Urban Population Annual Growth Rate 2012
Urban population annual growth rate measures the year-over-year percentage increase in a country's urban population.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Oman | 14.792 % | |
2 | Syrian Arab Republic | 10.186 % | |
3 | Equatorial Guinea | 9.357 % | |
4 | Uganda | 9.261 % | |
5 | Burundi | 9.143 % | |
6 | Cambodia | 8.232 % | |
7 | British Virgin Islands | 6.828 % | |
8 | Solomon Islands | 6.813 % | |
9 | Kuwait | 6.317 % | |
10 | Afghanistan | 6.313 % | |
11 | Qatar | 5.952 % | |
12 | South Sudan | 5.848 % | |
13 | Mauritania | 5.65 % | |
14 | Lesotho | 5.388 % | |
15 | Turkey | 5.11 % | |
16 | Mali | 5.107 % | |
17 | Tanzania | 5.012 % | |
18 | Angola | 4.976 % | |
19 | Ethiopia | 4.702 % | |
20 | Iraq | 4.679 % | |
21 | Liberia | 4.595 % | |
22 | Philippines | 4.553 % | |
23 | Saudi Arabia | 4.417 % | |
24 | Turks and Caicos Islands | 4.404 % | |
25 | Maldives | 4.391 % | |
26 | Burkina Faso | 4.364 % | |
27 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 4.319 % | |
28 | Nigeria | 4.309 % | |
29 | Benin | 4.307 % | |
30 | Zambia | 4.232 % | |
31 | Chad | 4.195 % | |
32 | United Arab Emirates | 4.192 % | |
33 | Gambia | 4.088 % | |
34 | Namibia | 3.977 % | |
35 | Gabon | 3.943 % | |
36 | Yemen | 3.937 % | |
37 | Senegal | 3.731 % | |
38 | Guinea-Bissau | 3.716 % | |
39 | Madagascar | 3.704 % | |
40 | Niger | 3.674 % | |
41 | Sierra Leone | 3.595 % | |
42 | Mozambique | 3.59 % | |
43 | Ghana | 3.562 % | |
44 | Cameroon | 3.525 % | |
45 | Togo | 3.46 % | |
46 | Sri Lanka | 3.388 % | |
47 | Malawi | 3.339 % | |
48 | Honduras | 3.309 % | |
49 | China, Macao SAR | 3.275 % | |
50 | Guinea | 3.209 % | |
51 | Somalia | 3.145 % | |
52 | Laos | 3.103 % | |
53 | China | 3.1 % | |
54 | Jordan | 3.088 % | |
55 | Congo | 3.05 % | |
56 | Côte d'Ivoire | 3.017 % | |
57 | Haiti | 2.992 % | |
58 | Comoros | 2.983 % | |
59 | Luxembourg | 2.944 % | |
60 | Tuvalu | 2.936 % | |
61 | Guatemala | 2.925 % | |
62 | Lebanon | 2.924 % | |
63 | Papua New Guinea | 2.897 % | |
64 | Algeria | 2.886 % | |
65 | Sudan | 2.858 % | |
66 | State of Palestine | 2.838 % | |
67 | Cayman Islands | 2.714 % | |
68 | Bhutan | 2.706 % | |
69 | Indonesia | 2.617 % | |
70 | Kenya | 2.572 % | |
71 | San Marino | 2.568 % | |
72 | Vietnam | 2.538 % | |
73 | Pakistan | 2.489 % | |
74 | Sao Tome and Principe | 2.479 % | |
75 | Malaysia | 2.461 % | |
76 | Singapore | 2.453 % | |
77 | Rwanda | 2.445 % | |
78 | Kiribati | 2.394 % | |
79 | India | 2.377 % | |
80 | Vanuatu | 2.327 % | |
81 | Botswana | 2.27 % | |
82 | Bangladesh | 2.262 % | |
83 | Morocco | 2.236 % | |
84 | Bolivia | 2.233 % | |
85 | Monaco | 2.229 % | |
86 | Turkmenistan | 2.222 % | |
87 | Sint Maarten (Dutch part) | 2.182 % | |
88 | Timor-Leste | 2.132 % | |
89 | Tajikistan | 2.13 % | |
90 | Egypt | 2.124 % | |
91 | Iran | 2.034 % | |
92 | Djibouti | 1.969 % | |
93 | Mongolia | 1.946 % | |
94 | Kazakhstan | 1.933 % | |
95 | Costa Rica | 1.915 % | |
96 | New Caledonia | 1.915 % | |
97 | Panama | 1.907 % | |
98 | Azerbaijan | 1.886 % | |
99 | Australia | 1.883 % | |
100 | Thailand | 1.881 % | |
101 | Israel | 1.843 % | |
102 | Kyrgyzstan | 1.805 % | |
103 | Paraguay | 1.788 % | |
104 | Nicaragua | 1.745 % | |
105 | Zimbabwe | 1.734 % | |
106 | El Salvador | 1.722 % | |
107 | Ecuador | 1.665 % | |
108 | Nauru | 1.66 % | |
109 | Cabo Verde | 1.656 % | |
110 | South Africa | 1.651 % | |
111 | Peru | 1.65 % | |
112 | Belize | 1.59 % | |
113 | Central African Republic | 1.582 % | |
114 | Tunisia | 1.563 % | |
115 | Norway | 1.539 % | |
116 | Uzbekistan | 1.504 % | |
117 | Cyprus | 1.491 % | |
118 | Brunei Darussalam | 1.479 % | |
119 | Mexico | 1.477 % | |
120 | Kosovo | 1.379 % | |
121 | Eritrea | 1.309 % | |
122 | Venezuela | 1.291 % | |
123 | Myanmar | 1.261 % | |
124 | Eswatini | 1.249 % | |
125 | Dominican Republic | 1.241 % | |
126 | Saint Lucia | 1.24 % | |
127 | Switzerland | 1.2 % | |
128 | Aruba | 1.198 % | |
129 | Fiji | 1.167 % | |
130 | Bahrain | 1.16 % | |
131 | Gibraltar | 1.159 % | |
132 | Canada | 1.143 % | |
133 | Colombia | 1.137 % | |
134 | Brazil | 1.136 % | |
135 | Argentina | 1.134 % | |
136 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 1.104 % | |
137 | Seychelles | 1.101 % | |
138 | Nepal | 1.07 % | |
139 | Suriname | 1.056 % | |
140 | Sweden | 1.05 % | |
141 | Chile | 1.042 % | |
142 | Bahamas | 0.979 % | |
143 | Jamaica | 0.97 % | |
144 | Netherlands | 0.969 % | |
145 | Liechtenstein | 0.951 % | |
146 | Malta | 0.949 % | |
147 | Belgium | 0.921 % | |
148 | French Polynesia | 0.917 % | |
149 | Finland | 0.914 % | |
150 | United Kingdom | 0.903 % | |
151 | Curaçao | 0.847 % | |
152 | Italy | 0.798 % | |
153 | United States | 0.784 % | |
154 | North Korea | 0.774 % | |
155 | Ireland | 0.69 % | |
156 | Iceland | 0.643 % | |
157 | Grenada | 0.632 % | |
158 | Dominica | 0.614 % | |
159 | Saint Martin (French part) | 0.557 % | |
160 | France | 0.547 % | |
161 | Austria | 0.545 % | |
162 | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.539 % | |
163 | New Zealand | 0.495 % | |
164 | Belarus | 0.465 % | |
165 | Denmark | 0.464 % | |
166 | South Korea | 0.461 % | |
167 | Uruguay | 0.423 % | |
168 | Russia | 0.413 % | |
169 | Montenegro | 0.333 % | |
170 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 0.328 % | |
171 | Barbados | 0.289 % | |
172 | Greenland | 0.282 % | |
173 | Spain | 0.256 % | |
174 | Germany | 0.254 % | |
175 | Samoa | 0.201 % | |
176 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 0.191 % | |
177 | Antigua and Barbuda | 0.135 % | |
178 | Georgia | 0.119 % | |
179 | Cuba | 0.105 % | |
180 | Czech Republic | 0.054 % | |
181 | Republic of Moldova | 0.024 % | |
182 | Japan | 0.02 % | |
183 | Guyana | 0.018 % | |
184 | Isle of Man | 0.005 % | |
185 | United States Virgin Islands | -0.01 % | |
186 | Mauritius | -0.046 % | |
187 | Ukraine | -0.065 % | |
188 | Slovakia | -0.088 % | |
189 | Tonga | -0.111 % | |
190 | Armenia | -0.116 % | |
191 | Guam | -0.127 % | |
192 | North Macedonia | -0.132 % | |
193 | Bermuda | -0.137 % | |
194 | Slovenia | -0.16 % | |
195 | Poland | -0.168 % | |
196 | Estonia | -0.232 % | |
197 | Greece | -0.238 % | |
198 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | -0.297 % | |
199 | Bulgaria | -0.361 % | |
200 | Hungary | -0.374 % | |
201 | Marshall Islands | -0.384 % | |
202 | Portugal | -0.406 % | |
203 | Croatia | -0.426 % | |
204 | Faroe Islands | -0.448 % | |
205 | Romania | -0.454 % | |
206 | Albania | -0.475 % | |
207 | Northern Mariana Islands | -0.617 % | |
208 | Serbia | -0.633 % | |
209 | Puerto Rico | -0.878 % | |
210 | American Samoa | -1.105 % | |
211 | Lithuania | -1.143 % | |
212 | Latvia | -1.231 % | |
213 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | -1.258 % | |
214 | Andorra | -1.296 % | |
215 | Palau | -1.563 % | |
216 | Libya | -2.645 % |
- #1
Oman
- #2
Syrian Arab Republic
- #3
Equatorial Guinea
- #4
Uganda
- #5
Burundi
- #6
Cambodia
- #7
British Virgin Islands
- #8
Solomon Islands
- #9
Kuwait
- #10
Afghanistan
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #216
Libya
- #215
Palau
- #214
Andorra
- #213
Bosnia and Herzegovina
- #212
Latvia
- #211
Lithuania
- #210
American Samoa
- #209
Puerto Rico
- #208
Serbia
- #207
Northern Mariana Islands
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2012, the country with the highest Urban Population Annual Growth Rate was Oman with a remarkable rate of 14.79%, while the global range spanned from -0.37% to 14.79%. The average growth rate across the 200 countries analyzed was 2.29%, providing a benchmark for understanding urbanization trends.
Drivers of Urban Population Growth
The significant variation in urban population growth rates can often be attributed to a mix of economic opportunities, demographic shifts, and governmental policies. Countries like Oman and the Syrian Arab Republic experienced substantial urban growth rates of 14.79% and 10.19%, respectively. Oman's economic boom, driven by oil wealth and subsequent investments in urban infrastructure, likely fueled its urban expansion. Conversely, the growth in Syria was more complex, potentially influenced by internal displacement and migration to urban areas due to socio-political factors.
In Equatorial Guinea and Uganda, with growth rates of 9.36% and 9.26%, the burgeoning urban populations might be linked to rural-to-urban migration as individuals seek better employment prospects and living conditions. These patterns highlight the role of economic incentives and demographic trends in shaping urban growth.
Factors Behind Declining Urban Growth
Some countries exhibited negative growth rates, indicating a decrease in urban populations. Hungary and Bulgaria, with urban population declines of -0.37% and -0.36%, respectively, reflect broader regional trends of population stagnation and decline in parts of Eastern Europe. Factors such as aging populations, emigration, and limited economic opportunities outside major cities contribute to these trends.
In the case of Greece and Estonia, with rates of -0.24% and -0.23%, economic challenges and austerity measures during the European financial crisis likely exacerbated urban shrinkage, as people moved abroad or returned to rural areas.
Significant Year-over-Year Changes
The analysis of year-over-year changes reveals substantial fluctuations in urban growth dynamics. Qatar experienced the most significant increase, with its growth rate rising by 5.34%, a staggering 868.8% increase. This surge is likely tied to rapid economic development and the influx of foreign labor to support infrastructure projects.
Conversely, China saw a substantial decrease of -2.59%, a -45.5% drop, which might reflect a shift in internal migration patterns and government policies aimed at managing urban sprawl and promoting sustainable urban development. Bulgaria and Nepal also experienced notable declines, with decreases of -1.24% and -1.17%, respectively, suggesting regional and economic factors influencing urban population dynamics.
Implications of Urban Population Trends
The Urban Population Annual Growth Rate is a crucial indicator of how countries manage urbanization and its associated challenges. Rapid urban growth, as seen in Oman and Uganda, demands robust urban planning and infrastructure development to accommodate increasing populations. These countries must address issues such as housing, transportation, and public services to ensure sustainable urban environments.
In contrast, countries with declining urban populations, like Hungary and Greece, face different challenges, including revitalizing urban centers and maintaining economic vitality in the face of demographic decline. These patterns underscore the diverse approaches required to manage urban growth across different global contexts.
Frequently Asked Questions About Urban Population Annual Growth Rate in 2012
Which country had the highest urban population annual growth rate in 2012?
Oman had the highest urban population annual growth rate in 2012, with a rate of 14.79%.
Which country had the lowest urban population annual growth rate in 2012?
Libya had the lowest urban population annual growth rate in 2012, with a rate of -2.64%.
What was the average urban population annual growth rate across all countries in 2012?
The average urban population annual growth rate across all countries in 2012 was 2.05%.
What was the median urban population annual growth rate in 2012?
The median urban population annual growth rate in 2012 was 1.66%.
Which countries were in the top 10 for urban population annual growth rate in 2012?
The top 10 countries for urban population annual growth rate in 2012 were Oman, Syrian Arab Republic, Equatorial Guinea, Uganda, Burundi, Cambodia, British Virgin Islands, Solomon Islands, Kuwait, and Afghanistan.
How many countries were included in the dataset for urban population annual growth rate in 2012?
The dataset for urban population annual growth rate in 2012 included 216 countries.
Insights by country
Niger
Niger achieved a global rank of #40 with an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of 3.67354470036037% in 2012. This growth rate is notable compared to the regional average for West Africa, indicating a significant urbanization trend. Contributing factors include a youthful population and increasing economic opportunities in urban areas, which drive migration from rural regions.
Estonia
In 2012, Estonia had an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of -0.232225422923109 %, ranking #196 out of 216 countries. This decline contrasts sharply with many neighboring countries in Northern Europe, which generally experience urban growth. Contributing factors include a relatively stable rural population and economic shifts that have not incentivized urban migration, alongside demographic trends such as an aging population. Additionally, Estonia's urban areas face challenges in attracting younger residents due to limited job opportunities in certain sectors.
American Samoa
In 2012, American Samoa had an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of -1.10507773081383 %, ranking #210 out of 216 countries. This decline is notable compared to many Pacific Island nations, where urban growth rates are often positive due to migration and development. Contributing factors for American Samoa include limited economic opportunities and a significant out-migration of residents seeking jobs elsewhere, which has impacted urban population dynamics.
Tonga
Tonga's Urban Population Annual Growth Rate in 2012 was -0.111009804049505 %, ranking it #189 out of 216 countries. This negative growth contrasts sharply with many Pacific Island nations experiencing urbanization due to migration and economic opportunities. The decline can be attributed to factors such as limited job prospects in urban areas and a relatively stable rural population that prefers traditional lifestyles over urban migration.
Pakistan
In 2012, Pakistan had an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of 2.48903688358268 %, ranking #73 out of 216 countries. This growth rate is higher than the global average, reflecting the rapid urbanization trends seen across South Asia. Key drivers of this urban growth include significant rural-to-urban migration driven by economic opportunities and the expansion of cities to accommodate a young and growing population.
Vanuatu
In 2012, Vanuatu achieved a global rank of #80 with an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of 2.32738135103806 %. This growth rate is notable when compared to regional neighbors, indicating a trend towards urbanization in the Pacific, though it remains lower than some rapidly urbanizing countries. The primary drivers for this growth include a combination of economic opportunities in urban areas and a migration trend from rural communities seeking better living conditions and employment prospects.
Liberia
In 2012, Liberia achieved a remarkable rank of #21 globally for its Urban Population Annual Growth Rate, recorded at 4.59545605921178 %. This growth rate is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a rapid urbanization trend within the country. Key drivers of this growth include ongoing economic recovery efforts post-civil war and a youthful population migrating to urban areas in search of better opportunities.
Philippines
In 2012, the Philippines had an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of 4.55318100586888 %, ranking #22 out of 216 countries. This growth rate is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a rapid urbanization trend in the country. Key drivers include a young and growing population, alongside economic opportunities that attract rural residents to urban centers, particularly in Metro Manila.
Libya
In 2012, Libya had an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of -2.64495272097969 %, ranking #216 out of 216 countries. This negative growth contrasts sharply with many countries in the region, which typically experience urbanization. The decline is largely attributed to the ongoing political instability and conflict, which have led to significant emigration and urban dislocation. Additionally, the disruption of economic activities has further hindered urban population growth in Libya.
Portugal
In 2012, Portugal had an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of -0.405561487670235 %, ranking #202 out of 216 countries. This negative growth rate contrasts sharply with the global average, indicating a trend of urban depopulation. Contributing factors include economic challenges and a declining birth rate, leading to migration from urban areas as residents seek opportunities elsewhere.
Data Source
Urban population growth (annual %) - World Bank Open Data
The World Bank Open Data provides comprehensive datasets on various aspects of global development, including urban population growth rates. The "Urban population growth (annual %)" indicator offers country-level statistics reflecting the annual percentage change in the urban population, based on the total population.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Urban Population Annual Growth Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More People and Society Facts
Currently married (Percent)
The percentage of currently married individuals by country highlights societal trends in family structure and relationships. Understanding these statistics can provide insights into cultural norms and demographic shifts, influencing policies and social programs.
View dataBrowse All People and Society
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data