Hospital Beds per Capita 2004
Hospital beds per capita highlights healthcare infrastructure by showing available hospital beds per 1,000 people globally.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Japan | 14.18 beds per 1,000 | |
2 | Belarus | 10.26 beds per 1,000 | |
3 | Russia | 9.79 beds per 1,000 | |
4 | Germany | 8.62 beds per 1,000 | |
5 | Ukraine | 8.6 beds per 1,000 | |
6 | Latvia | 7.91 beds per 1,000 | |
7 | Hungary | 7.9 beds per 1,000 | |
8 | Austria | 7.73 beds per 1,000 | |
9 | Czech Republic | 7.6 beds per 1,000 | |
10 | Lithuania | 7.57 beds per 1,000 | |
11 | France | 7.55 beds per 1,000 | |
12 | Kazakhstan | 7.36 beds per 1,000 | |
13 | Malta | 7.28 beds per 1,000 | |
14 | Mongolia | 7.22 beds per 1,000 | |
15 | Azerbaijan | 7.19 beds per 1,000 | |
16 | Finland | 7.1 beds per 1,000 | |
17 | Slovakia | 6.91 beds per 1,000 | |
18 | Romania | 6.83 beds per 1,000 | |
19 | Poland | 6.67 beds per 1,000 | |
20 | Belgium | 6.48 beds per 1,000 | |
21 | Luxembourg | 6.39 beds per 1,000 | |
22 | Bulgaria | 6.16 beds per 1,000 | |
23 | Tajikistan | 5.97 beds per 1,000 | |
24 | Republic of Moldova | 5.71 beds per 1,000 | |
25 | Croatia | 5.7 beds per 1,000 | |
26 | Switzerland | 5.67 beds per 1,000 | |
27 | Ireland | 5.65 beds per 1,000 | |
28 | Estonia | 5.64 beds per 1,000 | |
29 | Uzbekistan | 5.49 beds per 1,000 | |
30 | South Korea | 5.46 beds per 1,000 | |
31 | Norway | 5.25 beds per 1,000 | |
32 | Kyrgyzstan | 5 beds per 1,000 | |
33 | Cuba | 4.93 beds per 1,000 | |
34 | Turkmenistan | 4.92 beds per 1,000 | |
35 | Slovenia | 4.81 beds per 1,000 | |
36 | Greece | 4.74 beds per 1,000 | |
37 | Armenia | 4.72 beds per 1,000 | |
38 | Seychelles | 4.72 beds per 1,000 | |
39 | North Macedonia | 4.65 beds per 1,000 | |
40 | Netherlands | 4.46 beds per 1,000 | |
41 | Georgia | 4.39 beds per 1,000 | |
42 | Montenegro | 4.14 beds per 1,000 | |
43 | Italy | 3.99 beds per 1,000 | |
44 | Australia | 3.97 beds per 1,000 | |
45 | Denmark | 3.97 beds per 1,000 | |
46 | Israel | 3.91 beds per 1,000 | |
47 | Libya | 3.9 beds per 1,000 | |
48 | United Kingdom | 3.85 beds per 1,000 | |
49 | Portugal | 3.59 beds per 1,000 | |
50 | Canada | 3.42 beds per 1,000 | |
51 | Mauritius | 3.41 beds per 1,000 | |
52 | Spain | 3.37 beds per 1,000 | |
53 | United States | 3.26 beds per 1,000 | |
54 | Bahamas | 3.2 beds per 1,000 | |
55 | Albania | 3.04 beds per 1,000 | |
56 | Sweden | 3.01 beds per 1,000 | |
57 | Lebanon | 3 beds per 1,000 | |
58 | Sri Lanka | 2.86 beds per 1,000 | |
59 | South Africa | 2.78 beds per 1,000 | |
60 | Andorra | 2.77 beds per 1,000 | |
61 | Brunei Darussalam | 2.67 beds per 1,000 | |
62 | Saudi Arabia | 2.6 beds per 1,000 | |
63 | Maldives | 2.52 beds per 1,000 | |
64 | Turkey | 2.43 beds per 1,000 | |
65 | Chile | 2.38 beds per 1,000 | |
66 | Kuwait | 2.2 beds per 1,000 | |
67 | Bahrain | 2.19 beds per 1,000 | |
68 | Panama | 2.1 beds per 1,000 | |
69 | Cabo Verde | 2.07 beds per 1,000 | |
70 | Botswana | 2.05 beds per 1,000 | |
71 | Thailand | 2.04 beds per 1,000 | |
72 | Qatar | 2 beds per 1,000 | |
73 | India | 1.99 beds per 1,000 | |
74 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1.98 beds per 1,000 | |
75 | Egypt | 1.92 beds per 1,000 | |
76 | Malaysia | 1.89 beds per 1,000 | |
77 | Oman | 1.86 beds per 1,000 | |
78 | China | 1.82 beds per 1,000 | |
79 | Algeria | 1.81 beds per 1,000 | |
80 | United Arab Emirates | 1.76 beds per 1,000 | |
81 | Tunisia | 1.72 beds per 1,000 | |
82 | Bhutan | 1.71 beds per 1,000 | |
83 | Jordan | 1.67 beds per 1,000 | |
84 | Eritrea | 1.61 beds per 1,000 | |
85 | Iran | 1.6 beds per 1,000 | |
86 | Ecuador | 1.56 beds per 1,000 | |
87 | Vietnam | 1.55 beds per 1,000 | |
88 | Syrian Arab Republic | 1.49 beds per 1,000 | |
89 | Costa Rica | 1.48 beds per 1,000 | |
90 | Kenya | 1.4 beds per 1,000 | |
91 | Iraq | 1.34 beds per 1,000 | |
92 | State of Palestine | 1.25 beds per 1,000 | |
93 | Laos | 1.15 beds per 1,000 | |
94 | Mexico | 1.07 beds per 1,000 | |
95 | Philippines | 0.95 beds per 1,000 | |
96 | Morocco | 0.87 beds per 1,000 | |
97 | Paraguay | 0.78 beds per 1,000 | |
98 | Togo | 0.78 beds per 1,000 | |
99 | Myanmar | 0.71 beds per 1,000 | |
100 | Sudan | 0.71 beds per 1,000 | |
101 | Honduras | 0.59 beds per 1,000 | |
102 | Indonesia | 0.58 beds per 1,000 | |
103 | Nigeria | 0.5 beds per 1,000 | |
104 | Pakistan | 0.48 beds per 1,000 | |
105 | Somalia | 0.42 beds per 1,000 | |
106 | Nepal | 0.2 beds per 1,000 |
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #106
Nepal
- #105
Somalia
- #104
Pakistan
- #103
Nigeria
- #102
Indonesia
- #101
Honduras
- #100
Sudan
- #99
Myanmar
- #98
Togo
- #97
Paraguay
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2004, Japan led the world in Hospital Beds per Capita with a remarkable 14.18 beds per 1,000 people, while globally, this metric ranged from a minimum of 0.20 to a maximum of 14.18 across 106 countries. The global average stood at 3.84 beds per 1,000 people, offering a benchmark for assessing healthcare infrastructure worldwide.
Economic Prosperity and Healthcare Infrastructure
The availability of hospital beds per capita often correlates with a country's economic status. In 2004, countries with robust economies like Germany and Austria boasted 8.62 and 7.73 beds per 1,000 people, respectively. These figures reflect their substantial investment in public health infrastructure, a priority supported by strong GDPs and comprehensive healthcare policies. Conversely, countries with developing economies, such as Nepal and Somalia, reported only 0.20 and 0.42 beds per 1,000 people. Limited financial resources in these nations often result in underfunded healthcare systems, leading to fewer hospital beds and reduced healthcare accessibility.
Historical Context and Healthcare Policies
Historical and political contexts significantly influence hospital bed availability. Former Soviet states like Russia and Ukraine had 9.79 and 8.6 beds per 1,000 people, respectively, reflecting the Soviet legacy of emphasizing healthcare infrastructure. These countries inherited extensive hospital networks designed to serve large populations. In contrast, nations with recent histories of conflict or instability, such as Sudan (0.71) and Myanmar (0.71), often struggle to maintain or expand healthcare facilities, impacting their hospital bed availability.
Urbanization and Its Impact
Urbanization plays a critical role in shaping healthcare infrastructure. Urban centers often have better healthcare facilities due to higher population densities and economic activity. Countries like Latvia (7.91) and Hungary (7.9) showcase higher hospital beds per capita, partly because of their urbanized environments, which demand and support comprehensive healthcare services. In contrast, nations with significant rural populations, such as Nigeria (0.5) and Indonesia (0.58), often face challenges in distributing healthcare resources evenly, resulting in lower per capita metrics.
Year-over-Year Trends and Their Implications
Examining year-over-year changes provides insight into healthcare policy shifts and economic conditions. Maldives experienced a notable increase of 0.35 beds per 1,000 people, a 16.1% rise, reflecting targeted healthcare improvements. Similarly, South Korea saw a 6.4% increase, adding 0.33 beds per 1,000 people, indicative of its rapidly advancing healthcare system. On the other hand, Andorra witnessed a significant decrease of 0.58 beds per 1,000 people, a 17.3% decline, potentially due to policy shifts or resource reallocation. Former Soviet nations like Belarus and Russia saw reductions of 5.3%, highlighting the challenges of maintaining extensive healthcare networks post-Soviet era.
In conclusion, the 2004 data on Hospital Beds per Capita underscores the diverse factors influencing healthcare infrastructure globally. Economic strength, historical contexts, urbanization, and policy decisions all play crucial roles in determining the availability of hospital beds, reflecting broader healthcare priorities and challenges faced by each nation.
Frequently Asked Questions About Hospital Beds per Capita in 2004
Which country had the highest number of hospital beds per capita in 2004?
Japan had the highest number of hospital beds per capita in 2004, with 14.18 beds per 1,000 people.
What was the average number of hospital beds per capita across countries in 2004?
The average number of hospital beds per capita across countries in 2004 was 3.84 beds per 1,000 people.
Which country had the lowest number of hospital beds per capita in 2004?
Nepal had the lowest number of hospital beds per capita in 2004, with 0.2 beds per 1,000 people.
What was the median number of hospital beds per capita in 2004?
The median number of hospital beds per capita in 2004 was 3.23 beds per 1,000 people.
How many countries were included in the dataset for hospital beds per capita in 2004?
The dataset for hospital beds per capita in 2004 included 106 countries.
Which countries were in the top 3 for hospital beds per capita in 2004?
The top 3 countries for hospital beds per capita in 2004 were Japan with 14.18, Belarus with 10.26, and Russia with 9.79 beds per 1,000 people.
Insights by country
Czech Republic
In 2004, the Czech Republic ranked #9 globally with 7.6 beds per 1,000 people for Hospital Beds per Capita. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting the country's robust healthcare system. The high number of hospital beds can be attributed to the Czech Republic's strong emphasis on public health and a well-established healthcare infrastructure, supported by government policies prioritizing accessible medical care for its citizens.
Iraq
In 2004, Iraq had a global rank of #91 with 1.34 beds per 1,000 population for Hospital Beds per Capita. This figure is notably lower than the global average, reflecting significant challenges in the healthcare infrastructure compared to higher-ranked countries. The ongoing conflict and instability in Iraq have severely impacted healthcare investments and access, leading to a shortage of medical facilities and resources.
Norway
In 2004, Norway ranked #31 globally with 5.25 beds per 1,000 population for Hospital Beds per Capita. This figure is notably higher than the global average, reflecting Norway's strong healthcare system compared to many other countries. Contributing factors include the nation's substantial investment in public health services and a commitment to universal healthcare, ensuring access to medical facilities for its citizens.
Andorra
In 2004, Andorra ranked #60 globally with 2.77 beds per 1,000 population for Hospital Beds per Capita. This figure is relatively low compared to neighboring countries, reflecting a healthcare system tailored to a small, affluent population rather than a larger, more diverse demographic. The high standard of living and effective healthcare policies in Andorra contribute to a focus on preventive care, which may reduce the need for extensive hospital bed capacity.
Bahamas
In 2004, the Bahamas ranked #54 globally with 3.2 beds per 1,000 population for Hospital Beds per Capita. This figure is relatively low compared to regional counterparts in the Caribbean, where healthcare infrastructure varies significantly. The availability of hospital beds in the Bahamas is influenced by its geographic dispersion of islands, which presents logistical challenges for healthcare delivery and resource allocation.
Libya
In 2004, Libya ranked #47 globally with 3.9 beds per 1,000 population for Hospital Beds per Capita. This figure is below the global average, indicating a healthcare system that may struggle to meet the needs of its citizens compared to higher-ranking countries. Contributing factors include Libya's historical investments in healthcare infrastructure, driven by oil revenues, and the impact of ongoing political instability that affects healthcare delivery and access.
Poland
In 2004, Poland ranked #19 globally with 6.67 beds per 1,000 people for Hospital Beds per Capita. This figure is higher than the global average, reflecting Poland's commitment to healthcare infrastructure compared to many other countries. The robust number of hospital beds can be attributed to Poland's focus on improving health services post-communism, alongside a relatively stable economy that supports public health investments.
Saudi Arabia
In 2004, Saudi Arabia ranked #62 globally with 2.6 beds per 1,000 people for Hospital Beds per Capita. This figure is below the global average, reflecting a healthcare system that is still developing relative to higher-ranked countries. Economic growth driven by oil revenues has enabled investments in healthcare infrastructure, but challenges remain in meeting the needs of a rapidly growing population.
Latvia
In 2004, Latvia ranked #6 globally for Hospital Beds per Capita, with a value of 7.91 beds per 1,000. This figure is notably higher than the global average, reflecting Latvia's commitment to healthcare infrastructure. The high number of hospital beds can be attributed to the country's focus on improving health services after regaining independence in the early 1990s, alongside a relatively small population that allows for more resources per capita.
Brunei Darussalam
In 2004, Brunei Darussalam ranked #61 globally with 2.67 beds per 1,000 people for Hospital Beds per Capita. This figure is relatively higher than the global average, reflecting the country's commitment to healthcare. The significant investment in healthcare infrastructure is driven by Brunei's wealth from oil and gas resources, ensuring access to medical services for its small population.
Data Source
Hospital beds per 1,000 people | Our World in Data
Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive data and visualizations on global development issues. The dataset on hospital beds per 1,000 people offers country-level statistics on healthcare infrastructure, facilitating comparisons across nations.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Hospital Beds per Capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.