Urban Population Annual Growth Rate 2005
Urban population annual growth rate measures the year-over-year percentage increase in a country's urban population.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Kenya | 10.113 % | |
2 | Nepal | 10.068 % | |
3 | Bahrain | 9.053 % | |
4 | Equatorial Guinea | 8.386 % | |
5 | Uganda | 7.905 % | |
6 | Qatar | 6.779 % | |
7 | Burundi | 6.61 % | |
8 | Burkina Faso | 6.278 % | |
9 | United Arab Emirates | 6.091 % | |
10 | Turks and Caicos Islands | 5.523 % | |
11 | South Sudan | 5.489 % | |
12 | Liberia | 5.377 % | |
13 | Angola | 5.367 % | |
14 | Tanzania | 5.329 % | |
15 | Maldives | 5.289 % | |
16 | Mali | 5.277 % | |
17 | Sao Tome and Principe | 5.092 % | |
18 | Afghanistan | 5.087 % | |
19 | Somalia | 4.907 % | |
20 | Saudi Arabia | 4.704 % | |
21 | Zambia | 4.634 % | |
22 | Nigeria | 4.607 % | |
23 | Mauritania | 4.521 % | |
24 | Yemen | 4.499 % | |
25 | State of Palestine | 4.467 % | |
26 | Thailand | 4.45 % | |
27 | Laos | 4.425 % | |
28 | Gambia | 4.422 % | |
29 | British Virgin Islands | 4.414 % | |
30 | Ethiopia | 4.38 % | |
31 | Timor-Leste | 4.378 % | |
32 | Benin | 4.361 % | |
33 | Congo | 4.241 % | |
34 | Solomon Islands | 4.227 % | |
35 | Namibia | 4.169 % | |
36 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 4.152 % | |
37 | Ghana | 4.1 % | |
38 | Chad | 4.096 % | |
39 | China, Macao SAR | 4.051 % | |
40 | Madagascar | 4.021 % | |
41 | Botswana | 3.861 % | |
42 | Bhutan | 3.837 % | |
43 | Dominican Republic | 3.835 % | |
44 | Gabon | 3.743 % | |
45 | Togo | 3.741 % | |
46 | Malaysia | 3.697 % | |
47 | Guatemala | 3.693 % | |
48 | Honduras | 3.673 % | |
49 | Kuwait | 3.67 % | |
50 | Niger | 3.63 % | |
51 | Vanuatu | 3.619 % | |
52 | Mongolia | 3.595 % | |
53 | Cameroon | 3.585 % | |
54 | Sierra Leone | 3.505 % | |
55 | China | 3.491 % | |
56 | Andorra | 3.461 % | |
57 | Costa Rica | 3.375 % | |
58 | Haiti | 3.359 % | |
59 | Tuvalu | 3.333 % | |
60 | Côte d'Ivoire | 3.312 % | |
61 | Vietnam | 3.239 % | |
62 | Iraq | 3.214 % | |
63 | Syrian Arab Republic | 3.171 % | |
64 | Malawi | 3.16 % | |
65 | Guinea-Bissau | 3.135 % | |
66 | Iran | 3.122 % | |
67 | Cayman Islands | 3.117 % | |
68 | Bangladesh | 3.113 % | |
69 | Papua New Guinea | 3.046 % | |
70 | Philippines | 3.025 % | |
71 | Senegal | 3.012 % | |
72 | Indonesia | 3.006 % | |
73 | Pakistan | 2.921 % | |
74 | Guinea | 2.909 % | |
75 | Eritrea | 2.878 % | |
76 | Mozambique | 2.816 % | |
77 | India | 2.744 % | |
78 | Oman | 2.7 % | |
79 | Rwanda | 2.691 % | |
80 | Algeria | 2.66 % | |
81 | Ireland | 2.657 % | |
82 | Jordan | 2.597 % | |
83 | Curaçao | 2.573 % | |
84 | French Polynesia | 2.512 % | |
85 | Turkey | 2.486 % | |
86 | Central African Republic | 2.48 % | |
87 | Cabo Verde | 2.462 % | |
88 | New Caledonia | 2.408 % | |
89 | Bolivia | 2.4 % | |
90 | Aruba | 2.39 % | |
91 | Lesotho | 2.384 % | |
92 | Panama | 2.381 % | |
93 | Singapore | 2.351 % | |
94 | Brunei Darussalam | 2.349 % | |
95 | Sri Lanka | 2.33 % | |
96 | Sudan | 2.328 % | |
97 | Belize | 2.287 % | |
98 | Saint Martin (French part) | 2.256 % | |
99 | Uzbekistan | 2.251 % | |
100 | Comoros | 2.245 % | |
101 | South Africa | 2.234 % | |
102 | Libya | 2.218 % | |
103 | Morocco | 2.179 % | |
104 | Egypt | 2.095 % | |
105 | Ecuador | 2.092 % | |
106 | Kiribati | 2.057 % | |
107 | Cambodia | 2.04 % | |
108 | Spain | 2.034 % | |
109 | Luxembourg | 1.987 % | |
110 | Turkmenistan | 1.957 % | |
111 | Tajikistan | 1.955 % | |
112 | Japan | 1.872 % | |
113 | Israel | 1.824 % | |
114 | Netherlands | 1.747 % | |
115 | Venezuela | 1.737 % | |
116 | Lebanon | 1.736 % | |
117 | San Marino | 1.732 % | |
118 | Albania | 1.72 % | |
119 | Colombia | 1.66 % | |
120 | Fiji | 1.647 % | |
121 | Portugal | 1.617 % | |
122 | Nicaragua | 1.587 % | |
123 | Cyprus | 1.551 % | |
124 | Gibraltar | 1.548 % | |
125 | Mexico | 1.542 % | |
126 | Iceland | 1.517 % | |
127 | Hungary | 1.484 % | |
128 | El Salvador | 1.481 % | |
129 | Peru | 1.479 % | |
130 | Palau | 1.461 % | |
131 | Brazil | 1.461 % | |
132 | Azerbaijan | 1.442 % | |
133 | Bahamas | 1.435 % | |
134 | Myanmar | 1.366 % | |
135 | Paraguay | 1.364 % | |
136 | Tunisia | 1.346 % | |
137 | Australia | 1.335 % | |
138 | Canada | 1.303 % | |
139 | Argentina | 1.231 % | |
140 | United States | 1.171 % | |
141 | New Zealand | 1.162 % | |
142 | Sint Maarten (Dutch part) | 1.151 % | |
143 | Kyrgyzstan | 1.121 % | |
144 | Djibouti | 1.092 % | |
145 | Chile | 1.042 % | |
146 | Marshall Islands | 1.028 % | |
147 | Suriname | 1.026 % | |
148 | Norway | 1.013 % | |
149 | Zimbabwe | 1.009 % | |
150 | Jamaica | 0.943 % | |
151 | Belgium | 0.909 % | |
152 | Montenegro | 0.894 % | |
153 | Greece | 0.881 % | |
154 | United Kingdom | 0.815 % | |
155 | Malta | 0.734 % | |
156 | Austria | 0.717 % | |
157 | North Korea | 0.708 % | |
158 | Italy | 0.706 % | |
159 | Finland | 0.689 % | |
160 | Tonga | 0.689 % | |
161 | France | 0.683 % | |
162 | Switzerland | 0.666 % | |
163 | Denmark | 0.617 % | |
164 | Isle of Man | 0.592 % | |
165 | South Korea | 0.564 % | |
166 | Dominica | 0.537 % | |
167 | Sweden | 0.498 % | |
168 | Guam | 0.46 % | |
169 | Serbia | 0.458 % | |
170 | Liechtenstein | 0.455 % | |
171 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 0.437 % | |
172 | Uruguay | 0.385 % | |
173 | Grenada | 0.369 % | |
174 | Cuba | 0.324 % | |
175 | Seychelles | 0.296 % | |
176 | Bermuda | 0.249 % | |
177 | Kazakhstan | 0.245 % | |
178 | Greenland | 0.219 % | |
179 | United States Virgin Islands | 0.204 % | |
180 | Mauritius | 0.145 % | |
181 | Eswatini | 0.107 % | |
182 | Czech Republic | 0.055 % | |
183 | Slovenia | 0.048 % | |
184 | Croatia | 0.024 % | |
185 | Faroe Islands | -0.011 % | |
186 | Germany | -0.032 % | |
187 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | -0.086 % | |
188 | Georgia | -0.094 % | |
189 | Nauru | -0.109 % | |
190 | Kosovo | -0.148 % | |
191 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | -0.195 % | |
192 | Poland | -0.216 % | |
193 | Barbados | -0.235 % | |
194 | Puerto Rico | -0.247 % | |
195 | Slovakia | -0.288 % | |
196 | Monaco | -0.301 % | |
197 | Belarus | -0.314 % | |
198 | Romania | -0.321 % | |
199 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | -0.355 % | |
200 | Republic of Moldova | -0.435 % | |
201 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | -0.461 % | |
202 | Ukraine | -0.505 % | |
203 | Estonia | -0.512 % | |
204 | Bulgaria | -0.514 % | |
205 | North Macedonia | -0.525 % | |
206 | Russia | -0.58 % | |
207 | American Samoa | -0.646 % | |
208 | Armenia | -0.685 % | |
209 | Samoa | -0.98 % | |
210 | Latvia | -1.118 % | |
211 | Guyana | -1.24 % | |
212 | Antigua and Barbuda | -1.347 % | |
213 | Lithuania | -1.664 % | |
214 | Northern Mariana Islands | -2.424 % | |
215 | Trinidad and Tobago | -4.182 % | |
216 | Saint Lucia | -4.657 % |
- #1
Kenya
- #2
Nepal
- #3
Bahrain
- #4
Equatorial Guinea
- #5
Uganda
- #6
Qatar
- #7
Burundi
- #8
Burkina Faso
- #9
United Arab Emirates
- #10
Turks and Caicos Islands
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #216
Saint Lucia
- #215
Trinidad and Tobago
- #214
Northern Mariana Islands
- #213
Lithuania
- #212
Antigua and Barbuda
- #211
Guyana
- #210
Latvia
- #209
Samoa
- #208
Armenia
- #207
American Samoa
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2005, Kenya led the world with an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of 10.11%, while the global range extended from -0.44% to this peak value. The average urban population growth rate across the 200 countries with available data was 2.43%, providing a benchmark for global urbanization trends in that year.
Drivers of High Urban Growth Rates
The countries with the highest urban population growth rates in 2005, such as Kenya (10.11%), Nepal (10.07%), and Bahrain (9.05%), typically share certain economic and demographic characteristics. In many cases, rapid urbanization is driven by rural-to-urban migration as people seek better economic opportunities in cities. For instance, Kenya has experienced significant migration to urban centers like Nairobi, driven by its status as a regional economic hub.
In the Middle East, countries like Bahrain and Qatar (6.78%) have seen urban growth fueled by robust economic development linked to oil and gas industries. These sectors attract a large influx of both expatriate workers and internal migrants seeking employment opportunities. Similarly, Equatorial Guinea (8.39%) has seen urban growth spurred by its oil boom, which has transformed cities into centers of economic activity.
Negative Urban Growth: Causes and Implications
At the opposite end of the spectrum, countries like the Republic of Moldova (-0.44%), Bosnia and Herzegovina (-0.36%), and Romania (-0.32%) experienced negative urban population growth rates in 2005. This decline is often linked to economic stagnation, political instability, or demographic transitions such as declining birth rates and emigration.
In Eastern Europe, economic challenges and the aftermath of political upheaval have led to urban depopulation, as seen in Belarus (-0.31%) and Poland (-0.22%). These countries have faced significant outmigration to Western Europe, where economic opportunities are perceived to be more abundant. This demographic shift poses challenges for urban planning and economic development in their home countries.
Year-over-Year Changes: Significant Movements
Analyzing year-over-year changes, Liberia experienced the most significant increase in urban population growth rate, rising by 3.23% (150.0%). This dramatic increase can be attributed to post-conflict recovery and urban reconstruction efforts that attracted people back to cities. Similarly, Qatar saw a substantial rise of 2.78% (69.5%), reflecting its ongoing economic expansion and urban development projects.
Conversely, San Marino had the largest decrease, with a drop of -4.13% (-70.5%). This decline could be due to its small population size, where minor demographic shifts have a pronounced impact on growth rates. Other significant decreases were observed in Andorra (-2.75%) and Palau (-1.87%), highlighting the volatility of urban growth in smaller or isolated nations.
Implications of Urban Growth Patterns
The urban population growth trends of 2005 reveal broader implications for infrastructure, housing, and policy. Countries with high growth rates, such as Burundi (6.61%) and Burkina Faso (6.28%), must address challenges related to urban infrastructure development and service provision. Rapid urbanization can strain resources and lead to issues such as overcrowding and inadequate public services if not managed effectively.
In contrast, nations experiencing negative urban growth, like Slovakia (-0.29%) and Puerto Rico (-0.25%), face different challenges. These include economic revitalization and reversing demographic decline to sustain urban areas. Strategic policy interventions are essential to balance urban growth with sustainable development goals.
Frequently Asked Questions About Urban Population Annual Growth Rate in 2005
Which country had the highest urban population annual growth rate in 2005?
Kenya had the highest urban population annual growth rate in 2005, with a rate of 10.11%.
Which country had the lowest urban population annual growth rate in 2005?
Saint Lucia had the lowest urban population annual growth rate in 2005, with a rate of -4.66%.
What was the average urban population annual growth rate across all countries in 2005?
The average urban population annual growth rate across all countries in 2005 was 2.15%.
What was the median urban population annual growth rate in 2005?
The median urban population annual growth rate in 2005 was 2.01%.
Which countries were in the top 3 for urban population annual growth rate in 2005?
The top 3 countries for urban population annual growth rate in 2005 were Kenya (10.11%), Nepal (10.07%), and Bahrain (9.05%).
How many countries were included in the dataset for urban population annual growth rate in 2005?
The dataset for urban population annual growth rate in 2005 included 216 countries.
Insights by country
Kuwait
Kuwait ranked #49 globally with an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of 3.67027707336391 % in 2005. This growth rate is notably higher than the global average, reflecting the rapid urbanization trends seen across the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. The key drivers of this growth in Kuwait include its substantial oil wealth, which has spurred economic development and attracted a significant expatriate workforce, alongside a relatively small native population.
Eritrea
Eritrea's Urban Population Annual Growth Rate was 2.8778339442139 % in 2005, ranking it #75 out of 216 countries. This growth rate is above the global average, reflecting a trend of increasing urbanization in many developing nations.
The key drivers of this urban growth in Eritrea include ongoing economic challenges and the migration of rural populations to cities in search of better opportunities. Additionally, the government’s focus on urban infrastructure development has contributed to this demographic shift.
Bahrain
Bahrain ranked #3 globally with an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of 9.05287256267753 % in 2005. This figure is notably higher than the global average, reflecting rapid urbanization trends. The key drivers for this growth include Bahrain's strategic economic initiatives, which have attracted a diverse workforce, and its limited land area, prompting increased urban development to accommodate a burgeoning population.
French Polynesia
In 2005, French Polynesia recorded an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of 2.51156869642063 %, ranking #84 out of 216 countries. This growth rate is notable compared to many Pacific island nations, which often face stagnation due to limited resources. Economic opportunities in tourism and a young demographic have driven urbanization in French Polynesia, as residents migrate towards urban centers for better employment prospects.
Czech Republic
The Czech Republic ranked #182 globally in 2005 with an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of 0.0547009724924329 %. This figure is notably lower than many neighboring countries, reflecting a trend of stable urbanization in contrast to more rapid growth seen in regions like Eastern Europe. Contributing factors include a mature urban infrastructure and a relatively high standard of living, which have led to slower population shifts from rural to urban areas.
Afghanistan
In 2005, Afghanistan ranked #18 globally with an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of 5.08707018829666 %. This growth rate is significantly higher than the global average, indicating rapid urbanization in the country. Key drivers include ongoing conflict leading to rural-urban migration and the need for economic opportunities in cities, as many Afghans seek improved living conditions and access to services.
Niger
Niger ranked #50 globally with an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of 3.62971954924472 % in 2005. This growth rate is significant compared to many neighboring countries in West Africa, reflecting a trend towards urbanization in the region.
The rapid urbanization in Niger can be attributed to factors such as increasing economic opportunities in urban areas and a youthful population seeking better living conditions. Additionally, ongoing rural-to-urban migration has fueled this demographic shift, as residents leave rural regions affected by climate challenges and limited resources.
Brazil
In 2005, Brazil had an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of 1.46073467565998 %, ranking #131 out of 216 countries. This rate is below the global average, indicating slower urbanization compared to many other nations. Key drivers for this growth include Brazil's ongoing economic development and internal migration patterns, as people move from rural areas to cities in search of better opportunities.
Laos
In 2005, Laos achieved a remarkable 27th global rank in Urban Population Annual Growth Rate, with a value of 4.42548509984005 %. This rate is significantly higher than many of its Southeast Asian neighbors, reflecting rapid urbanization trends in the region. Key drivers include economic development initiatives and increased migration from rural areas to cities, as citizens seek better employment opportunities and living conditions.
El Salvador
In 2005, El Salvador had an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of 1.4812650657243 %, ranking #128 out of 216 countries. This growth rate is lower than that of many neighboring countries, reflecting regional trends in urbanization. Key drivers include economic challenges and limited job opportunities in urban areas, which influence migration patterns and urban development.
Barbados
In 2005, Barbados had an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of -0.234778585461381 %, ranking #193 out of 216 countries. This decline is notable compared to many Caribbean nations, which often experience urbanization due to tourism and economic development. Key factors contributing to this negative growth include a stable population size and limited economic opportunities in urban areas, leading to a stagnant urban environment.
Papua New Guinea
Papua New Guinea ranked #69 globally with an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of 3.04639982941645 % in 2005. This growth rate is notably higher than many neighboring Pacific nations, reflecting significant urban migration trends. Factors driving this urbanization include economic opportunities in cities, as well as ongoing population pressures in rural areas, which push individuals towards urban centers for better livelihoods.
Luxembourg
In 2005, Luxembourg had an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of 1.98688358626466 %, ranking #109 out of 216 countries. This growth rate is notable when compared to many of its European neighbors, which often experience slower urbanization rates. The rapid urban growth in Luxembourg can be attributed to its robust economy, driven by the financial sector, and its status as a hub for international migration, attracting a diverse population seeking employment opportunities.
Malaysia
In 2005, Malaysia achieved a global rank of #46 with an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of 3.69725403553387%. This rate is notably higher than the global average, reflecting significant urbanization trends in the region. Key drivers include rapid economic development, increased job opportunities in urban areas, and government policies promoting urban infrastructure and housing. These factors have collectively contributed to a substantial migration from rural to urban settings in Malaysia.
Data Source
Urban population growth (annual %) - World Bank Open Data
The World Bank Open Data provides comprehensive datasets on various aspects of global development, including urban population growth rates. The "Urban population growth (annual %)" indicator offers country-level statistics reflecting the annual percentage change in the urban population, based on the total population.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Urban Population Annual Growth Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More People and Society Facts
Currently married (Percent)
The percentage of currently married individuals by country highlights societal trends in family structure and relationships. Understanding these statistics can provide insights into cultural norms and demographic shifts, influencing policies and social programs.
View dataBrowse All People and Society
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data