Nurses and Midwives Density 2013
Nurses and midwives density measures healthcare accessibility. Learn about countries with the highest and lowest density per 1,000 people.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Monaco | 19.61 per 1,000 people | |
2 | Norway | 17.21 per 1,000 people | |
3 | Iceland | 16.26 per 1,000 people | |
4 | Switzerland | 16.21 per 1,000 people | |
5 | Ireland | 12.55 per 1,000 people | |
6 | Netherlands | 12.32 per 1,000 people | |
7 | Luxembourg | 12.3 per 1,000 people | |
8 | Australia | 11.95 per 1,000 people | |
9 | Sweden | 11.72 per 1,000 people | |
10 | Finland | 11.63 per 1,000 people | |
11 | Uzbekistan | 11.41 per 1,000 people | |
12 | Denmark | 11.35 per 1,000 people | |
13 | United States | 11 per 1,000 people | |
14 | Belgium | 10.9 per 1,000 people | |
15 | Belarus | 10.81 per 1,000 people | |
16 | Germany | 10.76 per 1,000 people | |
17 | New Zealand | 10.57 per 1,000 people | |
18 | Canada | 9.513 per 1,000 people | |
19 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 9.066 per 1,000 people | |
20 | France | 8.784 per 1,000 people | |
21 | San Marino | 8.452 per 1,000 people | |
22 | Czech Republic | 8.413 per 1,000 people | |
23 | United Kingdom | 8.396 per 1,000 people | |
24 | Slovenia | 8.392 per 1,000 people | |
25 | Cuba | 8.087 per 1,000 people | |
26 | Lithuania | 7.851 per 1,000 people | |
27 | Kazakhstan | 7.783 per 1,000 people | |
28 | Brazil | 7.661 per 1,000 people | |
29 | Ukraine | 7.432 per 1,000 people | |
30 | Brunei Darussalam | 7.408 per 1,000 people | |
31 | Malta | 7.354 per 1,000 people | |
32 | Libya | 6.978 per 1,000 people | |
33 | Austria | 6.935 per 1,000 people | |
34 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 6.913 per 1,000 people | |
35 | Dominica | 6.729 per 1,000 people | |
36 | Hungary | 6.599 per 1,000 people | |
37 | Azerbaijan | 6.559 per 1,000 people | |
38 | Republic of Moldova | 6.559 per 1,000 people | |
39 | Portugal | 6.293 per 1,000 people | |
40 | Serbia | 6.245 per 1,000 people | |
41 | Kuwait | 6.239 per 1,000 people | |
42 | Croatia | 6.226 per 1,000 people | |
43 | Romania | 6.157 per 1,000 people | |
44 | Slovakia | 6.081 per 1,000 people | |
45 | Estonia | 5.963 per 1,000 people | |
46 | Kyrgyzstan | 5.906 per 1,000 people | |
47 | Poland | 5.84 per 1,000 people | |
48 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 5.789 per 1,000 people | |
49 | Singapore | 5.643 per 1,000 people | |
50 | Kiribati | 5.448 per 1,000 people | |
51 | Montenegro | 5.333 per 1,000 people | |
52 | Italy | 5.293 per 1,000 people | |
53 | Spain | 5.293 per 1,000 people | |
54 | Israel | 5.29 per 1,000 people | |
55 | South Korea | 5.255 per 1,000 people | |
56 | Armenia | 5.157 per 1,000 people | |
57 | Latvia | 5.08 per 1,000 people | |
58 | Bulgaria | 4.919 per 1,000 people | |
59 | Antigua and Barbuda | 4.779 per 1,000 people | |
60 | Oman | 4.416 per 1,000 people | |
61 | Tajikistan | 4.387 per 1,000 people | |
62 | North Macedonia | 4.335 per 1,000 people | |
63 | Albania | 4.284 per 1,000 people | |
64 | Russia | 4.247 per 1,000 people | |
65 | Philippines | 4.242 per 1,000 people | |
66 | Andorra | 4.189 per 1,000 people | |
67 | Georgia | 4.022 per 1,000 people | |
68 | Turkmenistan | 4.017 per 1,000 people | |
69 | United Arab Emirates | 3.923 per 1,000 people | |
70 | Mongolia | 3.845 per 1,000 people | |
71 | Malaysia | 3.837 per 1,000 people | |
72 | Tonga | 3.81 per 1,000 people | |
73 | Cyprus | 3.734 per 1,000 people | |
74 | Jordan | 3.661 per 1,000 people | |
75 | Greece | 3.536 per 1,000 people | |
76 | Eswatini | 3.305 per 1,000 people | |
77 | China, Macao SAR | 3.124 per 1,000 people | |
78 | Mauritius | 3.07 per 1,000 people | |
79 | Panama | 2.938 per 1,000 people | |
80 | Mexico | 2.816 per 1,000 people | |
81 | Fiji | 2.742 per 1,000 people | |
82 | Argentina | 2.728 per 1,000 people | |
83 | Bahrain | 2.619 per 1,000 people | |
84 | Turkey | 2.526 per 1,000 people | |
85 | Peru | 2.209 per 1,000 people | |
86 | Suriname | 2.209 per 1,000 people | |
87 | Costa Rica | 2.179 per 1,000 people | |
88 | Chile | 2.152 per 1,000 people | |
89 | China | 2.018 per 1,000 people | |
90 | Belize | 1.979 per 1,000 people | |
91 | Iraq | 1.96 per 1,000 people | |
92 | Ecuador | 1.934 per 1,000 people | |
93 | Solomon Islands | 1.915 per 1,000 people | |
94 | Egypt | 1.831 per 1,000 people | |
95 | Nepal | 1.827 per 1,000 people | |
96 | Namibia | 1.825 per 1,000 people | |
97 | El Salvador | 1.812 per 1,000 people | |
98 | Sri Lanka | 1.78 per 1,000 people | |
99 | Lebanon | 1.577 per 1,000 people | |
100 | Jamaica | 1.474 per 1,000 people | |
101 | Eritrea | 1.386 per 1,000 people | |
102 | Nicaragua | 1.378 per 1,000 people | |
103 | Zimbabwe | 1.336 per 1,000 people | |
104 | Uganda | 1.334 per 1,000 people | |
105 | Dominican Republic | 1.236 per 1,000 people | |
106 | Sierra Leone | 1.235 per 1,000 people | |
107 | India | 1.206 per 1,000 people | |
108 | South Africa | 1.167 per 1,000 people | |
109 | Bhutan | 1.102 per 1,000 people | |
110 | Colombia | 1.077 per 1,000 people | |
111 | Nigeria | 0.973 per 1,000 people | |
112 | Morocco | 0.97 per 1,000 people | |
113 | Laos | 0.948 per 1,000 people | |
114 | Congo | 0.941 per 1,000 people | |
115 | Cambodia | 0.937 per 1,000 people | |
116 | Timor-Leste | 0.908 per 1,000 people | |
117 | Kenya | 0.896 per 1,000 people | |
118 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 0.81 per 1,000 people | |
119 | Cabo Verde | 0.787 per 1,000 people | |
120 | Yemen | 0.742 per 1,000 people | |
121 | Guyana | 0.725 per 1,000 people | |
122 | Honduras | 0.691 per 1,000 people | |
123 | Indonesia | 0.652 per 1,000 people | |
124 | Burundi | 0.633 per 1,000 people | |
125 | Paraguay | 0.615 per 1,000 people | |
126 | Benin | 0.565 per 1,000 people | |
127 | Côte d'Ivoire | 0.528 per 1,000 people | |
128 | Guinea-Bissau | 0.519 per 1,000 people | |
129 | Pakistan | 0.478 per 1,000 people | |
130 | Burkina Faso | 0.44 per 1,000 people | |
131 | Mozambique | 0.427 per 1,000 people | |
132 | Chad | 0.296 per 1,000 people | |
133 | Madagascar | 0.284 per 1,000 people | |
134 | Afghanistan | 0.255 per 1,000 people | |
135 | Niger | 0.223 per 1,000 people | |
136 | Malawi | 0.222 per 1,000 people | |
137 | Bangladesh | 0.195 per 1,000 people |
- #1
Monaco
- #2
Norway
- #3
Iceland
- #4
Switzerland
- #5
Ireland
- #6
Netherlands
- #7
Luxembourg
- #8
Australia
- #9
Sweden
- #10
Finland
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #137
Bangladesh
- #136
Malawi
- #135
Niger
- #134
Afghanistan
- #133
Madagascar
- #132
Chad
- #131
Mozambique
- #130
Burkina Faso
- #129
Pakistan
- #128
Guinea-Bissau
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2013, Monaco led the world in Nurses and Midwives Density with a remarkable figure of 19.61 per 1,000 people. The global range for this metric spanned from a minimum of 0.20 to a maximum of 19.61, highlighting the disparities in healthcare accessibility across countries. The average density worldwide was 4.74 per 1,000 people, providing a benchmark against which individual country performances can be assessed.
Economic Prosperity and Healthcare Staffing
Countries with higher economic prosperity tend to have greater Nurses and Midwives Density. This is evident in nations like Monaco, Norway (17.21), and Iceland (16.26), which rank among the highest in this metric. Economic resources enable these countries to invest significantly in healthcare infrastructure and training, ensuring a robust supply of medical professionals. The correlation between wealth and healthcare staffing is further supported by Switzerland (16.21) and Luxembourg (12.3), where high GDP per capita corresponds with elevated densities of nurses and midwives.
Challenges in Low-Density Regions
At the lower end of the spectrum, countries such as Bangladesh (0.195) and Malawi (0.222) face significant challenges in healthcare accessibility. These countries struggle with limited economic resources, which impede their ability to train and retain healthcare professionals. Niger (0.223) and Afghanistan (0.255) also illustrate the impact of political instability and underdeveloped healthcare systems on nurse and midwife availability. Such low densities are often symptomatic of broader systemic issues, including inadequate healthcare funding and infrastructure.
Policy Impact on Healthcare Staffing
Policy interventions can dramatically influence Nurses and Midwives Density. For instance, Australia, with a density of 11.95, saw a significant year-over-year increase of 1.78 (17.5%). This rise can be attributed to targeted government policies aimed at increasing healthcare workforce capacity. Conversely, Poland experienced the most considerable decrease, with a reduction of 2.54 (-30.3%), likely due to policy shifts or economic constraints affecting healthcare funding and staff retention.
Year-over-Year Trends and Implications
The year-over-year data reveals significant shifts in Nurses and Midwives Density across various countries. Belize recorded a remarkable increase of 0.86 (77.5%), reflecting successful healthcare initiatives or increased investment in training programs. Peru also saw a notable rise of 0.69 (44.9%), indicating improvements in healthcare accessibility. In contrast, countries like Paraguay experienced a steep decline of 0.52 (-45.8%), which may suggest economic or policy-driven challenges that need addressing to stabilize their healthcare workforce.
Overall, the data from 2013 underscores the significant disparities in healthcare accessibility, as indicated by Nurses and Midwives Density. Economic wealth, policy decisions, and systemic challenges all play crucial roles in determining a country's ability to provide adequate healthcare staffing. Understanding these factors is essential for nations aiming to improve their healthcare systems and address the underlying causes of low density in nurses and midwives.
Frequently Asked Questions About Nurses and Midwives Density in 2013
Which country had the highest nurses and midwives density in 2013?
Monaco had the highest nurses and midwives density in 2013, with 19.61 per 1,000 people.
Which country had the lowest nurses and midwives density in 2013?
Bangladesh had the lowest nurses and midwives density in 2013, with 0.2 per 1,000 people.
What was the average nurses and midwives density across all countries in 2013?
The average nurses and midwives density across all countries in 2013 was 4.74 per 1,000 people.
What was the median nurses and midwives density in 2013?
The median nurses and midwives density in 2013 was 3.92 per 1,000 people.
Which countries were in the top 3 for nurses and midwives density in 2013?
The top 3 countries for nurses and midwives density in 2013 were Monaco, Norway, and Iceland.
How many countries were included in the nurses and midwives density dataset for 2013?
The dataset for nurses and midwives density in 2013 included 137 countries.
Insights by country
Ecuador
Ecuador ranked #92 globally in 2013 with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 1.934 per 1,000 people. This figure is notably lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in healthcare access and workforce distribution. Contributing factors include economic constraints and a relatively high rural population, which complicates the delivery of healthcare services, particularly in remote areas.
Laos
In 2013, Laos had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 0.948 per 1,000 people, ranking #113 out of 137 countries. This density is significantly lower than the global average, indicating challenges in healthcare accessibility compared to many other nations. Contributing factors include Laos's limited healthcare infrastructure, economic constraints, and a rural population that often lacks access to medical services.
Belize
In 2013, Belize had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 1.979 per 1,000 people, ranking #90 out of 137 countries. This figure is lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in healthcare resource allocation compared to higher-ranked nations. Contributing factors include Belize's limited healthcare budget and a small population, which can restrict the availability of trained healthcare professionals.
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranked #48 globally in 2013 with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 5.789 per 1,000 people. This figure is notably lower than the European Union average, indicating a potential gap in healthcare staffing compared to neighboring countries. Contributing factors include the country's post-war recovery and ongoing economic challenges, which have affected healthcare investment and workforce training initiatives.
Andorra
In 2013, Andorra had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 4.189 per 1,000 people, ranking #66 out of 137 countries. This figure is relatively low compared to many European nations, where the density often exceeds 8 per 1,000. The country's small population and limited healthcare infrastructure contribute to this density, as Andorra has a unique healthcare system that relies heavily on cross-border services with neighboring countries.
El Salvador
In 2013, El Salvador had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 1.812 per 1,000 people, ranking #97 out of 137 countries. This density is lower than the global average, indicating challenges in healthcare workforce availability compared to higher-ranked nations. Contributing factors include economic constraints and limited investment in healthcare infrastructure, which have historically affected the training and retention of healthcare professionals in the country.
South Korea
In 2013, South Korea had a Nurses and Midwives Density of 5.255 per 1,000 people, ranking #55 out of 137 countries. This figure is below the global average, reflecting a more competitive healthcare environment compared to many neighboring countries. The relatively high density can be attributed to South Korea's advanced healthcare system and significant investment in medical education, aimed at addressing the needs of its aging population.
Canada
In 2013, Canada ranked #18 globally with a Nurses and Midwives Density of 9.513 per 1,000 people. This figure is above the global average, reflecting a strong healthcare infrastructure compared to many other nations. Contributing factors include Canada's publicly funded healthcare system, which emphasizes access to nursing and midwifery services, and a relatively high level of education and training for healthcare professionals.
Cuba
Cuba ranked #25 globally in 2013 for Nurses and Midwives Density, with a value of 8.087 per 1,000 people. This figure is notably higher than the global average, reflecting the country's strong emphasis on healthcare. The high density of healthcare professionals in Cuba is largely attributed to its comprehensive health policies and a robust education system that prioritizes medical training, allowing the country to maintain a well-distributed healthcare workforce despite economic challenges.
Cabo Verde
Cabo Verde ranked #119 globally in Nurses and Midwives Density, with a value of 0.787 per 1,000 people in 2013. This figure is significantly lower than the global average, highlighting challenges in healthcare staffing within the country. Contributing factors include limited economic resources and the geographic dispersion of its islands, which complicates healthcare delivery and access. Additionally, Cabo Verde's emphasis on improving healthcare infrastructure has yet to fully translate into higher workforce density.
Data Source
Nurses and midwives per 1,000 people - Our World in Data
Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive data and visualizations on global development issues. The dataset on nurses and midwives per 1,000 people offers insights into healthcare workforce distribution across various countries, highlighting trends and disparities in healthcare access.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Nurses and Midwives Density data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.