Female Labor Force Participation Rate 2001
Female labor force participation rate measures the active engagement of women in the workforce, indicating economic inclusivity.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Mozambique | 88.014 % | |
2 | Tanzania | 86.165 % | |
3 | Madagascar | 85.668 % | |
4 | Solomon Islands | 84.751 % | |
5 | Iceland | 84.69 % | |
6 | North Korea | 83.747 % | |
7 | Burundi | 83.438 % | |
8 | Cambodia | 79.722 % | |
9 | Burkina Faso | 79.146 % | |
10 | Cameroon | 78.863 % | |
11 | Nigeria | 78.777 % | |
12 | Malawi | 78.214 % | |
13 | Vietnam | 77.228 % | |
14 | Eritrea | 76.744 % | |
15 | Ethiopia | 76.393 % | |
16 | Angola | 76.334 % | |
17 | Azerbaijan | 76.315 % | |
18 | Sweden | 75.951 % | |
19 | Norway | 75.82 % | |
20 | Barbados | 75.35 % | |
21 | Vanuatu | 74.836 % | |
22 | Denmark | 74.678 % | |
23 | Bahamas | 74.344 % | |
24 | China | 73.416 % | |
25 | Netherlands | 73.347 % | |
26 | Switzerland | 73.143 % | |
27 | Liberia | 73.114 % | |
28 | Finland | 73.037 % | |
29 | South Sudan | 72.677 % | |
30 | Kazakhstan | 72.249 % | |
31 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 72.208 % | |
32 | Uganda | 72.101 % | |
33 | Georgia | 72.087 % | |
34 | Kenya | 71.437 % | |
35 | Canada | 70.744 % | |
36 | Niger | 70.313 % | |
37 | Ghana | 70.281 % | |
38 | Thailand | 69.925 % | |
39 | United States | 69.011 % | |
40 | New Zealand | 68.143 % | |
41 | Belarus | 67.955 % | |
42 | Lesotho | 67.642 % | |
43 | United Kingdom | 67.58 % | |
44 | Congo | 67.575 % | |
45 | Sierra Leone | 67.405 % | |
46 | Central African Republic | 66.542 % | |
47 | Lithuania | 66.446 % | |
48 | Australia | 65.945 % | |
49 | Benin | 65.581 % | |
50 | Guinea | 65.568 % | |
51 | Estonia | 65.491 % | |
52 | Ukraine | 65.118 % | |
53 | Russia | 65.1 % | |
54 | United States Virgin Islands | 64.685 % | |
55 | Portugal | 64.599 % | |
56 | New Caledonia | 64.356 % | |
57 | Germany | 64.027 % | |
58 | Timor-Leste | 63.929 % | |
59 | Slovakia | 63.569 % | |
60 | Czech Republic | 63.179 % | |
61 | Latvia | 63.131 % | |
62 | Slovenia | 62.703 % | |
63 | Mali | 62.538 % | |
64 | Armenia | 62.312 % | |
65 | Bhutan | 62.305 % | |
66 | Israel | 62.282 % | |
67 | Uruguay | 62.273 % | |
68 | Guam | 62.253 % | |
69 | China, Macao SAR | 62.225 % | |
70 | Austria | 62.161 % | |
71 | Zimbabwe | 62.126 % | |
72 | France | 62.07 % | |
73 | Kyrgyzstan | 62.046 % | |
74 | Ireland | 61.735 % | |
75 | Jamaica | 61.716 % | |
76 | Laos | 61.689 % | |
77 | Republic of Moldova | 61.491 % | |
78 | Peru | 60.723 % | |
79 | Bolivia | 60.185 % | |
80 | Japan | 60.113 % | |
81 | Myanmar | 60.085 % | |
82 | Chad | 59.927 % | |
83 | Cyprus | 59.812 % | |
84 | Poland | 59.537 % | |
85 | Bulgaria | 59.455 % | |
86 | Saint Lucia | 58.794 % | |
87 | Haiti | 58.7 % | |
88 | Brunei Darussalam | 58.291 % | |
89 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 58.225 % | |
90 | Hungary | 58.197 % | |
91 | Singapore | 57.166 % | |
92 | Argentina | 57.138 % | |
93 | Brazil | 56.838 % | |
94 | Mongolia | 56.684 % | |
95 | Colombia | 56.523 % | |
96 | Serbia | 56.361 % | |
97 | Togo | 56.177 % | |
98 | Croatia | 55.956 % | |
99 | Albania | 55.449 % | |
100 | Guinea-Bissau | 54.95 % | |
101 | Rwanda | 54.817 % | |
102 | Belgium | 54.397 % | |
103 | Equatorial Guinea | 54.314 % | |
104 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 53.595 % | |
105 | Paraguay | 53.576 % | |
106 | South Korea | 53.288 % | |
107 | Turkmenistan | 52.94 % | |
108 | Trinidad and Tobago | 52.475 % | |
109 | Cรดte d'Ivoire | 52.093 % | |
110 | Indonesia | 51.933 % | |
111 | Luxembourg | 51.911 % | |
112 | Botswana | 51.742 % | |
113 | Venezuela | 51.418 % | |
114 | French Polynesia | 50.991 % | |
115 | Zambia | 50.907 % | |
116 | South Africa | 50.657 % | |
117 | Montenegro | 50.527 % | |
118 | Spain | 50.485 % | |
119 | Qatar | 50.158 % | |
120 | Papua New Guinea | 49.266 % | |
121 | Greece | 49.245 % | |
122 | Namibia | 49.108 % | |
123 | Ecuador | 49.097 % | |
124 | Panama | 48.957 % | |
125 | Philippines | 48.3 % | |
126 | Cabo Verde | 47.825 % | |
127 | North Macedonia | 47.738 % | |
128 | Romania | 47.666 % | |
129 | El Salvador | 47.638 % | |
130 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 47.625 % | |
131 | Guatemala | 47.493 % | |
132 | Italy | 47.033 % | |
133 | Tajikistan | 46.988 % | |
134 | Gambia | 46.78 % | |
135 | Tonga | 46.559 % | |
136 | Eswatini | 45.985 % | |
137 | Kuwait | 45.684 % | |
138 | Samoa | 45.255 % | |
139 | Costa Rica | 44.953 % | |
140 | Honduras | 44.23 % | |
141 | Uzbekistan | 43.132 % | |
142 | Malaysia | 43.117 % | |
143 | Belize | 42.287 % | |
144 | Cuba | 42.167 % | |
145 | Puerto Rico | 41.506 % | |
146 | Chile | 40.935 % | |
147 | Dominican Republic | 40.793 % | |
148 | Mexico | 40.346 % | |
149 | Gabon | 39.908 % | |
150 | Mauritius | 39.763 % | |
151 | Sri Lanka | 39.118 % | |
152 | Fiji | 38.548 % | |
153 | Nicaragua | 38.261 % | |
154 | Maldives | 37.748 % | |
155 | Guyana | 36.825 % | |
156 | Suriname | 36.69 % | |
157 | India | 36.336 % | |
158 | Bahrain | 36.305 % | |
159 | Malta | 35.389 % | |
160 | United Arab Emirates | 35.341 % | |
161 | Senegal | 34.249 % | |
162 | Comoros | 33.291 % | |
163 | Libya | 32.644 % | |
164 | Bangladesh | 29.663 % | |
165 | Mauritania | 29.018 % | |
166 | Turkey | 28.63 % | |
167 | Sudan | 28.395 % | |
168 | Morocco | 26.52 % | |
169 | Tunisia | 25.517 % | |
170 | Oman | 25.09 % | |
171 | Nepal | 22.712 % | |
172 | Sao Tome and Principe | 22.324 % | |
173 | Somalia | 21.808 % | |
174 | Egypt | 21.685 % | |
175 | Lebanon | 21.381 % | |
176 | Syrian Arab Republic | 21.277 % | |
177 | Yemen | 19.787 % | |
178 | Djibouti | 16.918 % | |
179 | Saudi Arabia | 16.594 % | |
180 | Pakistan | 16.461 % | |
181 | Iran | 15.391 % | |
182 | Afghanistan | 14.609 % | |
183 | Algeria | 13.003 % | |
184 | Jordan | 11.877 % | |
185 | Iraq | 10.589 % | |
186 | State of Palestine | 10.402 % |
- #1
Mozambique
- #2
Tanzania
- #3
Madagascar
- #4
Solomon Islands
- #5
Iceland
- #6
North Korea
- #7
Burundi
- #8
Cambodia
- #9
Burkina Faso
- #10
Cameroon
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #186
State of Palestine
- #185
Iraq
- #184
Jordan
- #183
Algeria
- #182
Afghanistan
- #181
Iran
- #180
Pakistan
- #179
Saudi Arabia
- #178
Djibouti
- #177
Yemen
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2001, the country with the highest Female Labor Force Participation Rate was Mozambique at 88.01%, while the global range spanned from a minimum of 10.40% to a maximum of 88.01%. The global average participation rate for women in the labor force was 54.23%, providing a benchmark for economic inclusivity across different regions.
Economic Structures and Female Workforce Engagement
The disparity in Female Labor Force Participation Rates across countries in 2001 largely reflects differences in economic structures and societal roles. In countries like Mozambique (88.01%) and Tanzania (86.17%), high participation rates can be attributed to the agricultural sector's dominance, where women traditionally play a significant role. Moreover, these economies often rely on informal sectors where female labor is prevalent.
Conversely, nations such as the State of Palestine (10.40%) and Iraq (10.59%) exhibit low participation, partly due to economic disruptions and sociopolitical constraints that limit women's access to the workforce. These regions may also have cultural norms and legal frameworks that restrict female employment outside the home.
Policy Influence on Female Labor Participation
Government policies significantly impact Female Labor Force Participation Rates. For example, Iceland (84.69%) demonstrates how progressive gender equality policies, including parental leave and child care support, can foster high female labor engagement. Such initiatives reduce the opportunity cost of women entering the workforce and promote a balanced work-life environment.
In contrast, countries like Saudi Arabia (16.59%) have historically restricted women's participation through stringent legal and cultural frameworks. However, policy reforms in recent years aim to increase female workforce participation by enhancing women's rights and access to employment opportunities.
Geopolitical and Cultural Dynamics
Geopolitical and cultural dynamics further explain the variations in participation rates. In North Korea (83.75%), state-driven employment policies and the need for a dual-income household due to economic challenges contribute to high female labor force involvement. This contrasts sharply with Jordan (11.88%), where cultural expectations and limited job opportunities constrain women's economic participation.
In Afghanistan (14.61%) and Pakistan (16.46%), ongoing conflict and conservative cultural practices continue to limit women's access to education and employment, thus affecting their participation in the labor force.
Conclusion: Trends and Implications
The Female Labor Force Participation Rate in 2001 underscores significant global disparities rooted in economic, policy, and cultural factors. Countries with robust participation rates often combine supportive policies with economic structures that naturally include women. Meanwhile, low participation rates are frequently linked to restrictive policies, cultural norms, or economic instability. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for policymakers aiming to enhance economic inclusivity and harness the potential of female labor in driving economic growth.
Frequently Asked Questions About Female Labor Force Participation Rate in 2001
Which country had the highest female labor force participation rate in 2001?
Mozambique had the highest female labor force participation rate in 2001, with 88.01%.
Which country had the lowest female labor force participation rate in 2001?
The State of Palestine had the lowest female labor force participation rate in 2001, with 10.4%.
What was the average female labor force participation rate across countries in 2001?
The average female labor force participation rate across the 186 countries in 2001 was 54.23%.
What was the median female labor force participation rate in 2001?
The median female labor force participation rate in 2001 was 56.76%.
Which countries were in the top 3 for female labor force participation rate in 2001?
The top 3 countries for female labor force participation rate in 2001 were Mozambique (88.01%), Tanzania (86.17%), and Madagascar (85.67%).
What is the spread between the highest and lowest female labor force participation rates in 2001?
The spread between the highest and lowest female labor force participation rates in 2001 was 77.61 percentage points, from Mozambique's 88.01% to the State of Palestine's 10.4%.
Insights by country
Namibia
In 2001, Namibia ranked #122 globally with a Female Labor Force Participation Rate of 49.108%. This figure is notably lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in gender equality in the workforce. Key drivers include historical socio-economic disparities and a labor market that has traditionally favored male employment, particularly in sectors such as mining and agriculture.
India
In 2001, India ranked #157 globally with a Female Labor Force Participation Rate of 36.336%. This figure is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in gender equality in the workforce. Contributing factors include cultural norms that prioritize traditional gender roles, limited access to education for women, and economic structures that often restrict female employment opportunities.
Somalia
In 2001, Somalia had a Female Labor Force Participation Rate of 21.808 %, ranking #173 out of 186 countries. This rate is significantly lower than many neighboring countries, reflecting broader regional challenges in women's employment opportunities. Contributing factors include ongoing conflict, limited access to education, and cultural norms that restrict women's roles in the workforce.
Mongolia
In 2001, Mongolia ranked #94 globally with a Female Labor Force Participation Rate of 56.684%. This rate is notably higher than the global average, reflecting a significant role of women in Mongolia's economy, particularly in agriculture and herding. Key drivers for this participation include the country's vast rural landscape, where traditional livelihoods often require female involvement, and progressive policies aimed at gender equality that emerged after the transition to a market economy.
Nepal
Nepal had a Female Labor Force Participation Rate of 22.712 % in 2001, ranking #171 out of 186 countries. This rate is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in gender equality within the labor market. Contributing factors include traditional gender roles, limited access to education for women, and economic structures that prioritize male employment in agriculture and informal sectors.
Qatar
In 2001, Qatar had a Female Labor Force Participation Rate of 50.158 %, ranking #119 out of 186 countries. This rate was notably below the global average, reflecting cultural and economic factors that influence women's employment opportunities. The country's rapid economic growth due to oil and gas revenues has led to increased demand for labor, yet traditional gender roles and limited policy support for female employment have constrained participation rates.
Latvia
In 2001, Latvia ranked #61 globally with a Female Labor Force Participation Rate of 63.131%. This rate is relatively high compared to many neighboring countries in the Baltic region, reflecting a commitment to gender equality in the workforce. Key drivers of this participation include Latvia's post-Soviet economic reforms, which encouraged women's employment, and strong educational attainment among women, leading to greater workforce integration.
Mali
In 2001, Mali achieved a Female Labor Force Participation Rate of 62.538%, ranking #63 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, reflecting a strong cultural emphasis on women's roles in agriculture and informal sectors. Contributing factors include a predominantly rural population where women often engage in subsistence farming, as well as policies aimed at improving gender equality in the workforce.
Morocco
In 2001, Morocco ranked #168 globally with a Female Labor Force Participation Rate of 26.52 %. This figure is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting broader challenges in gender equality in the workforce. Contributing factors include traditional gender roles, limited access to education for women, and economic structures that often prioritize male employment. Additionally, regional disparities in labor opportunities further exacerbate the low participation rate among Moroccan women.
Panama
In 2001, Panama had a Female Labor Force Participation Rate of 48.957 %, ranking #124 out of 186 countries. This rate is lower than the global average, indicating challenges in female employment compared to other nations. Factors contributing to this statistic include traditional gender roles, limited access to childcare, and economic structures that favor male employment in key sectors.
Data Source
Labor force participation rate, female (% of female population ages 15-64) (modeled ILO estimate) | Data
The dataset is provided by the World Bank and offers modeled estimates of the female labor force participation rate as a percentage of the female population aged 15-64. It serves as a key indicator for understanding women's engagement in the labor market across different countries.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Female Labor Force Participation Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Economy Facts
Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country
Explore the agriculture value added as a share of GDP by country, measuring the economic impact of farming sectors. This statistic highlights the importance of agriculture in national economies and informs investment decisions.
View dataBrowse All Economy
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data