Nurses and Midwives Density 2006

Nurses and midwives density measures healthcare accessibility. Learn about countries with the highest and lowest density per 1,000 people.

99 data points••Global Coverage•Nurses and midwives per 1,000 people - Our World in Data•

Interactive Map

Loading interactive map...

Complete Data Rankings

Rank
Actions
1
Norway flag
Norway
15.84 per 1,000 people
2
Iceland flag
Iceland
14.5 per 1,000 people
3
Switzerland flag
Switzerland
13.35 per 1,000 people
4
Ireland flag
Ireland
12.56 per 1,000 people
5
Sweden flag
Sweden
11.37 per 1,000 people
6
Luxembourg flag
Luxembourg
11.26 per 1,000 people
7
Uzbekistan flag
Uzbekistan
10.83 per 1,000 people
8
Denmark flag
Denmark
10.8 per 1,000 people
9
United States flag
United States
10.5 per 1,000 people
10
Belarus flag
Belarus
9.992 per 1,000 people
11
Finland flag
Finland
9.656 per 1,000 people
12
Belgium flag
Belgium
9.597 per 1,000 people
13
Germany flag
Germany
9.584 per 1,000 people
14
United Kingdom flag
United Kingdom
9.443 per 1,000 people
15
New Zealand flag
New Zealand
9.397 per 1,000 people
16
Japan flag
Japan
9.313 per 1,000 people
17
Canada flag
Canada
8.807 per 1,000 people
18
Czech Republic flag
Czech Republic
8.433 per 1,000 people
19
Netherlands flag
Netherlands
8.27 per 1,000 people
20
Azerbaijan flag
Azerbaijan
8.181 per 1,000 people
21
France flag
France
7.837 per 1,000 people
22
Lithuania flag
Lithuania
7.678 per 1,000 people
23
Slovenia flag
Slovenia
7.649 per 1,000 people
24
Russia flag
Russia
7.154 per 1,000 people
25
Kazakhstan flag
Kazakhstan
7.023 per 1,000 people
26
Estonia flag
Estonia
6.612 per 1,000 people
27
Ukraine flag
Ukraine
6.556 per 1,000 people
28
Hungary flag
Hungary
6.407 per 1,000 people
29
Qatar flag
Qatar
6.358 per 1,000 people
30
Austria flag
Austria
6.354 per 1,000 people
31
Slovakia flag
Slovakia
6.346 per 1,000 people
32
Palau flag
Palau
6.02 per 1,000 people
33
Romania flag
Romania
6.016 per 1,000 people
34
Republic of Moldova flag
Republic of Moldova
5.939 per 1,000 people
35
Kyrgyzstan flag
Kyrgyzstan
5.835 per 1,000 people
36
Latvia flag
Latvia
5.832 per 1,000 people
37
Malta flag
Malta
5.803 per 1,000 people
38
Serbia flag
Serbia
5.784 per 1,000 people
39
Poland flag
Poland
5.654 per 1,000 people
40
Israel flag
Israel
5.595 per 1,000 people
41
Croatia flag
Croatia
5.412 per 1,000 people
42
Brunei Darussalam flag
Brunei Darussalam
5.402 per 1,000 people
43
Italy flag
Italy
5.352 per 1,000 people
44
Montenegro flag
Montenegro
5.242 per 1,000 people
45
Armenia flag
Armenia
5.057 per 1,000 people
46
Portugal flag
Portugal
4.842 per 1,000 people
47
Singapore flag
Singapore
4.749 per 1,000 people
48
Bulgaria flag
Bulgaria
4.585 per 1,000 people
49
Spain flag
Spain
4.581 per 1,000 people
50
Seychelles flag
Seychelles
4.58 per 1,000 people
51
Bosnia and Herzegovina flag
Bosnia and Herzegovina
4.577 per 1,000 people
52
Turkmenistan flag
Turkmenistan
4.474 per 1,000 people
53
Philippines flag
Philippines
4.325 per 1,000 people
54
Georgia flag
Georgia
4.187 per 1,000 people
55
Albania flag
Albania
4.178 per 1,000 people
56
Kuwait flag
Kuwait
4.169 per 1,000 people
57
South Korea flag
South Korea
4.043 per 1,000 people
58
Oman flag
Oman
3.823 per 1,000 people
59
Grenada flag
Grenada
3.615 per 1,000 people
60
Greece flag
Greece
3.476 per 1,000 people
61
Tajikistan flag
Tajikistan
3.44 per 1,000 people
62
North Macedonia flag
North Macedonia
3.416 per 1,000 people
63
Trinidad and Tobago flag
Trinidad and Tobago
3.407 per 1,000 people
64
Cyprus flag
Cyprus
3.298 per 1,000 people
65
Andorra flag
Andorra
3.254 per 1,000 people
66
Jordan flag
Jordan
3.083 per 1,000 people
67
Uruguay flag
Uruguay
3.024 per 1,000 people
68
United Arab Emirates flag
United Arab Emirates
2.963 per 1,000 people
69
Botswana flag
Botswana
2.671 per 1,000 people
70
Malaysia flag
Malaysia
2.658 per 1,000 people
71
Bahrain flag
Bahrain
2.619 per 1,000 people
72
Mexico flag
Mexico
2.228 per 1,000 people
73
Egypt flag
Egypt
2.172 per 1,000 people
74
Panama flag
Panama
2.013 per 1,000 people
75
Turkey flag
Turkey
1.815 per 1,000 people
76
Iran flag
Iran
1.624 per 1,000 people
77
Sri Lanka flag
Sri Lanka
1.618 per 1,000 people
78
Thailand flag
Thailand
1.527 per 1,000 people
79
Costa Rica flag
Costa Rica
1.525 per 1,000 people
80
Nigeria flag
Nigeria
1.437 per 1,000 people
81
Congo flag
Congo
1.368 per 1,000 people
82
Nicaragua flag
Nicaragua
1.178 per 1,000 people
83
China flag
China
1.082 per 1,000 people
84
Sudan flag
Sudan
1.043 per 1,000 people
85
Vietnam flag
Vietnam
0.906 per 1,000 people
86
Myanmar flag
Myanmar
0.812 per 1,000 people
87
South Africa flag
South Africa
0.786 per 1,000 people
88
India flag
India
0.775 per 1,000 people
89
Colombia flag
Colombia
0.718 per 1,000 people
90
Zambia flag
Zambia
0.69 per 1,000 people
91
Afghanistan flag
Afghanistan
0.458 per 1,000 people
92
Gambia flag
Gambia
0.439 per 1,000 people
93
Mozambique flag
Mozambique
0.343 per 1,000 people
94
Madagascar flag
Madagascar
0.289 per 1,000 people
95
Tanzania flag
Tanzania
0.234 per 1,000 people
96
Ethiopia flag
Ethiopia
0.221 per 1,000 people
97
Chad flag
Chad
0.177 per 1,000 people
98
Bangladesh flag
Bangladesh
0.138 per 1,000 people
99
Somalia flag
Somalia
0.088 per 1,000 people

↑Top 10 Countries

  1. #1Norway flagNorway
  2. #2Iceland flagIceland
  3. #3Switzerland flagSwitzerland
  4. #4Ireland flagIreland
  5. #5Sweden flagSweden
  6. #6Luxembourg flagLuxembourg
  7. #7Uzbekistan flagUzbekistan
  8. #8Denmark flagDenmark
  9. #9United States flagUnited States
  10. #10Belarus flagBelarus

Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.

↓Bottom 10 Countries

  1. #99Somalia flagSomalia
  2. #98Bangladesh flagBangladesh
  3. #97Chad flagChad
  4. #96Ethiopia flagEthiopia
  5. #95Tanzania flagTanzania
  6. #94Madagascar flagMadagascar
  7. #93Mozambique flagMozambique
  8. #92Gambia flagGambia
  9. #91Afghanistan flagAfghanistan
  10. #90Zambia flagZambia

Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.

Analysis & Context

Norway leads the world in Nurses and Midwives Density with a figure of 15.84 per 1,000 people in 2006, while the global range spans from 0.09 to 15.84. The average density across the 99 countries with available data is 4.97, providing a benchmark for evaluating healthcare accessibility worldwide.

Economic Prosperity and Healthcare Workforce Density

Countries with higher economic prosperity often report greater Nurses and Midwives Density. For instance, Norway, Iceland (14.5), and Switzerland (13.35) not only have robust economies but also invest significantly in healthcare infrastructure. This investment translates into a higher density of healthcare professionals, ensuring better accessibility and quality of care. In contrast, countries like Somalia (0.088) and Bangladesh (0.138) face economic challenges that limit their ability to expand and maintain healthcare workforces.

Geographical and Policy Influences

Geographical factors and national healthcare policies also play crucial roles in determining Nurses and Midwives Density. Nordic countries such as Sweden (11.37) and Denmark (10.8) benefit from strong policy frameworks that prioritize healthcare accessibility as a public good. These policies ensure a consistent supply of trained professionals. Conversely, countries like Chad (0.177) and Ethiopia (0.221) struggle with geographic and infrastructural limitations that hinder healthcare delivery and workforce expansion.

Year-over-Year Changes and Their Implications

The year-over-year changes in Nurses and Midwives Density highlight significant shifts in certain countries. Latvia experienced the largest increase, with a growth of 0.63 (12.1%), reflecting successful efforts to bolster its healthcare workforce. Albania followed with an increase of 0.56 (15.4%), indicating effective policy interventions. On the other hand, India saw the most substantial decrease, with a drop of 0.51 (-39.6%), which may be attributed to systemic challenges in training and retaining healthcare professionals.

Impact of Urbanization on Healthcare Workforce Distribution

Urbanization significantly influences Nurses and Midwives Density. Countries with high urbanization rates, such as the United States (10.5) and Uzbekistan (10.83), often exhibit higher densities due to concentrated healthcare facilities and resources in urban areas. This urban focus can lead to disparities in rural regions, where access to healthcare professionals remains limited. In contrast, countries with lower urbanization, like Madagascar (0.289), face challenges in evenly distributing healthcare resources across vast rural areas.

In conclusion, the Nurses and Midwives Density data from 2006 underscores the complexity of healthcare accessibility across different regions. Economic strength, policy frameworks, geographic factors, and urbanization all play pivotal roles in shaping these densities, highlighting the multifaceted approach needed to enhance healthcare systems globally.

Frequently Asked Questions About Nurses and Midwives Density in 2006

Which country had the highest density of nurses and midwives per 1,000 people in 2006?

Norway had the highest density with 15.84 nurses and midwives per 1,000 people in 2006.

What was the average density of nurses and midwives per 1,000 people across all countries in 2006?

The average density of nurses and midwives was 4.97 per 1,000 people in 2006.

Which country had the lowest density of nurses and midwives per 1,000 people in 2006?

Somalia had the lowest density with 0.09 nurses and midwives per 1,000 people in 2006.

What was the median density of nurses and midwives per 1,000 people in 2006?

The median density of nurses and midwives was 4.58 per 1,000 people in 2006.

How many countries were included in the dataset for nurses and midwives density in 2006?

The dataset included 99 countries for nurses and midwives density in 2006.

Which countries were in the top 3 for nurses and midwives density per 1,000 people in 2006?

The top 3 countries were Norway with 15.84, Iceland with 14.5, and Switzerland with 13.35 nurses and midwives per 1,000 people in 2006.

Insights by country

1

Greece

In 2006, Greece ranked #60 globally with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 3.476 per 1,000 people. This figure is lower than the European average, reflecting challenges in healthcare staffing compared to higher-ranking countries like Norway, which has a significantly greater density. Contributing factors include Greece's economic constraints and the impact of migration, which has affected the availability of healthcare professionals in the country.

2

Jordan

In 2006, Jordan had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 3.083 per 1,000 people, ranking #66 out of 99 countries. This figure is below the global average, indicating a relatively low availability of nursing and midwifery professionals compared to countries with higher healthcare resources. Contributing factors include Jordan's economic constraints and the influx of refugees, which have strained the healthcare system and affected workforce availability.

3

Afghanistan

In 2006, Afghanistan ranked #91 out of 99 countries with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 0.458 per 1,000 people. This figure is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting severe healthcare challenges. Contributing factors include ongoing conflict, limited healthcare infrastructure, and a shortage of trained medical professionals, which hinder the delivery of essential health services in the country.

4

Myanmar

In 2006, Myanmar had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 0.812 per 1,000 people, ranking #86 out of 99 countries. This density is significantly lower than the global average, indicating a critical shortage of healthcare professionals in the country. Contributing factors include prolonged political instability, limited healthcare funding, and challenges in training and retaining medical staff, which hinder the development of a robust healthcare system.

5

Finland

In 2006, Finland achieved a rank of #11 globally with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 9.656 per 1,000 people. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a robust healthcare workforce. Finland's strong emphasis on public health education and comprehensive healthcare policies has contributed to this high density, ensuring access to quality care across its population.

6

Cyprus

In 2006, Cyprus had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 3.298 per 1,000 people, ranking #64 out of 99 countries. This density is lower than the European average, indicating a potential gap in healthcare staffing compared to its neighbors. Contributing factors include Cyprus's relatively small population and a healthcare system that has undergone reforms aimed at improving services, which may not yet have fully translated into increased healthcare personnel density.

7

Madagascar

In 2006, Madagascar had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 0.289 per 1,000 people, ranking #94 out of 99 countries. This figure is significantly lower than the global average, indicating a critical shortage of healthcare professionals. Contributing factors include limited healthcare funding, a high burden of disease, and challenges in training and retaining medical personnel in rural areas.

8

Albania

In 2006, Albania had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 4.178 per 1,000 people, ranking #55 out of 99 countries. This density is lower than the global average, indicating challenges in healthcare staffing compared to more developed nations. Factors such as economic constraints and a transitioning healthcare system have impacted the availability of medical professionals in Albania, contributing to this relatively low density.

9

Chad

In 2006, Chad had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 0.177 per 1,000 people, ranking #97 out of 99 countries. This figure is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting a critical shortage of healthcare professionals in the nation. Contributing factors include Chad's challenging economic conditions, limited healthcare infrastructure, and ongoing political instability, which hinder the training and retention of medical staff.

10

India

In 2006, India had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 0.775 per 1,000 people, ranking #88 out of 99 countries. This density is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in healthcare accessibility compared to higher-ranked countries. Contributing factors include India's large population, regional disparities in healthcare resources, and ongoing issues in health workforce training and retention.

11

Armenia

In 2006, Armenia had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 5.057 per 1,000 people, ranking #45 out of 99 countries. This figure is notably lower than the global average, indicating challenges in healthcare staffing compared to top-ranked countries. Contributing factors include Armenia's economic constraints and a relatively small population, which can limit the availability of healthcare professionals and resources.

12

Somalia

In 2006, Somalia had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 0.088 per 1,000 people, ranking #99 out of 99 countries. This figure is significantly lower than the global average, highlighting a critical gap in healthcare resources. Contributing factors include ongoing conflict, limited healthcare infrastructure, and a lack of investment in medical training and education, which have severely hindered the development of the healthcare workforce in the country.

13

Malta

In 2006, Malta had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 5.803 per 1,000 people, ranking #37 out of 99 countries. This density is higher than the global average, reflecting Malta's commitment to healthcare services. Factors contributing to this statistic include the country's robust healthcare system supported by government policies and a relatively high investment in medical training and education.

14

Ethiopia

Ethiopia ranked #96 out of 99 countries in 2006 for Nurses and Midwives Density, with a value of 0.221 per 1,000 people. This figure is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting a critical shortage of healthcare professionals in the country. Contributing factors include limited healthcare funding, a high population growth rate, and ongoing challenges in training and retaining medical staff, which hinder the development of a robust healthcare system.

Data Source

Nurses and midwives per 1,000 people - Our World in Data

Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive data and visualizations on global development issues. The dataset on nurses and midwives per 1,000 people offers insights into healthcare workforce distribution across various countries, highlighting trends and disparities in healthcare access.

Visit Data Source

Historical Data by Year

Explore Nurses and Midwives Density data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.

More Health Facts