Average Non-HDL Cholesterol Levels 2010
Average non-HDL cholesterol levels indicate heart disease risk and vary across countries.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Malaysia | 4.2 mg/dL | |
2 | Serbia | 4 mg/dL | |
3 | Thailand | 4 mg/dL | |
4 | Costa Rica | 3.9 mg/dL | |
5 | Croatia | 3.9 mg/dL | |
6 | Ecuador | 3.9 mg/dL | |
7 | Fiji | 3.9 mg/dL | |
8 | Honduras | 3.9 mg/dL | |
9 | Kuwait | 3.9 mg/dL | |
10 | Latvia | 3.9 mg/dL | |
11 | Lebanon | 3.9 mg/dL | |
12 | Lithuania | 3.9 mg/dL | |
13 | Malta | 3.9 mg/dL | |
14 | Seychelles | 3.9 mg/dL | |
15 | Andorra | 3.8 mg/dL | |
16 | Austria | 3.8 mg/dL | |
17 | Brunei Darussalam | 3.8 mg/dL | |
18 | Bulgaria | 3.8 mg/dL | |
19 | Colombia | 3.8 mg/dL | |
20 | Cook Islands | 3.8 mg/dL | |
21 | France | 3.8 mg/dL | |
22 | Hungary | 3.8 mg/dL | |
23 | Jordan | 3.8 mg/dL | |
24 | Mexico | 3.8 mg/dL | |
25 | Montenegro | 3.8 mg/dL | |
26 | North Macedonia | 3.8 mg/dL | |
27 | Panama | 3.8 mg/dL | |
28 | Philippines | 3.8 mg/dL | |
29 | Singapore | 3.8 mg/dL | |
30 | Slovenia | 3.8 mg/dL | |
31 | Tonga | 3.8 mg/dL | |
32 | Cyprus | 3.7 mg/dL | |
33 | Czech Republic | 3.7 mg/dL | |
34 | El Salvador | 3.7 mg/dL | |
35 | Estonia | 3.7 mg/dL | |
36 | Germany | 3.7 mg/dL | |
37 | Iraq | 3.7 mg/dL | |
38 | Italy | 3.7 mg/dL | |
39 | Mauritius | 3.7 mg/dL | |
40 | New Zealand | 3.7 mg/dL | |
41 | Norway | 3.7 mg/dL | |
42 | Poland | 3.7 mg/dL | |
43 | Portugal | 3.7 mg/dL | |
44 | Samoa | 3.7 mg/dL | |
45 | Slovakia | 3.7 mg/dL | |
46 | Switzerland | 3.7 mg/dL | |
47 | Ukraine | 3.7 mg/dL | |
48 | United Kingdom | 3.7 mg/dL | |
49 | Albania | 3.6 mg/dL | |
50 | Argentina | 3.6 mg/dL | |
51 | Bahamas | 3.6 mg/dL | |
52 | Bahrain | 3.6 mg/dL | |
53 | Brazil | 3.6 mg/dL | |
54 | Chile | 3.6 mg/dL | |
55 | Denmark | 3.6 mg/dL | |
56 | Finland | 3.6 mg/dL | |
57 | Guyana | 3.6 mg/dL | |
58 | Iran | 3.6 mg/dL | |
59 | Oman | 3.6 mg/dL | |
60 | Papua New Guinea | 3.6 mg/dL | |
61 | Paraguay | 3.6 mg/dL | |
62 | Romania | 3.6 mg/dL | |
63 | Russia | 3.6 mg/dL | |
64 | Solomon Islands | 3.6 mg/dL | |
65 | Syrian Arab Republic | 3.6 mg/dL | |
66 | Tuvalu | 3.6 mg/dL | |
67 | United Arab Emirates | 3.6 mg/dL | |
68 | Uruguay | 3.6 mg/dL | |
69 | Vanuatu | 3.6 mg/dL | |
70 | Venezuela | 3.6 mg/dL | |
71 | Algeria | 3.5 mg/dL | |
72 | Australia | 3.5 mg/dL | |
73 | Belarus | 3.5 mg/dL | |
74 | Dominica | 3.5 mg/dL | |
75 | Dominican Republic | 3.5 mg/dL | |
76 | Egypt | 3.5 mg/dL | |
77 | Greece | 3.5 mg/dL | |
78 | Guatemala | 3.5 mg/dL | |
79 | Iceland | 3.5 mg/dL | |
80 | Ireland | 3.5 mg/dL | |
81 | Israel | 3.5 mg/dL | |
82 | Japan | 3.5 mg/dL | |
83 | Luxembourg | 3.5 mg/dL | |
84 | Marshall Islands | 3.5 mg/dL | |
85 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 3.5 mg/dL | |
86 | Mongolia | 3.5 mg/dL | |
87 | Myanmar | 3.5 mg/dL | |
88 | Nauru | 3.5 mg/dL | |
89 | Netherlands | 3.5 mg/dL | |
90 | Peru | 3.5 mg/dL | |
91 | Qatar | 3.5 mg/dL | |
92 | South Korea | 3.5 mg/dL | |
93 | Spain | 3.5 mg/dL | |
94 | Sweden | 3.5 mg/dL | |
95 | Trinidad and Tobago | 3.5 mg/dL | |
96 | Turkey | 3.5 mg/dL | |
97 | Yemen | 3.5 mg/dL | |
98 | Antigua and Barbuda | 3.4 mg/dL | |
99 | Belgium | 3.4 mg/dL | |
100 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 3.4 mg/dL | |
101 | Canada | 3.4 mg/dL | |
102 | Cuba | 3.4 mg/dL | |
103 | Grenada | 3.4 mg/dL | |
104 | Haiti | 3.4 mg/dL | |
105 | India | 3.4 mg/dL | |
106 | Indonesia | 3.4 mg/dL | |
107 | Jamaica | 3.4 mg/dL | |
108 | Maldives | 3.4 mg/dL | |
109 | Republic of Moldova | 3.4 mg/dL | |
110 | Nicaragua | 3.4 mg/dL | |
111 | Niue | 3.4 mg/dL | |
112 | North Korea | 3.4 mg/dL | |
113 | Palau | 3.4 mg/dL | |
114 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 3.4 mg/dL | |
115 | Saudi Arabia | 3.4 mg/dL | |
116 | Suriname | 3.4 mg/dL | |
117 | United States | 3.4 mg/dL | |
118 | Azerbaijan | 3.3 mg/dL | |
119 | Belize | 3.3 mg/dL | |
120 | Bolivia | 3.3 mg/dL | |
121 | China | 3.3 mg/dL | |
122 | Kiribati | 3.3 mg/dL | |
123 | Libya | 3.3 mg/dL | |
124 | Saint Lucia | 3.3 mg/dL | |
125 | Tunisia | 3.3 mg/dL | |
126 | Turkmenistan | 3.3 mg/dL | |
127 | Uzbekistan | 3.3 mg/dL | |
128 | Vietnam | 3.3 mg/dL | |
129 | Armenia | 3.2 mg/dL | |
130 | Barbados | 3.2 mg/dL | |
131 | Bhutan | 3.2 mg/dL | |
132 | Cambodia | 3.2 mg/dL | |
133 | Laos | 3.2 mg/dL | |
134 | Pakistan | 3.2 mg/dL | |
135 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 3.2 mg/dL | |
136 | South Africa | 3.2 mg/dL | |
137 | Sri Lanka | 3.2 mg/dL | |
138 | Afghanistan | 3.1 mg/dL | |
139 | Bangladesh | 3.1 mg/dL | |
140 | Timor-Leste | 3.1 mg/dL | |
141 | Georgia | 3.1 mg/dL | |
142 | Ghana | 3.1 mg/dL | |
143 | Kazakhstan | 3.1 mg/dL | |
144 | Kyrgyzstan | 3.1 mg/dL | |
145 | Morocco | 3.1 mg/dL | |
146 | Nepal | 3.1 mg/dL | |
147 | Mauritania | 3 mg/dL | |
148 | Somalia | 3 mg/dL | |
149 | Tajikistan | 3 mg/dL | |
150 | Tanzania | 3 mg/dL | |
151 | Angola | 2.9 mg/dL | |
152 | Congo | 2.9 mg/dL | |
153 | Djibouti | 2.9 mg/dL | |
154 | Equatorial Guinea | 2.9 mg/dL | |
155 | Eritrea | 2.9 mg/dL | |
156 | Gabon | 2.9 mg/dL | |
157 | Gambia | 2.9 mg/dL | |
158 | Sudan | 2.9 mg/dL | |
159 | Zimbabwe | 2.9 mg/dL | |
160 | Benin | 2.8 mg/dL | |
161 | Botswana | 2.8 mg/dL | |
162 | Cameroon | 2.8 mg/dL | |
163 | Cabo Verde | 2.8 mg/dL | |
164 | Central African Republic | 2.8 mg/dL | |
165 | Comoros | 2.8 mg/dL | |
166 | Côte d'Ivoire | 2.8 mg/dL | |
167 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 2.8 mg/dL | |
168 | Guinea | 2.8 mg/dL | |
169 | Guinea-Bissau | 2.8 mg/dL | |
170 | Liberia | 2.8 mg/dL | |
171 | Madagascar | 2.8 mg/dL | |
172 | Mozambique | 2.8 mg/dL | |
173 | Namibia | 2.8 mg/dL | |
174 | Senegal | 2.8 mg/dL | |
175 | Sierra Leone | 2.8 mg/dL | |
176 | Burundi | 2.7 mg/dL | |
177 | Chad | 2.7 mg/dL | |
178 | Eswatini | 2.7 mg/dL | |
179 | Ethiopia | 2.7 mg/dL | |
180 | Kenya | 2.7 mg/dL | |
181 | Mali | 2.7 mg/dL | |
182 | Niger | 2.7 mg/dL | |
183 | Sao Tome and Principe | 2.7 mg/dL | |
184 | Togo | 2.7 mg/dL | |
185 | Uganda | 2.7 mg/dL | |
186 | Zambia | 2.7 mg/dL | |
187 | Burkina Faso | 2.5 mg/dL | |
188 | Lesotho | 2.5 mg/dL | |
189 | Nigeria | 2.5 mg/dL | |
190 | Rwanda | 2.5 mg/dL | |
191 | Malawi | 2.3 mg/dL |
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #191
Malawi
- #190
Rwanda
- #189
Nigeria
- #188
Lesotho
- #187
Burkina Faso
- #186
Zambia
- #185
Uganda
- #184
Togo
- #183
Sao Tome and Principe
- #182
Niger
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2010, Malaysia recorded the highest Average Non-HDL Cholesterol Levels at 4.2 mg/dL, while the global range spanned from 2.30 mg/dL to 4.20 mg/dL. The global average for non-HDL cholesterol levels was 3.36 mg/dL, providing a benchmark for understanding heart disease risk across different countries.
Economic Development and Cholesterol Levels
Countries with higher non-HDL cholesterol levels, such as Malaysia and Thailand, often have more developed economies, which can lead to dietary patterns that include higher consumption of processed foods and saturated fats. This economic prosperity often correlates with increased access to high-calorie diets, contributing to elevated cholesterol levels. Conversely, nations like Malawi and Burkina Faso, with some of the lowest levels at 2.3 mg/dL and 2.5 mg/dL respectively, typically have less industrialized economies. This often results in diets that are more plant-based and lower in cholesterol, reflecting the impact of economic status on health metrics.
Regional Dietary Influences
Dietary habits, deeply rooted in cultural norms, play a significant role in shaping cholesterol levels. For instance, the Mediterranean diet, prevalent in countries like Lebanon and Serbia, is traditionally rich in fruits, vegetables, and healthy fats, yet these countries report high non-HDL cholesterol levels of around 3.9-4.0 mg/dL. This paradox suggests that despite healthy dietary elements, other factors such as increased consumption of red meat and processed foods might elevate cholesterol levels. In contrast, African nations such as Nigeria and Rwanda report lower levels, reflecting diets that are largely based on grains and legumes, which contribute to maintaining lower cholesterol readings.
Year-Over-Year Trends and Changes
The analysis of year-over-year changes reveals intriguing patterns. Countries like Indonesia and Cambodia experienced the most significant increases in non-HDL cholesterol levels, each rising by 0.10 mg/dL. This increase could be attributed to rapid urbanization and the accompanying dietary shifts towards more Westernized eating patterns. On the other hand, countries such as Lebanon and Lithuania saw a decrease of 0.10 mg/dL in their cholesterol levels, possibly due to increased public health initiatives promoting heart-healthy lifestyles and improved healthcare access.
Public Health Implications
The data underscores the importance of public health policies aimed at reducing non-HDL cholesterol levels. Countries like Kuwait and Fiji, with levels at 3.9 mg/dL, may benefit from government-led initiatives focusing on dietary education and physical activity promotion. The stark contrast in cholesterol levels between nations with varying economic statuses highlights a need for tailored health interventions that consider local dietary customs and economic conditions. Moreover, the slight average decrease of 0.01 mg/dL globally indicates a gradual shift towards healthier lifestyles, although the pace of change suggests there is much work to be done.
In summary, the Average Non-HDL Cholesterol Levels in 2010 reveal significant disparities driven by economic, dietary, and policy factors. Understanding these influences is crucial for developing effective strategies to combat heart disease risks worldwide.
Frequently Asked Questions About Average Non-HDL Cholesterol Levels in 2010
Which country had the highest average non-HDL cholesterol level in 2010?
Malaysia had the highest average non-HDL cholesterol level in 2010, with a value of 4.2 mg/dL.
What was the average non-HDL cholesterol level across all countries in 2010?
The average non-HDL cholesterol level across all countries in 2010 was 3.36 mg/dL.
Which country had the lowest average non-HDL cholesterol level in 2010?
Malawi had the lowest average non-HDL cholesterol level in 2010, with a value of 2.3 mg/dL.
What was the median non-HDL cholesterol level among countries in 2010?
The median non-HDL cholesterol level among countries in 2010 was 3.5 mg/dL.
How many countries are included in the dataset for average non-HDL cholesterol levels in 2010?
The dataset includes 191 countries for average non-HDL cholesterol levels in 2010.
What is the range of average non-HDL cholesterol levels between the highest and lowest countries in 2010?
The range of average non-HDL cholesterol levels between the highest country, Malaysia, and the lowest country, Malawi, in 2010 is 1.9 mg/dL.
Insights by country
Palau
In 2010, Palau had an average Non-HDL cholesterol level of 3.4 mg/dL, ranking #113 out of 191 countries. This level is relatively low compared to many nations, reflecting a healthier dietary pattern often associated with island populations. Palau's traditional diet, rich in fish and local produce, alongside its efforts in promoting public health, contribute to maintaining these favorable cholesterol levels.
Papua New Guinea
Papua New Guinea ranked #62 globally in 2010, with an Average Non-HDL Cholesterol Level of 3.6 mg/dL. This level is relatively low compared to many countries, reflecting a dietary pattern that includes less processed food and higher consumption of traditional staples. Factors such as limited access to healthcare and varying lifestyle practices across its diverse population contribute to these cholesterol levels.
Latvia
In 2010, Latvia achieved a global rank of #11 with an average non-HDL cholesterol level of 3.9 mg/dL. This level is notably lower than many countries, indicating effective public health measures compared to the global average. Factors contributing to Latvia's favorable cholesterol levels include a growing awareness of cardiovascular health and dietary improvements influenced by EU membership, which has led to better access to health information and resources.
Finland
In 2010, Finland had an average Non-HDL Cholesterol Level of 3.6 mg/dL, ranking #57 out of 191 countries. This level is lower than the global average, indicating a relatively favorable cholesterol profile compared to many nations. Factors contributing to this statistic include Finland's strong healthcare system, public health policies promoting healthy diets, and a high standard of living that supports overall health.
Slovenia
In 2010, Slovenia had an average Non-HDL Cholesterol level of 3.8 mg/dL, ranking #29 out of 191 countries. This level is notably lower than the global average, indicating a relatively healthy cholesterol profile compared to many nations. Contributing factors include Slovenia's strong healthcare system and public health initiatives focused on nutrition and lifestyle, which promote heart health among its population.
Luxembourg
In 2010, Luxembourg ranked #84 globally with an average Non-HDL Cholesterol level of 3.5 mg/dL. This figure is notably higher than the lowest-ranked country, which reported significantly elevated cholesterol levels. Contributing factors to Luxembourg's cholesterol levels include its affluent lifestyle and high consumption of processed foods, alongside a growing expat population that influences dietary habits.
Portugal
In 2010, Portugal ranked #43 globally with an average non-HDL cholesterol level of 3.7 mg/dL. This figure is lower than many Western European countries, reflecting a generally healthier dietary pattern influenced by the Mediterranean diet prevalent in the region. Contributing factors include Portugal's emphasis on fresh seafood, fruits, and vegetables, as well as public health initiatives aimed at reducing cardiovascular risk.
Romania
In 2010, Romania had an average non-HDL cholesterol level of 3.6 mg/dL, ranking #64 out of 191 countries. This level is relatively low compared to the global average, indicating a healthier lipid profile among its population. Contributing factors include Romania's dietary patterns, which are influenced by traditional cuisine, and ongoing public health initiatives aimed at improving cardiovascular health.
New Zealand
In 2010, New Zealand ranked #40 globally with an average non-HDL cholesterol level of 3.7 mg/dL. This level is relatively low compared to some neighboring countries, indicating a healthier lipid profile among its population. Contributing factors include New Zealand's emphasis on outdoor lifestyles and a diet rich in fruits and vegetables, which are staples in the country's agricultural sector.
Montenegro
In 2010, Montenegro ranked #25 globally with an average non-HDL cholesterol level of 3.8 mg/dL. This level is notably lower than the global average, reflecting the country's dietary habits and lifestyle factors. Montenegro's Mediterranean diet, rich in fruits, vegetables, and fish, contributes to these favorable cholesterol levels, alongside increasing public health awareness and initiatives aimed at reducing cardiovascular diseases.
Data Source
Average non-HDL cholesterol levels | Our World in Data
Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive global data on various topics, including health, economics, and environment. The dataset on average non-HDL cholesterol levels offers country-level statistics to help understand trends and disparities in cardiovascular health.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Average Non-HDL Cholesterol Levels data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.