Female Labor Force Participation Rate 2002
Female labor force participation rate measures the active engagement of women in the workforce, indicating economic inclusivity.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Mozambique | 88.114 % | |
2 | Tanzania | 86.667 % | |
3 | Madagascar | 85.706 % | |
4 | Solomon Islands | 85.058 % | |
5 | North Korea | 83.977 % | |
6 | Iceland | 83.682 % | |
7 | Burundi | 82.49 % | |
8 | Cameroon | 78.905 % | |
9 | Cambodia | 78.89 % | |
10 | Nigeria | 78.868 % | |
11 | Burkina Faso | 78.858 % | |
12 | Malawi | 78.211 % | |
13 | Eritrea | 76.746 % | |
14 | Vietnam | 76.482 % | |
15 | Angola | 76.388 % | |
16 | Ethiopia | 76.382 % | |
17 | Norway | 76.251 % | |
18 | Sweden | 76.072 % | |
19 | Barbados | 75.442 % | |
20 | Denmark | 75.41 % | |
21 | Vanuatu | 75.24 % | |
22 | Azerbaijan | 74.851 % | |
23 | Bahamas | 74.715 % | |
24 | Switzerland | 73.819 % | |
25 | Netherlands | 73.711 % | |
26 | Finland | 73.695 % | |
27 | Liberia | 73.139 % | |
28 | China | 73.052 % | |
29 | South Sudan | 72.628 % | |
30 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 72.188 % | |
31 | Canada | 72.118 % | |
32 | Kazakhstan | 72.053 % | |
33 | Uganda | 72.048 % | |
34 | Georgia | 71.452 % | |
35 | Kenya | 71.448 % | |
36 | Niger | 70.272 % | |
37 | Ghana | 70.168 % | |
38 | Thailand | 69.931 % | |
39 | New Zealand | 68.796 % | |
40 | Belarus | 68.714 % | |
41 | United States | 68.663 % | |
42 | United Kingdom | 68.116 % | |
43 | Congo | 67.589 % | |
44 | Sierra Leone | 67.408 % | |
45 | Lesotho | 67.001 % | |
46 | Central African Republic | 66.556 % | |
47 | Benin | 66.536 % | |
48 | Russia | 66.208 % | |
49 | Australia | 66.18 % | |
50 | Lithuania | 65.667 % | |
51 | Guinea | 65.494 % | |
52 | Portugal | 65.404 % | |
53 | Ukraine | 65.317 % | |
54 | Latvia | 64.781 % | |
55 | Germany | 64.554 % | |
56 | New Caledonia | 64.426 % | |
57 | Timor-Leste | 64.418 % | |
58 | Estonia | 64.034 % | |
59 | United States Virgin Islands | 64.017 % | |
60 | Slovenia | 64.004 % | |
61 | Austria | 63.74 % | |
62 | Bhutan | 63.304 % | |
63 | Slovakia | 63.066 % | |
64 | Czech Republic | 62.704 % | |
65 | Mali | 62.516 % | |
66 | Ireland | 62.438 % | |
67 | France | 62.396 % | |
68 | Peru | 62.317 % | |
69 | Armenia | 62.266 % | |
70 | Kyrgyzstan | 62.191 % | |
71 | Zimbabwe | 62.129 % | |
72 | China, Macao SAR | 61.951 % | |
73 | Israel | 61.835 % | |
74 | Laos | 61.495 % | |
75 | Jamaica | 61.215 % | |
76 | Republic of Moldova | 61.208 % | |
77 | Uruguay | 60.621 % | |
78 | Cyprus | 60.448 % | |
79 | Bolivia | 60.066 % | |
80 | Japan | 59.86 % | |
81 | Saint Lucia | 59.67 % | |
82 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 59.662 % | |
83 | Myanmar | 59.494 % | |
84 | Chad | 59.287 % | |
85 | Haiti | 59.018 % | |
86 | Bulgaria | 58.913 % | |
87 | Hungary | 58.694 % | |
88 | Poland | 58.641 % | |
89 | Brazil | 58.579 % | |
90 | Brunei Darussalam | 58.475 % | |
91 | Guam | 58.457 % | |
92 | Mongolia | 56.682 % | |
93 | Togo | 56.237 % | |
94 | Serbia | 56.174 % | |
95 | Singapore | 56.096 % | |
96 | Croatia | 56.03 % | |
97 | Colombia | 55.477 % | |
98 | Belgium | 55.368 % | |
99 | Rwanda | 55.17 % | |
100 | Argentina | 55.115 % | |
101 | Guinea-Bissau | 55.012 % | |
102 | Albania | 54.951 % | |
103 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 54.315 % | |
104 | Equatorial Guinea | 54.309 % | |
105 | South Korea | 53.838 % | |
106 | Spain | 53.721 % | |
107 | Paraguay | 53.7 % | |
108 | Luxembourg | 53.414 % | |
109 | Turkmenistan | 53.234 % | |
110 | Cรดte d'Ivoire | 53.161 % | |
111 | Trinidad and Tobago | 52.993 % | |
112 | Botswana | 52.382 % | |
113 | South Africa | 50.973 % | |
114 | Zambia | 50.957 % | |
115 | French Polynesia | 50.922 % | |
116 | Venezuela | 50.657 % | |
117 | Montenegro | 50.606 % | |
118 | Ecuador | 50.3 % | |
119 | Greece | 50.298 % | |
120 | Qatar | 50.153 % | |
121 | Indonesia | 50.062 % | |
122 | Panama | 49.902 % | |
123 | Namibia | 49.611 % | |
124 | Papua New Guinea | 49.429 % | |
125 | Cabo Verde | 48.27 % | |
126 | Philippines | 48.263 % | |
127 | North Macedonia | 48.049 % | |
128 | Italy | 47.902 % | |
129 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 47.869 % | |
130 | Guatemala | 47.706 % | |
131 | Romania | 47.692 % | |
132 | El Salvador | 47.455 % | |
133 | Tajikistan | 46.955 % | |
134 | Tonga | 46.506 % | |
135 | Gambia | 46.257 % | |
136 | Eswatini | 46.214 % | |
137 | Kuwait | 46.192 % | |
138 | Samoa | 45.126 % | |
139 | Costa Rica | 44.651 % | |
140 | Honduras | 43.782 % | |
141 | Malaysia | 43.594 % | |
142 | Uzbekistan | 43.095 % | |
143 | Belize | 42.8 % | |
144 | Cuba | 42.696 % | |
145 | Dominican Republic | 42.658 % | |
146 | Puerto Rico | 42.537 % | |
147 | Mauritius | 41.678 % | |
148 | Chile | 40.741 % | |
149 | Mexico | 40.483 % | |
150 | Gabon | 40.021 % | |
151 | Nicaragua | 39.191 % | |
152 | Sri Lanka | 38.876 % | |
153 | Fiji | 38.186 % | |
154 | Maldives | 37.827 % | |
155 | Suriname | 37.553 % | |
156 | Malta | 36.948 % | |
157 | Bahrain | 36.889 % | |
158 | India | 36.428 % | |
159 | Guyana | 36.248 % | |
160 | United Arab Emirates | 36.035 % | |
161 | Senegal | 34.348 % | |
162 | Comoros | 33.335 % | |
163 | Libya | 33.007 % | |
164 | Bangladesh | 29.775 % | |
165 | Turkey | 29.618 % | |
166 | Mauritania | 28.949 % | |
167 | Sudan | 28.059 % | |
168 | Morocco | 25.926 % | |
169 | Tunisia | 25.536 % | |
170 | Oman | 25.347 % | |
171 | Nepal | 22.957 % | |
172 | Sao Tome and Principe | 22.368 % | |
173 | Somalia | 21.766 % | |
174 | Lebanon | 21.548 % | |
175 | Syrian Arab Republic | 20.598 % | |
176 | Egypt | 19.458 % | |
177 | Yemen | 18.489 % | |
178 | Djibouti | 17.022 % | |
179 | Pakistan | 16.542 % | |
180 | Saudi Arabia | 16.436 % | |
181 | Iran | 16.374 % | |
182 | Afghanistan | 14.563 % | |
183 | Algeria | 13.178 % | |
184 | Jordan | 12.53 % | |
185 | Iraq | 10.935 % | |
186 | State of Palestine | 10.445 % |
- #1
Mozambique
- #2
Tanzania
- #3
Madagascar
- #4
Solomon Islands
- #5
North Korea
- #6
Iceland
- #7
Burundi
- #8
Cameroon
- #9
Cambodia
- #10
Nigeria
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #186
State of Palestine
- #185
Iraq
- #184
Jordan
- #183
Algeria
- #182
Afghanistan
- #181
Iran
- #180
Saudi Arabia
- #179
Pakistan
- #178
Djibouti
- #177
Yemen
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2002, Mozambique led the world with the highest Female Labor Force Participation Rate of 88.11%, while the global range spanned from a low of 10.45% in the State of Palestine to Mozambique's peak. The global average participation rate was 54.35%, providing a benchmark for economic inclusivity worldwide.
High Participation in Sub-Saharan Africa
The data from 2002 reveals a significant clustering of high female labor force participation rates in Sub-Saharan Africa. Countries such as Mozambique (88.11%), Tanzania (86.67%), and Madagascar (85.71%) demonstrate exceptionally high levels of female workforce engagement. This trend can be attributed to several factors, including the prevalence of agriculture as a dominant economic sector, where women often play critical roles. Additionally, social norms in these regions may support the economic participation of women, and economic necessity often drives higher rates of female employment.
Barriers in the Middle East and North Africa
At the other end of the spectrum, the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) regions show the lowest participation rates. Countries like the State of Palestine (10.45%), Iraq (10.94%), and Jordan (12.53%) feature prominently among the bottom ten. These low rates are often influenced by cultural norms that prioritize traditional gender roles, coupled with economic structures that offer limited employment opportunities for women. Additionally, political instability and conflict may exacerbate barriers to female employment in these regions.
Economic and Policy Drivers in High-Performing Countries
In countries such as Iceland (83.68%) and North Korea (83.98%), high female labor force participation rates reflect robust policy frameworks and economic structures that support gender inclusivity. Iceland, known for its progressive gender equality policies, provides institutional support for women's workforce participation, including parental leave and childcare services. Meanwhile, North Korea's state-driven economy mandates female labor participation as part of its national workforce policy.
Year-over-Year Trends and Movements
The year-over-year changes in female labor force participation rates in 2002 highlight significant shifts. Spain saw the largest increase with a gain of 3.24% (6.4%), influenced by economic reforms and increased labor market flexibility. Other notable increases occurred in Mauritius (+1.91%) and the Dominican Republic (+1.87%), reflecting economic diversification and improved educational opportunities for women. Conversely, Guam experienced the largest decrease of -3.80% (-6.1%), possibly due to economic restructuring or changes in labor force demographics. Egypt also saw a significant decline of -2.23% (-10.3%), which could be linked to socio-economic challenges and policy shifts affecting women's employment.
Conclusion: Patterns and Implications
The 2002 data on female labor force participation rates underscores the diverse economic and cultural landscapes influencing women's roles in the workforce. High participation rates in Sub-Saharan Africa contrast sharply with lower rates in the MENA region, highlighting the impact of socio-economic structures, cultural norms, and policy frameworks. Understanding these patterns is crucial for policymakers aiming to enhance economic inclusivity and leverage the potential of women in the workforce. As countries continue to evolve their economic policies, fostering gender equality remains a key component of sustainable economic growth.
Frequently Asked Questions About Female Labor Force Participation Rate in 2002
Which country had the highest female labor force participation rate in 2002?
Mozambique had the highest female labor force participation rate in 2002, with 88.11%.
Which country had the lowest female labor force participation rate in 2002?
The State of Palestine had the lowest female labor force participation rate in 2002, at 10.45%.
What was the average female labor force participation rate across all countries in 2002?
The average female labor force participation rate across all countries in 2002 was 54.35%.
What was the median female labor force participation rate in 2002?
The median female labor force participation rate in 2002 was 56.21%.
Which countries were in the top 3 for female labor force participation rate in 2002?
The top 3 countries for female labor force participation rate in 2002 were Mozambique, Tanzania, and Madagascar.
How many countries are included in the dataset for female labor force participation rate in 2002?
The dataset includes 186 countries for female labor force participation rate in 2002.
Insights by country
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
In 2002, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines had a Female Labor Force Participation Rate of 54.315 %, ranking #103 out of 186 countries. This rate is below the global average, indicating potential challenges in gender equality within the workforce. Contributing factors include the country's economic reliance on agriculture and tourism, which may limit opportunities for women in higher-paying sectors.
Ukraine
In 2002, Ukraine achieved a Female Labor Force Participation Rate of 65.317%, ranking #53 out of 186 countries. This figure is notably higher than the global average, reflecting a strong tradition of women's participation in the workforce, particularly in sectors such as agriculture and services. Economic reforms following independence in the 1990s encouraged women's employment, while demographic trends, including a declining population, have also influenced labor market dynamics.
Zimbabwe
In 2002, Zimbabwe's Female Labor Force Participation Rate was 62.129 %, ranking #71 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, indicating a significant level of female engagement in the workforce. Contributing factors include Zimbabwe's historical emphasis on gender equality in education and employment, alongside economic challenges that necessitated dual-income households for survival.
Syrian Arab Republic
In 2002, the Syrian Arab Republic had a Female Labor Force Participation Rate of 20.598%, ranking #175 out of 186 countries. This rate is significantly lower than the global average, indicating limited economic opportunities for women compared to many other nations. Contributing factors include ongoing socio-political instability and traditional gender roles, which restrict women's access to employment and economic participation in the region.
Serbia
In 2002, Serbia had a **Female Labor Force Participation Rate** of **56.174%**, ranking **#94** out of 186 countries. This figure is below the global average, reflecting challenges in workforce integration compared to higher-ranking nations. Contributing factors include the impact of economic transition post-Yugoslavia, where traditional gender roles and limited job opportunities for women have historically influenced participation rates.
Slovenia
In 2002, Slovenia achieved a Female Labor Force Participation Rate of 64.004 %, ranking #60 out of 186 countries. This rate was above the global average, indicating a relatively strong engagement of women in the workforce compared to many other nations. Contributing factors include Slovenia's progressive labor policies and a strong emphasis on gender equality, which have fostered an environment supportive of female employment.
Singapore
In 2002, Singapore had a Female Labor Force Participation Rate of 56.096 %, ranking #95 out of 186 countries. This rate was below the global average, reflecting challenges in gender equality in the workplace. Key factors influencing this statistic included a rapidly evolving economy that demanded a skilled workforce, alongside cultural norms that traditionally placed women in caregiving roles.
Eswatini
In 2002, Eswatini ranked #136 globally with a Female Labor Force Participation Rate of 46.214%. This rate is notably lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in gender equality and economic participation compared to countries with higher rates, such as the Nordic nations. Contributing factors include traditional gender roles, limited access to education for women, and economic structures that often restrict employment opportunities in rural areas.
Turkmenistan
In 2002, Turkmenistan had a Female Labor Force Participation Rate of 53.234 %, ranking #109 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably lower than the global average, indicating significant barriers to women's economic engagement. Key drivers of this statistic include traditional gender roles and limited economic diversification, which restrict women's access to various job sectors in Turkmenistan.
Tonga
In 2002, Tonga ranked #134 globally with a Female Labor Force Participation Rate of 46.506%. This rate is below the global average, indicating challenges in women's economic engagement compared to many neighboring Pacific nations. Contributing factors include limited job opportunities, traditional gender roles, and the impact of remittances, which often reduce the necessity for women to participate in the labor market.
Data Source
Labor force participation rate, female (% of female population ages 15-64) (modeled ILO estimate) | Data
The dataset is provided by the World Bank and offers modeled estimates of the female labor force participation rate as a percentage of the female population aged 15-64. It serves as a key indicator for understanding women's engagement in the labor market across different countries.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Female Labor Force Participation Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Economy Facts
Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country
Explore the agriculture value added as a share of GDP by country, measuring the economic impact of farming sectors. This statistic highlights the importance of agriculture in national economies and informs investment decisions.
View dataBrowse All Economy
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data