Female Labor Force Participation Rate 2010
Female labor force participation rate measures the active engagement of women in the workforce, indicating economic inclusivity.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | North Korea | 85.747 % | |
2 | Madagascar | 85.425 % | |
3 | Tanzania | 85.347 % | |
4 | Cambodia | 84.364 % | |
5 | Solomon Islands | 84.254 % | |
6 | Mozambique | 83.088 % | |
7 | Iceland | 81.672 % | |
8 | Burundi | 80.272 % | |
9 | Nigeria | 77.897 % | |
10 | Norway | 77.268 % | |
11 | Bahamas | 77.253 % | |
12 | Vietnam | 76.836 % | |
13 | Burkina Faso | 76.718 % | |
14 | Eritrea | 76.667 % | |
15 | Angola | 76.561 % | |
16 | Ethiopia | 76.447 % | |
17 | Sweden | 76.226 % | |
18 | Barbados | 75.723 % | |
19 | Peru | 75.626 % | |
20 | Switzerland | 75.34 % | |
21 | Netherlands | 75.315 % | |
22 | Denmark | 74.617 % | |
23 | Canada | 74.328 % | |
24 | Kazakhstan | 73.691 % | |
25 | South Sudan | 73.474 % | |
26 | Liberia | 73.131 % | |
27 | Finland | 72.482 % | |
28 | Belarus | 71.894 % | |
29 | New Zealand | 71.64 % | |
30 | Kenya | 71.569 % | |
31 | Uganda | 71.417 % | |
32 | Cameroon | 71.351 % | |
33 | Estonia | 71.148 % | |
34 | Malawi | 71.024 % | |
35 | Latvia | 70.905 % | |
36 | Germany | 70.63 % | |
37 | Benin | 70.296 % | |
38 | Niger | 70.034 % | |
39 | China | 70.014 % | |
40 | Australia | 69.976 % | |
41 | China, Macao SAR | 69.908 % | |
42 | Portugal | 69.697 % | |
43 | Thailand | 69.623 % | |
44 | Ghana | 69.196 % | |
45 | United Kingdom | 69.046 % | |
46 | Austria | 68.991 % | |
47 | Lithuania | 68.661 % | |
48 | Congo | 68.062 % | |
49 | United States Virgin Islands | 67.924 % | |
50 | Russia | 67.915 % | |
51 | Slovenia | 67.259 % | |
52 | United States | 67.043 % | |
53 | Saint Lucia | 67.038 % | |
54 | Cyprus | 66.793 % | |
55 | Uruguay | 66.714 % | |
56 | Central African Republic | 66.507 % | |
57 | Israel | 66.362 % | |
58 | Spain | 66.275 % | |
59 | Georgia | 66.059 % | |
60 | New Caledonia | 65.981 % | |
61 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 65.968 % | |
62 | France | 65.928 % | |
63 | Bhutan | 65.888 % | |
64 | Azerbaijan | 64.889 % | |
65 | Republic of Moldova | 64.727 % | |
66 | Ireland | 64.525 % | |
67 | Ukraine | 64.452 % | |
68 | Japan | 63.098 % | |
69 | Armenia | 62.853 % | |
70 | Bulgaria | 62.376 % | |
71 | Singapore | 62.37 % | |
72 | Sierra Leone | 62.358 % | |
73 | Haiti | 62.255 % | |
74 | Mali | 62.223 % | |
75 | Timor-Leste | 62.182 % | |
76 | Belgium | 61.828 % | |
77 | Zimbabwe | 61.659 % | |
78 | Cรดte d'Ivoire | 61.615 % | |
79 | Czech Republic | 61.504 % | |
80 | Lesotho | 61.461 % | |
81 | Guam | 61.347 % | |
82 | Slovakia | 61.256 % | |
83 | Hungary | 60.38 % | |
84 | Luxembourg | 60.062 % | |
85 | Brazil | 60.061 % | |
86 | Laos | 59.867 % | |
87 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 59.813 % | |
88 | Brunei Darussalam | 59.692 % | |
89 | Croatia | 59.671 % | |
90 | Poland | 59.649 % | |
91 | Bolivia | 59.126 % | |
92 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 58.859 % | |
93 | Vanuatu | 58.339 % | |
94 | Colombia | 58.204 % | |
95 | Greece | 56.718 % | |
96 | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.669 % | |
97 | Togo | 56.537 % | |
98 | Mongolia | 56.051 % | |
99 | Rwanda | 55.975 % | |
100 | Jamaica | 55.811 % | |
101 | Paraguay | 55.655 % | |
102 | Myanmar | 55.504 % | |
103 | Guinea-Bissau | 55.401 % | |
104 | Guinea | 55.309 % | |
105 | Botswana | 55.305 % | |
106 | Argentina | 55.169 % | |
107 | Kyrgyzstan | 55.041 % | |
108 | Cabo Verde | 54.974 % | |
109 | South Korea | 54.554 % | |
110 | Albania | 54.262 % | |
111 | Equatorial Guinea | 54.246 % | |
112 | Chad | 54.025 % | |
113 | Namibia | 53.692 % | |
114 | Indonesia | 53.186 % | |
115 | Venezuela | 53.134 % | |
116 | Chile | 52.889 % | |
117 | French Polynesia | 52.584 % | |
118 | Serbia | 52.24 % | |
119 | Panama | 52.22 % | |
120 | Qatar | 51.634 % | |
121 | Zambia | 51.37 % | |
122 | Italy | 51.024 % | |
123 | Montenegro | 50.938 % | |
124 | Ecuador | 50.675 % | |
125 | Cuba | 49.598 % | |
126 | Philippines | 49.397 % | |
127 | El Salvador | 49.124 % | |
128 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 48.843 % | |
129 | Papua New Guinea | 48.843 % | |
130 | South Africa | 48.705 % | |
131 | Costa Rica | 48.66 % | |
132 | Kuwait | 48.549 % | |
133 | North Macedonia | 48.249 % | |
134 | Romania | 48.122 % | |
135 | Mauritius | 48.008 % | |
136 | Eswatini | 47.792 % | |
137 | Malaysia | 47.426 % | |
138 | Belize | 46.948 % | |
139 | Nicaragua | 46.652 % | |
140 | Gambia | 46.595 % | |
141 | Tonga | 46.107 % | |
142 | Mexico | 45.732 % | |
143 | Fiji | 45.397 % | |
144 | Bahrain | 45.078 % | |
145 | Turkmenistan | 45.052 % | |
146 | Dominican Republic | 44.638 % | |
147 | Samoa | 44.552 % | |
148 | Suriname | 44.473 % | |
149 | United Arab Emirates | 43.792 % | |
150 | Honduras | 43.756 % | |
151 | Guatemala | 42.898 % | |
152 | Malta | 42.576 % | |
153 | Uzbekistan | 42.261 % | |
154 | Puerto Rico | 41.881 % | |
155 | Gabon | 41.744 % | |
156 | Guyana | 41.723 % | |
157 | Maldives | 37.85 % | |
158 | Bangladesh | 37.552 % | |
159 | Sri Lanka | 37.127 % | |
160 | Libya | 36.138 % | |
161 | Senegal | 34.924 % | |
162 | Comoros | 33.811 % | |
163 | Turkey | 30.092 % | |
164 | India | 29.892 % | |
165 | Tajikistan | 29.739 % | |
166 | Mauritania | 28.408 % | |
167 | Sudan | 28.077 % | |
168 | Oman | 27.709 % | |
169 | Tunisia | 26.996 % | |
170 | Morocco | 26.984 % | |
171 | Nepal | 26.166 % | |
172 | Lebanon | 24.929 % | |
173 | Egypt | 24.639 % | |
174 | Pakistan | 22.992 % | |
175 | Sao Tome and Principe | 22.524 % | |
176 | Somalia | 21.349 % | |
177 | Saudi Arabia | 18.378 % | |
178 | Djibouti | 17.761 % | |
179 | Iran | 16.08 % | |
180 | Afghanistan | 16.06 % | |
181 | Algeria | 15.44 % | |
182 | Jordan | 15.327 % | |
183 | State of Palestine | 14.691 % | |
184 | Syrian Arab Republic | 13.657 % | |
185 | Iraq | 12.649 % | |
186 | Yemen | 10.455 % |
- #1
North Korea
- #2
Madagascar
- #3
Tanzania
- #4
Cambodia
- #5
Solomon Islands
- #6
Mozambique
- #7
Iceland
- #8
Burundi
- #9
Nigeria
- #10
Norway
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #186
Yemen
- #185
Iraq
- #184
Syrian Arab Republic
- #183
State of Palestine
- #182
Jordan
- #181
Algeria
- #180
Afghanistan
- #179
Iran
- #178
Djibouti
- #177
Saudi Arabia
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2010, the country with the highest Female Labor Force Participation Rate was North Korea at 85.75%, while the global range spanned from a minimum of 10.46% to a maximum of 85.75%. The global average participation rate stood at 55.47%, highlighting significant disparities across different regions and countries.
Economic Structures and Female Workforce Engagement
The variation in Female Labor Force Participation Rate across countries can be attributed to differing economic structures and cultural norms. In countries like North Korea (85.75%) and Madagascar (85.43%), high participation rates are often linked to agrarian economies where women's labor is crucial in agriculture and related activities. Similarly, Tanzania (85.35%) and Cambodia (84.36%) exhibit high engagement due to similar economic dependencies.
In contrast, countries with oil-dependent economies such as Saudi Arabia (18.38%) and Yemen (10.46%) show lower participation rates. These economies often have less diversified labor markets, with cultural norms further restricting women's entry into the workforce.
Policy Impact on Labor Force Participation
Government policies and societal attitudes play a pivotal role in shaping female labor force participation. In Iceland (81.67%) and Norway (77.27%), progressive policies supporting gender equality and work-life balance, such as parental leave and childcare support, have contributed to higher rates of female workforce engagement.
Conversely, in countries like Iraq (12.65%) and Jordan (15.33%), restrictive policies and societal norms limit women's economic participation. In these regions, traditional roles and limited access to education and employment opportunities for women are significant barriers.
Trends and Year-over-Year Changes
The year-over-year changes in female labor force participation provide insights into dynamic shifts within countries. Cambodia experienced the largest increase of 4.03% (5.0%), driven by economic reforms and increased opportunities in sectors like textiles and manufacturing. Similarly, Guam (6.1%) and Romania (7.7%) saw significant increases due to policy initiatives aimed at enhancing female employment rates.
On the other hand, Vanuatu recorded the largest decrease of 4.44% (-7.1%), potentially due to economic disruptions or shifts in labor market demands. Botswana (-4.8%) and Cameroon (-3.7%) also witnessed declines, which could be linked to economic contractions or changes in industry demands that disproportionately affected female employment.
Regional Disparities and Economic Inclusivity
The disparities in the Female Labor Force Participation Rate highlight broader issues of economic inclusivity and development. Regions with high participation rates often correlate with greater economic inclusivity and gender equality. For instance, Burundi (80.27%) and Nigeria (77.90%) demonstrate how economic necessity and cultural acceptance of female labor can drive high participation rates despite differing levels of economic development.
In contrast, countries at the bottom of the rankings, such as Syria (13.66%) and Afghanistan (16.06%), face challenges related to conflict, restrictive cultural practices, and limited economic opportunities for women. These factors collectively contribute to low participation rates and highlight the need for targeted policies to enhance women's access to the labor market.
Overall, the Female Labor Force Participation Rate in 2010 reflects a complex interplay of economic, cultural, and policy factors. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for formulating strategies to improve female workforce engagement and achieve greater economic inclusivity worldwide.
Frequently Asked Questions About Female Labor Force Participation Rate in 2010
Which country had the highest female labor force participation rate in 2010?
In 2010, North Korea had the highest female labor force participation rate at 85.75%.
Which country had the lowest female labor force participation rate in 2010?
Yemen had the lowest female labor force participation rate in 2010, with a rate of 10.46%.
What was the average female labor force participation rate across all countries in 2010?
The average female labor force participation rate across all countries in 2010 was 55.47%.
What was the median female labor force participation rate in 2010?
The median female labor force participation rate in 2010 was 58.27%.
Which countries were in the top 3 for female labor force participation rate in 2010?
The top 3 countries for female labor force participation rate in 2010 were North Korea (85.75%), Madagascar (85.42%), and Tanzania (85.35%).
What was the range of female labor force participation rates in 2010?
The range of female labor force participation rates in 2010 spanned from 10.46% in Yemen to 85.75% in North Korea.
Insights by country
Ethiopia
Ethiopia ranked #16 globally in 2010 with a Female Labor Force Participation Rate of 76.447%. This rate is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting the country's unique socio-economic landscape. Key drivers include a strong agricultural sector that employs many women and government policies aimed at promoting gender equality in the workforce.
Latvia
In 2010, Latvia achieved a Female Labor Force Participation Rate of 70.905 %, ranking #35 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, reflecting the country's commitment to gender equality in the workforce. Factors contributing to this high participation include Latvia's progressive policies on parental leave and child care, alongside a growing economy that encourages female employment in various sectors.
Mozambique
In 2010, Mozambique achieved a remarkable rank of #6 globally with a Female Labor Force Participation Rate of 83.088%. This rate is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting strong engagement of women in the workforce compared to many countries. Key drivers include Mozambique's economic reliance on agriculture, where women play a vital role, and progressive policies aimed at promoting gender equality in labor.
Malaysia
In 2010, Malaysia had a Female Labor Force Participation Rate of 47.426 %, ranking #137 out of 186 countries. This figure is notably lower than the global average, indicating significant room for improvement in gender equality within the workforce. Contributing factors include cultural norms that prioritize traditional gender roles and a lack of supportive policies for working mothers, which hinder women's full participation in the economy.
Sao Tome and Principe
In 2010, Sao Tome and Principe had a Female Labor Force Participation Rate of 22.524 %, ranking #175 out of 186 countries. This rate is significantly lower than the global average, highlighting the challenges faced by women in the labor market. Economic factors, such as limited job opportunities in a small island economy, and cultural norms surrounding gender roles contribute to this low participation rate.
Lithuania
In 2010, Lithuania had a Female Labor Force Participation Rate of 68.661%, ranking #47 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, reflecting a strong commitment to gender equality in the workforce. Key drivers include Lithuania's robust educational system, which promotes high levels of female education, and progressive labor policies that support women's employment opportunities.
Guinea-Bissau
In 2010, Guinea-Bissau ranked #103 globally with a Female Labor Force Participation Rate of 55.401 %. This rate is notably higher than the global average, reflecting the country's unique socio-economic dynamics. The participation of women in the labor force is driven by cultural factors and the necessity for dual-income households in a country facing economic challenges and limited job opportunities.
Eswatini
In 2010, Eswatini had a Female Labor Force Participation Rate of 47.792 %, ranking #136 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably lower than the global average, reflecting broader challenges in women's employment opportunities across the region. Contributing factors include traditional gender roles and limited access to education and vocational training for women, which hinder their full participation in the labor market.
Afghanistan
In 2010, Afghanistan had a Female Labor Force Participation Rate of 16.06 %, ranking #180 out of 186 countries. This rate is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting the challenges faced by women in the workforce. Factors contributing to this low participation include ongoing conflict, cultural restrictions, and limited access to education and employment opportunities for women.
Syrian Arab Republic
In 2010, the Syrian Arab Republic ranked #184 globally with a Female Labor Force Participation Rate of 13.657%. This rate is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting the country's challenging socio-economic conditions. Factors such as ongoing conflict, limited job opportunities for women, and traditional gender roles have severely restricted female employment in Syria.
Data Source
Labor force participation rate, female (% of female population ages 15-64) (modeled ILO estimate) | Data
The dataset is provided by the World Bank and offers modeled estimates of the female labor force participation rate as a percentage of the female population aged 15-64. It serves as a key indicator for understanding women's engagement in the labor market across different countries.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Female Labor Force Participation Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Economy Facts
Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country
Explore the agriculture value added as a share of GDP by country, measuring the economic impact of farming sectors. This statistic highlights the importance of agriculture in national economies and informs investment decisions.
View dataBrowse All Economy
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data