Nurses and Midwives Density 2010
Nurses and midwives density measures healthcare accessibility. Learn about countries with the highest and lowest density per 1,000 people.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Norway | 16.66 per 1,000 people | |
2 | Iceland | 15.32 per 1,000 people | |
3 | Switzerland | 14.93 per 1,000 people | |
4 | Ireland | 13.45 per 1,000 people | |
5 | Netherlands | 11.81 per 1,000 people | |
6 | Sweden | 11.61 per 1,000 people | |
7 | Uzbekistan | 11.43 per 1,000 people | |
8 | Luxembourg | 11.4 per 1,000 people | |
9 | Denmark | 11.14 per 1,000 people | |
10 | United States | 10.88 per 1,000 people | |
11 | Finland | 10.79 per 1,000 people | |
12 | New Zealand | 10.63 per 1,000 people | |
13 | Belarus | 10.54 per 1,000 people | |
14 | Australia | 10.41 per 1,000 people | |
15 | Japan | 10.3 per 1,000 people | |
16 | Germany | 10.24 per 1,000 people | |
17 | Belgium | 10.1 per 1,000 people | |
18 | Canada | 9.342 per 1,000 people | |
19 | Cuba | 9.118 per 1,000 people | |
20 | United Kingdom | 8.859 per 1,000 people | |
21 | France | 8.571 per 1,000 people | |
22 | Czech Republic | 8.528 per 1,000 people | |
23 | Slovenia | 8.252 per 1,000 people | |
24 | Lithuania | 7.658 per 1,000 people | |
25 | Kazakhstan | 7.453 per 1,000 people | |
26 | Brunei Darussalam | 7.41 per 1,000 people | |
27 | Ukraine | 7.365 per 1,000 people | |
28 | Azerbaijan | 7.259 per 1,000 people | |
29 | Russia | 7.005 per 1,000 people | |
30 | Austria | 6.757 per 1,000 people | |
31 | Malta | 6.714 per 1,000 people | |
32 | Kuwait | 6.637 per 1,000 people | |
33 | Palau | 6.467 per 1,000 people | |
34 | Slovakia | 6.421 per 1,000 people | |
35 | Estonia | 6.402 per 1,000 people | |
36 | Hungary | 6.397 per 1,000 people | |
37 | Republic of Moldova | 6.354 per 1,000 people | |
38 | Qatar | 6.211 per 1,000 people | |
39 | Serbia | 6.141 per 1,000 people | |
40 | Portugal | 5.902 per 1,000 people | |
41 | Poland | 5.864 per 1,000 people | |
42 | Croatia | 5.813 per 1,000 people | |
43 | Singapore | 5.779 per 1,000 people | |
44 | Romania | 5.722 per 1,000 people | |
45 | Kyrgyzstan | 5.575 per 1,000 people | |
46 | Italy | 5.439 per 1,000 people | |
47 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 5.334 per 1,000 people | |
48 | Spain | 5.283 per 1,000 people | |
49 | Montenegro | 5.218 per 1,000 people | |
50 | Latvia | 5.197 per 1,000 people | |
51 | Maldives | 5.177 per 1,000 people | |
52 | Saudi Arabia | 5.159 per 1,000 people | |
53 | Armenia | 5.144 per 1,000 people | |
54 | Israel | 5.111 per 1,000 people | |
55 | South Korea | 4.712 per 1,000 people | |
56 | Bulgaria | 4.71 per 1,000 people | |
57 | Oman | 4.666 per 1,000 people | |
58 | Seychelles | 4.337 per 1,000 people | |
59 | North Macedonia | 4.232 per 1,000 people | |
60 | Georgia | 4.156 per 1,000 people | |
61 | Turkmenistan | 4.126 per 1,000 people | |
62 | Albania | 4.045 per 1,000 people | |
63 | Tajikistan | 3.887 per 1,000 people | |
64 | Andorra | 3.841 per 1,000 people | |
65 | Tonga | 3.724 per 1,000 people | |
66 | Kiribati | 3.717 per 1,000 people | |
67 | Greece | 3.684 per 1,000 people | |
68 | Mongolia | 3.656 per 1,000 people | |
69 | Jordan | 3.517 per 1,000 people | |
70 | Cyprus | 3.499 per 1,000 people | |
71 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 3.319 per 1,000 people | |
72 | United Arab Emirates | 3.269 per 1,000 people | |
73 | Malaysia | 3.237 per 1,000 people | |
74 | Botswana | 2.861 per 1,000 people | |
75 | Trinidad and Tobago | 2.816 per 1,000 people | |
76 | Mauritius | 2.807 per 1,000 people | |
77 | Philippines | 2.647 per 1,000 people | |
78 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 2.564 per 1,000 people | |
79 | Bahrain | 2.516 per 1,000 people | |
80 | Marshall Islands | 2.442 per 1,000 people | |
81 | Mexico | 2.422 per 1,000 people | |
82 | Turkey | 2.251 per 1,000 people | |
83 | Tunisia | 2.214 per 1,000 people | |
84 | Thailand | 2.023 per 1,000 people | |
85 | Costa Rica | 1.872 per 1,000 people | |
86 | Syrian Arab Republic | 1.782 per 1,000 people | |
87 | Lebanon | 1.744 per 1,000 people | |
88 | Sri Lanka | 1.694 per 1,000 people | |
89 | Ecuador | 1.652 per 1,000 people | |
90 | China | 1.515 per 1,000 people | |
91 | Samoa | 1.482 per 1,000 people | |
92 | Nigeria | 1.291 per 1,000 people | |
93 | Nicaragua | 1.284 per 1,000 people | |
94 | Chile | 1.258 per 1,000 people | |
95 | Vietnam | 1.24 per 1,000 people | |
96 | Panama | 1.227 per 1,000 people | |
97 | Timor-Leste | 1.157 per 1,000 people | |
98 | Cabo Verde | 1.065 per 1,000 people | |
99 | Ghana | 1.032 per 1,000 people | |
100 | Guyana | 1.006 per 1,000 people | |
101 | South Africa | 1.001 per 1,000 people | |
102 | Myanmar | 0.922 per 1,000 people | |
103 | Colombia | 0.897 per 1,000 people | |
104 | India | 0.863 per 1,000 people | |
105 | Honduras | 0.855 per 1,000 people | |
106 | Laos | 0.846 per 1,000 people | |
107 | Cambodia | 0.845 per 1,000 people | |
108 | Mauritania | 0.827 per 1,000 people | |
109 | Bolivia | 0.822 per 1,000 people | |
110 | Zimbabwe | 0.788 per 1,000 people | |
111 | Kenya | 0.713 per 1,000 people | |
112 | Zambia | 0.711 per 1,000 people | |
113 | Lesotho | 0.665 per 1,000 people | |
114 | Burundi | 0.637 per 1,000 people | |
115 | Yemen | 0.62 per 1,000 people | |
116 | Cameroon | 0.545 per 1,000 people | |
117 | Burkina Faso | 0.534 per 1,000 people | |
118 | Pakistan | 0.504 per 1,000 people | |
119 | Papua New Guinea | 0.477 per 1,000 people | |
120 | Liberia | 0.445 per 1,000 people | |
121 | Benin | 0.424 per 1,000 people | |
122 | Mali | 0.421 per 1,000 people | |
123 | Congo | 0.418 per 1,000 people | |
124 | Mozambique | 0.413 per 1,000 people | |
125 | Madagascar | 0.213 per 1,000 people | |
126 | Bangladesh | 0.177 per 1,000 people | |
127 | Sierra Leone | 0.148 per 1,000 people |
- #1
Norway
- #2
Iceland
- #3
Switzerland
- #4
Ireland
- #5
Netherlands
- #6
Sweden
- #7
Uzbekistan
- #8
Luxembourg
- #9
Denmark
- #10
United States
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #127
Sierra Leone
- #126
Bangladesh
- #125
Madagascar
- #124
Mozambique
- #123
Congo
- #122
Mali
- #121
Benin
- #120
Liberia
- #119
Papua New Guinea
- #118
Pakistan
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2010, Norway led the world in Nurses and Midwives Density with a rate of 16.66 per 1,000 people, while the global range spanned from a minimum of 0.15 to a maximum of 16.66. The average density worldwide was 4.61 per 1,000 people, illustrating significant disparities in healthcare accessibility across different regions.
Economic Influence on Healthcare Workforce Density
The economic status of a country often correlates with its healthcare workforce density. High-income countries like Norway and Switzerland have densities of 16.66 and 14.93 per 1,000 people, respectively. These nations can allocate substantial resources towards healthcare, ensuring better training, recruitment, and retention of nurses and midwives. On the other hand, low-income countries such as Sierra Leone and Bangladesh, with densities of 0.148 and 0.177 respectively, face challenges in funding healthcare systems, leading to lower workforce densities.
Policy and Workforce Distribution
Government policies play a crucial role in shaping the density of nurses and midwives. In countries like Iceland and Ireland, with densities of 15.32 and 13.45, national health policies prioritize healthcare access, often resulting in higher density figures. Conversely, in Pakistan and Madagascar, where densities are 0.504 and 0.213, policy constraints and limited investment in healthcare infrastructure hinder the growth of the healthcare workforce.
Urbanization and Its Impact on Density
Urbanization significantly affects nurses and midwives density. Urbanized nations tend to have higher densities due to better access to education and healthcare facilities. For instance, Netherlands and Sweden, with densities of 11.81 and 11.61, benefit from concentrated urban populations that facilitate healthcare delivery. In contrast, countries like Mozambique and Benin, with densities of 0.413 and 0.424, face challenges in rural healthcare provision, leading to lower overall densities.
Year-over-Year Changes in Density
Examining the year-over-year changes in density reveals interesting patterns. Brunei Darussalam experienced the most significant increase with a rise of 2.30 (45.1%), driven by policy changes and investments in healthcare education. Similarly, Kuwait and Qatar saw increases of 1.79 (36.9%) and 1.42 (29.7%), reflecting their strategic focus on healthcare improvements. Conversely, Philippines saw the largest decrease of -2.88 (-52.1%), which may be attributed to workforce migration and insufficient domestic healthcare funding.
Overall, the Nurses and Midwives Density in 2010 highlights the stark contrasts in healthcare accessibility worldwide. Economic capability, governmental policy, and urbanization emerge as key factors influencing the distribution of healthcare workers. Understanding these patterns is essential for addressing global health disparities and ensuring equitable healthcare access for all populations.
Frequently Asked Questions About Nurses and Midwives Density in 2010
Which country had the highest density of nurses and midwives per 1,000 people in 2010?
Norway had the highest density of nurses and midwives in 2010, with 16.66 per 1,000 people.
Which country had the lowest density of nurses and midwives per 1,000 people in 2010?
Sierra Leone had the lowest density of nurses and midwives in 2010, with only 0.15 per 1,000 people.
What was the average density of nurses and midwives per 1,000 people across all countries in 2010?
The average density of nurses and midwives in 2010 was 4.61 per 1,000 people.
What was the median density of nurses and midwives per 1,000 people in 2010?
The median density of nurses and midwives in 2010 was 3.84 per 1,000 people.
How many countries were included in the dataset for nurses and midwives density in 2010?
The dataset included 127 countries for nurses and midwives density in 2010.
Which countries were in the top 3 for nurses and midwives density in 2010?
The top 3 countries for nurses and midwives density in 2010 were Norway, Iceland, and Switzerland.
Insights by country
Trinidad and Tobago
In 2010, Trinidad and Tobago ranked #75 globally with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 2.816 per 1,000 people. This figure is lower than the global average, indicating a potential challenge in healthcare accessibility compared to higher-ranked countries. Contributing factors include the country's economic constraints and a relatively small population, which can impact the availability of healthcare professionals.
Australia
In 2010, Australia had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 10.41 per 1,000 people, ranking #14 out of 127 countries. This density is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting Australia's robust healthcare system. Contributing factors include a strong emphasis on healthcare policy, substantial government investment in health services, and a well-educated workforce, which collectively enhance the availability of nursing and midwifery professionals in the country.
Bahrain
In 2010, Bahrain ranked #79 globally with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 2.516 per 1,000 people. This figure is lower than many of its Gulf neighbors, reflecting a regional trend where healthcare workforce density varies significantly. Bahrain's relatively small population and ongoing investments in healthcare infrastructure have influenced this density, as the country continues to develop its health services to meet growing demands.
South Korea
In 2010, South Korea had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 4.712 per 1,000 people, ranking #55 out of 127 countries. This figure is notably lower than many developed nations, reflecting challenges in healthcare staffing compared to regional peers like Japan. Contributing factors include a rapidly aging population and ongoing reforms in the healthcare system aimed at improving access and quality of care.
China
In 2010, China had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 1.515 per 1,000 people, ranking #90 out of 127 countries. This figure is below the global average, indicating a need for improvement in healthcare staffing compared to higher-ranked nations. Contributing factors include China's vast population, which places immense pressure on healthcare resources, and ongoing reforms aimed at increasing access to medical services in rural areas.
Albania
In 2010, Albania ranked #62 globally with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 4.045 per 1,000 people. This figure is notably lower than the European average, indicating challenges in healthcare staffing compared to neighboring countries. Contributing factors to this density include Albania's economic constraints and historical underinvestment in healthcare infrastructure, which have limited the availability of trained nursing professionals.
Lesotho
In 2010, Lesotho had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 0.665 per 1,000 people, ranking #113 out of 127 countries. This figure is significantly lower than the global average, highlighting the challenges faced in healthcare provision. Contributing factors include Lesotho's mountainous terrain, which complicates access to healthcare facilities, and a high burden of disease, particularly from HIV/AIDS, which strains the healthcare workforce.
Germany
In 2010, Germany achieved a global rank of #16 with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 10.24 per 1,000 people. This figure is notably higher than the global average, reflecting the country’s strong healthcare system. Contributing factors include Germany's robust economy, which supports extensive healthcare funding, and a well-established educational framework for nursing and midwifery professions. Additionally, Germany's aging population has increased the demand for healthcare services, further emphasizing the importance of these healthcare professionals.
France
In 2010, France ranked #21 globally with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 8.571 per 1,000 people. This figure is above the global average, reflecting the country's strong healthcare system compared to many others. Key drivers for this density include France's commitment to universal healthcare and a robust educational framework for healthcare professionals, ensuring a well-distributed workforce across urban and rural areas.
Israel
In 2010, Israel had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 5.111 per 1,000 people, ranking #54 out of 127 countries. This figure is notably higher than the global average, reflecting Israel's robust healthcare system and commitment to medical personnel training. Factors contributing to this density include a strong emphasis on healthcare in national policy and a well-developed educational framework for nursing and midwifery professionals.
Data Source
Nurses and midwives per 1,000 people - Our World in Data
Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive data and visualizations on global development issues. The dataset on nurses and midwives per 1,000 people offers insights into healthcare workforce distribution across various countries, highlighting trends and disparities in healthcare access.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Nurses and Midwives Density data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.