Nurses and Midwives Density 2001
Nurses and midwives density measures healthcare accessibility. Learn about countries with the highest and lowest density per 1,000 people.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Ireland | 14.77 per 1,000 people | |
2 | Iceland | 13.9 per 1,000 people | |
3 | Switzerland | 11.91 per 1,000 people | |
4 | Uzbekistan | 10.89 per 1,000 people | |
5 | Netherlands | 10.61 per 1,000 people | |
6 | Australia | 10.5 per 1,000 people | |
7 | Sweden | 10.48 per 1,000 people | |
8 | Denmark | 10.42 per 1,000 people | |
9 | United States | 10.21 per 1,000 people | |
10 | New Zealand | 10.13 per 1,000 people | |
11 | Canada | 9.777 per 1,000 people | |
12 | Belarus | 9.653 per 1,000 people | |
13 | Germany | 8.91 per 1,000 people | |
14 | United Kingdom | 8.789 per 1,000 people | |
15 | Turkmenistan | 8.514 per 1,000 people | |
16 | Azerbaijan | 8.494 per 1,000 people | |
17 | Czech Republic | 8.317 per 1,000 people | |
18 | Lithuania | 7.955 per 1,000 people | |
19 | Luxembourg | 7.675 per 1,000 people | |
20 | Kyrgyzstan | 7.263 per 1,000 people | |
21 | Slovakia | 7.263 per 1,000 people | |
22 | Slovenia | 7.134 per 1,000 people | |
23 | Russia | 6.999 per 1,000 people | |
24 | France | 6.972 per 1,000 people | |
25 | Ukraine | 6.479 per 1,000 people | |
26 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 6.419 per 1,000 people | |
27 | Dominica | 6.413 per 1,000 people | |
28 | Kazakhstan | 6.179 per 1,000 people | |
29 | Estonia | 6.125 per 1,000 people | |
30 | Barbados | 6.021 per 1,000 people | |
31 | Israel | 5.878 per 1,000 people | |
32 | Austria | 5.781 per 1,000 people | |
33 | Italy | 5.755 per 1,000 people | |
34 | Hungary | 5.732 per 1,000 people | |
35 | Republic of Moldova | 5.531 per 1,000 people | |
36 | Romania | 5.473 per 1,000 people | |
37 | Poland | 5.447 per 1,000 people | |
38 | Armenia | 5.393 per 1,000 people | |
39 | Croatia | 5.158 per 1,000 people | |
40 | Qatar | 4.936 per 1,000 people | |
41 | Latvia | 4.714 per 1,000 people | |
42 | Kuwait | 4.58 per 1,000 people | |
43 | Georgia | 4.397 per 1,000 people | |
44 | Singapore | 4.227 per 1,000 people | |
45 | Philippines | 4.207 per 1,000 people | |
46 | Bulgaria | 4.198 per 1,000 people | |
47 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 4.194 per 1,000 people | |
48 | Spain | 3.995 per 1,000 people | |
49 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 3.951 per 1,000 people | |
50 | Tajikistan | 3.841 per 1,000 people | |
51 | Albania | 3.81 per 1,000 people | |
52 | Malta | 3.657 per 1,000 people | |
53 | North Macedonia | 3.535 per 1,000 people | |
54 | South Korea | 3.404 per 1,000 people | |
55 | Grenada | 3.389 per 1,000 people | |
56 | Tonga | 3.301 per 1,000 people | |
57 | United Arab Emirates | 3.298 per 1,000 people | |
58 | Andorra | 3.247 per 1,000 people | |
59 | Greece | 3.176 per 1,000 people | |
60 | Bahrain | 3.094 per 1,000 people | |
61 | Cyprus | 3.073 per 1,000 people | |
62 | Brazil | 3.005 per 1,000 people | |
63 | Jordan | 2.894 per 1,000 people | |
64 | Trinidad and Tobago | 2.665 per 1,000 people | |
65 | Botswana | 2.333 per 1,000 people | |
66 | Saint Lucia | 2.316 per 1,000 people | |
67 | Mexico | 2.231 per 1,000 people | |
68 | Malaysia | 2.11 per 1,000 people | |
69 | Bolivia | 2.067 per 1,000 people | |
70 | Panama | 1.853 per 1,000 people | |
71 | Turkey | 1.725 per 1,000 people | |
72 | Ecuador | 1.584 per 1,000 people | |
73 | Costa Rica | 1.274 per 1,000 people | |
74 | Thailand | 1.226 per 1,000 people | |
75 | Venezuela | 1.121 per 1,000 people | |
76 | China | 1.006 per 1,000 people | |
77 | Lebanon | 0.944 per 1,000 people | |
78 | Sri Lanka | 0.806 per 1,000 people | |
79 | Vietnam | 0.759 per 1,000 people | |
80 | India | 0.748 per 1,000 people | |
81 | South Africa | 0.675 per 1,000 people | |
82 | Colombia | 0.537 per 1,000 people | |
83 | Pakistan | 0.394 per 1,000 people | |
84 | Mozambique | 0.276 per 1,000 people |
- #1
Ireland
- #2
Iceland
- #3
Switzerland
- #4
Uzbekistan
- #5
Netherlands
- #6
Australia
- #7
Sweden
- #8
Denmark
- #9
United States
- #10
New Zealand
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #84
Mozambique
- #83
Pakistan
- #82
Colombia
- #81
South Africa
- #80
India
- #79
Vietnam
- #78
Sri Lanka
- #77
Lebanon
- #76
China
- #75
Venezuela
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2001, Ireland led the world in Nurses and Midwives Density with a value of 14.77 per 1,000 people, while the global range spanned from 0.28 to 14.77 per 1,000 people. The global average density was 5.17, providing a benchmark for assessing healthcare accessibility across different nations.
Economic Prosperity and Healthcare Workforce Density
Countries with higher economic prosperity often exhibit a greater density of nurses and midwives. This trend is evident in nations like Ireland with a density of 14.77, Iceland at 13.9, and Switzerland at 11.91. These countries not only have robust healthcare systems but also prioritize public health funding, allowing for better staffing and training of healthcare professionals. Economic stability enables investment in healthcare infrastructure, which in turn supports a higher density of healthcare workers. Conversely, countries like Mozambique with a density of 0.276 and Pakistan at 0.394 face economic challenges that limit their ability to invest in healthcare human resources.
Geographic and Demographic Influences
Geographic and demographic factors also play a crucial role in determining the availability of nurses and midwives. In densely populated countries, such as India with a density of 0.748 and China at 1.006, the sheer size of the population can dilute the density figures despite significant absolute numbers of healthcare workers. In contrast, smaller or less densely populated countries like New Zealand with a density of 10.13 and Denmark at 10.42 can achieve higher densities due to more manageable population sizes and focused healthcare delivery systems.
Policy Impact on Healthcare Workforce
National health policies significantly impact the density of nurses and midwives. Countries like Australia with a density of 10.5 and Sweden at 10.48 have long had comprehensive healthcare policies that emphasize preventive care and workforce development. These policies ensure a steady supply of trained professionals and incentivize careers in healthcare through education and training programs. On the other hand, countries struggling with policy implementation, such as Venezuela with a density of 1.121, face challenges in maintaining adequate healthcare staffing levels due to economic and political instability.
Global Disparities and Health Outcomes
The disparities in nurses and midwives density reflect broader global inequalities in healthcare access and outcomes. High-density countries typically enjoy better health outcomes, lower mortality rates, and higher life expectancy. For instance, Netherlands with a density of 10.61 and United States at 10.21 benefit from extensive health coverage and access to healthcare services. In contrast, countries with lower densities, like South Africa at 0.675 and Vietnam at 0.759, often face challenges such as higher disease burdens and limited access to essential healthcare services, which can exacerbate public health issues.
Understanding these patterns provides critical insights into how economic, geographic, and policy factors shape healthcare accessibility across nations, highlighting the importance of strategic investments in healthcare workforces to improve global health outcomes.
Frequently Asked Questions About Nurses and Midwives Density in 2001
Which country had the highest density of nurses and midwives per 1,000 people in 2001?
Ireland had the highest density of nurses and midwives in 2001, with 14.77 per 1,000 people.
What was the lowest density of nurses and midwives per 1,000 people in 2001, and which country had it?
Mozambique had the lowest density of nurses and midwives in 2001, with 0.28 per 1,000 people.
What was the average density of nurses and midwives per 1,000 people across the dataset in 2001?
The average density of nurses and midwives in 2001 was 5.17 per 1,000 people.
What was the median density of nurses and midwives per 1,000 people in 2001?
The median density of nurses and midwives in 2001 was 4.49 per 1,000 people.
Which countries were in the top 3 for nurses and midwives density per 1,000 people in 2001?
The top 3 countries for nurses and midwives density in 2001 were Ireland with 14.77, Iceland with 13.9, and Switzerland with 11.91 per 1,000 people.
How many countries were included in the nurses and midwives density dataset for 2001?
The dataset for nurses and midwives density in 2001 included 84 countries.
Insights by country
Italy
In 2001, Italy had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 5.755 per 1,000 people, ranking #33 out of 84 countries. This density is higher than the global average, reflecting Italy's robust healthcare system compared to lower-ranked nations. Contributing factors include Italy's investment in public health and a strong emphasis on healthcare education, which has historically prioritized nursing and midwifery training.
Croatia
In 2001, Croatia ranked #39 globally in Nurses and Midwives Density with a value of 5.158 per 1,000 people. This figure is above the global average but lower than many European neighbors, indicating a relatively moderate healthcare workforce density. Contributing factors include Croatia's healthcare policies and the economic conditions following its transition from a socialist system, which have shaped the availability and distribution of healthcare professionals.
Saint Lucia
In 2001, Saint Lucia had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 2.316 per 1,000 people, ranking #66 out of 84 countries. This figure is notably lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in healthcare workforce availability. Contributing factors include the island's limited economic resources and a small population that may restrict the recruitment and retention of healthcare professionals.
Slovakia
In 2001, Slovakia achieved a global rank of #21 with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 7.263 per 1,000 people. This figure is notably higher than the average density in many neighboring countries, reflecting a robust healthcare workforce relative to the region. Key drivers of this density include Slovakia's commitment to healthcare education and investment in medical training programs, which have bolstered the number of qualified nurses and midwives available to serve the population.
Latvia
In 2001, Latvia ranked #41 globally with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 4.714 per 1,000 people. This figure is lower than the European average, which reflects challenges in healthcare staffing across the region. Contributing factors include Latvia's economic transition post-independence and a significant outflow of healthcare professionals seeking better opportunities abroad.
Sri Lanka
In 2001, Sri Lanka had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 0.806 per 1,000 people, ranking #78 out of 84 countries. This figure is significantly lower than many neighboring countries, reflecting challenges in healthcare resource allocation in the region. Factors contributing to this density include economic constraints, which limit investment in health infrastructure, and demographic shifts that affect healthcare service delivery.
United States
In 2001, the United States achieved a global rank of #9 with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 10.21 per 1,000 people. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting the country's robust healthcare system and emphasis on medical workforce development. Factors contributing to this density include advanced healthcare infrastructure, substantial investment in healthcare education, and a strong regulatory framework that supports nursing and midwifery professions.
Spain
In 2001, Spain ranked #48 globally with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 3.995 per 1,000 people. This figure is below the European average, indicating a lower availability of nursing professionals compared to many neighboring countries. Contributing factors include Spain's healthcare policy challenges and demographic shifts, which have influenced the training and retention of healthcare workers in the country.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
In 2001, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 4.194 per 1,000 people, ranking #47 out of 84 countries. This figure is notable as it reflects a commitment to healthcare, especially when compared to lower-ranked nations that may struggle with healthcare access. Contributing factors include the country's investment in health services and a relatively stable economy, which supports the training and retention of healthcare professionals.
Belarus
In 2001, Belarus achieved a global rank of #12 with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 9.653 per 1,000 people. This figure is notably higher than the global average, reflecting a strong healthcare system compared to many countries. The density is driven by Belarus's commitment to public health and a well-established education system for health professionals, ensuring adequate training and deployment of nurses and midwives across the nation.
Data Source
Nurses and midwives per 1,000 people - Our World in Data
Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive data and visualizations on global development issues. The dataset on nurses and midwives per 1,000 people offers insights into healthcare workforce distribution across various countries, highlighting trends and disparities in healthcare access.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Nurses and Midwives Density data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.