Nurses and Midwives Density 2007
Nurses and midwives density measures healthcare accessibility. Learn about countries with the highest and lowest density per 1,000 people.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Norway | 15.98 per 1,000 people | |
2 | Iceland | 14.78 per 1,000 people | |
3 | Ireland | 13.65 per 1,000 people | |
4 | Switzerland | 13.61 per 1,000 people | |
5 | Sweden | 11.48 per 1,000 people | |
6 | Luxembourg | 11.16 per 1,000 people | |
7 | Uzbekistan | 10.92 per 1,000 people | |
8 | Denmark | 10.87 per 1,000 people | |
9 | United States | 10.56 per 1,000 people | |
10 | Australia | 10.14 per 1,000 people | |
11 | Belarus | 10.01 per 1,000 people | |
12 | Finland | 9.878 per 1,000 people | |
13 | New Zealand | 9.795 per 1,000 people | |
14 | Germany | 9.767 per 1,000 people | |
15 | Belgium | 9.719 per 1,000 people | |
16 | United Kingdom | 9.105 per 1,000 people | |
17 | Canada | 9.006 per 1,000 people | |
18 | Cuba | 8.665 per 1,000 people | |
19 | Czech Republic | 8.415 per 1,000 people | |
20 | Netherlands | 8.37 per 1,000 people | |
21 | Azerbaijan | 8.137 per 1,000 people | |
22 | France | 7.919 per 1,000 people | |
23 | Slovenia | 7.775 per 1,000 people | |
24 | Lithuania | 7.659 per 1,000 people | |
25 | Kazakhstan | 7.132 per 1,000 people | |
26 | Russia | 7.125 per 1,000 people | |
27 | Estonia | 6.702 per 1,000 people | |
28 | Slovakia | 6.639 per 1,000 people | |
29 | Ukraine | 6.548 per 1,000 people | |
30 | Austria | 6.425 per 1,000 people | |
31 | Hungary | 6.122 per 1,000 people | |
32 | Malta | 6.088 per 1,000 people | |
33 | Romania | 6.075 per 1,000 people | |
34 | Republic of Moldova | 6.056 per 1,000 people | |
35 | Serbia | 5.95 per 1,000 people | |
36 | Poland | 5.768 per 1,000 people | |
37 | Latvia | 5.749 per 1,000 people | |
38 | Kyrgyzstan | 5.739 per 1,000 people | |
39 | Croatia | 5.526 per 1,000 people | |
40 | Israel | 5.481 per 1,000 people | |
41 | Italy | 5.476 per 1,000 people | |
42 | Montenegro | 5.354 per 1,000 people | |
43 | Brunei Darussalam | 5.163 per 1,000 people | |
44 | Portugal | 5.128 per 1,000 people | |
45 | Armenia | 5.069 per 1,000 people | |
46 | Singapore | 4.859 per 1,000 people | |
47 | Maldives | 4.743 per 1,000 people | |
48 | Spain | 4.731 per 1,000 people | |
49 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 4.709 per 1,000 people | |
50 | Bulgaria | 4.698 per 1,000 people | |
51 | Philippines | 4.568 per 1,000 people | |
52 | Seychelles | 4.492 per 1,000 people | |
53 | Kuwait | 4.319 per 1,000 people | |
54 | Turkmenistan | 4.275 per 1,000 people | |
55 | Albania | 4.217 per 1,000 people | |
56 | South Korea | 4.21 per 1,000 people | |
57 | Georgia | 4.103 per 1,000 people | |
58 | Oman | 4.044 per 1,000 people | |
59 | North Macedonia | 3.705 per 1,000 people | |
60 | Marshall Islands | 3.615 per 1,000 people | |
61 | Peru | 3.562 per 1,000 people | |
62 | Greece | 3.461 per 1,000 people | |
63 | Tajikistan | 3.458 per 1,000 people | |
64 | Cyprus | 3.434 per 1,000 people | |
65 | Trinidad and Tobago | 3.425 per 1,000 people | |
66 | Andorra | 3.419 per 1,000 people | |
67 | Antigua and Barbuda | 3.391 per 1,000 people | |
68 | United Arab Emirates | 3.269 per 1,000 people | |
69 | Botswana | 3.016 per 1,000 people | |
70 | Namibia | 2.849 per 1,000 people | |
71 | Jordan | 2.765 per 1,000 people | |
72 | Malaysia | 2.603 per 1,000 people | |
73 | Mauritius | 2.599 per 1,000 people | |
74 | Mexico | 2.292 per 1,000 people | |
75 | Turkey | 2.005 per 1,000 people | |
76 | Sri Lanka | 1.985 per 1,000 people | |
77 | Algeria | 1.928 per 1,000 people | |
78 | Syrian Arab Republic | 1.799 per 1,000 people | |
79 | Costa Rica | 1.588 per 1,000 people | |
80 | Vanuatu | 1.555 per 1,000 people | |
81 | Thailand | 1.507 per 1,000 people | |
82 | Nigeria | 1.432 per 1,000 people | |
83 | Lebanon | 1.431 per 1,000 people | |
84 | El Salvador | 1.389 per 1,000 people | |
85 | Nicaragua | 1.202 per 1,000 people | |
86 | China | 1.176 per 1,000 people | |
87 | Timor-Leste | 1.052 per 1,000 people | |
88 | Iraq | 1.049 per 1,000 people | |
89 | Sudan | 0.992 per 1,000 people | |
90 | Vietnam | 0.97 per 1,000 people | |
91 | Congo | 0.877 per 1,000 people | |
92 | Myanmar | 0.834 per 1,000 people | |
93 | Bhutan | 0.803 per 1,000 people | |
94 | South Africa | 0.803 per 1,000 people | |
95 | India | 0.782 per 1,000 people | |
96 | Colombia | 0.754 per 1,000 people | |
97 | Gambia | 0.715 per 1,000 people | |
98 | Bolivia | 0.6 per 1,000 people | |
99 | Afghanistan | 0.518 per 1,000 people | |
100 | Cameroon | 0.456 per 1,000 people | |
101 | Togo | 0.4 per 1,000 people | |
102 | Mozambique | 0.369 per 1,000 people | |
103 | Madagascar | 0.281 per 1,000 people | |
104 | Ethiopia | 0.218 per 1,000 people | |
105 | Mali | 0.164 per 1,000 people | |
106 | Bangladesh | 0.157 per 1,000 people |
- #1
Norway
- #2
Iceland
- #3
Ireland
- #4
Switzerland
- #5
Sweden
- #6
Luxembourg
- #7
Uzbekistan
- #8
Denmark
- #9
United States
- #10
Australia
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #106
Bangladesh
- #105
Mali
- #104
Ethiopia
- #103
Madagascar
- #102
Mozambique
- #101
Togo
- #100
Cameroon
- #99
Afghanistan
- #98
Bolivia
- #97
Gambia
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2007, Norway led the world in Nurses and Midwives Density with a remarkable 15.98 per 1,000 people, highlighting significant healthcare accessibility compared to the global range of 0.16 to 15.98. The global average density was 4.84, providing a baseline for assessing healthcare workforce distribution worldwide.
Economic Affluence and Healthcare Workforce Density
Countries with higher economic affluence often exhibit greater densities of nurses and midwives, as evidenced by Norway (15.98), Iceland (14.78), and Ireland (13.65). These nations allocate substantial resources towards healthcare infrastructure, ensuring a robust supply of healthcare professionals. The ability to offer competitive salaries and advanced training facilities attracts a higher number of healthcare workers, which directly correlates with better healthcare outcomes. Conversely, countries with limited economic resources, such as Bangladesh (0.157) and Mali (0.164), struggle to achieve similar densities due to financial constraints that limit healthcare investment.
Geopolitical Stability and Workforce Distribution
Geopolitical stability plays a crucial role in maintaining a steady healthcare workforce. Nations like Switzerland (13.61) and Sweden (11.48), known for their stable political environments, can sustain high nurse and midwife densities. Stability ensures consistent policy implementation, which is vital for long-term workforce planning. In contrast, countries experiencing political instability or conflict, such as Afghanistan (0.518), often face challenges in retaining healthcare professionals, who may migrate to safer regions with better working conditions.
Year-over-Year Changes in Healthcare Workforce
Analyzing year-over-year changes reveals significant shifts in healthcare workforce densities. Ireland saw the most substantial increase of +1.09 (8.7%), reflecting successful healthcare reforms and investment in workforce expansion. Similarly, New Zealand (+0.40) and Sri Lanka (+0.37) experienced notable growth, attributed to policy initiatives aimed at improving healthcare access. Conversely, Congo faced a steep decline of -0.49 (-35.9%), likely due to economic and political challenges affecting healthcare funding and workforce retention. The United Kingdom also saw a decrease of -0.34 (-3.6%), possibly linked to policy adjustments and budgetary constraints.
Implications of Workforce Density on Healthcare Outcomes
The density of nurses and midwives has profound implications for healthcare outcomes. High-density countries like Luxembourg (11.16) and Denmark (10.87) can offer more personalized patient care and reduced workload per healthcare worker, leading to better patient outcomes and higher job satisfaction among professionals. In contrast, low-density regions such as Ethiopia (0.218) and Madagascar (0.281) face challenges in providing adequate healthcare services, often resulting in overburdened staff and compromised patient care quality. Addressing these disparities requires targeted policies and international support to enhance healthcare workforce capacity in underserved areas.
Frequently Asked Questions About Nurses and Midwives Density in 2007
Which country had the highest density of nurses and midwives in 2007?
Norway had the highest density of nurses and midwives in 2007, with 15.98 per 1,000 people.
Which country had the lowest density of nurses and midwives in 2007?
Bangladesh had the lowest density of nurses and midwives in 2007, with 0.16 per 1,000 people.
What was the average density of nurses and midwives across all countries in 2007?
The average density of nurses and midwives across all countries in 2007 was 4.84 per 1,000 people.
What was the median density of nurses and midwives in 2007?
The median density of nurses and midwives in 2007 was 4.3 per 1,000 people.
Which countries were in the top 10 for nurses and midwives density in 2007?
The top 10 countries for nurses and midwives density in 2007 were Norway, Iceland, Ireland, Switzerland, Sweden, Luxembourg, Uzbekistan, Denmark, United States, and Australia.
How many countries were included in the nurses and midwives density dataset for 2007?
The dataset for nurses and midwives density in 2007 included 106 countries.
Insights by country
Croatia
In 2007, Croatia had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 5.526 per 1,000 people, ranking #39 out of 106 countries. This figure is notably higher than the global average, reflecting Croatia’s commitment to healthcare. Contributing factors include a relatively well-developed healthcare system and a focus on maintaining healthcare personnel despite economic challenges in the region.
Namibia
In 2007, Namibia had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 2.849 per 1,000 people, ranking #70 out of 106 countries. This figure is below the global average, indicating a shortage of healthcare personnel compared to higher-ranking nations. Contributing factors include Namibia's relatively low investment in healthcare infrastructure and the challenges posed by its vast geographic landscape, which can hinder access to medical services in rural areas.
Armenia
In 2007, Armenia had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 5.069 per 1,000 people, ranking #45 out of 106 countries. This figure is below the global average, indicating a relative scarcity of healthcare professionals compared to higher-ranked nations. Contributing factors include Armenia's economic challenges and a historical focus on other areas of healthcare infrastructure, which have impacted the training and retention of nursing staff.
Andorra
In 2007, Andorra had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 3.419 per 1,000 people, ranking #66 out of 106 countries. This figure is relatively low compared to many European nations, which often exceed 8 per 1,000. The density is influenced by Andorra's small population and limited healthcare infrastructure, which may not require a high number of nursing professionals relative to larger countries.
Thailand
In 2007, Thailand had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 1.507 per 1,000 people, ranking #81 out of 106 countries. This figure is lower than many of its Southeast Asian neighbors, reflecting challenges in healthcare workforce distribution in the region. Contributing factors include urban-rural disparities in healthcare access and a growing demand for healthcare services due to an aging population and increasing health issues.
Austria
In 2007, Austria ranked #30 globally for Nurses and Midwives Density with a value of 6.425 per 1,000 people. This figure is above the global average, indicating a relatively strong healthcare workforce compared to many countries. Contributing factors include Austria's well-established healthcare system and significant investment in medical education, which ensure a steady supply of trained professionals to meet the population's needs.
Canada
In 2007, Canada ranked #17 globally for Nurses and Midwives Density, with a value of 9.006 per 1,000 people. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating a robust healthcare workforce compared to many other nations. Contributing factors include Canada's publicly funded healthcare system, which emphasizes accessibility and quality of care, as well as a commitment to training and retaining healthcare professionals across its vast and diverse regions.
Malta
In 2007, Malta had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 6.088 per 1,000 people, ranking #32 out of 106 countries. This density is notably higher than the global average, reflecting Malta's robust healthcare system. Contributing factors include its small population size, which allows for more focused healthcare resources, and government policies that prioritize health services and workforce training in the medical field.
Finland
In 2007, Finland achieved a global rank of #12 with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 9.878 per 1,000 people. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting Finland's strong healthcare system and commitment to public health. Key drivers of this high density include Finland's robust investment in healthcare infrastructure and a comprehensive education system that produces a well-trained nursing workforce.
Cuba
Cuba achieved a global rank of #18 with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 8.665 per 1,000 people in 2007. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting the country's commitment to healthcare. The high density is driven by Cuba's robust healthcare system, which emphasizes preventive care and education, supported by government policies that prioritize health services and training for medical professionals.
Data Source
Nurses and midwives per 1,000 people - Our World in Data
Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive data and visualizations on global development issues. The dataset on nurses and midwives per 1,000 people offers insights into healthcare workforce distribution across various countries, highlighting trends and disparities in healthcare access.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Nurses and Midwives Density data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.