Nurses and Midwives Density 2006
Nurses and midwives density measures healthcare accessibility. Learn about countries with the highest and lowest density per 1,000 people.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Norway | 15.84 per 1,000 people | |
2 | Iceland | 14.5 per 1,000 people | |
3 | Switzerland | 13.35 per 1,000 people | |
4 | Ireland | 12.56 per 1,000 people | |
5 | Sweden | 11.37 per 1,000 people | |
6 | Luxembourg | 11.26 per 1,000 people | |
7 | Uzbekistan | 10.83 per 1,000 people | |
8 | Denmark | 10.8 per 1,000 people | |
9 | United States | 10.5 per 1,000 people | |
10 | Belarus | 9.992 per 1,000 people | |
11 | Finland | 9.656 per 1,000 people | |
12 | Belgium | 9.597 per 1,000 people | |
13 | Germany | 9.584 per 1,000 people | |
14 | United Kingdom | 9.443 per 1,000 people | |
15 | New Zealand | 9.397 per 1,000 people | |
16 | Japan | 9.313 per 1,000 people | |
17 | Canada | 8.807 per 1,000 people | |
18 | Czech Republic | 8.433 per 1,000 people | |
19 | Netherlands | 8.27 per 1,000 people | |
20 | Azerbaijan | 8.181 per 1,000 people | |
21 | France | 7.837 per 1,000 people | |
22 | Lithuania | 7.678 per 1,000 people | |
23 | Slovenia | 7.649 per 1,000 people | |
24 | Russia | 7.154 per 1,000 people | |
25 | Kazakhstan | 7.023 per 1,000 people | |
26 | Estonia | 6.612 per 1,000 people | |
27 | Ukraine | 6.556 per 1,000 people | |
28 | Hungary | 6.407 per 1,000 people | |
29 | Qatar | 6.358 per 1,000 people | |
30 | Austria | 6.354 per 1,000 people | |
31 | Slovakia | 6.346 per 1,000 people | |
32 | Palau | 6.02 per 1,000 people | |
33 | Romania | 6.016 per 1,000 people | |
34 | Republic of Moldova | 5.939 per 1,000 people | |
35 | Kyrgyzstan | 5.835 per 1,000 people | |
36 | Latvia | 5.832 per 1,000 people | |
37 | Malta | 5.803 per 1,000 people | |
38 | Serbia | 5.784 per 1,000 people | |
39 | Poland | 5.654 per 1,000 people | |
40 | Israel | 5.595 per 1,000 people | |
41 | Croatia | 5.412 per 1,000 people | |
42 | Brunei Darussalam | 5.402 per 1,000 people | |
43 | Italy | 5.352 per 1,000 people | |
44 | Montenegro | 5.242 per 1,000 people | |
45 | Armenia | 5.057 per 1,000 people | |
46 | Portugal | 4.842 per 1,000 people | |
47 | Singapore | 4.749 per 1,000 people | |
48 | Bulgaria | 4.585 per 1,000 people | |
49 | Spain | 4.581 per 1,000 people | |
50 | Seychelles | 4.58 per 1,000 people | |
51 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 4.577 per 1,000 people | |
52 | Turkmenistan | 4.474 per 1,000 people | |
53 | Philippines | 4.325 per 1,000 people | |
54 | Georgia | 4.187 per 1,000 people | |
55 | Albania | 4.178 per 1,000 people | |
56 | Kuwait | 4.169 per 1,000 people | |
57 | South Korea | 4.043 per 1,000 people | |
58 | Oman | 3.823 per 1,000 people | |
59 | Grenada | 3.615 per 1,000 people | |
60 | Greece | 3.476 per 1,000 people | |
61 | Tajikistan | 3.44 per 1,000 people | |
62 | North Macedonia | 3.416 per 1,000 people | |
63 | Trinidad and Tobago | 3.407 per 1,000 people | |
64 | Cyprus | 3.298 per 1,000 people | |
65 | Andorra | 3.254 per 1,000 people | |
66 | Jordan | 3.083 per 1,000 people | |
67 | Uruguay | 3.024 per 1,000 people | |
68 | United Arab Emirates | 2.963 per 1,000 people | |
69 | Botswana | 2.671 per 1,000 people | |
70 | Malaysia | 2.658 per 1,000 people | |
71 | Bahrain | 2.619 per 1,000 people | |
72 | Mexico | 2.228 per 1,000 people | |
73 | Egypt | 2.172 per 1,000 people | |
74 | Panama | 2.013 per 1,000 people | |
75 | Turkey | 1.815 per 1,000 people | |
76 | Iran | 1.624 per 1,000 people | |
77 | Sri Lanka | 1.618 per 1,000 people | |
78 | Thailand | 1.527 per 1,000 people | |
79 | Costa Rica | 1.525 per 1,000 people | |
80 | Nigeria | 1.437 per 1,000 people | |
81 | Congo | 1.368 per 1,000 people | |
82 | Nicaragua | 1.178 per 1,000 people | |
83 | China | 1.082 per 1,000 people | |
84 | Sudan | 1.043 per 1,000 people | |
85 | Vietnam | 0.906 per 1,000 people | |
86 | Myanmar | 0.812 per 1,000 people | |
87 | South Africa | 0.786 per 1,000 people | |
88 | India | 0.775 per 1,000 people | |
89 | Colombia | 0.718 per 1,000 people | |
90 | Zambia | 0.69 per 1,000 people | |
91 | Afghanistan | 0.458 per 1,000 people | |
92 | Gambia | 0.439 per 1,000 people | |
93 | Mozambique | 0.343 per 1,000 people | |
94 | Madagascar | 0.289 per 1,000 people | |
95 | Tanzania | 0.234 per 1,000 people | |
96 | Ethiopia | 0.221 per 1,000 people | |
97 | Chad | 0.177 per 1,000 people | |
98 | Bangladesh | 0.138 per 1,000 people | |
99 | Somalia | 0.088 per 1,000 people |
- #1
Norway
- #2
Iceland
- #3
Switzerland
- #4
Ireland
- #5
Sweden
- #6
Luxembourg
- #7
Uzbekistan
- #8
Denmark
- #9
United States
- #10
Belarus
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #99
Somalia
- #98
Bangladesh
- #97
Chad
- #96
Ethiopia
- #95
Tanzania
- #94
Madagascar
- #93
Mozambique
- #92
Gambia
- #91
Afghanistan
- #90
Zambia
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
Norway leads the world in Nurses and Midwives Density with a figure of 15.84 per 1,000 people in 2006, while the global range spans from 0.09 to 15.84. The average density across the 99 countries with available data is 4.97, providing a benchmark for evaluating healthcare accessibility worldwide.
Economic Prosperity and Healthcare Workforce Density
Countries with higher economic prosperity often report greater Nurses and Midwives Density. For instance, Norway, Iceland (14.5), and Switzerland (13.35) not only have robust economies but also invest significantly in healthcare infrastructure. This investment translates into a higher density of healthcare professionals, ensuring better accessibility and quality of care. In contrast, countries like Somalia (0.088) and Bangladesh (0.138) face economic challenges that limit their ability to expand and maintain healthcare workforces.
Geographical and Policy Influences
Geographical factors and national healthcare policies also play crucial roles in determining Nurses and Midwives Density. Nordic countries such as Sweden (11.37) and Denmark (10.8) benefit from strong policy frameworks that prioritize healthcare accessibility as a public good. These policies ensure a consistent supply of trained professionals. Conversely, countries like Chad (0.177) and Ethiopia (0.221) struggle with geographic and infrastructural limitations that hinder healthcare delivery and workforce expansion.
Year-over-Year Changes and Their Implications
The year-over-year changes in Nurses and Midwives Density highlight significant shifts in certain countries. Latvia experienced the largest increase, with a growth of 0.63 (12.1%), reflecting successful efforts to bolster its healthcare workforce. Albania followed with an increase of 0.56 (15.4%), indicating effective policy interventions. On the other hand, India saw the most substantial decrease, with a drop of 0.51 (-39.6%), which may be attributed to systemic challenges in training and retaining healthcare professionals.
Impact of Urbanization on Healthcare Workforce Distribution
Urbanization significantly influences Nurses and Midwives Density. Countries with high urbanization rates, such as the United States (10.5) and Uzbekistan (10.83), often exhibit higher densities due to concentrated healthcare facilities and resources in urban areas. This urban focus can lead to disparities in rural regions, where access to healthcare professionals remains limited. In contrast, countries with lower urbanization, like Madagascar (0.289), face challenges in evenly distributing healthcare resources across vast rural areas.
In conclusion, the Nurses and Midwives Density data from 2006 underscores the complexity of healthcare accessibility across different regions. Economic strength, policy frameworks, geographic factors, and urbanization all play pivotal roles in shaping these densities, highlighting the multifaceted approach needed to enhance healthcare systems globally.
Frequently Asked Questions About Nurses and Midwives Density in 2006
Which country had the highest density of nurses and midwives per 1,000 people in 2006?
Norway had the highest density with 15.84 nurses and midwives per 1,000 people in 2006.
What was the average density of nurses and midwives per 1,000 people across all countries in 2006?
The average density of nurses and midwives was 4.97 per 1,000 people in 2006.
Which country had the lowest density of nurses and midwives per 1,000 people in 2006?
Somalia had the lowest density with 0.09 nurses and midwives per 1,000 people in 2006.
What was the median density of nurses and midwives per 1,000 people in 2006?
The median density of nurses and midwives was 4.58 per 1,000 people in 2006.
How many countries were included in the dataset for nurses and midwives density in 2006?
The dataset included 99 countries for nurses and midwives density in 2006.
Which countries were in the top 3 for nurses and midwives density per 1,000 people in 2006?
The top 3 countries were Norway with 15.84, Iceland with 14.5, and Switzerland with 13.35 nurses and midwives per 1,000 people in 2006.
Insights by country
Greece
In 2006, Greece ranked #60 globally with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 3.476 per 1,000 people. This figure is lower than the European average, reflecting challenges in healthcare staffing compared to higher-ranking countries like Norway, which has a significantly greater density. Contributing factors include Greece's economic constraints and the impact of migration, which has affected the availability of healthcare professionals in the country.
Jordan
In 2006, Jordan had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 3.083 per 1,000 people, ranking #66 out of 99 countries. This figure is below the global average, indicating a relatively low availability of nursing and midwifery professionals compared to countries with higher healthcare resources. Contributing factors include Jordan's economic constraints and the influx of refugees, which have strained the healthcare system and affected workforce availability.
Afghanistan
In 2006, Afghanistan ranked #91 out of 99 countries with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 0.458 per 1,000 people. This figure is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting severe healthcare challenges. Contributing factors include ongoing conflict, limited healthcare infrastructure, and a shortage of trained medical professionals, which hinder the delivery of essential health services in the country.
Myanmar
In 2006, Myanmar had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 0.812 per 1,000 people, ranking #86 out of 99 countries. This density is significantly lower than the global average, indicating a critical shortage of healthcare professionals in the country. Contributing factors include prolonged political instability, limited healthcare funding, and challenges in training and retaining medical staff, which hinder the development of a robust healthcare system.
Finland
In 2006, Finland achieved a rank of #11 globally with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 9.656 per 1,000 people. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a robust healthcare workforce. Finland's strong emphasis on public health education and comprehensive healthcare policies has contributed to this high density, ensuring access to quality care across its population.
Cyprus
In 2006, Cyprus had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 3.298 per 1,000 people, ranking #64 out of 99 countries. This density is lower than the European average, indicating a potential gap in healthcare staffing compared to its neighbors. Contributing factors include Cyprus's relatively small population and a healthcare system that has undergone reforms aimed at improving services, which may not yet have fully translated into increased healthcare personnel density.
Madagascar
In 2006, Madagascar had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 0.289 per 1,000 people, ranking #94 out of 99 countries. This figure is significantly lower than the global average, indicating a critical shortage of healthcare professionals. Contributing factors include limited healthcare funding, a high burden of disease, and challenges in training and retaining medical personnel in rural areas.
Albania
In 2006, Albania had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 4.178 per 1,000 people, ranking #55 out of 99 countries. This density is lower than the global average, indicating challenges in healthcare staffing compared to more developed nations. Factors such as economic constraints and a transitioning healthcare system have impacted the availability of medical professionals in Albania, contributing to this relatively low density.
Chad
In 2006, Chad had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 0.177 per 1,000 people, ranking #97 out of 99 countries. This figure is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting a critical shortage of healthcare professionals in the nation. Contributing factors include Chad's challenging economic conditions, limited healthcare infrastructure, and ongoing political instability, which hinder the training and retention of medical staff.
India
In 2006, India had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 0.775 per 1,000 people, ranking #88 out of 99 countries. This density is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in healthcare accessibility compared to higher-ranked countries. Contributing factors include India's large population, regional disparities in healthcare resources, and ongoing issues in health workforce training and retention.
Armenia
In 2006, Armenia had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 5.057 per 1,000 people, ranking #45 out of 99 countries. This figure is notably lower than the global average, indicating challenges in healthcare staffing compared to top-ranked countries. Contributing factors include Armenia's economic constraints and a relatively small population, which can limit the availability of healthcare professionals and resources.
Somalia
In 2006, Somalia had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 0.088 per 1,000 people, ranking #99 out of 99 countries. This figure is significantly lower than the global average, highlighting a critical gap in healthcare resources. Contributing factors include ongoing conflict, limited healthcare infrastructure, and a lack of investment in medical training and education, which have severely hindered the development of the healthcare workforce in the country.
Malta
In 2006, Malta had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 5.803 per 1,000 people, ranking #37 out of 99 countries. This density is higher than the global average, reflecting Malta's commitment to healthcare services. Factors contributing to this statistic include the country's robust healthcare system supported by government policies and a relatively high investment in medical training and education.
Ethiopia
Ethiopia ranked #96 out of 99 countries in 2006 for Nurses and Midwives Density, with a value of 0.221 per 1,000 people. This figure is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting a critical shortage of healthcare professionals in the country. Contributing factors include limited healthcare funding, a high population growth rate, and ongoing challenges in training and retaining medical staff, which hinder the development of a robust healthcare system.
Data Source
Nurses and midwives per 1,000 people - Our World in Data
Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive data and visualizations on global development issues. The dataset on nurses and midwives per 1,000 people offers insights into healthcare workforce distribution across various countries, highlighting trends and disparities in healthcare access.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Nurses and Midwives Density data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.