Nurses and Midwives Density 2005

Nurses and midwives density measures healthcare accessibility. Learn about countries with the highest and lowest density per 1,000 people.

103 data points••Global Coverage•Nurses and midwives per 1,000 people - Our World in Data•

Interactive Map

Loading interactive map...

Complete Data Rankings

Rank
Actions
1
Norway flag
Norway
15.51 per 1,000 people
2
Iceland flag
Iceland
14.75 per 1,000 people
3
Switzerland flag
Switzerland
12.93 per 1,000 people
4
Ireland flag
Ireland
12.23 per 1,000 people
5
Luxembourg flag
Luxembourg
11.29 per 1,000 people
6
Sweden flag
Sweden
11.21 per 1,000 people
7
Uzbekistan flag
Uzbekistan
11.01 per 1,000 people
8
Denmark flag
Denmark
10.75 per 1,000 people
9
United States flag
United States
10.41 per 1,000 people
10
Belarus flag
Belarus
9.932 per 1,000 people
11
New Zealand flag
New Zealand
9.708 per 1,000 people
12
Australia flag
Australia
9.707 per 1,000 people
13
United Kingdom flag
United Kingdom
9.6 per 1,000 people
14
Belgium flag
Belgium
9.466 per 1,000 people
15
Germany flag
Germany
9.458 per 1,000 people
16
Finland flag
Finland
9.367 per 1,000 people
17
Canada flag
Canada
8.691 per 1,000 people
18
Czech Republic flag
Czech Republic
8.478 per 1,000 people
19
Netherlands flag
Netherlands
8.256 per 1,000 people
20
Azerbaijan flag
Azerbaijan
8.186 per 1,000 people
21
France flag
France
7.643 per 1,000 people
22
Lithuania flag
Lithuania
7.605 per 1,000 people
23
Slovenia flag
Slovenia
7.52 per 1,000 people
24
Russia flag
Russia
7.086 per 1,000 people
25
Kazakhstan flag
Kazakhstan
6.637 per 1,000 people
26
Estonia flag
Estonia
6.58 per 1,000 people
27
Ukraine flag
Ukraine
6.544 per 1,000 people
28
Slovakia flag
Slovakia
6.331 per 1,000 people
29
Austria flag
Austria
6.197 per 1,000 people
30
Hungary flag
Hungary
6.159 per 1,000 people
31
Kyrgyzstan flag
Kyrgyzstan
6.131 per 1,000 people
32
Qatar flag
Qatar
5.912 per 1,000 people
33
Republic of Moldova flag
Republic of Moldova
5.889 per 1,000 people
34
Romania flag
Romania
5.817 per 1,000 people
35
Serbia flag
Serbia
5.813 per 1,000 people
36
Malta flag
Malta
5.674 per 1,000 people
37
Poland flag
Poland
5.645 per 1,000 people
38
Israel flag
Israel
5.606 per 1,000 people
39
Brunei Darussalam flag
Brunei Darussalam
5.589 per 1,000 people
40
Croatia flag
Croatia
5.326 per 1,000 people
41
Montenegro flag
Montenegro
5.218 per 1,000 people
42
Latvia flag
Latvia
5.204 per 1,000 people
43
Italy flag
Italy
5.189 per 1,000 people
44
Armenia flag
Armenia
4.947 per 1,000 people
45
Barbados flag
Barbados
4.879 per 1,000 people
46
Singapore flag
Singapore
4.725 per 1,000 people
47
Turkmenistan flag
Turkmenistan
4.655 per 1,000 people
48
Portugal flag
Portugal
4.585 per 1,000 people
49
Bulgaria flag
Bulgaria
4.508 per 1,000 people
50
Spain flag
Spain
4.485 per 1,000 people
51
Bosnia and Herzegovina flag
Bosnia and Herzegovina
4.475 per 1,000 people
52
Seychelles flag
Seychelles
4.367 per 1,000 people
53
Georgia flag
Georgia
4.331 per 1,000 people
54
Philippines flag
Philippines
4.193 per 1,000 people
55
South Korea flag
South Korea
3.899 per 1,000 people
56
Oman flag
Oman
3.771 per 1,000 people
57
Albania flag
Albania
3.62 per 1,000 people
58
Greece flag
Greece
3.567 per 1,000 people
59
Andorra flag
Andorra
3.437 per 1,000 people
60
Tajikistan flag
Tajikistan
3.396 per 1,000 people
61
North Macedonia flag
North Macedonia
3.355 per 1,000 people
62
Cyprus flag
Cyprus
2.988 per 1,000 people
63
United Arab Emirates flag
United Arab Emirates
2.951 per 1,000 people
64
Jordan flag
Jordan
2.89 per 1,000 people
65
Bahrain flag
Bahrain
2.562 per 1,000 people
66
Malaysia flag
Malaysia
2.538 per 1,000 people
67
Botswana flag
Botswana
2.428 per 1,000 people
68
Micronesia (Fed. States of) flag
Micronesia (Fed. States of)
2.345 per 1,000 people
69
Mexico flag
Mexico
2.209 per 1,000 people
70
Panama flag
Panama
2.015 per 1,000 people
71
Saint Lucia flag
Saint Lucia
1.97 per 1,000 people
72
Syrian Arab Republic flag
Syrian Arab Republic
1.839 per 1,000 people
73
Turkey flag
Turkey
1.756 per 1,000 people
74
Nigeria flag
Nigeria
1.472 per 1,000 people
75
Costa Rica flag
Costa Rica
1.463 per 1,000 people
76
Solomon Islands flag
Solomon Islands
1.437 per 1,000 people
77
Iran flag
Iran
1.365 per 1,000 people
78
Sri Lanka flag
Sri Lanka
1.361 per 1,000 people
79
Uganda flag
Uganda
1.346 per 1,000 people
80
Iraq flag
Iraq
1.32 per 1,000 people
81
India flag
India
1.283 per 1,000 people
82
Nicaragua flag
Nicaragua
1.178 per 1,000 people
83
Honduras flag
Honduras
1.043 per 1,000 people
84
China flag
China
1.03 per 1,000 people
85
Lebanon flag
Lebanon
1.011 per 1,000 people
86
Laos flag
Laos
0.975 per 1,000 people
87
Vietnam flag
Vietnam
0.859 per 1,000 people
88
Myanmar flag
Myanmar
0.77 per 1,000 people
89
South Africa flag
South Africa
0.749 per 1,000 people
90
Zambia flag
Zambia
0.714 per 1,000 people
91
Colombia flag
Colombia
0.678 per 1,000 people
92
Afghanistan flag
Afghanistan
0.612 per 1,000 people
93
Comoros flag
Comoros
0.58 per 1,000 people
94
Djibouti flag
Djibouti
0.536 per 1,000 people
95
Côte d'Ivoire flag
Côte d'Ivoire
0.448 per 1,000 people
96
Rwanda flag
Rwanda
0.448 per 1,000 people
97
Gambia flag
Gambia
0.439 per 1,000 people
98
Cameroon flag
Cameroon
0.393 per 1,000 people
99
El Salvador flag
El Salvador
0.346 per 1,000 people
100
Madagascar flag
Madagascar
0.335 per 1,000 people
101
Mozambique flag
Mozambique
0.334 per 1,000 people
102
Ethiopia flag
Ethiopia
0.24 per 1,000 people
103
Bangladesh flag
Bangladesh
0.139 per 1,000 people

↑Top 10 Countries

  1. #1Norway flagNorway
  2. #2Iceland flagIceland
  3. #3Switzerland flagSwitzerland
  4. #4Ireland flagIreland
  5. #5Luxembourg flagLuxembourg
  6. #6Sweden flagSweden
  7. #7Uzbekistan flagUzbekistan
  8. #8Denmark flagDenmark
  9. #9United States flagUnited States
  10. #10Belarus flagBelarus

Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.

↓Bottom 10 Countries

  1. #103Bangladesh flagBangladesh
  2. #102Ethiopia flagEthiopia
  3. #101Mozambique flagMozambique
  4. #100Madagascar flagMadagascar
  5. #99El Salvador flagEl Salvador
  6. #98Cameroon flagCameroon
  7. #97Gambia flagGambia
  8. #96Rwanda flagRwanda
  9. #95Côte d'Ivoire flagCôte d'Ivoire
  10. #94Djibouti flagDjibouti

Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.

Analysis & Context

In 2005, Norway led the world in Nurses and Midwives Density with a value of 15.51 per 1,000 people, while the global range spanned from 0.14 to 15.51. The average density across the 103 countries with available data was 4.67, providing a snapshot of global healthcare accessibility disparities.

Healthcare Access and Economic Prosperity

The correlation between economic prosperity and healthcare resources is evident in the 2005 Nurses and Midwives Density data. Countries with higher economic development, such as Norway (15.51) and Switzerland (12.93), exhibit significantly higher densities. These nations benefit from robust healthcare systems supported by substantial public and private investment. In contrast, Bangladesh, with a density of just 0.14, and Ethiopia at 0.24, reflect the challenges faced by low-income countries in expanding healthcare services. Economic constraints in these regions limit the ability to train and employ sufficient healthcare professionals.

Policy and Demographic Influences

Government policy and demographic factors also play crucial roles in determining Nurses and Midwives Density. Iceland (14.75) and Sweden (11.21) illustrate the impact of comprehensive healthcare policies and a focus on accessible public services. These countries have long histories of prioritizing healthcare, ensuring a high density of medical professionals relative to their populations. Conversely, Mozambique (0.334) and Madagascar (0.335) struggle with less developed healthcare infrastructures, often exacerbated by higher population growth rates and less effective healthcare policies.

Year-over-Year Changes and Trends

Analyzing year-over-year changes provides insights into dynamic shifts within countries. Luxembourg saw the most significant increase in density, rising by 1.93 (20.6%), which can be attributed to targeted investments in healthcare infrastructure and workforce expansion. Uganda experienced a notable increase of 0.65 (92.6%), reflecting efforts to improve healthcare access despite economic challenges. Conversely, Seychelles experienced the most substantial decrease, dropping by 2.82 (-39.2%), possibly due to resource reallocation or policy changes affecting healthcare staffing. Cameroon also saw a significant decline of 1.18 (-74.9%), highlighting potential systemic issues or economic setbacks impacting healthcare delivery.

Regional Disparities and Urbanization

Regional disparities are stark, with countries like Uzbekistan (11.01) showing higher densities in areas with concentrated urban development. Urbanization often correlates with increased healthcare resources due to centralized services and greater economic activity. In contrast, countries such as Rwanda (0.448) and Côte d'Ivoire (0.448) reflect lower densities, indicating rural challenges where healthcare resources are sparse and difficult to access. These disparities highlight the ongoing need for targeted policies that address urban-rural divides in healthcare access.

Overall, the 2005 data on Nurses and Midwives Density underscores the critical role of economic strength, policy frameworks, and demographic factors in shaping healthcare accessibility. As countries continue to develop, addressing these disparities remains essential for improving global health outcomes.

Frequently Asked Questions About Nurses and Midwives Density in 2005

Which country had the highest density of nurses and midwives per 1,000 people in 2005?

Norway had the highest density of nurses and midwives in 2005, with 15.51 per 1,000 people.

Which country had the lowest density of nurses and midwives per 1,000 people in 2005?

Bangladesh had the lowest density of nurses and midwives in 2005, with 0.14 per 1,000 people.

What was the average density of nurses and midwives per 1,000 people across all countries in 2005?

The average density of nurses and midwives across all countries in 2005 was 4.67 per 1,000 people.

What was the median density of nurses and midwives per 1,000 people in 2005?

The median density of nurses and midwives in 2005 was 4.37 per 1,000 people.

Which countries were in the top 3 for nurses and midwives density per 1,000 people in 2005?

The top 3 countries for nurses and midwives density in 2005 were Norway with 15.51, Iceland with 14.75, and Switzerland with 12.93 per 1,000 people.

How many countries were included in the dataset for nurses and midwives density in 2005?

The dataset for nurses and midwives density in 2005 included 103 countries.

Insights by country

1

Cyprus

In 2005, Cyprus had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 2.988 per 1,000 people, ranking #62 out of 103 countries. This figure is notably lower than the global average, indicating a relative scarcity of healthcare professionals compared to other nations. Contributing factors include Cyprus's small population and economic challenges, which may limit healthcare funding and workforce expansion in the nursing sector.

2

Madagascar

In 2005, Madagascar had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 0.335 per 1,000 people, ranking #100 out of 103 countries. This figure is significantly lower than many neighboring countries, highlighting a critical gap in healthcare resources in the region. Contributing factors include economic challenges, limited healthcare infrastructure, and a shortage of trained medical professionals, which hinder the country's ability to provide adequate maternal and child health services.

3

Kyrgyzstan

Kyrgyzstan ranked #31 globally in 2005 with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 6.131 per 1,000 people. This figure is notably higher than many of its Central Asian neighbors, reflecting a relatively robust healthcare workforce in the region. Contributing factors include government investments in healthcare training programs and a focus on improving maternal and child health services, which have prioritized the roles of nurses and midwives in the healthcare system.

4

Jordan

In 2005, Jordan had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 2.89 per 1,000 people, ranking #64 out of 103 countries. This figure is below the global average, reflecting challenges in healthcare workforce availability compared to higher-ranked nations. Contributing factors include Jordan's economic constraints and the impact of regional conflicts, which have strained healthcare resources and influenced the recruitment and retention of medical professionals.

5

Czech Republic

In 2005, the Czech Republic ranked #18 globally with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 8.478 per 1,000 people. This figure is notably higher than the global average, reflecting the country's strong healthcare system and emphasis on medical education. Factors contributing to this density include a well-established nursing curriculum and government policies that prioritize healthcare access and workforce training.

6

Australia

In 2005, Australia ranked #12 globally in Nurses and Midwives Density with a value of 9.707 per 1,000 people. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting Australia's robust healthcare system. Contributing factors include a well-established education system for healthcare professionals and government policies that prioritize healthcare access and workforce development.

7

Armenia

In 2005, Armenia had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 4.947 per 1,000 people, ranking #44 out of 103 countries. This figure is slightly below the global average, indicating a need for improvement in healthcare staffing compared to top-performing nations. Contributing factors include Armenia's post-Soviet healthcare transition and economic challenges, which have affected the retention and training of healthcare professionals.

8

Denmark

In 2005, Denmark achieved a global rank of #8 with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 10.75 per 1,000 people. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting Denmark's robust healthcare system and investment in medical personnel. The high density can be attributed to the country's strong emphasis on public health policies, a well-established education system for healthcare professionals, and a commitment to universal healthcare access.

9

Laos

In 2005, Laos had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 0.975 per 1,000 people, ranking #86 out of 103 countries. This figure is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting the challenges faced by the healthcare system in the region. Contributing factors include limited healthcare infrastructure, a shortage of trained professionals, and economic constraints that hinder investment in health services.

10

Spain

In 2005, Spain had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 4.485 per 1,000 people, ranking #50 out of 103 countries. This figure is below the European average, suggesting a need for improvement in healthcare staffing compared to its neighbors. The relatively high density can be attributed to Spain's robust public healthcare system, which emphasizes accessibility, as well as ongoing investments in healthcare education and training programs.

Data Source

Nurses and midwives per 1,000 people - Our World in Data

Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive data and visualizations on global development issues. The dataset on nurses and midwives per 1,000 people offers insights into healthcare workforce distribution across various countries, highlighting trends and disparities in healthcare access.

Visit Data Source

Historical Data by Year

Explore Nurses and Midwives Density data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.

More Health Facts