Nurses and Midwives Density 2002

Nurses and midwives density measures healthcare accessibility. Learn about countries with the highest and lowest density per 1,000 people.

86 data points••Global Coverage•Nurses and midwives per 1,000 people - Our World in Data•

Interactive Map

Loading interactive map...

Complete Data Rankings

Rank
Actions
1
Ireland flag
Ireland
15.3 per 1,000 people
2
Norway flag
Norway
14.22 per 1,000 people
3
Iceland flag
Iceland
13.99 per 1,000 people
4
Switzerland flag
Switzerland
12.32 per 1,000 people
5
Uzbekistan flag
Uzbekistan
10.85 per 1,000 people
6
Sweden flag
Sweden
10.7 per 1,000 people
7
Denmark flag
Denmark
10.56 per 1,000 people
8
United States flag
United States
10.21 per 1,000 people
9
Australia flag
Australia
9.893 per 1,000 people
10
Belarus flag
Belarus
9.767 per 1,000 people
11
Canada flag
Canada
9.406 per 1,000 people
12
New Zealand flag
New Zealand
9.389 per 1,000 people
13
United Kingdom flag
United Kingdom
9.093 per 1,000 people
14
Germany flag
Germany
9.017 per 1,000 people
15
Japan flag
Japan
8.6 per 1,000 people
16
Czech Republic flag
Czech Republic
8.442 per 1,000 people
17
Azerbaijan flag
Azerbaijan
8.303 per 1,000 people
18
Luxembourg flag
Luxembourg
7.991 per 1,000 people
19
Netherlands flag
Netherlands
7.881 per 1,000 people
20
Lithuania flag
Lithuania
7.792 per 1,000 people
21
Cuba flag
Cuba
7.504 per 1,000 people
22
Turkmenistan flag
Turkmenistan
7.195 per 1,000 people
23
Slovenia flag
Slovenia
7.171 per 1,000 people
24
Slovakia flag
Slovakia
7.132 per 1,000 people
25
Russia flag
Russia
7.061 per 1,000 people
26
France flag
France
6.862 per 1,000 people
27
Kyrgyzstan flag
Kyrgyzstan
6.839 per 1,000 people
28
Ukraine flag
Ukraine
6.465 per 1,000 people
29
Kazakhstan flag
Kazakhstan
6.358 per 1,000 people
30
Estonia flag
Estonia
6.319 per 1,000 people
31
Brunei Darussalam flag
Brunei Darussalam
6.234 per 1,000 people
32
Hungary flag
Hungary
5.898 per 1,000 people
33
Austria flag
Austria
5.881 per 1,000 people
34
Italy flag
Italy
5.817 per 1,000 people
35
Israel flag
Israel
5.797 per 1,000 people
36
Romania flag
Romania
5.669 per 1,000 people
37
Republic of Moldova flag
Republic of Moldova
5.589 per 1,000 people
38
Poland flag
Poland
5.431 per 1,000 people
39
Malta flag
Malta
5.38 per 1,000 people
40
Croatia flag
Croatia
5.176 per 1,000 people
41
Armenia flag
Armenia
5.093 per 1,000 people
42
Latvia flag
Latvia
4.765 per 1,000 people
43
Georgia flag
Georgia
4.399 per 1,000 people
44
Spain flag
Spain
4.2 per 1,000 people
45
Philippines flag
Philippines
4.18 per 1,000 people
46
Bulgaria flag
Bulgaria
4.063 per 1,000 people
47
Tuvalu flag
Tuvalu
4.063 per 1,000 people
48
Portugal flag
Portugal
4.014 per 1,000 people
49
Bosnia and Herzegovina flag
Bosnia and Herzegovina
4.009 per 1,000 people
50
Tajikistan flag
Tajikistan
3.798 per 1,000 people
51
North Macedonia flag
North Macedonia
3.678 per 1,000 people
52
Albania flag
Albania
3.66 per 1,000 people
53
South Korea flag
South Korea
3.639 per 1,000 people
54
Mongolia flag
Mongolia
3.53 per 1,000 people
55
Greece flag
Greece
3.527 per 1,000 people
56
Brazil flag
Brazil
3.397 per 1,000 people
57
Grenada flag
Grenada
3.376 per 1,000 people
58
Tonga flag
Tonga
3.369 per 1,000 people
59
United Arab Emirates flag
United Arab Emirates
3.339 per 1,000 people
60
Andorra flag
Andorra
3.293 per 1,000 people
61
Cyprus flag
Cyprus
3.051 per 1,000 people
62
Trinidad and Tobago flag
Trinidad and Tobago
2.864 per 1,000 people
63
Bahrain flag
Bahrain
2.806 per 1,000 people
64
Jordan flag
Jordan
2.672 per 1,000 people
65
Botswana flag
Botswana
2.376 per 1,000 people
66
Mexico flag
Mexico
2.226 per 1,000 people
67
Algeria flag
Algeria
2.197 per 1,000 people
68
Malaysia flag
Malaysia
2.15 per 1,000 people
69
Paraguay flag
Paraguay
1.95 per 1,000 people
70
Panama flag
Panama
1.929 per 1,000 people
71
Syrian Arab Republic flag
Syrian Arab Republic
1.918 per 1,000 people
72
Turkey flag
Turkey
1.698 per 1,000 people
73
Ecuador flag
Ecuador
1.628 per 1,000 people
74
Thailand flag
Thailand
1.318 per 1,000 people
75
Costa Rica flag
Costa Rica
1.301 per 1,000 people
76
Sri Lanka flag
Sri Lanka
1.022 per 1,000 people
77
China flag
China
0.969 per 1,000 people
78
Uruguay flag
Uruguay
0.878 per 1,000 people
79
El Salvador flag
El Salvador
0.859 per 1,000 people
80
Vietnam flag
Vietnam
0.785 per 1,000 people
81
Djibouti flag
Djibouti
0.691 per 1,000 people
82
South Africa flag
South Africa
0.677 per 1,000 people
83
Colombia flag
Colombia
0.57 per 1,000 people
84
Tanzania flag
Tanzania
0.368 per 1,000 people
85
Madagascar flag
Madagascar
0.299 per 1,000 people
86
Mozambique flag
Mozambique
0.297 per 1,000 people

↑Top 10 Countries

  1. #1Ireland flagIreland
  2. #2Norway flagNorway
  3. #3Iceland flagIceland
  4. #4Switzerland flagSwitzerland
  5. #5Uzbekistan flagUzbekistan
  6. #6Sweden flagSweden
  7. #7Denmark flagDenmark
  8. #8United States flagUnited States
  9. #9Australia flagAustralia
  10. #10Belarus flagBelarus

Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.

↓Bottom 10 Countries

  1. #86Mozambique flagMozambique
  2. #85Madagascar flagMadagascar
  3. #84Tanzania flagTanzania
  4. #83Colombia flagColombia
  5. #82South Africa flagSouth Africa
  6. #81Djibouti flagDjibouti
  7. #80Vietnam flagVietnam
  8. #79El Salvador flagEl Salvador
  9. #78Uruguay flagUruguay
  10. #77China flagChina

Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.

Analysis & Context

In 2002, the country with the highest Nurses and Midwives Density was Ireland with a density of 15.3 per 1,000 people, while the global range spanned from 0.30 to 15.30. This measure of healthcare accessibility varied significantly, with the global average density standing at 5.19 per 1,000 people.

Economic Prosperity and High Density

Countries with higher economic prosperity tend to have a greater density of healthcare professionals, including nurses and midwives. For instance, Ireland leads with a density of 15.3 per 1,000 people, followed closely by Norway at 14.22 and Iceland at 13.99. These countries not only have robust healthcare systems but also prioritize healthcare funding and infrastructure, allowing for higher employment rates in the healthcare sector. The strong economic status of these countries supports the training and retention of healthcare professionals, contributing to their high densities.

Challenges in Low-Density Regions

On the other end of the spectrum, countries like Mozambique and Madagascar have the lowest densities at 0.297 and 0.299 per 1,000 people, respectively. These nations face significant challenges including economic constraints, limited healthcare infrastructure, and insufficient educational opportunities for healthcare training. Such factors contribute to the low accessibility of healthcare professionals, impacting overall healthcare delivery and outcomes. Additionally, political instability and resource allocation issues further exacerbate these challenges, leading to a persistent low density of nurses and midwives.

Urbanization and Healthcare Workforce Distribution

Countries with higher urbanization rates often exhibit greater densities of healthcare professionals due to the concentration of healthcare facilities in urban centers. For example, Switzerland and Sweden, with densities of 12.32 and 10.7 respectively, benefit from a centralized healthcare delivery model that is common in urban areas. This urban concentration facilitates easier access to healthcare services and professionals. Conversely, countries like Tanzania with a density of 0.368 often struggle with rural healthcare delivery, where professionals are spread thin across vast geographic areas, reducing effective density and accessibility.

Year-over-Year Changes: Growth and Decline

The year-over-year changes in nurses and midwives density reveal significant shifts in certain countries. Malta experienced the largest increase, with a rise of 1.72 per 1,000 people, translating to a 47.1% growth. This can be attributed to targeted healthcare policies and investments aimed at expanding the workforce. Ireland and Switzerland also saw notable increases of 0.53 and 0.41, respectively, reflecting their ongoing commitment to enhancing healthcare accessibility.

Conversely, some countries witnessed declines, with the Netherlands experiencing a significant decrease of 2.73 per 1,000 people, a 25.7% reduction. This drop may be linked to policy shifts or economic factors affecting healthcare employment. Similar trends were observed in Turkmenistan and New Zealand, with decreases of 1.32 and 0.74 respectively, indicating potential areas of concern for healthcare workforce sustainability.

Overall, the data on nurses and midwives density in 2002 highlights the disparities between nations and the multifaceted factors influencing these densities. Economic strength, urbanization, policy decisions, and educational opportunities all play crucial roles in shaping the accessibility and distribution of healthcare professionals worldwide.

Frequently Asked Questions About Nurses and Midwives Density in 2002

Which country had the highest density of nurses and midwives per 1,000 people in 2002?

Ireland had the highest density of nurses and midwives in 2002, with 15.3 per 1,000 people.

Which country had the lowest density of nurses and midwives per 1,000 people in 2002?

Mozambique had the lowest density of nurses and midwives in 2002, with 0.3 per 1,000 people.

What was the average density of nurses and midwives per 1,000 people across all countries in 2002?

The average density of nurses and midwives across all countries in 2002 was 5.19 per 1,000 people.

What was the median density of nurses and midwives per 1,000 people in 2002?

The median density of nurses and midwives in 2002 was 4.3 per 1,000 people.

Which countries were in the top 3 for nurses and midwives density per 1,000 people in 2002?

The top 3 countries for nurses and midwives density in 2002 were Ireland (15.3), Norway (14.22), and Iceland (13.99) per 1,000 people.

How many countries were included in the dataset for nurses and midwives density in 2002?

The dataset for nurses and midwives density in 2002 included 86 countries.

Insights by country

1

Azerbaijan

Azerbaijan ranked #17 globally in 2002 with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 8.303 per 1,000 people. This figure is notably higher than the global average, reflecting a strong healthcare workforce relative to many other countries. Key drivers of this statistic include Azerbaijan's investment in healthcare infrastructure and a focus on improving maternal and child health services, which have historically prioritized the training and retention of nursing and midwifery professionals.

2

Sri Lanka

Sri Lanka ranked #76 globally in Nurses and Midwives Density with a value of 1.022 per 1,000 people in 2002. This figure is notably lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in the healthcare sector compared to higher-ranked countries. Contributing factors include economic constraints and a focus on primary healthcare, which historically limited the expansion of nursing and midwifery services in the country.

3

Ireland

In 2002, Ireland achieved a remarkable rank of #1 globally in Nurses and Midwives Density, with a density of 15.3 per 1,000 people. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting Ireland's strong healthcare investment compared to many countries. The high density can be attributed to Ireland's robust healthcare policies and a commitment to training and retaining healthcare professionals in response to its growing population and increasing healthcare demands.

4

Bahrain

In 2002, Bahrain had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 2.806 per 1,000 people, ranking #63 out of 86 countries. This figure is relatively low compared to regional neighbors, indicating a potential gap in healthcare workforce availability. Factors contributing to this density include Bahrain's small population size and ongoing efforts to enhance healthcare services, influenced by economic growth and investment in public health initiatives.

5

Denmark

In 2002, Denmark achieved a global rank of #7 with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 10.56 per 1,000 people. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting Denmark's strong healthcare system compared to many countries. The high density can be attributed to Denmark's comprehensive public healthcare policies and a well-educated workforce, which prioritize access to healthcare services and maternal care.

6

Greece

In 2002, Greece had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 3.527 per 1,000 people, ranking #55 out of 86 countries. This figure is below the European average, reflecting challenges in healthcare staffing compared to higher-ranked nations like Norway, which has a significantly higher density. Factors contributing to Greece's relatively low density include economic constraints and a healthcare system that has faced various reforms and funding issues, impacting the availability of nursing professionals.

7

Algeria

In 2002, Algeria had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 2.197 per 1,000 people, ranking #67 out of 86 countries. This figure is below the global average, highlighting challenges in healthcare staffing compared to more developed nations. Contributing factors include economic constraints and a healthcare system that has struggled with resource allocation and workforce training, particularly in rural areas.

8

Panama

In 2002, Panama had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 1.929 per 1,000 people, ranking #70 out of 86 countries. This figure is below the global average, indicating challenges in healthcare staffing compared to higher-ranked nations. Contributing factors include Panama's economic constraints and a healthcare system that faces pressures from both urban and rural population demands, affecting the distribution and availability of healthcare professionals.

9

El Salvador

In 2002, El Salvador had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 0.859 per 1,000 people, ranking #79 out of 86 countries. This density is notably lower than the global average, indicating challenges in healthcare accessibility. Contributing factors include economic constraints, which limit healthcare funding and workforce training, as well as a high emigration rate that depletes the healthcare sector of skilled professionals.

10

Brunei Darussalam

In 2002, Brunei Darussalam achieved a global rank of #31 with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 6.234 per 1,000 people. This figure is notably higher than the global average, reflecting the country's robust healthcare system. The high density of healthcare professionals can be attributed to Brunei's significant investment in its public health infrastructure and a strong emphasis on healthcare access for its citizens.

Data Source

Nurses and midwives per 1,000 people - Our World in Data

Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive data and visualizations on global development issues. The dataset on nurses and midwives per 1,000 people offers insights into healthcare workforce distribution across various countries, highlighting trends and disparities in healthcare access.

Visit Data Source

Historical Data by Year

Explore Nurses and Midwives Density data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.

More Health Facts