Urban Population Annual Growth Rate 2006
Urban population annual growth rate measures the year-over-year percentage increase in a country's urban population.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Qatar | 16.722 % | |
2 | Bahrain | 9.434 % | |
3 | Nepal | 9.392 % | |
4 | Kenya | 9.144 % | |
5 | Uganda | 8.528 % | |
6 | Equatorial Guinea | 8.262 % | |
7 | United Arab Emirates | 7.542 % | |
8 | Jordan | 6.826 % | |
9 | Burundi | 6.648 % | |
10 | Liberia | 6.418 % | |
11 | Afghanistan | 6.125 % | |
12 | Timor-Leste | 5.979 % | |
13 | Kuwait | 5.562 % | |
14 | Burkina Faso | 5.52 % | |
15 | Tanzania | 5.468 % | |
16 | South Sudan | 5.447 % | |
17 | Mali | 5.311 % | |
18 | Turks and Caicos Islands | 5.274 % | |
19 | Angola | 5.269 % | |
20 | China, Macao SAR | 5.225 % | |
21 | Sao Tome and Principe | 5.026 % | |
22 | Zambia | 4.888 % | |
23 | Mauritania | 4.871 % | |
24 | Syrian Arab Republic | 4.721 % | |
25 | Maldives | 4.703 % | |
26 | Yemen | 4.578 % | |
27 | Saudi Arabia | 4.556 % | |
28 | Nigeria | 4.55 % | |
29 | Somalia | 4.55 % | |
30 | British Virgin Islands | 4.524 % | |
31 | Ethiopia | 4.378 % | |
32 | Gambia | 4.373 % | |
33 | Benin | 4.3 % | |
34 | Solomon Islands | 4.292 % | |
35 | Congo | 4.254 % | |
36 | Thailand | 4.214 % | |
37 | Namibia | 4.202 % | |
38 | Laos | 4.168 % | |
39 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 4.148 % | |
40 | Togo | 4.105 % | |
41 | State of Palestine | 4.088 % | |
42 | Ghana | 4.035 % | |
43 | Cameroon | 4.018 % | |
44 | Madagascar | 4.006 % | |
45 | Botswana | 3.878 % | |
46 | Dominican Republic | 3.819 % | |
47 | Gabon | 3.797 % | |
48 | Vanuatu | 3.66 % | |
49 | China | 3.657 % | |
50 | Niger | 3.65 % | |
51 | Chad | 3.649 % | |
52 | Mongolia | 3.626 % | |
53 | Honduras | 3.614 % | |
54 | Guatemala | 3.586 % | |
55 | Malaysia | 3.566 % | |
56 | Vietnam | 3.548 % | |
57 | Tuvalu | 3.383 % | |
58 | Bhutan | 3.352 % | |
59 | Haiti | 3.343 % | |
60 | Costa Rica | 3.339 % | |
61 | Côte d'Ivoire | 3.286 % | |
62 | Malawi | 3.226 % | |
63 | Guinea-Bissau | 3.208 % | |
64 | Ireland | 3.161 % | |
65 | Singapore | 3.129 % | |
66 | Lesotho | 3.083 % | |
67 | Sierra Leone | 3.076 % | |
68 | Cayman Islands | 3.04 % | |
69 | Senegal | 3.039 % | |
70 | Papua New Guinea | 3.029 % | |
71 | Bangladesh | 2.993 % | |
72 | Guinea | 2.983 % | |
73 | Indonesia | 2.965 % | |
74 | Oman | 2.952 % | |
75 | Mozambique | 2.894 % | |
76 | Pakistan | 2.894 % | |
77 | Philippines | 2.887 % | |
78 | Iran | 2.8 % | |
79 | Sri Lanka | 2.73 % | |
80 | Algeria | 2.721 % | |
81 | India | 2.714 % | |
82 | French Polynesia | 2.707 % | |
83 | Rwanda | 2.689 % | |
84 | Curaçao | 2.588 % | |
85 | New Caledonia | 2.582 % | |
86 | Turkey | 2.527 % | |
87 | Kiribati | 2.437 % | |
88 | Cabo Verde | 2.415 % | |
89 | Bolivia | 2.403 % | |
90 | Comoros | 2.364 % | |
91 | Sudan | 2.339 % | |
92 | Panama | 2.295 % | |
93 | Morocco | 2.29 % | |
94 | Central African Republic | 2.284 % | |
95 | Brunei Darussalam | 2.215 % | |
96 | Cambodia | 2.195 % | |
97 | South Africa | 2.191 % | |
98 | Belize | 2.187 % | |
99 | Iceland | 2.15 % | |
100 | Saint Martin (French part) | 2.129 % | |
101 | Andorra | 2.113 % | |
102 | Libya | 2.079 % | |
103 | Luxembourg | 2.057 % | |
104 | Spain | 2.047 % | |
105 | Ecuador | 2.045 % | |
106 | Uzbekistan | 2.042 % | |
107 | Eritrea | 2.004 % | |
108 | Egypt | 1.99 % | |
109 | Seychelles | 1.933 % | |
110 | Turkmenistan | 1.931 % | |
111 | Tajikistan | 1.899 % | |
112 | Lebanon | 1.89 % | |
113 | Israel | 1.816 % | |
114 | San Marino | 1.755 % | |
115 | Nicaragua | 1.727 % | |
116 | Albania | 1.682 % | |
117 | Venezuela | 1.68 % | |
118 | Fiji | 1.675 % | |
119 | Aruba | 1.571 % | |
120 | Djibouti | 1.563 % | |
121 | Colombia | 1.532 % | |
122 | Netherlands | 1.526 % | |
123 | Portugal | 1.526 % | |
124 | Bahamas | 1.513 % | |
125 | Australia | 1.501 % | |
126 | Cyprus | 1.483 % | |
127 | Gibraltar | 1.467 % | |
128 | Japan | 1.437 % | |
129 | Peru | 1.405 % | |
130 | Brazil | 1.399 % | |
131 | Azerbaijan | 1.386 % | |
132 | Mexico | 1.384 % | |
133 | El Salvador | 1.371 % | |
134 | Tunisia | 1.322 % | |
135 | Canada | 1.317 % | |
136 | Myanmar | 1.294 % | |
137 | Zimbabwe | 1.267 % | |
138 | Paraguay | 1.256 % | |
139 | Argentina | 1.228 % | |
140 | New Zealand | 1.226 % | |
141 | United States | 1.182 % | |
142 | Hungary | 1.18 % | |
143 | Sint Maarten (Dutch part) | 1.151 % | |
144 | Norway | 1.141 % | |
145 | Kyrgyzstan | 1.064 % | |
146 | Suriname | 1.035 % | |
147 | Chile | 1.018 % | |
148 | Belgium | 1.01 % | |
149 | Marshall Islands | 0.988 % | |
150 | Iraq | 0.978 % | |
151 | Greece | 0.913 % | |
152 | Jamaica | 0.899 % | |
153 | Isle of Man | 0.883 % | |
154 | United Kingdom | 0.86 % | |
155 | Montenegro | 0.816 % | |
156 | South Korea | 0.742 % | |
157 | Finland | 0.74 % | |
158 | Tonga | 0.693 % | |
159 | Sweden | 0.687 % | |
160 | North Korea | 0.663 % | |
161 | Switzerland | 0.65 % | |
162 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 0.642 % | |
163 | Denmark | 0.612 % | |
164 | France | 0.581 % | |
165 | Dominica | 0.565 % | |
166 | Uruguay | 0.551 % | |
167 | Italy | 0.535 % | |
168 | Austria | 0.526 % | |
169 | Malta | 0.471 % | |
170 | Liechtenstein | 0.433 % | |
171 | Kazakhstan | 0.416 % | |
172 | Guam | 0.394 % | |
173 | Grenada | 0.355 % | |
174 | Serbia | 0.331 % | |
175 | Faroe Islands | 0.296 % | |
176 | Cuba | 0.285 % | |
177 | Eswatini | 0.232 % | |
178 | Bermuda | 0.196 % | |
179 | Czech Republic | 0.191 % | |
180 | Belarus | 0.19 % | |
181 | Slovenia | 0.158 % | |
182 | United States Virgin Islands | 0.112 % | |
183 | Georgia | 0.101 % | |
184 | Mauritius | 0.025 % | |
185 | Germany | -0.086 % | |
186 | Croatia | -0.088 % | |
187 | Greenland | -0.094 % | |
188 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | -0.096 % | |
189 | Trinidad and Tobago | -0.117 % | |
190 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | -0.131 % | |
191 | Nauru | -0.149 % | |
192 | Bulgaria | -0.161 % | |
193 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | -0.168 % | |
194 | Kosovo | -0.179 % | |
195 | Palau | -0.202 % | |
196 | Russia | -0.215 % | |
197 | Romania | -0.25 % | |
198 | Barbados | -0.252 % | |
199 | Poland | -0.274 % | |
200 | Slovakia | -0.307 % | |
201 | Ukraine | -0.329 % | |
202 | Monaco | -0.476 % | |
203 | Estonia | -0.519 % | |
204 | North Macedonia | -0.521 % | |
205 | Puerto Rico | -0.524 % | |
206 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | -0.625 % | |
207 | Republic of Moldova | -0.665 % | |
208 | Armenia | -0.704 % | |
209 | American Samoa | -0.751 % | |
210 | Samoa | -0.929 % | |
211 | Latvia | -0.949 % | |
212 | Antigua and Barbuda | -1.326 % | |
213 | Guyana | -1.398 % | |
214 | Lithuania | -1.507 % | |
215 | Northern Mariana Islands | -2.637 % | |
216 | Saint Lucia | -5.144 % |
- #1
Qatar
- #2
Bahrain
- #3
Nepal
- #4
Kenya
- #5
Uganda
- #6
Equatorial Guinea
- #7
United Arab Emirates
- #8
Jordan
- #9
Burundi
- #10
Liberia
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #216
Saint Lucia
- #215
Northern Mariana Islands
- #214
Lithuania
- #213
Guyana
- #212
Antigua and Barbuda
- #211
Latvia
- #210
Samoa
- #209
American Samoa
- #208
Armenia
- #207
Republic of Moldova
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2006, Qatar led the world with the highest Urban Population Annual Growth Rate at 16.72%, while the global range for this metric spanned from -0.31% to 16.72%. The global average urban population growth rate was 2.52%, providing a baseline for understanding urbanization trends across 200 countries.
Drivers of High Urban Population Growth
The staggering urban growth rates in countries like Qatar (16.72%), Bahrain (9.43%), and Nepal (9.39%) are indicative of specific economic and demographic factors. In the case of Qatar and Bahrain, rapid economic expansion driven by the oil and gas industries has led to significant urban migration. These countries have seen an influx of foreign workers moving to urban centers for employment opportunities, contributing to the high urban growth rates. Similarly, in Nepal, urbanization is fueled by rural-to-urban migration as people seek better living standards and employment in cities.
Understanding Negative Urban Growth Rates
Conversely, countries like Slovakia (-0.31%) and Poland (-0.27%) exhibit negative urban population growth rates. This decline can often be attributed to economic stagnation or demographic shifts, such as declining birth rates and emigration. In Eastern Europe, for instance, economic transitions post-Soviet era have led to urban depopulation as younger populations migrate to Western Europe for better economic prospects. Additionally, the aging population in these regions contributes to the slower urban growth.
Significant Year-over-Year Changes
The year-over-year changes reveal dynamic shifts in urban growth patterns. Qatar saw a remarkable increase of 9.94% (146.7%), highlighting its rapid urbanization driven by economic prosperity. Jordan also experienced a significant rise of 4.23% (162.9%), likely due to regional instability causing an influx of refugees and increased urban development. On the other hand, Iraq faced the most considerable decrease at -2.24% (-69.6%), reflecting the impact of conflict and instability on urbanization.
Economic and Policy Implications
High urban population growth rates often signal robust economic opportunities but also pose challenges such as infrastructure strain and resource management. Countries like Uganda (8.53%) and Kenya (9.14%) are experiencing rapid urbanization, which can drive economic growth if managed with effective urban planning and policy frameworks. However, without adequate infrastructure and services, these rates can exacerbate urban poverty and social inequality. Policymakers must balance growth with sustainable urban development to ensure long-term prosperity and stability.
In summary, the Urban Population Annual Growth Rate in 2006 highlights significant disparities in urbanization trends worldwide. While some countries are experiencing rapid growth due to economic opportunities and migration, others face challenges of depopulation and economic stagnation. Understanding these patterns is crucial for developing effective urban policies and managing the global urban transition.
Frequently Asked Questions About Urban Population Annual Growth Rate in 2006
Which country had the highest urban population annual growth rate in 2006?
Qatar had the highest urban population annual growth rate in 2006, with a rate of 16.72%.
What was the lowest urban population annual growth rate recorded in 2006?
The lowest urban population annual growth rate in 2006 was recorded in Saint Lucia, with a rate of -5.14%.
What was the average urban population annual growth rate across all countries in 2006?
The average urban population annual growth rate across all countries in 2006 was 2.25%.
What was the median urban population annual growth rate in 2006?
The median urban population annual growth rate in 2006 was 1.96%.
Which countries were in the top 3 for urban population annual growth rate in 2006?
The top 3 countries for urban population annual growth rate in 2006 were Qatar with 16.72%, Bahrain with 9.43%, and Nepal with 9.39%.
How many countries were included in the dataset for urban population annual growth rate in 2006?
The dataset for urban population annual growth rate in 2006 included 216 countries.
Insights by country
Bosnia and Herzegovina
In 2006, Bosnia and Herzegovina had an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of -0.0962931101497754 %, ranking #188 out of 216 countries. This negative growth rate contrasts sharply with many neighboring countries in the Balkans, which have seen urbanization increases. Contributing factors include economic instability and a significant emigration trend, as many citizens seek better opportunities abroad, impacting urban population dynamics.
Aruba
In 2006, Aruba had an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of 1.57064739365999 %, ranking #119 out of 216 countries. This growth rate is relatively modest compared to neighboring Caribbean nations, which often experience higher urbanization rates due to tourism and economic expansion. The growth in Aruba is driven by its stable economy, largely reliant on tourism, and a small geographic area that encourages urban development.
Algeria
In 2006, Algeria had an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of 2.72118821083371 %, ranking #80 out of 216 countries. This growth rate is notable compared to the global average, reflecting a trend of increasing urbanization in many developing nations. Key drivers of this urban growth in Algeria include ongoing economic development and a significant rural-to-urban migration as citizens seek better employment opportunities and living conditions.
Sweden
In 2006, Sweden had an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of 0.68727228130455 %, ranking #159 out of 216 countries. This growth rate is lower than the global average, indicating a more stable urbanization trend compared to rapidly urbanizing nations. Contributing factors include Sweden's well-established infrastructure and high standard of living, which attract urban migration but at a moderate pace due to the country's smaller population size and effective regional development policies.
Norway
In 2006, Norway had an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of 1.14111833830031 %, ranking #144 out of 216 countries. This growth rate is below the global average, indicating a slower urbanization trend compared to many other nations. Contributing factors include Norway's established urban infrastructure and a stable population size, which reflects a high standard of living and effective urban planning policies.
Sudan
In 2006, Sudan had an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of 2.33892505775764 %, ranking #91 out of 216 countries. This growth rate is notable when compared to regional trends, as many neighboring countries experience higher urbanization rates due to differing economic conditions. The key drivers of Sudan's urban growth include ongoing internal migration driven by conflict and economic opportunities in urban centers, which are often seen as more stable than rural areas.
Dominica
In 2006, Dominica had an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of 0.565072246942304 %, ranking #165 out of 216 countries. This growth rate is relatively low compared to Caribbean neighbors, reflecting regional trends of urbanization. Factors contributing to this statistic include Dominica's limited economic opportunities in urban areas and its emphasis on preserving rural agricultural practices, which influence migration patterns within the country.
Bangladesh
In 2006, Bangladesh ranked #71 globally with an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of 2.99286532012132 %. This growth rate is indicative of urbanization trends that are often higher than the global average, driven by rapid industrialization and rural-to-urban migration. Factors such as economic opportunities in urban areas and a young population seeking better livelihoods contribute significantly to this urban expansion.
Rwanda
In 2006, Rwanda recorded an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of 2.68934981041493 %, ranking #83 out of 216 countries. This growth rate is notable compared to many neighboring countries in East Africa, which often experience higher urbanization pressures. The primary drivers for Rwanda's urban growth include ongoing economic development initiatives and a focus on infrastructure improvements post-genocide, leading to increased migration to urban areas for better opportunities.
India
In 2006, India had an Urban Population Annual Growth Rate of 2.7138445773411 %, ranking #81 out of 216 countries. This growth rate is indicative of urbanization trends that are significant in South Asia, where rapid urban migration is common. Key drivers for this growth include economic opportunities in cities and a young, growing population seeking better living conditions and jobs.
Data Source
Urban population growth (annual %) - World Bank Open Data
The World Bank Open Data provides comprehensive datasets on various aspects of global development, including urban population growth rates. The "Urban population growth (annual %)" indicator offers country-level statistics reflecting the annual percentage change in the urban population, based on the total population.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Urban Population Annual Growth Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More People and Society Facts
Currently married (Percent)
The percentage of currently married individuals by country highlights societal trends in family structure and relationships. Understanding these statistics can provide insights into cultural norms and demographic shifts, influencing policies and social programs.
View dataBrowse All People and Society
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data