Urban Population Annual Growth Rate 2010
Urban population annual growth rate measures the year-over-year percentage increase in a country's urban population.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Equatorial Guinea | 9.712 % | |
2 | Uganda | 9.465 % | |
3 | Burundi | 9.209 % | |
4 | South Sudan | 6.682 % | |
5 | Cambodia | 6.035 % | |
6 | Bahrain | 5.852 % | |
7 | Mauritania | 5.826 % | |
8 | Solomon Islands | 5.624 % | |
9 | Afghanistan | 5.542 % | |
10 | Mali | 5.346 % | |
11 | Kuwait | 5.155 % | |
12 | Angola | 5.112 % | |
13 | Tanzania | 5.053 % | |
14 | Lesotho | 5.028 % | |
15 | Ethiopia | 4.814 % | |
16 | Philippines | 4.686 % | |
17 | Zambia | 4.633 % | |
18 | Maldives | 4.605 % | |
19 | Burkina Faso | 4.471 % | |
20 | Congo | 4.423 % | |
21 | Turks and Caicos Islands | 4.4 % | |
22 | Somalia | 4.397 % | |
23 | Kiribati | 4.395 % | |
24 | Nigeria | 4.381 % | |
25 | Togo | 4.294 % | |
26 | Benin | 4.282 % | |
27 | Vanuatu | 4.206 % | |
28 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 4.196 % | |
29 | Yemen | 4.189 % | |
30 | Nepal | 4.151 % | |
31 | Gambia | 4.116 % | |
32 | Liberia | 3.974 % | |
33 | Gabon | 3.964 % | |
34 | Madagascar | 3.89 % | |
35 | Namibia | 3.828 % | |
36 | Chad | 3.776 % | |
37 | Sierra Leone | 3.741 % | |
38 | Turkey | 3.716 % | |
39 | Sao Tome and Principe | 3.682 % | |
40 | Niger | 3.667 % | |
41 | Ghana | 3.66 % | |
42 | Cameroon | 3.606 % | |
43 | Sri Lanka | 3.565 % | |
44 | Jordan | 3.557 % | |
45 | Oman | 3.509 % | |
46 | Syrian Arab Republic | 3.478 % | |
47 | Laos | 3.465 % | |
48 | Malawi | 3.441 % | |
49 | Guinea-Bissau | 3.433 % | |
50 | Tuvalu | 3.43 % | |
51 | Honduras | 3.407 % | |
52 | Mozambique | 3.372 % | |
53 | Iraq | 3.353 % | |
54 | Senegal | 3.307 % | |
55 | Botswana | 3.289 % | |
56 | Guinea | 3.268 % | |
57 | Timor-Leste | 3.227 % | |
58 | Costa Rica | 3.173 % | |
59 | Côte d'Ivoire | 3.138 % | |
60 | Guatemala | 3.128 % | |
61 | State of Palestine | 3.051 % | |
62 | Pakistan | 3.012 % | |
63 | Thailand | 2.976 % | |
64 | Papua New Guinea | 2.972 % | |
65 | Kenya | 2.936 % | |
66 | British Virgin Islands | 2.887 % | |
67 | Algeria | 2.866 % | |
68 | Sudan | 2.844 % | |
69 | Comoros | 2.796 % | |
70 | Vietnam | 2.785 % | |
71 | Bhutan | 2.778 % | |
72 | Cayman Islands | 2.776 % | |
73 | Seychelles | 2.767 % | |
74 | Malaysia | 2.744 % | |
75 | India | 2.71 % | |
76 | Haiti | 2.674 % | |
77 | Indonesia | 2.643 % | |
78 | United Arab Emirates | 2.64 % | |
79 | Rwanda | 2.552 % | |
80 | Monaco | 2.439 % | |
81 | Mongolia | 2.436 % | |
82 | Morocco | 2.383 % | |
83 | Bangladesh | 2.382 % | |
84 | Luxembourg | 2.335 % | |
85 | China | 2.312 % | |
86 | Bolivia | 2.293 % | |
87 | Cabo Verde | 2.169 % | |
88 | Brunei Darussalam | 2.138 % | |
89 | Eritrea | 2.135 % | |
90 | Iran | 2.132 % | |
91 | Tajikistan | 2.132 % | |
92 | Turkmenistan | 2.1 % | |
93 | Dominican Republic | 2.058 % | |
94 | Djibouti | 2.048 % | |
95 | Libya | 2.02 % | |
96 | Albania | 1.979 % | |
97 | Panama | 1.968 % | |
98 | Egypt | 1.842 % | |
99 | Israel | 1.826 % | |
100 | Belize | 1.821 % | |
101 | Netherlands | 1.813 % | |
102 | Ecuador | 1.807 % | |
103 | South Africa | 1.776 % | |
104 | Singapore | 1.772 % | |
105 | Nicaragua | 1.756 % | |
106 | New Caledonia | 1.731 % | |
107 | El Salvador | 1.719 % | |
108 | Zimbabwe | 1.678 % | |
109 | Australia | 1.663 % | |
110 | French Polynesia | 1.554 % | |
111 | Isle of Man | 1.522 % | |
112 | Tunisia | 1.516 % | |
113 | Norway | 1.483 % | |
114 | Azerbaijan | 1.47 % | |
115 | Kazakhstan | 1.461 % | |
116 | Mexico | 1.453 % | |
117 | Paraguay | 1.415 % | |
118 | Cyprus | 1.411 % | |
119 | Peru | 1.405 % | |
120 | Kyrgyzstan | 1.387 % | |
121 | Gibraltar | 1.369 % | |
122 | Venezuela | 1.327 % | |
123 | Hungary | 1.327 % | |
124 | Bahamas | 1.305 % | |
125 | Colombia | 1.301 % | |
126 | Canada | 1.3 % | |
127 | Curaçao | 1.28 % | |
128 | Fiji | 1.274 % | |
129 | Argentina | 1.246 % | |
130 | Belgium | 1.231 % | |
131 | Myanmar | 1.22 % | |
132 | Lebanon | 1.186 % | |
133 | Brazil | 1.166 % | |
134 | Switzerland | 1.089 % | |
135 | Sweden | 1.087 % | |
136 | New Zealand | 1.076 % | |
137 | Chile | 1.055 % | |
138 | Suriname | 1.054 % | |
139 | Uzbekistan | 1.044 % | |
140 | Eswatini | 1.029 % | |
141 | Saint Martin (French part) | 0.965 % | |
142 | Ireland | 0.948 % | |
143 | United Kingdom | 0.94 % | |
144 | Sint Maarten (Dutch part) | 0.901 % | |
145 | Greenland | 0.877 % | |
146 | United States | 0.864 % | |
147 | San Marino | 0.858 % | |
148 | Finland | 0.801 % | |
149 | Jamaica | 0.779 % | |
150 | Spain | 0.743 % | |
151 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 0.734 % | |
152 | Marshall Islands | 0.73 % | |
153 | Faroe Islands | 0.709 % | |
154 | North Korea | 0.69 % | |
155 | Italy | 0.687 % | |
156 | Uruguay | 0.681 % | |
157 | Liechtenstein | 0.676 % | |
158 | Qatar | 0.651 % | |
159 | Malta | 0.596 % | |
160 | Greece | 0.583 % | |
161 | Japan | 0.582 % | |
162 | Dominica | 0.57 % | |
163 | Denmark | 0.563 % | |
164 | South Korea | 0.552 % | |
165 | Portugal | 0.493 % | |
166 | France | 0.487 % | |
167 | Montenegro | 0.485 % | |
168 | Tonga | 0.454 % | |
169 | China, Macao SAR | 0.373 % | |
170 | Barbados | 0.31 % | |
171 | Austria | 0.291 % | |
172 | Nauru | 0.269 % | |
173 | Belarus | 0.264 % | |
174 | Grenada | 0.26 % | |
175 | Bermuda | 0.251 % | |
176 | Russia | 0.236 % | |
177 | Guam | 0.22 % | |
178 | Czech Republic | 0.211 % | |
179 | Slovenia | 0.188 % | |
180 | Cuba | 0.177 % | |
181 | Georgia | 0.169 % | |
182 | United States Virgin Islands | 0.053 % | |
183 | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.022 % | |
184 | Aruba | -0.021 % | |
185 | Serbia | -0.088 % | |
186 | Germany | -0.114 % | |
187 | Kosovo | -0.115 % | |
188 | Estonia | -0.125 % | |
189 | Iceland | -0.128 % | |
190 | Mauritius | -0.134 % | |
191 | Ukraine | -0.197 % | |
192 | Slovakia | -0.201 % | |
193 | Republic of Moldova | -0.214 % | |
194 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | -0.237 % | |
195 | Croatia | -0.276 % | |
196 | Bulgaria | -0.36 % | |
197 | Romania | -0.378 % | |
198 | Antigua and Barbuda | -0.414 % | |
199 | Central African Republic | -0.416 % | |
200 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | -0.429 % | |
201 | Puerto Rico | -0.438 % | |
202 | North Macedonia | -0.48 % | |
203 | Poland | -0.503 % | |
204 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | -0.551 % | |
205 | Samoa | -0.589 % | |
206 | Armenia | -0.727 % | |
207 | Saudi Arabia | -0.731 % | |
208 | American Samoa | -0.871 % | |
209 | Guyana | -0.984 % | |
210 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | -1.086 % | |
211 | Palau | -1.132 % | |
212 | Saint Lucia | -1.888 % | |
213 | Latvia | -2.089 % | |
214 | Lithuania | -2.112 % | |
215 | Northern Mariana Islands | -2.172 % | |
216 | Andorra | -3.962 % |
- #1
Equatorial Guinea
- #2
Uganda
- #3
Burundi
- #4
South Sudan
- #5
Cambodia
- #6
Bahrain
- #7
Mauritania
- #8
Solomon Islands
- #9
Afghanistan
- #10
Mali
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #216
Andorra
- #215
Northern Mariana Islands
- #214
Lithuania
- #213
Latvia
- #212
Saint Lucia
- #211
Palau
- #210
Bosnia and Herzegovina
- #209
Guyana
- #208
American Samoa
- #207
Saudi Arabia
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
The country with the highest Urban Population Annual Growth Rate in 2010 was Equatorial Guinea at 9.71%, while the global range spanned from -0.43% to 9.71%. The average global growth rate was 2.20%, providing a benchmark for understanding how individual countries compare.
Divergent Growth Patterns in Urbanization
The Urban Population Annual Growth Rate in 2010 highlighted a significant disparity among countries. Equatorial Guinea led with a growth rate of 9.71%, indicating rapid urbanization, likely driven by its oil-fueled economic boom during that period. Similarly, Uganda and Burundi, with growth rates of 9.46% and 9.21% respectively, reflected broader trends in Sub-Saharan Africa where urbanization is accelerating due to rural-to-urban migration and population growth.
Conversely, countries like the Micronesia (Federated States of) and the Central African Republic saw negative growth rates of -0.43% and -0.42%, respectively. This contraction in urban population could be attributed to economic hardships, political instability, or emigration, factors contributing to an urban exodus or stagnation.
Economic Drivers of Urban Growth
In many cases, economic factors played a critical role in shaping urban population growth rates. For instance, Bahrain and Afghanistan, with growth rates of 5.85% and 5.54% respectively, benefited from economic activities that attracted people to urban centers. Bahrain's growth can be linked to its strategic position as a financial hub in the Middle East, while Afghanistan's urban growth might reflect reconstruction efforts and international aid post-conflict.
On the other hand, countries like Romania and Bulgaria, with negative growth rates of -0.38% and -0.36%, experienced urban shrinkage, possibly due to economic stagnation and outmigration to more prosperous regions within the European Union.
Year-over-Year Changes and Their Implications
The year-over-year changes in urban population growth rates revealed significant shifts in some countries. The Seychelles experienced the largest increase, with its growth rate jumping by 2.43 percentage points, a staggering 729.8% rise, likely due to tourism and investment inflows bolstering urban development. Cambodia also saw a notable increase of 1.75 percentage points, reflecting its ongoing economic transformation and urban expansion.
In contrast, the Qatar saw the most significant decrease, with its growth rate plummeting by 11.57 percentage points. This dramatic decline could be attributed to the global financial crisis's aftermath, which affected its real estate and construction sectors. Similarly, the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain experienced decreases of 3.83 and 2.75 percentage points, respectively, indicating a regional pattern of slowing urban growth due to economic adjustments.
Policy and Demographic Influences
Policy initiatives and demographic changes further influenced urban growth rates. In South Sudan, which had a growth rate of 6.68%, urbanization was propelled by policies aimed at nation-building following its independence. Meanwhile, the Solomon Islands and Mali, with rates of 5.62% and 5.35%, respectively, saw urban growth driven by demographic pressures and development policies focusing on urban infrastructure improvements.
In regions like Eastern Europe, demographic decline due to low birth rates and aging populations contributed to negative urban growth. For example, Ukraine, with a rate of -0.20%, faced challenges from a shrinking workforce and emigration, which impacted urban growth negatively.
Overall, the Urban Population Annual Growth Rate in 2010 encapsulated a complex interplay of economic, demographic, and policy factors, illustrating how diverse forces shape urbanization patterns across the globe.
Frequently Asked Questions About Urban Population Annual Growth Rate in 2010
Which country had the highest urban population annual growth rate in 2010?
Equatorial Guinea had the highest urban population annual growth rate in 2010, with a rate of 9.71%.
Which country had the lowest urban population annual growth rate in 2010?
Andorra had the lowest urban population annual growth rate in 2010, with a rate of -3.96%.
What was the average urban population annual growth rate across all countries in 2010?
The average urban population annual growth rate across all countries in 2010 was 1.94%.
What was the median urban population annual growth rate in 2010?
The median urban population annual growth rate in 2010 was 1.67%.
How many countries were included in the dataset for urban population annual growth rate in 2010?
The dataset for urban population annual growth rate in 2010 included 216 countries.
What is the range of urban population annual growth rates in 2010?
The range of urban population annual growth rates in 2010 spans from -3.96% in Andorra to 9.71% in Equatorial Guinea.
Insights by country
Vanuatu
In 2010, Vanuatu achieved a global rank of #27 with an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of 4.2060412799186 %. This growth rate is significantly higher than many Pacific Island nations, reflecting a trend of urban migration in the region. Key drivers include economic opportunities in urban centers and the impact of climate change, which has led to population shifts from rural areas to cities seeking better resources and infrastructure.
Bhutan
In 2010, Bhutan achieved a global rank of #71 with an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of 2.77772550771019 %. This growth rate is notable when compared to the global average, reflecting the country's ongoing urbanization trend. Key drivers include economic development initiatives and a focus on improving infrastructure in urban areas, which attract rural populations seeking better opportunities and services.
Latvia
In 2010, Latvia had an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of -2.08913666797325 %, ranking #213 out of 216 countries. This decline contrasts sharply with neighboring Baltic states, which experienced varying degrees of urban growth during the same period. Contributing factors to Latvia's negative growth included significant emigration, economic challenges, and a declining birth rate, which hindered urban population expansion.
Kiribati
In 2010, Kiribati achieved a global rank of #23 with an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of 4.39488327568974 %. This growth rate is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting the rapid urbanization trends seen in many Pacific island nations. Contributing factors include the migration of populations from outer islands to urban centers like South Tarawa, driven by limited economic opportunities and climate change impacts on traditional livelihoods.
Armenia
In 2010, Armenia had an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of -0.727310338461337 %, ranking #206 out of 216 countries. This decline contrasts sharply with the global trend of urbanization, where many countries experience growth. Contributing factors include economic challenges, a significant outflow of population due to emigration, and a relatively low birth rate, which have collectively hindered urban population expansion in Armenia.
Kenya
In 2010, Kenya's Urban Population Annual Growth Rate was 2.93617401354433 %, ranking #65 out of 216 countries. This growth rate is higher than the global average, reflecting a trend seen in many Sub-Saharan African nations. Rapid urbanization in Kenya is driven by factors such as rural-to-urban migration, economic opportunities in cities, and a youthful population seeking better living standards.
Czech Republic
In 2010, the Czech Republic had an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of 0.211053475581419 %, ranking #178 out of 216 countries. This growth rate is relatively low compared to many other European nations, reflecting a stable urbanization trend in the region. Contributing factors include a developed infrastructure and a strong economy that has led to urban stability, reducing the need for rapid urban migration.
Cuba
Cuba's Urban Population Annual Growth Rate in 2010 was 0.176505935781862 %, ranking it #180 out of 216 countries. This growth rate is significantly lower than many of its Caribbean neighbors, reflecting a broader trend of urbanization challenges in the region.
The limited economic opportunities and ongoing emigration have contributed to a stagnant urban growth rate. Additionally, Cuba's unique political and economic policies have influenced urban development and migration patterns, leading to slower population increases in urban areas.
Grenada
In 2010, Grenada had an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of 0.260136718397879 %, ranking #174 out of 216 countries. This growth rate is notably lower than many Caribbean neighbors, reflecting regional challenges in urbanization compared to more rapidly growing economies. Factors such as limited job opportunities and a small population contribute to Grenada's modest urban growth, as the country continues to focus on agricultural and tourism sectors rather than large-scale urban development.
Australia
In 2010, Australia had an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of 1.66251815322792 %, ranking #109 out of 216 countries. This growth rate is lower than many of its Pacific neighbors, reflecting a trend of urbanization that is more pronounced in rapidly developing nations. Key drivers of Australia's urban population growth include a stable economy, ongoing immigration, and urban development policies that encourage city living.
Data Source
Urban population growth (annual %) - World Bank Open Data
The World Bank Open Data provides comprehensive datasets on various aspects of global development, including urban population growth rates. The "Urban population growth (annual %)" indicator offers country-level statistics reflecting the annual percentage change in the urban population, based on the total population.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Urban Population Annual Growth Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More People and Society Facts
Currently married (Percent)
The percentage of currently married individuals by country highlights societal trends in family structure and relationships. Understanding these statistics can provide insights into cultural norms and demographic shifts, influencing policies and social programs.
View dataBrowse All People and Society
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data