Total demand for family planning (Percent) 2026
Total demand for family planning measures the percentage of individuals seeking access to reproductive health services. Understanding this statistic is crucial for addressing global population growth and improving health outcomes.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | Finland | 81.66 % |
2 | Switzerland | 77.1 % |
3 | Canada | 75.87 % |
4 | United Kingdom | 75.07 % |
5 | Cuba | 73.11 % |
6 | Brazil | 72.6 % |
7 | Chile | 71.74 % |
8 | Austria | 71.17 % |
9 | Norway | 70.63 % |
10 | Bulgaria | 70.6 % |
11 | China | 70.06 % |
12 | France | 70.02 % |
13 | Ireland | 70.02 % |
14 | Spain | 68.96 % |
15 | Colombia | 68.9 % |
16 | North Korea | 68.61 % |
17 | New Zealand | 68.32 % |
18 | Netherlands | 68.26 % |
19 | Argentina | 67.94 % |
20 | Estonia | 67.75 % |
21 | Denmark | 67.41 % |
22 | Czech Republic | 67.27 % |
23 | Botswana | 66.25 % |
24 | Paraguay | 66.22 % |
25 | Belgium | 66.05 % |
26 | United States | 65.73 % |
27 | Australia | 65.29 % |
28 | Nicaragua | 64.82 % |
29 | Dominican Republic | 64.63 % |
30 | Sweden | 64.19 % |
31 | Italy | 64.07 % |
32 | Latvia | 63.77 % |
33 | Uruguay | 63.7 % |
34 | Costa Rica | 63.4 % |
35 | Namibia | 63.35 % |
36 | Mexico | 62.6 % |
37 | Barbados | 62.47 % |
38 | Bangladesh | 62.05 % |
39 | Belarus | 62.03 % |
40 | South Africa | 62.02 % |
41 | Malawi | 61.79 % |
42 | Vietnam | 61.77 % |
43 | Venezuela | 61.52 % |
44 | Portugal | 61.45 % |
45 | Germany | 61.31 % |
46 | United States Virgin Islands | 61.13 % |
47 | Saint Lucia | 60.78 % |
48 | Ecuador | 60.75 % |
49 | Poland | 60.51 % |
50 | Panama | 60.42 % |
51 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 60.04 % |
52 | Cook Islands | 59.9 % |
53 | Republic of Moldova | 59.81 % |
54 | El Salvador | 59.77 % |
55 | Japan | 59.68 % |
56 | Slovakia | 59.53 % |
57 | Iran | 59.47 % |
58 | Peru | 59.43 % |
59 | Dominica | 59.21 % |
60 | Romania | 59.15 % |
61 | Réunion | 58.87 % |
62 | Ukraine | 58.79 % |
63 | Nepal | 58.71 % |
64 | Eswatini | 58.66 % |
65 | Puerto Rico | 58.61 % |
66 | Zimbabwe | 58.61 % |
67 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 58.47 % |
68 | Honduras | 58.42 % |
69 | Lesotho | 58.42 % |
70 | India | 57.51 % |
71 | Sao Tome and Principe | 57.43 % |
72 | Malta | 56.98 % |
73 | Belize | 56.89 % |
74 | Albania | 56.79 % |
75 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 56.75 % |
76 | Hungary | 56.71 % |
77 | Congo | 56.57 % |
78 | Uganda | 56.57 % |
79 | Russia | 56.39 % |
80 | Cabo Verde | 56.13 % |
81 | Taiwan | 56.09 % |
82 | Grenada | 55.61 % |
83 | Turks and Caicos Islands | 55.6 % |
84 | Bahamas | 55.26 % |
85 | Bolivia | 55.08 % |
86 | Uzbekistan | 54.83 % |
87 | Montserrat | 54.51 % |
88 | Curaçao | 54.32 % |
89 | South Korea | 54.27 % |
90 | Madagascar | 53.67 % |
91 | Greece | 53.53 % |
92 | Vanuatu | 53.29 % |
93 | Serbia | 53.17 % |
94 | Lithuania | 53.04 % |
95 | North Macedonia | 53 % |
96 | Mongolia | 53 % |
97 | Anguilla | 52.86 % |
98 | Liberia | 52.85 % |
99 | Kazakhstan | 52.82 % |
100 | Haiti | 52.75 % |
101 | Zambia | 52.58 % |
102 | Kenya | 52.14 % |
103 | Cambodia | 51.49 % |
104 | Slovenia | 51.44 % |
105 | Antigua and Barbuda | 51.34 % |
106 | Guatemala | 51.14 % |
107 | Sri Lanka | 50.6 % |
108 | Guadeloupe | 50.24 % |
109 | Martinique | 50.23 % |
110 | Mozambique | 49.81 % |
111 | Suriname | 49.75 % |
112 | Egypt | 49.72 % |
113 | Croatia | 49.71 % |
114 | Guinea-Bissau | 49 % |
115 | Guyana | 48.81 % |
116 | United Arab Emirates | 48.76 % |
117 | Sierra Leone | 48.74 % |
118 | Laos | 48.69 % |
119 | Rwanda | 48.63 % |
120 | Bhutan | 48.35 % |
121 | Trinidad and Tobago | 48.31 % |
122 | Marshall Islands | 48.29 % |
123 | Indonesia | 48.28 % |
124 | Tanzania | 48.21 % |
125 | Turkey | 48.11 % |
126 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 47.82 % |
127 | Côte d'Ivoire | 47.27 % |
128 | Togo | 47.2 % |
129 | Kosovo | 47.16 % |
130 | Morocco | 47.07 % |
131 | Iraq | 47.04 % |
132 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 46.81 % |
133 | Burkina Faso | 46.3 % |
134 | State of Palestine | 46.21 % |
135 | Gabon | 46.14 % |
136 | Papua New Guinea | 46 % |
137 | Jamaica | 45.93 % |
138 | Yemen | 45.18 % |
139 | Ghana | 45.1 % |
140 | Bahrain | 44.77 % |
141 | Israel | 44.57 % |
142 | Turkmenistan | 44.47 % |
143 | Nauru | 44.39 % |
144 | Thailand | 44.11 % |
145 | Georgia | 43.98 % |
146 | Armenia | 43.8 % |
147 | Ethiopia | 43.77 % |
148 | Guam | 43.73 % |
149 | Angola | 43.7 % |
150 | Central African Republic | 43.25 % |
151 | Mauritius | 43.25 % |
152 | Kuwait | 43.04 % |
153 | Myanmar | 42.67 % |
154 | Azerbaijan | 42.39 % |
155 | Qatar | 42.25 % |
156 | Malaysia | 42.17 % |
157 | Philippines | 41.95 % |
158 | Syrian Arab Republic | 41.9 % |
159 | Equatorial Guinea | 41.26 % |
160 | Benin | 40.78 % |
161 | Fiji | 40.76 % |
162 | Mali | 40.67 % |
163 | Samoa | 40.49 % |
164 | Cameroon | 40.16 % |
165 | Kiribati | 40.09 % |
166 | Jordan | 39.83 % |
167 | Palau | 39.78 % |
168 | Tuvalu | 39.11 % |
169 | Algeria | 38.89 % |
170 | Tunisia | 38.82 % |
171 | Lebanon | 38.77 % |
172 | Tajikistan | 38.38 % |
173 | Singapore | 38.25 % |
174 | Pakistan | 38.19 % |
175 | Solomon Islands | 37.74 % |
176 | Maldives | 37.68 % |
177 | Montenegro | 37.6 % |
178 | Burundi | 36.8 % |
179 | Northern Mariana Islands | 36.78 % |
180 | Afghanistan | 36.45 % |
181 | Kyrgyzstan | 36.33 % |
182 | Nigeria | 35.5 % |
183 | Oman | 35.13 % |
184 | Saudi Arabia | 34.89 % |
185 | Comoros | 34.6 % |
186 | Senegal | 33.75 % |
187 | Guinea | 33.57 % |
188 | Timor-Leste | 33.27 % |
189 | Mauritania | 32.5 % |
190 | Tonga | 31.15 % |
191 | Gambia | 30.62 % |
192 | Djibouti | 29.25 % |
193 | Sudan | 29.18 % |
194 | South Sudan | 29.16 % |
195 | Niger | 28.5 % |
196 | Chad | 27.3 % |
197 | Libya | 26.25 % |
198 | Somalia | 25.21 % |
199 | Eritrea | 25.03 % |
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #199
Eritrea
- #198
Somalia
- #197
Libya
- #196
Chad
- #195
Niger
- #194
South Sudan
- #193
Sudan
- #192
Djibouti
- #191
Gambia
- #190
Tonga
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2026, Finland leads the world in Total demand for family planning (Percent) with a remarkable 81.66%, while the global range spans from a minimum of 25.03% to a maximum of 81.66%. The global average stands at 51.87%, providing a benchmark for evaluating individual country performance in this critical metric.
Economic Prosperity and Family Planning
Economic factors play a significant role in the Total demand for family planning (Percent). Countries with robust economies such as Finland (81.66%), Switzerland (77.10%), and Canada (75.87%) showcase high demand for family planning services. This correlation can be attributed to better access to healthcare infrastructure and education, which are often more advanced in wealthier nations. These countries have invested heavily in healthcare systems that provide comprehensive reproductive health services, thereby increasing the overall demand for family planning.
Conversely, nations with lower economic performance, such as Chad (27.30%) and Niger (28.50%), exhibit significantly lower demand. Limited healthcare access and education in these regions contribute to the reduced demand for family planning services. The economic constraints in these countries often lead to prioritizing immediate survival needs over long-term health planning, thus impacting the demand for family planning.
Policy Influence on Family Planning Demand
Government policies significantly influence the Total demand for family planning (Percent). In countries like Cuba (73.11%) and Brazil (72.60%), proactive government policies that promote reproductive health education and provide subsidized contraceptive methods have driven higher demand. These policies ensure that family planning services are accessible and affordable, encouraging more individuals to seek them out.
On the other hand, countries such as Sudan (29.18%) and Eritrea (25.03%) have lower demand, which can partly be attributed to restrictive policies or lack of governmental support for family planning initiatives. In these regions, cultural and political barriers may limit the implementation of effective family planning programs, thereby suppressing demand.
Year-Over-Year Trends in Family Planning Demand
Analyzing year-over-year changes reveals interesting trends in family planning demand. Côte d'Ivoire saw the most significant increase with a 0.87% rise, signifying a 1.9% improvement. This uptick might reflect recent efforts to enhance healthcare accessibility and awareness. Similarly, Burkina Faso and Uganda both experienced increases, with 0.70% and 0.67% respectively, indicating positive strides in family planning initiatives.
Conversely, Kenya faced the largest decrease of -0.56% (-1.1%). This decline could result from economic or political instability affecting healthcare delivery. Other countries like Thailand and Croatia also saw decreases, at -0.39% each, suggesting possible challenges in maintaining or expanding existing family planning services.
Geographical Disparities in Family Planning Demand
Geographical location also impacts the Total demand for family planning (Percent). European countries such as Austria (71.17%) and Norway (70.63%) typically report higher demand, reflecting the region's emphasis on comprehensive health services and education. The European Union's policies often support member countries in enhancing reproductive health services, which contributes to these high percentages.
In contrast, many African nations, including Somalia (25.21%) and Libya (26.25%), show lower demand percentages, often due to ongoing conflicts and limited healthcare infrastructure. These conditions hinder the development and implementation of effective family planning programs, resulting in lower demand.
Understanding these disparities is crucial for international organizations and governments aiming to improve global health outcomes. By addressing the underlying economic, policy, and geographical factors, stakeholders can better strategize to meet the family planning needs of diverse populations worldwide.
Data Source
United Nations Population Division
The Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs conducts demographic research, supports intergovernmental processes at the United Nations in the area of population and development, and assists countries in developing their capacity to produce and analyse population data and information. The Division brings population issues to the attention of the international community by highlighting the central role of demographic trends in all aspects of sustainable development. The Division publishes datasets on the world’s population and analyzes global demographic trends.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Total demand for family planning (Percent) data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More People and Society Facts
Currently married (Percent)
The percentage of currently married individuals by country highlights societal trends in family structure and relationships. Understanding these statistics can provide insights into cultural norms and demographic shifts, influencing policies and social programs.
View dataBrowse All People and Society
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data