Nurses and Midwives Density 2001

Nurses and midwives density measures healthcare accessibility. Learn about countries with the highest and lowest density per 1,000 people.

84 data points••Global Coverage•Nurses and midwives per 1,000 people - Our World in Data•

Interactive Map

Loading interactive map...

Complete Data Rankings

Rank
Actions
1
Ireland flag
Ireland
14.77 per 1,000 people
2
Iceland flag
Iceland
13.9 per 1,000 people
3
Switzerland flag
Switzerland
11.91 per 1,000 people
4
Uzbekistan flag
Uzbekistan
10.89 per 1,000 people
5
Netherlands flag
Netherlands
10.61 per 1,000 people
6
Australia flag
Australia
10.5 per 1,000 people
7
Sweden flag
Sweden
10.48 per 1,000 people
8
Denmark flag
Denmark
10.42 per 1,000 people
9
United States flag
United States
10.21 per 1,000 people
10
New Zealand flag
New Zealand
10.13 per 1,000 people
11
Canada flag
Canada
9.777 per 1,000 people
12
Belarus flag
Belarus
9.653 per 1,000 people
13
Germany flag
Germany
8.91 per 1,000 people
14
United Kingdom flag
United Kingdom
8.789 per 1,000 people
15
Turkmenistan flag
Turkmenistan
8.514 per 1,000 people
16
Azerbaijan flag
Azerbaijan
8.494 per 1,000 people
17
Czech Republic flag
Czech Republic
8.317 per 1,000 people
18
Lithuania flag
Lithuania
7.955 per 1,000 people
19
Luxembourg flag
Luxembourg
7.675 per 1,000 people
20
Kyrgyzstan flag
Kyrgyzstan
7.263 per 1,000 people
21
Slovakia flag
Slovakia
7.263 per 1,000 people
22
Slovenia flag
Slovenia
7.134 per 1,000 people
23
Russia flag
Russia
6.999 per 1,000 people
24
France flag
France
6.972 per 1,000 people
25
Ukraine flag
Ukraine
6.479 per 1,000 people
26
Saint Kitts and Nevis flag
Saint Kitts and Nevis
6.419 per 1,000 people
27
Dominica flag
Dominica
6.413 per 1,000 people
28
Kazakhstan flag
Kazakhstan
6.179 per 1,000 people
29
Estonia flag
Estonia
6.125 per 1,000 people
30
Barbados flag
Barbados
6.021 per 1,000 people
31
Israel flag
Israel
5.878 per 1,000 people
32
Austria flag
Austria
5.781 per 1,000 people
33
Italy flag
Italy
5.755 per 1,000 people
34
Hungary flag
Hungary
5.732 per 1,000 people
35
Republic of Moldova flag
Republic of Moldova
5.531 per 1,000 people
36
Romania flag
Romania
5.473 per 1,000 people
37
Poland flag
Poland
5.447 per 1,000 people
38
Armenia flag
Armenia
5.393 per 1,000 people
39
Croatia flag
Croatia
5.158 per 1,000 people
40
Qatar flag
Qatar
4.936 per 1,000 people
41
Latvia flag
Latvia
4.714 per 1,000 people
42
Kuwait flag
Kuwait
4.58 per 1,000 people
43
Georgia flag
Georgia
4.397 per 1,000 people
44
Singapore flag
Singapore
4.227 per 1,000 people
45
Philippines flag
Philippines
4.207 per 1,000 people
46
Bulgaria flag
Bulgaria
4.198 per 1,000 people
47
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines flag
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
4.194 per 1,000 people
48
Spain flag
Spain
3.995 per 1,000 people
49
Bosnia and Herzegovina flag
Bosnia and Herzegovina
3.951 per 1,000 people
50
Tajikistan flag
Tajikistan
3.841 per 1,000 people
51
Albania flag
Albania
3.81 per 1,000 people
52
Malta flag
Malta
3.657 per 1,000 people
53
North Macedonia flag
North Macedonia
3.535 per 1,000 people
54
South Korea flag
South Korea
3.404 per 1,000 people
55
Grenada flag
Grenada
3.389 per 1,000 people
56
Tonga flag
Tonga
3.301 per 1,000 people
57
United Arab Emirates flag
United Arab Emirates
3.298 per 1,000 people
58
Andorra flag
Andorra
3.247 per 1,000 people
59
Greece flag
Greece
3.176 per 1,000 people
60
Bahrain flag
Bahrain
3.094 per 1,000 people
61
Cyprus flag
Cyprus
3.073 per 1,000 people
62
Brazil flag
Brazil
3.005 per 1,000 people
63
Jordan flag
Jordan
2.894 per 1,000 people
64
Trinidad and Tobago flag
Trinidad and Tobago
2.665 per 1,000 people
65
Botswana flag
Botswana
2.333 per 1,000 people
66
Saint Lucia flag
Saint Lucia
2.316 per 1,000 people
67
Mexico flag
Mexico
2.231 per 1,000 people
68
Malaysia flag
Malaysia
2.11 per 1,000 people
69
Bolivia flag
Bolivia
2.067 per 1,000 people
70
Panama flag
Panama
1.853 per 1,000 people
71
Turkey flag
Turkey
1.725 per 1,000 people
72
Ecuador flag
Ecuador
1.584 per 1,000 people
73
Costa Rica flag
Costa Rica
1.274 per 1,000 people
74
Thailand flag
Thailand
1.226 per 1,000 people
75
Venezuela flag
Venezuela
1.121 per 1,000 people
76
China flag
China
1.006 per 1,000 people
77
Lebanon flag
Lebanon
0.944 per 1,000 people
78
Sri Lanka flag
Sri Lanka
0.806 per 1,000 people
79
Vietnam flag
Vietnam
0.759 per 1,000 people
80
India flag
India
0.748 per 1,000 people
81
South Africa flag
South Africa
0.675 per 1,000 people
82
Colombia flag
Colombia
0.537 per 1,000 people
83
Pakistan flag
Pakistan
0.394 per 1,000 people
84
Mozambique flag
Mozambique
0.276 per 1,000 people

↑Top 10 Countries

  1. #1Ireland flagIreland
  2. #2Iceland flagIceland
  3. #3Switzerland flagSwitzerland
  4. #4Uzbekistan flagUzbekistan
  5. #5Netherlands flagNetherlands
  6. #6Australia flagAustralia
  7. #7Sweden flagSweden
  8. #8Denmark flagDenmark
  9. #9United States flagUnited States
  10. #10New Zealand flagNew Zealand

Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.

↓Bottom 10 Countries

  1. #84Mozambique flagMozambique
  2. #83Pakistan flagPakistan
  3. #82Colombia flagColombia
  4. #81South Africa flagSouth Africa
  5. #80India flagIndia
  6. #79Vietnam flagVietnam
  7. #78Sri Lanka flagSri Lanka
  8. #77Lebanon flagLebanon
  9. #76China flagChina
  10. #75Venezuela flagVenezuela

Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.

Analysis & Context

In 2001, Ireland led the world in Nurses and Midwives Density with a value of 14.77 per 1,000 people, while the global range spanned from 0.28 to 14.77 per 1,000 people. The global average density was 5.17, providing a benchmark for assessing healthcare accessibility across different nations.

Economic Prosperity and Healthcare Workforce Density

Countries with higher economic prosperity often exhibit a greater density of nurses and midwives. This trend is evident in nations like Ireland with a density of 14.77, Iceland at 13.9, and Switzerland at 11.91. These countries not only have robust healthcare systems but also prioritize public health funding, allowing for better staffing and training of healthcare professionals. Economic stability enables investment in healthcare infrastructure, which in turn supports a higher density of healthcare workers. Conversely, countries like Mozambique with a density of 0.276 and Pakistan at 0.394 face economic challenges that limit their ability to invest in healthcare human resources.

Geographic and Demographic Influences

Geographic and demographic factors also play a crucial role in determining the availability of nurses and midwives. In densely populated countries, such as India with a density of 0.748 and China at 1.006, the sheer size of the population can dilute the density figures despite significant absolute numbers of healthcare workers. In contrast, smaller or less densely populated countries like New Zealand with a density of 10.13 and Denmark at 10.42 can achieve higher densities due to more manageable population sizes and focused healthcare delivery systems.

Policy Impact on Healthcare Workforce

National health policies significantly impact the density of nurses and midwives. Countries like Australia with a density of 10.5 and Sweden at 10.48 have long had comprehensive healthcare policies that emphasize preventive care and workforce development. These policies ensure a steady supply of trained professionals and incentivize careers in healthcare through education and training programs. On the other hand, countries struggling with policy implementation, such as Venezuela with a density of 1.121, face challenges in maintaining adequate healthcare staffing levels due to economic and political instability.

Global Disparities and Health Outcomes

The disparities in nurses and midwives density reflect broader global inequalities in healthcare access and outcomes. High-density countries typically enjoy better health outcomes, lower mortality rates, and higher life expectancy. For instance, Netherlands with a density of 10.61 and United States at 10.21 benefit from extensive health coverage and access to healthcare services. In contrast, countries with lower densities, like South Africa at 0.675 and Vietnam at 0.759, often face challenges such as higher disease burdens and limited access to essential healthcare services, which can exacerbate public health issues.

Understanding these patterns provides critical insights into how economic, geographic, and policy factors shape healthcare accessibility across nations, highlighting the importance of strategic investments in healthcare workforces to improve global health outcomes.

Frequently Asked Questions About Nurses and Midwives Density in 2001

Which country had the highest density of nurses and midwives per 1,000 people in 2001?

Ireland had the highest density of nurses and midwives in 2001, with 14.77 per 1,000 people.

What was the lowest density of nurses and midwives per 1,000 people in 2001, and which country had it?

Mozambique had the lowest density of nurses and midwives in 2001, with 0.28 per 1,000 people.

What was the average density of nurses and midwives per 1,000 people across the dataset in 2001?

The average density of nurses and midwives in 2001 was 5.17 per 1,000 people.

What was the median density of nurses and midwives per 1,000 people in 2001?

The median density of nurses and midwives in 2001 was 4.49 per 1,000 people.

Which countries were in the top 3 for nurses and midwives density per 1,000 people in 2001?

The top 3 countries for nurses and midwives density in 2001 were Ireland with 14.77, Iceland with 13.9, and Switzerland with 11.91 per 1,000 people.

How many countries were included in the nurses and midwives density dataset for 2001?

The dataset for nurses and midwives density in 2001 included 84 countries.

Insights by country

1

Italy

In 2001, Italy had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 5.755 per 1,000 people, ranking #33 out of 84 countries. This density is higher than the global average, reflecting Italy's robust healthcare system compared to lower-ranked nations. Contributing factors include Italy's investment in public health and a strong emphasis on healthcare education, which has historically prioritized nursing and midwifery training.

2

Croatia

In 2001, Croatia ranked #39 globally in Nurses and Midwives Density with a value of 5.158 per 1,000 people. This figure is above the global average but lower than many European neighbors, indicating a relatively moderate healthcare workforce density. Contributing factors include Croatia's healthcare policies and the economic conditions following its transition from a socialist system, which have shaped the availability and distribution of healthcare professionals.

3

Saint Lucia

In 2001, Saint Lucia had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 2.316 per 1,000 people, ranking #66 out of 84 countries. This figure is notably lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in healthcare workforce availability. Contributing factors include the island's limited economic resources and a small population that may restrict the recruitment and retention of healthcare professionals.

4

Slovakia

In 2001, Slovakia achieved a global rank of #21 with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 7.263 per 1,000 people. This figure is notably higher than the average density in many neighboring countries, reflecting a robust healthcare workforce relative to the region. Key drivers of this density include Slovakia's commitment to healthcare education and investment in medical training programs, which have bolstered the number of qualified nurses and midwives available to serve the population.

5

Latvia

In 2001, Latvia ranked #41 globally with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 4.714 per 1,000 people. This figure is lower than the European average, which reflects challenges in healthcare staffing across the region. Contributing factors include Latvia's economic transition post-independence and a significant outflow of healthcare professionals seeking better opportunities abroad.

6

Sri Lanka

In 2001, Sri Lanka had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 0.806 per 1,000 people, ranking #78 out of 84 countries. This figure is significantly lower than many neighboring countries, reflecting challenges in healthcare resource allocation in the region. Factors contributing to this density include economic constraints, which limit investment in health infrastructure, and demographic shifts that affect healthcare service delivery.

7

United States

In 2001, the United States achieved a global rank of #9 with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 10.21 per 1,000 people. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting the country's robust healthcare system and emphasis on medical workforce development. Factors contributing to this density include advanced healthcare infrastructure, substantial investment in healthcare education, and a strong regulatory framework that supports nursing and midwifery professions.

8

Spain

In 2001, Spain ranked #48 globally with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 3.995 per 1,000 people. This figure is below the European average, indicating a lower availability of nursing professionals compared to many neighboring countries. Contributing factors include Spain's healthcare policy challenges and demographic shifts, which have influenced the training and retention of healthcare workers in the country.

9

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

In 2001, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 4.194 per 1,000 people, ranking #47 out of 84 countries. This figure is notable as it reflects a commitment to healthcare, especially when compared to lower-ranked nations that may struggle with healthcare access. Contributing factors include the country's investment in health services and a relatively stable economy, which supports the training and retention of healthcare professionals.

10

Belarus

In 2001, Belarus achieved a global rank of #12 with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 9.653 per 1,000 people. This figure is notably higher than the global average, reflecting a strong healthcare system compared to many countries. The density is driven by Belarus's commitment to public health and a well-established education system for health professionals, ensuring adequate training and deployment of nurses and midwives across the nation.

Data Source

Nurses and midwives per 1,000 people - Our World in Data

Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive data and visualizations on global development issues. The dataset on nurses and midwives per 1,000 people offers insights into healthcare workforce distribution across various countries, highlighting trends and disparities in healthcare access.

Visit Data Source

Historical Data by Year

Explore Nurses and Midwives Density data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.

More Health Facts