 5.062 % | |
20 | Saudi Arabia | 4.855 % | |
21 | Afghanistan | 4.817 % | |
22 | State of Palestine | 4.739 % | |
23 | Thailand | 4.659 % | |
24 | Eritrea | 4.638 % | |
25 | Nigeria | 4.634 % | |
26 | Chad | 4.533 % | |
27 | Gambia | 4.505 % | |
28 | Yemen | 4.431 % | |
29 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 4.4 % | |
30 | Ethiopia | 4.367 % | |
31 | British Virgin Islands | 4.323 % | |
32 | Zambia | 4.319 % | |
33 | Bhutan | 4.198 % | |
34 | Ghana | 4.162 % | |
35 | Congo | 4.161 % | |
36 | Benin | 4.161 % | |
37 | Solomon Islands | 4.152 % | |
38 | Sierra Leone | 4.15 % | |
39 | Namibia | 4.1 % | |
40 | Mauritania | 4.088 % | |
41 | Madagascar | 4.031 % | |
42 | Qatar | 3.998 % | |
43 | Malaysia | 3.821 % | |
44 | Botswana | 3.801 % | |
45 | Guatemala | 3.799 % | |
46 | Togo | 3.734 % | |
47 | Honduras | 3.729 % | |
48 | Gabon | 3.697 % | |
49 | Cameroon | 3.686 % | |
50 | Dominican Republic | 3.623 % | |
51 | Vanuatu | 3.615 % | |
52 | Niger | 3.598 % | |
53 | China | 3.583 % | |
54 | Mongolia | 3.502 % | |
55 | Costa Rica | 3.386 % | |
56 | Côte d'Ivoire | 3.343 % | |
57 | Vietnam | 3.339 % | |
58 | Palau | 3.328 % | |
59 | Haiti | 3.314 % | |
60 | Syrian Arab Republic | 3.217 % | |
61 | Bangladesh | 3.205 % | |
62 | Cayman Islands | 3.177 % | |
63 | Tuvalu | 3.121 % | |
64 | Iran | 3.113 % | |
65 | Guinea-Bissau | 3.099 % | |
66 | Iraq | 3.098 % | |
67 | Malawi | 3.096 % | |
68 | Indonesia | 3.086 % | |
69 | Philippines | 3.07 % | |
70 | Papua New Guinea | 3.068 % | |
71 | Guinea | 3.063 % | |
72 | Timor-Leste | 3.06 % | |
73 | Pakistan | 2.995 % | |
74 | Senegal | 2.987 % | |
75 | India | 2.775 % | |
76 | Mozambique | 2.768 % | |
77 | Rwanda | 2.686 % | |
78 | Algeria | 2.611 % | |
79 | Cabo Verde | 2.559 % | |
80 | Turkey | 2.493 % | |
81 | New Caledonia | 2.474 % | |
82 | China, Macao SAR | 2.471 % | |
83 | Brunei Darussalam | 2.466 % | |
84 | Panama | 2.451 % | |
85 | Uzbekistan | 2.449 % | |
86 | Lesotho | 2.447 % | |
87 | Jordan | 2.428 % | |
88 | Bolivia | 2.414 % | |
89 | Belize | 2.407 % | |
90 | Kuwait | 2.405 % | |
91 | Japan | 2.372 % | |
92 | Saint Martin (French part) | 2.367 % | |
93 | Central African Republic | 2.365 % | |
94 | Ireland | 2.307 % | |
95 | Libya | 2.26 % | |
96 | Sudan | 2.244 % | |
97 | South Africa | 2.242 % | |
98 | French Polynesia | 2.198 % | |
99 | Egypt | 2.162 % | |
100 | Liberia | 2.15 % | |
101 | Ecuador | 2.143 % | |
102 | Spain | 2.045 % | |
103 | Kiribati | 2.039 % | |
104 | Morocco | 2.013 % | |
105 | Turkmenistan | 1.999 % | |
106 | Aruba | 1.967 % | |
107 | Cambodia | 1.966 % | |
108 | Tajikistan | 1.961 % | |
109 | Comoros | 1.949 % | |
110 | Azerbaijan | 1.947 % | |
111 | Sri Lanka | 1.944 % | |
112 | Luxembourg | 1.875 % | |
113 | Israel | 1.839 % | |
114 | Colombia | 1.831 % | |
115 | Lebanon | 1.799 % | |
116 | Oman | 1.791 % | |
117 | Venezuela | 1.785 % | |
118 | Curaçao | 1.753 % | |
119 | Mexico | 1.734 % | |
120 | Albania | 1.715 % | |
121 | Portugal | 1.696 % | |
122 | Fiji | 1.641 % | |
123 | Cyprus | 1.636 % | |
124 | El Salvador | 1.602 % | |
125 | Peru | 1.548 % | |
126 | Gibraltar | 1.548 % | |
127 | New Zealand | 1.537 % | |
128 | Brazil | 1.527 % | |
129 | Netherlands | 1.509 % | |
130 | Suriname | 1.477 % | |
131 | Paraguay | 1.476 % | |
132 | Bahamas | 1.465 % | |
133 | Myanmar | 1.457 % | |
134 | Nicaragua | 1.448 % | |
135 | Tunisia | 1.431 % | |
136 | Canada | 1.311 % | |
137 | Faroe Islands | 1.254 % | |
138 | Singapore | 1.252 % | |
139 | Argentina | 1.222 % | |
140 | Kyrgyzstan | 1.202 % | |
141 | United States | 1.199 % | |
142 | Australia | 1.197 % | |
143 | Zimbabwe | 1.17 % | |
144 | Sint Maarten (Dutch part) | 1.152 % | |
145 | Chile | 1.072 % | |
146 | Marshall Islands | 1.058 % | |
147 | Montenegro | 1.003 % | |
148 | Iceland | 1.002 % | |
149 | Djibouti | 1.001 % | |
150 | Norway | 0.989 % | |
151 | Jamaica | 0.981 % | |
152 | South Korea | 0.887 % | |
153 | Italy | 0.859 % | |
154 | Belgium | 0.799 % | |
155 | North Korea | 0.796 % | |
156 | Greece | 0.783 % | |
157 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 0.78 % | |
158 | Malta | 0.762 % | |
159 | France | 0.76 % | |
160 | Switzerland | 0.72 % | |
161 | United Kingdom | 0.705 % | |
162 | Tonga | 0.69 % | |
163 | Austria | 0.664 % | |
164 | Finland | 0.634 % | |
165 | Denmark | 0.601 % | |
166 | Liechtenstein | 0.576 % | |
167 | Guam | 0.546 % | |
168 | Dominica | 0.538 % | |
169 | Isle of Man | 0.533 % | |
170 | Serbia | 0.53 % | |
171 | Greenland | 0.519 % | |
172 | Sweden | 0.478 % | |
173 | Grenada | 0.398 % | |
174 | Cuba | 0.333 % | |
175 | Bermuda | 0.271 % | |
176 | Uruguay | 0.251 % | |
177 | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.232 % | |
178 | United States Virgin Islands | 0.209 % | |
179 | Mauritius | 0.178 % | |
180 | Kazakhstan | 0.121 % | |
181 | Hungary | 0.052 % | |
182 | Eswatini | 0.051 % | |
183 | Nauru | 0.01 % | |
184 | Germany | 0 % | |
185 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | -0.016 % | |
186 | Slovenia | -0.021 % | |
187 | Belarus | -0.044 % | |
188 | Czech Republic | -0.059 % | |
189 | Croatia | -0.061 % | |
190 | Puerto Rico | -0.076 % | |
191 | Kosovo | -0.119 % | |
192 | Barbados | -0.167 % | |
193 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | -0.17 % | |
194 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | -0.175 % | |
195 | Poland | -0.176 % | |
196 | Monaco | -0.207 % | |
197 | Georgia | -0.234 % | |
198 | Slovakia | -0.297 % | |
199 | North Macedonia | -0.319 % | |
200 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | -0.32 % | |
201 | Romania | -0.352 % | |
202 | Ukraine | -0.434 % | |
203 | American Samoa | -0.52 % | |
204 | Russia | -0.538 % | |
205 | Estonia | -0.549 % | |
206 | Bulgaria | -0.557 % | |
207 | Seychelles | -0.561 % | |
208 | Republic of Moldova | -0.623 % | |
209 | Armenia | -0.661 % | |
210 | Samoa | -0.726 % | |
211 | Guyana | -0.946 % | |
212 | Latvia | -1.134 % | |
213 | Antigua and Barbuda | -1.233 % | |
214 | Lithuania | -1.359 % | |
215 | Northern Mariana Islands | -2.206 % | |
216 | Saint Lucia | -3.813 % |
- #1
Kenya
- #2
Nepal
- #3
Bahrain
- #4
Equatorial Guinea
- #5
Uganda
- #6
Burkina Faso
- #7
Burundi
- #8
United Arab Emirates
- #9
Andorra
- #10
Maldives
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #216
Saint Lucia
- #215
Northern Mariana Islands
- #214
Lithuania
- #213
Antigua and Barbuda
- #212
Latvia
- #211
Guyana
- #210
Samoa
- #209
Armenia
- #208
Republic of Moldova
- #207
Seychelles
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2004, Kenya recorded the highest Urban Population Annual Growth Rate at 10.67%, while the global range spanned from -0.32% to 10.67% across 200 countries. The average global growth rate stood at 2.45%, providing a benchmark for urbanization trends worldwide.
Economic and Demographic Drivers of Urban Growth
The significant urban population growth in countries like Kenya and Nepal, with rates of 10.67% and 10.23% respectively, can largely be attributed to economic and demographic factors. Kenya's rapid urbanization is driven by rural-to-urban migration as individuals seek better economic opportunities in cities. Similarly, Bahrain and Equatorial Guinea, with growth rates of 8.61% and 8.52%, respectively, demonstrate how economic diversification and investment in urban infrastructure can attract populations to urban areas. These countries have seen investments in sectors such as oil, finance, and tourism, which bolster urban job markets.
Urbanization Challenges and Opportunities
Countries with high urban growth rates often face challenges related to infrastructure, housing, and services. For instance, Uganda and Burkina Faso, with growth rates of 7.14% and 6.85%, respectively, are experiencing strains on existing urban infrastructure due to rapid population increases. However, this growth also presents opportunities for economic development if managed efficiently. The rise in urban populations can lead to a more dynamic labor force and increased consumer markets, which are critical for economic growth.
Countries with Declining Urban Populations
On the opposite end, Micronesia (Fed. States of) and North Macedonia witnessed negative growth rates of -0.32% and -0.32%, respectively. These declines may be attributed to factors such as emigration, economic stagnation, or lack of investment in urban areas, leading to reduced urban attractiveness. Countries like Slovakia and Georgia, with rates of -0.30% and -0.23%, respectively, highlight the challenges of maintaining urban growth in the face of economic and demographic shifts.
Year-over-Year Changes in Urban Growth
Analyzing year-over-year changes, San Marino experienced the most significant increase in urban population growth, soaring by 4.54%, a 342.0% increase from the previous year. This spike can be linked to policy changes or increased economic activity attracting more residents to urban areas. In contrast, Timor-Leste saw the largest decrease, with a -2.78% change, representing a -47.6% decline. Such decreases may be due to instability or economic downturns discouraging urban residency.
The data from 2004 offers a compelling snapshot of global urbanization trends, highlighting both the challenges and opportunities faced by countries with varying urban growth rates. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for policymakers aiming to harness urban growth for sustainable development.
Frequently Asked Questions About Urban Population Annual Growth Rate in 2004
Which country had the highest urban population annual growth rate in 2004?
Kenya had the highest urban population annual growth rate in 2004, with a rate of 10.67%.
Which country had the lowest urban population annual growth rate in 2004?
Saint Lucia had the lowest urban population annual growth rate in 2004, with a rate of -3.81%.
What was the average urban population annual growth rate across all countries in 2004?
The average urban population annual growth rate across all countries in 2004 was 2.19%.
What was the median urban population annual growth rate in 2004?
The median urban population annual growth rate in 2004 was 1.96%.
How many countries are included in the dataset for urban population annual growth rate in 2004?
The dataset includes 216 countries for the urban population annual growth rate in 2004.
Which countries were in the top 3 for urban population annual growth rate in 2004?
The top 3 countries for urban population annual growth rate in 2004 were Kenya, Nepal, and Bahrain.
Insights by country
Afghanistan
In 2004, Afghanistan had an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of 4.81718391804813 %, ranking #21 out of 216 countries. This growth rate was significantly higher than the global average, reflecting the rapid urbanization occurring in the country amidst ongoing conflict and instability. Key drivers of this urban growth included the influx of internally displaced persons seeking safety and opportunities in urban centers, as well as the reconstruction efforts that attracted labor to cities.
Mauritania
In 2004, Mauritania had an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of 4.08792971020018 %, ranking #40 out of 216 countries. This growth rate is significantly higher than many neighboring countries, reflecting a trend towards urbanization in the region.
Key drivers include economic opportunities in urban areas, particularly in mining and fishing, along with internal migration from rural regions seeking better living conditions. Additionally, demographic factors such as a youthful population contribute to this rapid urban growth.
Northern Mariana Islands
In 2004, the Northern Mariana Islands had an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of -2.20649338632098 %, ranking #215 out of 216 countries. This negative growth rate is indicative of broader challenges faced by the territory, particularly when compared to the global trend of urbanization. Economic factors, including a decline in tourism and a shrinking workforce, have contributed to this demographic shift, as many residents have sought opportunities elsewhere.
Lithuania
In 2004, Lithuania had an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of -1.35907097475528 %, ranking #214 out of 216 countries. This decline is notably worse than many of its regional neighbors, reflecting broader trends in Eastern Europe during this period. Contributing factors include significant emigration and a declining birth rate, which have led to urban depopulation as residents seek better opportunities abroad.
Turkmenistan
In 2004, Turkmenistan had an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of 1.99914431612437 %, ranking #105 out of 216 countries. This growth rate is notable when compared to many neighboring countries in Central Asia, which have faced more significant urbanization challenges. The relatively stable growth can be attributed to Turkmenistan's ongoing economic development and government policies aimed at urban infrastructure improvements, which encourage migration from rural areas to cities.
Burkina Faso
In 2004, Burkina Faso ranked #6 globally with an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of 6.84884950664997 %. This growth rate is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting a rapid urbanization trend in the country. Key drivers include a young population migrating to cities for better economic opportunities and the expansion of urban infrastructure to accommodate this influx.
Sudan
In 2004, Sudan had an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of 2.24353215983513 %, ranking #96 out of 216 countries. This growth rate is indicative of urbanization trends in the region, although it is lower than the growth rates of several neighboring countries experiencing rapid urban expansion. Key drivers of this statistic include ongoing internal conflicts and economic challenges that have influenced migration patterns, as well as a youthful population seeking better opportunities in urban areas.
Saint Kitts and Nevis
In 2004, Saint Kitts and Nevis had an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of -0.174578705455626 %, ranking #194 out of 216 countries. This decline contrasts sharply with many Caribbean nations that experience urbanization due to tourism and economic development. The negative growth rate may be attributed to limited economic opportunities and a small population base, leading to out-migration as residents seek better prospects abroad.
Gibraltar
In 2004, Gibraltar had an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of 1.54769798714191 %, ranking #126 out of 216 countries. This growth rate is relatively modest compared to the global average, indicating unique demographic trends in this small territory. The increase can be attributed to Gibraltar's status as a financial and tourism hub, which attracts a steady influx of residents seeking economic opportunities.
Faroe Islands
In 2004, the Faroe Islands recorded an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of 1.25413240051664 %, ranking #137 out of 216 countries. This growth rate is modest compared to global trends, where urbanization is typically accelerating more rapidly in many regions. The relatively stable growth in the Faroe Islands can be attributed to its small population size and the limited urban infrastructure, which influences migration patterns and urban development.
Data Source
Urban population growth (annual %) - World Bank Open Data
The World Bank Open Data provides comprehensive datasets on various aspects of global development, including urban population growth rates. The "Urban population growth (annual %)" indicator offers country-level statistics reflecting the annual percentage change in the urban population, based on the total population.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Urban Population Annual Growth Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More People and Society Facts
Currently married (Percent)
The percentage of currently married individuals by country highlights societal trends in family structure and relationships. Understanding these statistics can provide insights into cultural norms and demographic shifts, influencing policies and social programs.
View dataBrowse All People and Society
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data