Nurses and Midwives Density 2019
Nurses and midwives density measures healthcare accessibility. Learn about countries with the highest and lowest density per 1,000 people.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Switzerland | 18.29 per 1,000 people | |
2 | Iceland | 16.16 per 1,000 people | |
3 | Norway | 16.01 per 1,000 people | |
4 | Ireland | 15.48 per 1,000 people | |
5 | Finland | 13.43 per 1,000 people | |
6 | Australia | 13.1 per 1,000 people | |
7 | United States | 13.02 per 1,000 people | |
8 | Luxembourg | 12.54 per 1,000 people | |
9 | Belgium | 12.26 per 1,000 people | |
10 | Germany | 12.03 per 1,000 people | |
11 | Denmark | 11.89 per 1,000 people | |
12 | Sweden | 11.63 per 1,000 people | |
13 | Belarus | 10.91 per 1,000 people | |
14 | Netherlands | 10.89 per 1,000 people | |
15 | New Zealand | 10.78 per 1,000 people | |
16 | Austria | 10.66 per 1,000 people | |
17 | Uzbekistan | 10.61 per 1,000 people | |
18 | Slovenia | 10.43 per 1,000 people | |
19 | Canada | 9.977 per 1,000 people | |
20 | Antigua and Barbuda | 9.65 per 1,000 people | |
21 | France | 9.336 per 1,000 people | |
22 | Czech Republic | 9.048 per 1,000 people | |
23 | United Kingdom | 8.645 per 1,000 people | |
24 | Russia | 8.635 per 1,000 people | |
25 | Malta | 8.21 per 1,000 people | |
26 | South Korea | 8.093 per 1,000 people | |
27 | Lithuania | 8.058 per 1,000 people | |
28 | Romania | 7.646 per 1,000 people | |
29 | Croatia | 7.398 per 1,000 people | |
30 | Portugal | 7.306 per 1,000 people | |
31 | Kazakhstan | 6.696 per 1,000 people | |
32 | Palau | 6.685 per 1,000 people | |
33 | Uruguay | 6.633 per 1,000 people | |
34 | Estonia | 6.602 per 1,000 people | |
35 | Saudi Arabia | 6.531 per 1,000 people | |
36 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 6.425 per 1,000 people | |
37 | Italy | 6.402 per 1,000 people | |
38 | Poland | 6.326 per 1,000 people | |
39 | Republic of Moldova | 6.139 per 1,000 people | |
40 | Slovakia | 6.062 per 1,000 people | |
41 | Spain | 6.037 per 1,000 people | |
42 | United Arab Emirates | 5.987 per 1,000 people | |
43 | Azerbaijan | 5.914 per 1,000 people | |
44 | Hungary | 5.564 per 1,000 people | |
45 | Israel | 5.5 per 1,000 people | |
46 | North Macedonia | 5.45 per 1,000 people | |
47 | Seychelles | 5.438 per 1,000 people | |
48 | Montenegro | 5.398 per 1,000 people | |
49 | Georgia | 5.309 per 1,000 people | |
50 | Maldives | 5.235 per 1,000 people | |
51 | Tajikistan | 5.119 per 1,000 people | |
52 | Albania | 5.081 per 1,000 people | |
53 | Kuwait | 4.956 per 1,000 people | |
54 | Bulgaria | 4.848 per 1,000 people | |
55 | Andorra | 4.824 per 1,000 people | |
56 | Philippines | 4.789 per 1,000 people | |
57 | Barbados | 4.708 per 1,000 people | |
58 | Armenia | 4.688 per 1,000 people | |
59 | Latvia | 4.599 per 1,000 people | |
60 | Oman | 4.427 per 1,000 people | |
61 | Brazil | 4.321 per 1,000 people | |
62 | Tonga | 4.286 per 1,000 people | |
63 | Kyrgyzstan | 4.24 per 1,000 people | |
64 | Cyprus | 4.209 per 1,000 people | |
65 | Argentina | 4.143 per 1,000 people | |
66 | Malaysia | 3.925 per 1,000 people | |
67 | Fiji | 3.852 per 1,000 people | |
68 | Trinidad and Tobago | 3.823 per 1,000 people | |
69 | Indonesia | 3.781 per 1,000 people | |
70 | Suriname | 3.769 per 1,000 people | |
71 | Turkmenistan | 3.69 per 1,000 people | |
72 | Greece | 3.648 per 1,000 people | |
73 | Chile | 3.576 per 1,000 people | |
74 | Mauritius | 3.494 per 1,000 people | |
75 | Botswana | 3.329 per 1,000 people | |
76 | Nepal | 3.327 per 1,000 people | |
77 | Samoa | 3.232 per 1,000 people | |
78 | Panama | 3.214 per 1,000 people | |
79 | Jordan | 3.168 per 1,000 people | |
80 | China | 3.123 per 1,000 people | |
81 | Thailand | 3.069 per 1,000 people | |
82 | Turkey | 2.977 per 1,000 people | |
83 | Costa Rica | 2.912 per 1,000 people | |
84 | Mexico | 2.865 per 1,000 people | |
85 | Ghana | 2.638 per 1,000 people | |
86 | Guyana | 2.627 per 1,000 people | |
87 | Gabon | 2.345 per 1,000 people | |
88 | Iraq | 2.313 per 1,000 people | |
89 | Namibia | 2.229 per 1,000 people | |
90 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 2.221 per 1,000 people | |
91 | Sao Tome and Principe | 2.165 per 1,000 people | |
92 | Sri Lanka | 2.151 per 1,000 people | |
93 | Tunisia | 2.113 per 1,000 people | |
94 | Peru | 2.107 per 1,000 people | |
95 | Bahrain | 2 per 1,000 people | |
96 | Bhutan | 1.825 per 1,000 people | |
97 | Syrian Arab Republic | 1.776 per 1,000 people | |
98 | Timor-Leste | 1.745 per 1,000 people | |
99 | Belize | 1.737 per 1,000 people | |
100 | Cabo Verde | 1.486 per 1,000 people | |
101 | Vanuatu | 1.459 per 1,000 people | |
102 | Dominican Republic | 1.439 per 1,000 people | |
103 | Zambia | 1.418 per 1,000 people | |
104 | Bolivia | 1.395 per 1,000 people | |
105 | Colombia | 1.374 per 1,000 people | |
106 | Mauritania | 1.187 per 1,000 people | |
107 | Myanmar | 1.111 per 1,000 people | |
108 | South Africa | 1.085 per 1,000 people | |
109 | Nigeria | 1.072 per 1,000 people | |
110 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 1.045 per 1,000 people | |
111 | Cambodia | 1.008 per 1,000 people | |
112 | Rwanda | 0.937 per 1,000 people | |
113 | Burkina Faso | 0.899 per 1,000 people | |
114 | Sierra Leone | 0.865 per 1,000 people | |
115 | Côte d'Ivoire | 0.645 per 1,000 people | |
116 | Burundi | 0.644 per 1,000 people | |
117 | South Sudan | 0.585 per 1,000 people | |
118 | Liberia | 0.544 per 1,000 people | |
119 | Benin | 0.54 per 1,000 people | |
120 | Senegal | 0.539 per 1,000 people | |
121 | Mozambique | 0.48 per 1,000 people | |
122 | Bangladesh | 0.477 per 1,000 people | |
123 | Pakistan | 0.453 per 1,000 people | |
124 | Gambia | 0.444 per 1,000 people | |
125 | Togo | 0.444 per 1,000 people | |
126 | Papua New Guinea | 0.414 per 1,000 people | |
127 | Algeria | 0.312 per 1,000 people | |
128 | Chad | 0.134 per 1,000 people |
- #1
Switzerland
- #2
Iceland
- #3
Norway
- #4
Ireland
- #5
Finland
- #6
Australia
- #7
United States
- #8
Luxembourg
- #9
Belgium
- #10
Germany
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #128
Chad
- #127
Algeria
- #126
Papua New Guinea
- #125
Togo
- #124
Gambia
- #123
Pakistan
- #122
Bangladesh
- #121
Mozambique
- #120
Senegal
- #119
Benin
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2019, Switzerland led the world with the highest Nurses and Midwives Density at 18.29 per 1,000 people, while the global range spanned from 0.13 to 18.29. The global average density was 5.02 per 1,000 people, providing a benchmark for healthcare accessibility in different regions.
Economic Prosperity and Healthcare Accessibility
Countries with higher nurses and midwives density often correlate with economic prosperity and robust healthcare systems. For instance, Switzerland and Norway report densities of 18.29 and 16.01, respectively. This reflects their significant investments in healthcare infrastructure and workforce. High-income countries, like Iceland with a density of 16.16, benefit from policies that prioritize public health and education, ensuring a steady supply of qualified healthcare professionals.
Conversely, many low-income countries experience challenges in healthcare accessibility. Chad and Algeria have densities of just 0.134 and 0.312, highlighting systemic issues such as inadequate funding, limited educational opportunities for healthcare professionals, and logistical barriers in rural areas.
Geographic and Demographic Influences
Geographic and demographic factors also play a critical role in nurses and midwives density. Iceland and Australia (density of 13.1) demonstrate how smaller populations and urban-centric development can lead to higher density figures, as healthcare resources are more concentrated and accessible. In contrast, countries like Bangladesh and Papua New Guinea, with densities of 0.477 and 0.414, face challenges due to larger populations and scattered rural communities, which dilute healthcare services per capita.
Moreover, countries with vast geographic landscapes, such as Australia and the United States (density of 13.02), need to address logistical challenges in distributing healthcare workers across remote areas, impacting overall density.
Policy Impact on Workforce Density
Healthcare policy and workforce planning are crucial determinants of density levels. Countries with strategic policies, like Ireland, which boasts a density of 15.48, have implemented successful healthcare reforms and education initiatives to bolster their workforce. This proactive approach contrasts with countries like Gambia and Togo, both with a density of 0.444, where policy constraints and economic limitations hinder workforce growth.
Governmental initiatives in countries such as Finland (density of 13.43) often include incentives for healthcare education and immigration policies that attract foreign professionals, contributing to higher density figures.
Trends and Fluctuations in Density
Year-over-year changes in nurses and midwives density reveal significant fluctuations influenced by various factors. Antigua and Barbuda experienced the largest increase with a rise of +4.86 per 1,000 people, marking a 101.6% growth. This dramatic increase can be attributed to targeted healthcare investments and educational initiatives.
In stark contrast, Brazil saw the most considerable decrease of -5.96 per 1,000 people, a -58.0% change, possibly due to economic downturns and policy shifts that affected healthcare funding and workforce retention. Similarly, Kuwait and Seychelles faced declines of -2.14 and -1.93, respectively, underscoring the impact of economic and political factors on healthcare workforce stability.
These trends highlight the dynamic nature of healthcare workforce densities and the need for continuous monitoring and adaptive policy-making to ensure equitable healthcare access globally.
Frequently Asked Questions About Nurses and Midwives Density in 2019
Which country had the highest density of nurses and midwives in 2019?
Switzerland had the highest density of nurses and midwives in 2019, with 18.29 per 1,000 people.
What was the average density of nurses and midwives per 1,000 people in 2019?
The average density of nurses and midwives per 1,000 people in 2019 was 5.02.
Which country had the lowest density of nurses and midwives in 2019?
Chad had the lowest density of nurses and midwives in 2019, with 0.13 per 1,000 people.
What was the median density of nurses and midwives per 1,000 people in 2019?
The median density of nurses and midwives per 1,000 people in 2019 was 4.18.
Which countries were in the top 3 for nurses and midwives density in 2019?
The top 3 countries for nurses and midwives density in 2019 were Switzerland, Iceland, and Norway.
How many countries are included in the dataset for nurses and midwives density in 2019?
The dataset includes 128 countries for nurses and midwives density in 2019.
Insights by country
Ghana
In 2019, Ghana had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 2.638 per 1,000 people, ranking #85 out of 128 countries. This figure is below the global average, indicating challenges in healthcare staffing compared to more developed nations. Contributing factors include limited healthcare funding and a growing population, which strain existing resources and affect the availability of trained nursing professionals.
Belgium
In 2019, Belgium achieved a global rank of #9 with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 12.26 per 1,000 people. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting the country's strong healthcare infrastructure. Contributing factors include Belgium's commitment to healthcare funding and a robust education system for nursing and midwifery professionals, which ensures a steady supply of skilled practitioners to meet the population's needs.
Liberia
In 2019, Liberia ranked #118 globally with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 0.544 per 1,000 people. This figure is significantly lower than the global average, indicating a critical shortage of healthcare personnel in the country. Contributing factors include the aftermath of civil conflict, which has severely impacted healthcare infrastructure, and ongoing economic challenges that hinder investment in health services.
Bolivia
In 2019, Bolivia ranked #104 globally with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 1.395 per 1,000 people. This figure is notably lower than many regional peers, reflecting broader challenges in healthcare access across the Andean region. Contributing factors include Bolivia's varied geography, which complicates healthcare delivery, and economic constraints that limit investment in health infrastructure and workforce training.
Botswana
Botswana ranked #75 globally with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 3.329 per 1,000 people in 2019. This figure is below the global average, reflecting challenges in healthcare workforce availability compared to higher-ranked countries. Contributing factors include Botswana's ongoing efforts to improve healthcare access and the impact of its economic policies on health sector funding and training programs.
Czech Republic
The Czech Republic achieved a global rank of #22 with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 9.048 per 1,000 people in 2019. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating a strong healthcare workforce relative to many countries. Contributing factors include the country's robust healthcare system and a commitment to training healthcare professionals, supported by government policies that prioritize public health and education.
Spain
In 2019, Spain had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 6.037 per 1,000 people, ranking #41 out of 128 countries. This figure is slightly below the European Union average, highlighting a need for improvement in healthcare staffing compared to its neighbors. Contributing factors include Spain's aging population and regional healthcare policies that influence the distribution of healthcare professionals across urban and rural areas.
Oman
In 2019, Oman achieved a Nurses and Midwives Density of 4.427 per 1,000 people, ranking #60 out of 128 countries. This figure is lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in healthcare workforce distribution in the region. Factors contributing to this density include Oman's ongoing efforts to improve healthcare access and the government's investment in medical education and training programs.
Nepal
Nepal ranked #76 globally in 2019 with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 3.327 per 1,000 people. This figure is lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in healthcare access compared to higher-ranking countries like Cuba, which has a density exceeding 8 per 1,000 people. Contributing factors to Nepal's density include a limited healthcare budget, geographic barriers that hinder access to medical facilities, and a shortage of trained healthcare professionals.
Malaysia
In 2019, Malaysia ranked #66 globally with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 3.925 per 1,000 people. This figure is below the global average, highlighting a need for improvement in healthcare workforce availability compared to higher-ranked countries. Contributing factors include Malaysia's ongoing healthcare reforms and efforts to enhance medical training, driven by a growing population and increasing healthcare demands.
Data Source
Nurses and midwives per 1,000 people - Our World in Data
Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive data and visualizations on global development issues. The dataset on nurses and midwives per 1,000 people offers insights into healthcare workforce distribution across various countries, highlighting trends and disparities in healthcare access.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Nurses and Midwives Density data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.