Nurses and Midwives Density 2012
Nurses and midwives density measures healthcare accessibility. Learn about countries with the highest and lowest density per 1,000 people.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Monaco | 18.93 per 1,000 people | |
2 | Norway | 17.07 per 1,000 people | |
3 | Iceland | 15.96 per 1,000 people | |
4 | Switzerland | 15.88 per 1,000 people | |
5 | Ireland | 12.98 per 1,000 people | |
6 | Luxembourg | 12.29 per 1,000 people | |
7 | Netherlands | 12.19 per 1,000 people | |
8 | Sweden | 11.69 per 1,000 people | |
9 | Uzbekistan | 11.47 per 1,000 people | |
10 | Finland | 11.42 per 1,000 people | |
11 | Denmark | 11.24 per 1,000 people | |
12 | United States | 11.03 per 1,000 people | |
13 | Belarus | 10.86 per 1,000 people | |
14 | Japan | 10.73 per 1,000 people | |
15 | Belgium | 10.61 per 1,000 people | |
16 | New Zealand | 10.59 per 1,000 people | |
17 | Germany | 10.41 per 1,000 people | |
18 | Australia | 10.17 per 1,000 people | |
19 | Canada | 9.372 per 1,000 people | |
20 | France | 9.038 per 1,000 people | |
21 | Czech Republic | 8.486 per 1,000 people | |
22 | San Marino | 8.478 per 1,000 people | |
23 | United Kingdom | 8.395 per 1,000 people | |
24 | Poland | 8.379 per 1,000 people | |
25 | Slovenia | 8.236 per 1,000 people | |
26 | Brunei Darussalam | 8.168 per 1,000 people | |
27 | Cuba | 8.151 per 1,000 people | |
28 | Lithuania | 7.892 per 1,000 people | |
29 | Kazakhstan | 7.806 per 1,000 people | |
30 | Ukraine | 7.39 per 1,000 people | |
31 | Malta | 6.967 per 1,000 people | |
32 | Austria | 6.886 per 1,000 people | |
33 | Azerbaijan | 6.719 per 1,000 people | |
34 | Republic of Moldova | 6.56 per 1,000 people | |
35 | Hungary | 6.5 per 1,000 people | |
36 | Estonia | 6.461 per 1,000 people | |
37 | Kuwait | 6.444 per 1,000 people | |
38 | Portugal | 6.221 per 1,000 people | |
39 | Serbia | 6.214 per 1,000 people | |
40 | Slovakia | 6.151 per 1,000 people | |
41 | Croatia | 6.073 per 1,000 people | |
42 | Romania | 5.957 per 1,000 people | |
43 | Kyrgyzstan | 5.856 per 1,000 people | |
44 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 5.788 per 1,000 people | |
45 | Singapore | 5.557 per 1,000 people | |
46 | Spain | 5.385 per 1,000 people | |
47 | Italy | 5.325 per 1,000 people | |
48 | Israel | 5.241 per 1,000 people | |
49 | Armenia | 5.22 per 1,000 people | |
50 | Saudi Arabia | 5.162 per 1,000 people | |
51 | Latvia | 5.054 per 1,000 people | |
52 | South Korea | 4.907 per 1,000 people | |
53 | Montenegro | 4.878 per 1,000 people | |
54 | Bulgaria | 4.831 per 1,000 people | |
55 | Albania | 4.425 per 1,000 people | |
56 | Oman | 4.406 per 1,000 people | |
57 | Tajikistan | 4.32 per 1,000 people | |
58 | North Macedonia | 4.247 per 1,000 people | |
59 | Seychelles | 4.211 per 1,000 people | |
60 | Russia | 4.136 per 1,000 people | |
61 | Turkmenistan | 4.078 per 1,000 people | |
62 | Philippines | 4.061 per 1,000 people | |
63 | Andorra | 3.971 per 1,000 people | |
64 | Georgia | 3.94 per 1,000 people | |
65 | Mongolia | 3.822 per 1,000 people | |
66 | Malaysia | 3.726 per 1,000 people | |
67 | United Arab Emirates | 3.67 per 1,000 people | |
68 | Marshall Islands | 3.638 per 1,000 people | |
69 | Greece | 3.581 per 1,000 people | |
70 | Cyprus | 3.523 per 1,000 people | |
71 | Mauritius | 2.899 per 1,000 people | |
72 | Botswana | 2.758 per 1,000 people | |
73 | Bahrain | 2.651 per 1,000 people | |
74 | Mexico | 2.559 per 1,000 people | |
75 | Turkey | 2.505 per 1,000 people | |
76 | Argentina | 2.49 per 1,000 people | |
77 | Costa Rica | 2.042 per 1,000 people | |
78 | Vanuatu | 1.844 per 1,000 people | |
79 | Chile | 1.836 per 1,000 people | |
80 | China | 1.823 per 1,000 people | |
81 | Sri Lanka | 1.777 per 1,000 people | |
82 | Samoa | 1.72 per 1,000 people | |
83 | Solomon Islands | 1.684 per 1,000 people | |
84 | Nepal | 1.566 per 1,000 people | |
85 | Jamaica | 1.55 per 1,000 people | |
86 | Peru | 1.524 per 1,000 people | |
87 | Vietnam | 1.457 per 1,000 people | |
88 | Kenya | 1.407 per 1,000 people | |
89 | Nicaragua | 1.388 per 1,000 people | |
90 | Uganda | 1.189 per 1,000 people | |
91 | Gambia | 1.168 per 1,000 people | |
92 | Paraguay | 1.134 per 1,000 people | |
93 | Zimbabwe | 1.124 per 1,000 people | |
94 | Belize | 1.115 per 1,000 people | |
95 | India | 1.1 per 1,000 people | |
96 | South Africa | 1.092 per 1,000 people | |
97 | Cabo Verde | 1.076 per 1,000 people | |
98 | Bhutan | 1.026 per 1,000 people | |
99 | Colombia | 1.016 per 1,000 people | |
100 | Myanmar | 0.981 per 1,000 people | |
101 | Cambodia | 0.913 per 1,000 people | |
102 | Laos | 0.856 per 1,000 people | |
103 | Burundi | 0.646 per 1,000 people | |
104 | Benin | 0.637 per 1,000 people | |
105 | Burkina Faso | 0.609 per 1,000 people | |
106 | Tanzania | 0.439 per 1,000 people | |
107 | Mozambique | 0.415 per 1,000 people | |
108 | Pakistan | 0.395 per 1,000 people | |
109 | Mali | 0.355 per 1,000 people | |
110 | Chad | 0.269 per 1,000 people | |
111 | Madagascar | 0.207 per 1,000 people | |
112 | Bangladesh | 0.198 per 1,000 people |
- #1
Monaco
- #2
Norway
- #3
Iceland
- #4
Switzerland
- #5
Ireland
- #6
Luxembourg
- #7
Netherlands
- #8
Sweden
- #9
Uzbekistan
- #10
Finland
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #112
Bangladesh
- #111
Madagascar
- #110
Chad
- #109
Mali
- #108
Pakistan
- #107
Mozambique
- #106
Tanzania
- #105
Burkina Faso
- #104
Benin
- #103
Burundi
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2012, the country with the highest Nurses and Midwives Density was Monaco, with a density of 18.93 per 1,000 people, while the global range spanned from a minimum of 0.20 to the maximum value in Monaco. The global average density of nurses and midwives was 5.22 per 1,000 people, providing a critical measure of healthcare accessibility worldwide.
Economic Prosperity and Healthcare Workforce Density
The stark contrast in Nurses and Midwives Density across countries often mirrors economic prosperity levels. Wealthier nations like Monaco (18.93), Norway (17.07), and Iceland (15.96) boast some of the highest densities. These countries allocate substantial resources to healthcare, ensuring a robust workforce. The correlation between economic strength and healthcare resource allocation is evident, as these nations prioritize public health infrastructure and professional training.
Conversely, countries with lower economic resources, such as Bangladesh (0.198) and Madagascar (0.207), face significant challenges in staffing healthcare facilities adequately. Limited financial capacity restricts their ability to train and retain healthcare professionals, impacting overall healthcare accessibility and quality.
Geographic and Demographic Influences
Geography and demographics also play pivotal roles in determining Nurses and Midwives Density. For instance, Uzbekistan (11.47) and Finland (11.42) demonstrate how geographic location and population distribution can influence healthcare workforce deployment. Both countries have implemented policies that cater to their specific demographic needs, ensuring that rural and urban areas are adequately serviced.
In contrast, countries like Chad (0.269) and Mali (0.355) struggle with vast rural landscapes and dispersed populations, complicating efforts to maintain a consistent healthcare workforce. These geographic challenges necessitate innovative approaches to healthcare delivery, such as mobile clinics and telemedicine, to bridge the accessibility gap.
Policy Impact on Workforce Density
Government policies significantly affect Nurses and Midwives Density. Switzerland (15.88) and Luxembourg (12.29) have benefited from strategic investments in healthcare education and workforce planning, resulting in high densities. These countries have established frameworks that support continuous education and professional development, ensuring a steady supply of qualified healthcare workers.
On the other hand, Pakistan (0.395) and Mozambique (0.415) highlight the consequences of inadequate policy support. These nations face systemic challenges, including insufficient training facilities and limited career advancement opportunities, which hinder the development of a robust healthcare workforce.
Year-over-Year Trends and Movements
Examining year-over-year changes reveals significant movements in Nurses and Midwives Density. Poland experienced the largest increase, with a rise of 2.53 (43.2%), highlighting effective policy interventions and increased investment in healthcare education. Similarly, Monaco, with a 0.94 (5.2%) increase, and Luxembourg, with a 0.66 (5.7%) increase, reflect ongoing improvements in healthcare staffing.
Conversely, Russia saw the most significant decrease, with a decline of 2.83 (-40.6%), possibly due to economic constraints and policy shifts. Other countries like Australia (-0.67) and Ireland (-0.42) also experienced declines, suggesting potential challenges in retaining healthcare professionals or shifts in resource allocation priorities.
The data from 2012 underscores the critical role of economic, geographic, and policy factors in shaping Nurses and Midwives Density across the globe. Understanding these influences can guide strategic decisions to enhance healthcare accessibility and workforce sustainability in diverse national contexts.
Frequently Asked Questions About Nurses and Midwives Density in 2012
Which country had the highest density of nurses and midwives per 1,000 people in 2012?
Monaco had the highest density of nurses and midwives in 2012, with 18.93 per 1,000 people.
Which country had the lowest density of nurses and midwives per 1,000 people in 2012?
Bangladesh had the lowest density of nurses and midwives in 2012, with 0.2 per 1,000 people.
What was the average density of nurses and midwives per 1,000 people across all countries in 2012?
The average density of nurses and midwives across all countries in 2012 was 5.22 per 1,000 people.
What was the median density of nurses and midwives per 1,000 people in 2012?
The median density of nurses and midwives in 2012 was 4.36 per 1,000 people.
Which countries were in the top 3 for nurses and midwives density per 1,000 people in 2012?
The top 3 countries for nurses and midwives density in 2012 were Monaco with 18.93, Norway with 17.07, and Iceland with 15.96 per 1,000 people.
How many countries were included in the dataset for nurses and midwives density in 2012?
The dataset for nurses and midwives density in 2012 included 112 countries.
Insights by country
Uzbekistan
In 2012, Uzbekistan achieved a global rank of #9 with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 11.47 per 1,000 people. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting a robust healthcare workforce compared to many other countries. Contributing factors include Uzbekistan's focus on improving healthcare access and investment in medical training programs, which have enhanced the availability of nursing and midwifery services across the nation.
Azerbaijan
Azerbaijan ranked #33 globally in 2012 for Nurses and Midwives Density, with a value of 6.719 per 1,000 people. This figure is notably higher than the global average, reflecting a strong healthcare workforce relative to many countries. The density is driven by Azerbaijan's commitment to improving healthcare access and quality, alongside investments in medical education and training programs aimed at bolstering the number of healthcare professionals in the country.
Saudi Arabia
In 2012, Saudi Arabia had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 5.162 per 1,000 people, ranking #50 out of 112 countries. This figure is notably lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in healthcare workforce availability. The country's rapid population growth and urbanization have strained healthcare services, necessitating ongoing investment in medical training and infrastructure to meet rising demand.
Cuba
Cuba ranked #27 globally in 2012 for Nurses and Midwives Density, with a value of 8.151 per 1,000 people. This figure is notably higher than the global average, reflecting the country's strong emphasis on healthcare. The high density of healthcare professionals in Cuba is driven by its government-funded healthcare system and a commitment to medical education, resulting in a robust workforce dedicated to public health despite economic challenges.
Malta
In 2012, Malta achieved a global rank of #31 with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 6.967 per 1,000 people. This figure is notably higher than the global average, reflecting Malta's commitment to healthcare quality. Factors contributing to this density include Malta's robust healthcare policies, a well-structured educational system for nursing and midwifery, and a relatively small population that allows for more personalized healthcare services.
Samoa
Samoa ranked #82 globally with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 1.72 per 1,000 people in 2012. This figure is lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in healthcare workforce development compared to countries with higher densities, such as Cuba. Contributing factors include Samoa's small population size and limited resources for training and retaining healthcare professionals, which are critical for improving healthcare access and outcomes.
Turkmenistan
In 2012, Turkmenistan achieved a global rank of #61 with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 4.078 per 1,000 people. This figure is relatively low compared to many neighboring countries, indicating a potential gap in healthcare resources in the region. Factors contributing to this density include Turkmenistan's centralized healthcare system and ongoing investments in medical education, which aim to improve the availability of healthcare professionals.
Zimbabwe
In 2012, Zimbabwe had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 1.124 per 1,000 people, ranking #93 out of 112 countries. This figure is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in healthcare staffing compared to countries with more robust health systems. Contributing factors include economic instability, which has hindered investment in healthcare, and emigration of skilled professionals seeking better opportunities abroad.
Philippines
In 2012, the Philippines ranked #62 globally with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 4.061 per 1,000 people. This figure is below the global average, indicating a need for enhanced healthcare workforce development compared to countries with higher densities, such as Cuba, which leads with a significantly higher ratio. Contributing factors to this density include the Philippines' large population, ongoing economic challenges, and the outflow of healthcare professionals seeking opportunities abroad, which impacts local healthcare availability.
Finland
In 2012, Finland achieved a global rank of #10 with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 11.42 per 1,000 people. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting Finland's robust healthcare system and commitment to high-quality medical services. Contributing factors include the country's strong emphasis on healthcare education and training, along with a well-established public health policy that prioritizes accessibility and quality of care for its citizens.
Data Source
Nurses and midwives per 1,000 people - Our World in Data
Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive data and visualizations on global development issues. The dataset on nurses and midwives per 1,000 people offers insights into healthcare workforce distribution across various countries, highlighting trends and disparities in healthcare access.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Nurses and Midwives Density data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.