Nurses and Midwives Density 2002
Nurses and midwives density measures healthcare accessibility. Learn about countries with the highest and lowest density per 1,000 people.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Ireland | 15.3 per 1,000 people | |
2 | Norway | 14.22 per 1,000 people | |
3 | Iceland | 13.99 per 1,000 people | |
4 | Switzerland | 12.32 per 1,000 people | |
5 | Uzbekistan | 10.85 per 1,000 people | |
6 | Sweden | 10.7 per 1,000 people | |
7 | Denmark | 10.56 per 1,000 people | |
8 | United States | 10.21 per 1,000 people | |
9 | Australia | 9.893 per 1,000 people | |
10 | Belarus | 9.767 per 1,000 people | |
11 | Canada | 9.406 per 1,000 people | |
12 | New Zealand | 9.389 per 1,000 people | |
13 | United Kingdom | 9.093 per 1,000 people | |
14 | Germany | 9.017 per 1,000 people | |
15 | Japan | 8.6 per 1,000 people | |
16 | Czech Republic | 8.442 per 1,000 people | |
17 | Azerbaijan | 8.303 per 1,000 people | |
18 | Luxembourg | 7.991 per 1,000 people | |
19 | Netherlands | 7.881 per 1,000 people | |
20 | Lithuania | 7.792 per 1,000 people | |
21 | Cuba | 7.504 per 1,000 people | |
22 | Turkmenistan | 7.195 per 1,000 people | |
23 | Slovenia | 7.171 per 1,000 people | |
24 | Slovakia | 7.132 per 1,000 people | |
25 | Russia | 7.061 per 1,000 people | |
26 | France | 6.862 per 1,000 people | |
27 | Kyrgyzstan | 6.839 per 1,000 people | |
28 | Ukraine | 6.465 per 1,000 people | |
29 | Kazakhstan | 6.358 per 1,000 people | |
30 | Estonia | 6.319 per 1,000 people | |
31 | Brunei Darussalam | 6.234 per 1,000 people | |
32 | Hungary | 5.898 per 1,000 people | |
33 | Austria | 5.881 per 1,000 people | |
34 | Italy | 5.817 per 1,000 people | |
35 | Israel | 5.797 per 1,000 people | |
36 | Romania | 5.669 per 1,000 people | |
37 | Republic of Moldova | 5.589 per 1,000 people | |
38 | Poland | 5.431 per 1,000 people | |
39 | Malta | 5.38 per 1,000 people | |
40 | Croatia | 5.176 per 1,000 people | |
41 | Armenia | 5.093 per 1,000 people | |
42 | Latvia | 4.765 per 1,000 people | |
43 | Georgia | 4.399 per 1,000 people | |
44 | Spain | 4.2 per 1,000 people | |
45 | Philippines | 4.18 per 1,000 people | |
46 | Bulgaria | 4.063 per 1,000 people | |
47 | Tuvalu | 4.063 per 1,000 people | |
48 | Portugal | 4.014 per 1,000 people | |
49 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 4.009 per 1,000 people | |
50 | Tajikistan | 3.798 per 1,000 people | |
51 | North Macedonia | 3.678 per 1,000 people | |
52 | Albania | 3.66 per 1,000 people | |
53 | South Korea | 3.639 per 1,000 people | |
54 | Mongolia | 3.53 per 1,000 people | |
55 | Greece | 3.527 per 1,000 people | |
56 | Brazil | 3.397 per 1,000 people | |
57 | Grenada | 3.376 per 1,000 people | |
58 | Tonga | 3.369 per 1,000 people | |
59 | United Arab Emirates | 3.339 per 1,000 people | |
60 | Andorra | 3.293 per 1,000 people | |
61 | Cyprus | 3.051 per 1,000 people | |
62 | Trinidad and Tobago | 2.864 per 1,000 people | |
63 | Bahrain | 2.806 per 1,000 people | |
64 | Jordan | 2.672 per 1,000 people | |
65 | Botswana | 2.376 per 1,000 people | |
66 | Mexico | 2.226 per 1,000 people | |
67 | Algeria | 2.197 per 1,000 people | |
68 | Malaysia | 2.15 per 1,000 people | |
69 | Paraguay | 1.95 per 1,000 people | |
70 | Panama | 1.929 per 1,000 people | |
71 | Syrian Arab Republic | 1.918 per 1,000 people | |
72 | Turkey | 1.698 per 1,000 people | |
73 | Ecuador | 1.628 per 1,000 people | |
74 | Thailand | 1.318 per 1,000 people | |
75 | Costa Rica | 1.301 per 1,000 people | |
76 | Sri Lanka | 1.022 per 1,000 people | |
77 | China | 0.969 per 1,000 people | |
78 | Uruguay | 0.878 per 1,000 people | |
79 | El Salvador | 0.859 per 1,000 people | |
80 | Vietnam | 0.785 per 1,000 people | |
81 | Djibouti | 0.691 per 1,000 people | |
82 | South Africa | 0.677 per 1,000 people | |
83 | Colombia | 0.57 per 1,000 people | |
84 | Tanzania | 0.368 per 1,000 people | |
85 | Madagascar | 0.299 per 1,000 people | |
86 | Mozambique | 0.297 per 1,000 people |
- #1
Ireland
- #2
Norway
- #3
Iceland
- #4
Switzerland
- #5
Uzbekistan
- #6
Sweden
- #7
Denmark
- #8
United States
- #9
Australia
- #10
Belarus
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #86
Mozambique
- #85
Madagascar
- #84
Tanzania
- #83
Colombia
- #82
South Africa
- #81
Djibouti
- #80
Vietnam
- #79
El Salvador
- #78
Uruguay
- #77
China
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2002, the country with the highest Nurses and Midwives Density was Ireland with a density of 15.3 per 1,000 people, while the global range spanned from 0.30 to 15.30. This measure of healthcare accessibility varied significantly, with the global average density standing at 5.19 per 1,000 people.
Economic Prosperity and High Density
Countries with higher economic prosperity tend to have a greater density of healthcare professionals, including nurses and midwives. For instance, Ireland leads with a density of 15.3 per 1,000 people, followed closely by Norway at 14.22 and Iceland at 13.99. These countries not only have robust healthcare systems but also prioritize healthcare funding and infrastructure, allowing for higher employment rates in the healthcare sector. The strong economic status of these countries supports the training and retention of healthcare professionals, contributing to their high densities.
Challenges in Low-Density Regions
On the other end of the spectrum, countries like Mozambique and Madagascar have the lowest densities at 0.297 and 0.299 per 1,000 people, respectively. These nations face significant challenges including economic constraints, limited healthcare infrastructure, and insufficient educational opportunities for healthcare training. Such factors contribute to the low accessibility of healthcare professionals, impacting overall healthcare delivery and outcomes. Additionally, political instability and resource allocation issues further exacerbate these challenges, leading to a persistent low density of nurses and midwives.
Urbanization and Healthcare Workforce Distribution
Countries with higher urbanization rates often exhibit greater densities of healthcare professionals due to the concentration of healthcare facilities in urban centers. For example, Switzerland and Sweden, with densities of 12.32 and 10.7 respectively, benefit from a centralized healthcare delivery model that is common in urban areas. This urban concentration facilitates easier access to healthcare services and professionals. Conversely, countries like Tanzania with a density of 0.368 often struggle with rural healthcare delivery, where professionals are spread thin across vast geographic areas, reducing effective density and accessibility.
Year-over-Year Changes: Growth and Decline
The year-over-year changes in nurses and midwives density reveal significant shifts in certain countries. Malta experienced the largest increase, with a rise of 1.72 per 1,000 people, translating to a 47.1% growth. This can be attributed to targeted healthcare policies and investments aimed at expanding the workforce. Ireland and Switzerland also saw notable increases of 0.53 and 0.41, respectively, reflecting their ongoing commitment to enhancing healthcare accessibility.
Conversely, some countries witnessed declines, with the Netherlands experiencing a significant decrease of 2.73 per 1,000 people, a 25.7% reduction. This drop may be linked to policy shifts or economic factors affecting healthcare employment. Similar trends were observed in Turkmenistan and New Zealand, with decreases of 1.32 and 0.74 respectively, indicating potential areas of concern for healthcare workforce sustainability.
Overall, the data on nurses and midwives density in 2002 highlights the disparities between nations and the multifaceted factors influencing these densities. Economic strength, urbanization, policy decisions, and educational opportunities all play crucial roles in shaping the accessibility and distribution of healthcare professionals worldwide.
Frequently Asked Questions About Nurses and Midwives Density in 2002
Which country had the highest density of nurses and midwives per 1,000 people in 2002?
Ireland had the highest density of nurses and midwives in 2002, with 15.3 per 1,000 people.
Which country had the lowest density of nurses and midwives per 1,000 people in 2002?
Mozambique had the lowest density of nurses and midwives in 2002, with 0.3 per 1,000 people.
What was the average density of nurses and midwives per 1,000 people across all countries in 2002?
The average density of nurses and midwives across all countries in 2002 was 5.19 per 1,000 people.
What was the median density of nurses and midwives per 1,000 people in 2002?
The median density of nurses and midwives in 2002 was 4.3 per 1,000 people.
Which countries were in the top 3 for nurses and midwives density per 1,000 people in 2002?
The top 3 countries for nurses and midwives density in 2002 were Ireland (15.3), Norway (14.22), and Iceland (13.99) per 1,000 people.
How many countries were included in the dataset for nurses and midwives density in 2002?
The dataset for nurses and midwives density in 2002 included 86 countries.
Insights by country
Azerbaijan
Azerbaijan ranked #17 globally in 2002 with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 8.303 per 1,000 people. This figure is notably higher than the global average, reflecting a strong healthcare workforce relative to many other countries. Key drivers of this statistic include Azerbaijan's investment in healthcare infrastructure and a focus on improving maternal and child health services, which have historically prioritized the training and retention of nursing and midwifery professionals.
Sri Lanka
Sri Lanka ranked #76 globally in Nurses and Midwives Density with a value of 1.022 per 1,000 people in 2002. This figure is notably lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in the healthcare sector compared to higher-ranked countries. Contributing factors include economic constraints and a focus on primary healthcare, which historically limited the expansion of nursing and midwifery services in the country.
Ireland
In 2002, Ireland achieved a remarkable rank of #1 globally in Nurses and Midwives Density, with a density of 15.3 per 1,000 people. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting Ireland's strong healthcare investment compared to many countries. The high density can be attributed to Ireland's robust healthcare policies and a commitment to training and retaining healthcare professionals in response to its growing population and increasing healthcare demands.
Bahrain
In 2002, Bahrain had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 2.806 per 1,000 people, ranking #63 out of 86 countries. This figure is relatively low compared to regional neighbors, indicating a potential gap in healthcare workforce availability. Factors contributing to this density include Bahrain's small population size and ongoing efforts to enhance healthcare services, influenced by economic growth and investment in public health initiatives.
Denmark
In 2002, Denmark achieved a global rank of #7 with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 10.56 per 1,000 people. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting Denmark's strong healthcare system compared to many countries. The high density can be attributed to Denmark's comprehensive public healthcare policies and a well-educated workforce, which prioritize access to healthcare services and maternal care.
Greece
In 2002, Greece had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 3.527 per 1,000 people, ranking #55 out of 86 countries. This figure is below the European average, reflecting challenges in healthcare staffing compared to higher-ranked nations like Norway, which has a significantly higher density. Factors contributing to Greece's relatively low density include economic constraints and a healthcare system that has faced various reforms and funding issues, impacting the availability of nursing professionals.
Algeria
In 2002, Algeria had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 2.197 per 1,000 people, ranking #67 out of 86 countries. This figure is below the global average, highlighting challenges in healthcare staffing compared to more developed nations. Contributing factors include economic constraints and a healthcare system that has struggled with resource allocation and workforce training, particularly in rural areas.
Panama
In 2002, Panama had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 1.929 per 1,000 people, ranking #70 out of 86 countries. This figure is below the global average, indicating challenges in healthcare staffing compared to higher-ranked nations. Contributing factors include Panama's economic constraints and a healthcare system that faces pressures from both urban and rural population demands, affecting the distribution and availability of healthcare professionals.
El Salvador
In 2002, El Salvador had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 0.859 per 1,000 people, ranking #79 out of 86 countries. This density is notably lower than the global average, indicating challenges in healthcare accessibility. Contributing factors include economic constraints, which limit healthcare funding and workforce training, as well as a high emigration rate that depletes the healthcare sector of skilled professionals.
Brunei Darussalam
In 2002, Brunei Darussalam achieved a global rank of #31 with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 6.234 per 1,000 people. This figure is notably higher than the global average, reflecting the country's robust healthcare system. The high density of healthcare professionals can be attributed to Brunei's significant investment in its public health infrastructure and a strong emphasis on healthcare access for its citizens.
Data Source
Nurses and midwives per 1,000 people - Our World in Data
Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive data and visualizations on global development issues. The dataset on nurses and midwives per 1,000 people offers insights into healthcare workforce distribution across various countries, highlighting trends and disparities in healthcare access.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Nurses and Midwives Density data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.