Female Labor Force Participation Rate 2003
Female labor force participation rate measures the active engagement of women in the workforce, indicating economic inclusivity.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Mozambique | 88.212 % | |
2 | Tanzania | 87.153 % | |
3 | Madagascar | 85.756 % | |
4 | Solomon Islands | 84.899 % | |
5 | North Korea | 84.212 % | |
6 | Iceland | 84.007 % | |
7 | Burundi | 81.475 % | |
8 | Cameroon | 78.946 % | |
9 | Nigeria | 78.622 % | |
10 | Burkina Faso | 78.581 % | |
11 | Malawi | 78.227 % | |
12 | Cambodia | 78.05 % | |
13 | Eritrea | 76.739 % | |
14 | Angola | 76.416 % | |
15 | Norway | 76.415 % | |
16 | Ethiopia | 76.373 % | |
17 | Sweden | 76.013 % | |
18 | Vietnam | 75.925 % | |
19 | Barbados | 75.502 % | |
20 | Vanuatu | 75.147 % | |
21 | Bahamas | 75.067 % | |
22 | Denmark | 74.759 % | |
23 | Switzerland | 74.086 % | |
24 | Netherlands | 73.83 % | |
25 | Finland | 73.678 % | |
26 | Canada | 73.281 % | |
27 | Liberia | 73.066 % | |
28 | China | 72.67 % | |
29 | South Sudan | 72.58 % | |
30 | Kazakhstan | 72.565 % | |
31 | Azerbaijan | 72.396 % | |
32 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 72.167 % | |
33 | Uganda | 71.976 % | |
34 | Kenya | 71.457 % | |
35 | Georgia | 70.291 % | |
36 | Niger | 70.224 % | |
37 | Ghana | 70.056 % | |
38 | Thailand | 69.965 % | |
39 | Belarus | 69.359 % | |
40 | Lithuania | 69.234 % | |
41 | New Zealand | 68.964 % | |
42 | United States | 68.271 % | |
43 | United Kingdom | 68.007 % | |
44 | Congo | 67.632 % | |
45 | Sierra Leone | 67.395 % | |
46 | Australia | 67.043 % | |
47 | Benin | 66.993 % | |
48 | Central African Republic | 66.568 % | |
49 | Portugal | 66.546 % | |
50 | Lesotho | 66.349 % | |
51 | Russia | 66.206 % | |
52 | Estonia | 66.114 % | |
53 | Ukraine | 65.624 % | |
54 | Germany | 65.376 % | |
55 | Latvia | 64.58 % | |
56 | New Caledonia | 64.569 % | |
57 | Timor-Leste | 64.543 % | |
58 | Bhutan | 64.344 % | |
59 | Guinea | 64.255 % | |
60 | France | 64.014 % | |
61 | Peru | 63.903 % | |
62 | Austria | 63.753 % | |
63 | Slovakia | 63.472 % | |
64 | Israel | 62.931 % | |
65 | United States Virgin Islands | 62.804 % | |
66 | Slovenia | 62.585 % | |
67 | Czech Republic | 62.527 % | |
68 | Mali | 62.499 % | |
69 | Ireland | 62.442 % | |
70 | Armenia | 62.226 % | |
71 | Zimbabwe | 62.046 % | |
72 | Cyprus | 61.941 % | |
73 | Laos | 61.299 % | |
74 | Kyrgyzstan | 60.796 % | |
75 | Jamaica | 60.721 % | |
76 | Saint Lucia | 60.538 % | |
77 | Uruguay | 60.45 % | |
78 | Republic of Moldova | 60.126 % | |
79 | Bolivia | 59.944 % | |
80 | Japan | 59.897 % | |
81 | Haiti | 59.338 % | |
82 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 59.301 % | |
83 | Hungary | 59.081 % | |
84 | Brazil | 58.918 % | |
85 | China, Macao SAR | 58.861 % | |
86 | Myanmar | 58.839 % | |
87 | Brunei Darussalam | 58.642 % | |
88 | Chad | 58.638 % | |
89 | Poland | 58.244 % | |
90 | Guam | 57.642 % | |
91 | Bulgaria | 57.158 % | |
92 | Singapore | 57.003 % | |
93 | Colombia | 56.948 % | |
94 | Mongolia | 56.625 % | |
95 | Togo | 56.3 % | |
96 | Argentina | 56.29 % | |
97 | Croatia | 56.064 % | |
98 | Serbia | 56.001 % | |
99 | Belgium | 55.778 % | |
100 | Spain | 55.519 % | |
101 | Rwanda | 55.385 % | |
102 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 55.161 % | |
103 | Trinidad and Tobago | 55.101 % | |
104 | Guinea-Bissau | 55.051 % | |
105 | Albania | 54.44 % | |
106 | Equatorial Guinea | 54.302 % | |
107 | Cรดte d'Ivoire | 54.225 % | |
108 | Paraguay | 53.676 % | |
109 | Luxembourg | 53.393 % | |
110 | South Korea | 53.229 % | |
111 | Botswana | 53.044 % | |
112 | Turkmenistan | 53.009 % | |
113 | Ecuador | 51.505 % | |
114 | South Africa | 51.277 % | |
115 | Greece | 51.268 % | |
116 | Zambia | 51.011 % | |
117 | French Polynesia | 50.925 % | |
118 | Montenegro | 50.623 % | |
119 | Qatar | 50.512 % | |
120 | Panama | 50.421 % | |
121 | Namibia | 50.114 % | |
122 | Guatemala | 50.028 % | |
123 | Indonesia | 49.662 % | |
124 | Papua New Guinea | 49.488 % | |
125 | El Salvador | 49.359 % | |
126 | Venezuela | 49.322 % | |
127 | North Macedonia | 49.314 % | |
128 | Cabo Verde | 48.737 % | |
129 | Italy | 48.654 % | |
130 | Philippines | 48.186 % | |
131 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 47.895 % | |
132 | Romania | 47.822 % | |
133 | Tajikistan | 46.926 % | |
134 | Kuwait | 46.819 % | |
135 | Gambia | 46.519 % | |
136 | Tonga | 46.473 % | |
137 | Eswatini | 46.423 % | |
138 | Mauritius | 45.11 % | |
139 | Costa Rica | 45.066 % | |
140 | Samoa | 45.029 % | |
141 | Malaysia | 44.05 % | |
142 | Puerto Rico | 43.606 % | |
143 | Cuba | 43.35 % | |
144 | Honduras | 43.341 % | |
145 | Belize | 43.313 % | |
146 | Uzbekistan | 42.86 % | |
147 | Chile | 42.221 % | |
148 | Dominican Republic | 41.709 % | |
149 | Mexico | 41.229 % | |
150 | Gabon | 40.167 % | |
151 | Nicaragua | 40.129 % | |
152 | Sri Lanka | 38.641 % | |
153 | Suriname | 38.441 % | |
154 | Maldives | 37.906 % | |
155 | Fiji | 37.824 % | |
156 | Bahrain | 37.47 % | |
157 | Guyana | 36.961 % | |
158 | United Arab Emirates | 36.759 % | |
159 | India | 36.523 % | |
160 | Malta | 36.516 % | |
161 | Senegal | 34.443 % | |
162 | Comoros | 33.413 % | |
163 | Libya | 33.376 % | |
164 | Bangladesh | 29.86 % | |
165 | Mauritania | 28.884 % | |
166 | Turkey | 28.315 % | |
167 | Sudan | 27.723 % | |
168 | Morocco | 26.232 % | |
169 | Oman | 25.669 % | |
170 | Tunisia | 25.564 % | |
171 | Nepal | 23.207 % | |
172 | Sao Tome and Principe | 22.426 % | |
173 | Somalia | 21.719 % | |
174 | Lebanon | 21.717 % | |
175 | Egypt | 20.252 % | |
176 | Syrian Arab Republic | 19.94 % | |
177 | Iran | 17.426 % | |
178 | Pakistan | 17.381 % | |
179 | Yemen | 17.261 % | |
180 | Djibouti | 17.071 % | |
181 | Saudi Arabia | 16.835 % | |
182 | Afghanistan | 14.567 % | |
183 | Algeria | 13.381 % | |
184 | State of Palestine | 12.967 % | |
185 | Jordan | 11.444 % | |
186 | Iraq | 11.294 % |
- #1
Mozambique
- #2
Tanzania
- #3
Madagascar
- #4
Solomon Islands
- #5
North Korea
- #6
Iceland
- #7
Burundi
- #8
Cameroon
- #9
Nigeria
- #10
Burkina Faso
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #186
Iraq
- #185
Jordan
- #184
State of Palestine
- #183
Algeria
- #182
Afghanistan
- #181
Saudi Arabia
- #180
Djibouti
- #179
Yemen
- #178
Pakistan
- #177
Iran
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2003, Mozambique led the world in Female Labor Force Participation Rate at 88.21%, while Iraq had the lowest at 11.29%. This metric, which measures the active engagement of women in the workforce, spanned a global range from 11.29% to 88.21%. The average participation rate across 186 countries was 54.52%, reflecting significant global disparities in economic inclusivity for women.
Economic and Cultural Influences on Participation Rates
The variation in Female Labor Force Participation Rates across different regions in 2003 can be attributed to a mix of economic, cultural, and policy factors. Countries like Mozambique (88.21%) and Tanzania (87.15%) exhibited high participation rates, which often correlate with agrarian economies where women's labor is integral to agricultural productivity. In contrast, nations such as Iraq (11.29%) and Jordan (11.44%) showed low participation rates, likely influenced by cultural norms and legal restrictions limiting women's workforce involvement.
For instance, in Saudi Arabia, where the participation rate was 16.84%, traditional gender roles and regulatory barriers historically constrained women's employment opportunities. Conversely, North Korea (84.21%) and Iceland (84.01%) featured high rates, driven by state policies promoting gender equality and economic structures necessitating dual-income households.
Policy Impact and Regional Disparities
Government policies and economic structures play pivotal roles in shaping female labor force participation. In Burundi (81.48%) and Cameroon (78.95%), the necessity of female contribution to household income in subsistence economies boosts participation. Meanwhile, in Afghanistan (14.57%) and Algeria (13.38%), restrictive laws and socio-political instability hinder women's workforce integration.
Countries with progressive labor laws and gender equality initiatives, such as Iceland and Norway, often see higher female participation. These policies not only encourage women's employment but also support family-friendly work environments, contributing to higher participation rates.
Analyzing Year-over-Year Changes
The year-over-year changes in female labor participation rates highlight significant movements in specific countries. The State of Palestine saw a remarkable increase of 2.52% (24.1%) in participation, indicating shifts in socio-economic conditions or policy changes promoting women's employment. Lithuania experienced a growth of 3.57% (5.4%), possibly reflecting economic adjustments or improvements in gender equality measures.
Conversely, China, Macao SAR registered the largest decrease of -3.09% (-5.0%), which could be attributed to economic restructuring or shifts in industry demands affecting female jobs. Azerbaijan and Bulgaria also saw declines of -2.45% (-3.3%) and -1.75% (-3.0%), respectively, highlighting the impact of economic transitions on female labor.
Significance of Female Labor Force Participation
The Female Labor Force Participation Rate serves as a crucial indicator of economic inclusivity and social progress. High participation rates, as seen in Mozambique and Tanzania, often align with economic models that integrate women into the workforce, fostering broader economic growth. Conversely, low rates in countries such as Iraq and Afghanistan suggest barriers to women's economic empowerment, affecting national productivity and social development.
Understanding these patterns and the underlying causes helps policymakers design targeted interventions to enhance female economic participation, ultimately supporting equitable economic growth and social stability worldwide.
Frequently Asked Questions About Female Labor Force Participation Rate in 2003
Which country had the highest female labor force participation rate in 2003?
Mozambique had the highest female labor force participation rate in 2003, with 88.21%.
Which country had the lowest female labor force participation rate in 2003?
Iraq had the lowest female labor force participation rate in 2003, with 11.29%.
What was the average female labor force participation rate across all countries in 2003?
The average female labor force participation rate across all countries in 2003 was 54.52%.
What was the median female labor force participation rate in 2003?
The median female labor force participation rate in 2003 was 56.79%.
Which countries were in the top 3 for female labor force participation rate in 2003?
The top 3 countries for female labor force participation rate in 2003 were Mozambique (88.21%), Tanzania (87.15%), and Madagascar (85.76%).
How many countries are included in the dataset for female labor force participation rate in 2003?
The dataset for female labor force participation rate in 2003 includes 186 countries.
Insights by country
Sao Tome and Principe
In 2003, Sao Tome and Principe had a Female Labor Force Participation Rate of 22.426 %, ranking #172 out of 186 countries. This rate is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting broader trends in gender inequality within the labor market. Economic factors, such as a reliance on agriculture and limited industrial development, have constrained women's employment opportunities in the country.
Brunei Darussalam
In 2003, Brunei Darussalam had a Female Labor Force Participation Rate of 58.642 %, ranking #87 out of 186 countries. This rate is relatively high compared to some neighboring Southeast Asian nations, reflecting a commitment to gender equality in the workforce. Contributing factors include the country's robust economy driven by oil and gas exports, which has created diverse job opportunities, and government policies that support women's employment and education.
Congo
In 2003, Congo achieved a Female Labor Force Participation Rate of 67.632%, ranking #44 out of 186 countries. This rate is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting the country's unique socio-economic dynamics. Contributing factors include a high demand for labor in agriculture and informal sectors, which often employ women, as well as policies aimed at promoting gender equality in the workforce.
Cuba
In 2003, Cuba had a Female Labor Force Participation Rate of 43.35 %, ranking #143 out of 186 countries. This figure is notably lower than the global average, indicating challenges in gender equality in the workforce. Factors contributing to this rate include the country's economic structure, which has historically limited job opportunities, and demographic trends that affect women's employment, such as high levels of emigration.
Albania
In 2003, Albania had a Female Labor Force Participation Rate of 54.44 %, ranking #105 out of 186 countries. This rate was below the global average, reflecting broader regional challenges in gender equality in the workforce. Key drivers for this participation rate include Albania's transitional economy, where traditional gender roles often limit women's employment opportunities, and ongoing efforts to improve labor market access for women.
Cyprus
In 2003, Cyprus had a Female Labor Force Participation Rate of 61.941 %, ranking #72 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably higher than many neighboring countries, reflecting a more progressive stance on women's roles in the workforce. Contributing factors include Cyprus's relatively high level of education among women and policies aimed at promoting gender equality in employment.
Myanmar
In 2003, Myanmar achieved a Female Labor Force Participation Rate of 58.839 %, ranking #86 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably higher than that of neighboring Thailand, which has faced challenges in female labor engagement. Contributing factors to Myanmar's participation rate include a significant agricultural sector that employs many women and ongoing efforts to improve gender equality in the workforce.
Ireland
In 2003, Ireland achieved a Female Labor Force Participation Rate of 62.442 %, ranking #69 out of 186 countries. This figure is notably lower than the European Union average, reflecting the region's commitment to gender equality in the workforce. Contributing factors to Ireland's participation rate include a robust economy that has historically encouraged female employment and progressive policies aimed at increasing women's roles in the labor market.
Indonesia
In 2003, Indonesia ranked #123 globally with a Female Labor Force Participation Rate of 49.662%. This figure is notably lower than the global average, indicating challenges in gender equality within the workforce. Key factors influencing this rate include cultural norms that prioritize traditional gender roles and limited access to education and employment opportunities for women, particularly in rural areas.
Angola
In 2003, Angola achieved a Female Labor Force Participation Rate of 76.416 %, ranking #14 out of 186 countries. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, highlighting Angola's unique position in promoting female employment. The high participation rate can be attributed to the country's post-war reconstruction efforts, which necessitated the inclusion of women in the workforce, as well as cultural shifts that encouraged women's economic contributions.
Data Source
Labor force participation rate, female (% of female population ages 15-64) (modeled ILO estimate) | Data
The dataset is provided by the World Bank and offers modeled estimates of the female labor force participation rate as a percentage of the female population aged 15-64. It serves as a key indicator for understanding women's engagement in the labor market across different countries.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Female Labor Force Participation Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Economy Facts
Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country
Explore the agriculture value added as a share of GDP by country, measuring the economic impact of farming sectors. This statistic highlights the importance of agriculture in national economies and informs investment decisions.
View dataBrowse All Economy
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data