Average Non-HDL Cholesterol Levels 2003
Average non-HDL cholesterol levels indicate heart disease risk and vary across countries.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Latvia | 4.1 mg/dL | |
2 | Lithuania | 4.1 mg/dL | |
3 | Malaysia | 4.1 mg/dL | |
4 | Serbia | 4.1 mg/dL | |
5 | Andorra | 4 mg/dL | |
6 | Austria | 4 mg/dL | |
7 | Bulgaria | 4 mg/dL | |
8 | Costa Rica | 4 mg/dL | |
9 | Croatia | 4 mg/dL | |
10 | Fiji | 4 mg/dL | |
11 | Germany | 4 mg/dL | |
12 | Hungary | 4 mg/dL | |
13 | Kuwait | 4 mg/dL | |
14 | Lebanon | 4 mg/dL | |
15 | Malta | 4 mg/dL | |
16 | New Zealand | 4 mg/dL | |
17 | Norway | 4 mg/dL | |
18 | Seychelles | 4 mg/dL | |
19 | Switzerland | 4 mg/dL | |
20 | United Kingdom | 4 mg/dL | |
21 | Colombia | 3.9 mg/dL | |
22 | Cook Islands | 3.9 mg/dL | |
23 | Czech Republic | 3.9 mg/dL | |
24 | Ecuador | 3.9 mg/dL | |
25 | Estonia | 3.9 mg/dL | |
26 | France | 3.9 mg/dL | |
27 | Honduras | 3.9 mg/dL | |
28 | Iceland | 3.9 mg/dL | |
29 | Iran | 3.9 mg/dL | |
30 | Italy | 3.9 mg/dL | |
31 | Jordan | 3.9 mg/dL | |
32 | Mexico | 3.9 mg/dL | |
33 | Montenegro | 3.9 mg/dL | |
34 | North Macedonia | 3.9 mg/dL | |
35 | Slovenia | 3.9 mg/dL | |
36 | Thailand | 3.9 mg/dL | |
37 | Ukraine | 3.9 mg/dL | |
38 | Argentina | 3.8 mg/dL | |
39 | Australia | 3.8 mg/dL | |
40 | Brunei Darussalam | 3.8 mg/dL | |
41 | Chile | 3.8 mg/dL | |
42 | Cyprus | 3.8 mg/dL | |
43 | Denmark | 3.8 mg/dL | |
44 | Finland | 3.8 mg/dL | |
45 | Iraq | 3.8 mg/dL | |
46 | Luxembourg | 3.8 mg/dL | |
47 | Nauru | 3.8 mg/dL | |
48 | Netherlands | 3.8 mg/dL | |
49 | Oman | 3.8 mg/dL | |
50 | Panama | 3.8 mg/dL | |
51 | Poland | 3.8 mg/dL | |
52 | Qatar | 3.8 mg/dL | |
53 | Singapore | 3.8 mg/dL | |
54 | Slovakia | 3.8 mg/dL | |
55 | Tonga | 3.8 mg/dL | |
56 | United Arab Emirates | 3.8 mg/dL | |
57 | Venezuela | 3.8 mg/dL | |
58 | Albania | 3.7 mg/dL | |
59 | Bahrain | 3.7 mg/dL | |
60 | Belarus | 3.7 mg/dL | |
61 | Belgium | 3.7 mg/dL | |
62 | Brazil | 3.7 mg/dL | |
63 | Canada | 3.7 mg/dL | |
64 | El Salvador | 3.7 mg/dL | |
65 | Ireland | 3.7 mg/dL | |
66 | Israel | 3.7 mg/dL | |
67 | Mauritius | 3.7 mg/dL | |
68 | Portugal | 3.7 mg/dL | |
69 | Romania | 3.7 mg/dL | |
70 | Russia | 3.7 mg/dL | |
71 | Samoa | 3.7 mg/dL | |
72 | Spain | 3.7 mg/dL | |
73 | Sweden | 3.7 mg/dL | |
74 | Tuvalu | 3.7 mg/dL | |
75 | Uruguay | 3.7 mg/dL | |
76 | Algeria | 3.6 mg/dL | |
77 | Bahamas | 3.6 mg/dL | |
78 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 3.6 mg/dL | |
79 | Egypt | 3.6 mg/dL | |
80 | Greece | 3.6 mg/dL | |
81 | Marshall Islands | 3.6 mg/dL | |
82 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 3.6 mg/dL | |
83 | Palau | 3.6 mg/dL | |
84 | Paraguay | 3.6 mg/dL | |
85 | Philippines | 3.6 mg/dL | |
86 | South Korea | 3.6 mg/dL | |
87 | Syrian Arab Republic | 3.6 mg/dL | |
88 | United States | 3.6 mg/dL | |
89 | Dominica | 3.5 mg/dL | |
90 | Guatemala | 3.5 mg/dL | |
91 | Japan | 3.5 mg/dL | |
92 | Libya | 3.5 mg/dL | |
93 | Republic of Moldova | 3.5 mg/dL | |
94 | Niue | 3.5 mg/dL | |
95 | Papua New Guinea | 3.5 mg/dL | |
96 | Peru | 3.5 mg/dL | |
97 | Saudi Arabia | 3.5 mg/dL | |
98 | Solomon Islands | 3.5 mg/dL | |
99 | Turkey | 3.5 mg/dL | |
100 | Vanuatu | 3.5 mg/dL | |
101 | Yemen | 3.5 mg/dL | |
102 | Cuba | 3.4 mg/dL | |
103 | Dominican Republic | 3.4 mg/dL | |
104 | Guyana | 3.4 mg/dL | |
105 | India | 3.4 mg/dL | |
106 | Mongolia | 3.4 mg/dL | |
107 | Nicaragua | 3.4 mg/dL | |
108 | North Korea | 3.4 mg/dL | |
109 | Suriname | 3.4 mg/dL | |
110 | Trinidad and Tobago | 3.4 mg/dL | |
111 | Tunisia | 3.4 mg/dL | |
112 | Antigua and Barbuda | 3.3 mg/dL | |
113 | Azerbaijan | 3.3 mg/dL | |
114 | Belize | 3.3 mg/dL | |
115 | Bolivia | 3.3 mg/dL | |
116 | Grenada | 3.3 mg/dL | |
117 | Haiti | 3.3 mg/dL | |
118 | Jamaica | 3.3 mg/dL | |
119 | Kiribati | 3.3 mg/dL | |
120 | Morocco | 3.3 mg/dL | |
121 | Myanmar | 3.3 mg/dL | |
122 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 3.3 mg/dL | |
123 | Saint Lucia | 3.3 mg/dL | |
124 | Turkmenistan | 3.3 mg/dL | |
125 | Armenia | 3.2 mg/dL | |
126 | Barbados | 3.2 mg/dL | |
127 | Bhutan | 3.2 mg/dL | |
128 | China | 3.2 mg/dL | |
129 | Kazakhstan | 3.2 mg/dL | |
130 | Maldives | 3.2 mg/dL | |
131 | Pakistan | 3.2 mg/dL | |
132 | South Africa | 3.2 mg/dL | |
133 | Uzbekistan | 3.2 mg/dL | |
134 | Afghanistan | 3.1 mg/dL | |
135 | Bangladesh | 3.1 mg/dL | |
136 | Indonesia | 3.1 mg/dL | |
137 | Kyrgyzstan | 3.1 mg/dL | |
138 | Laos | 3.1 mg/dL | |
139 | Nepal | 3.1 mg/dL | |
140 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 3.1 mg/dL | |
141 | Sri Lanka | 3.1 mg/dL | |
142 | Vietnam | 3.1 mg/dL | |
143 | Cambodia | 3 mg/dL | |
144 | Djibouti | 3 mg/dL | |
145 | Timor-Leste | 3 mg/dL | |
146 | Gabon | 3 mg/dL | |
147 | Georgia | 3 mg/dL | |
148 | Ghana | 3 mg/dL | |
149 | Congo | 2.9 mg/dL | |
150 | Gambia | 2.9 mg/dL | |
151 | Mauritania | 2.9 mg/dL | |
152 | Somalia | 2.9 mg/dL | |
153 | Tajikistan | 2.9 mg/dL | |
154 | Tanzania | 2.9 mg/dL | |
155 | Angola | 2.8 mg/dL | |
156 | Botswana | 2.8 mg/dL | |
157 | Central African Republic | 2.8 mg/dL | |
158 | Equatorial Guinea | 2.8 mg/dL | |
159 | Eritrea | 2.8 mg/dL | |
160 | Sudan | 2.8 mg/dL | |
161 | Zimbabwe | 2.8 mg/dL | |
162 | Benin | 2.7 mg/dL | |
163 | Cameroon | 2.7 mg/dL | |
164 | Cabo Verde | 2.7 mg/dL | |
165 | Comoros | 2.7 mg/dL | |
166 | Côte d'Ivoire | 2.7 mg/dL | |
167 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 2.7 mg/dL | |
168 | Eswatini | 2.7 mg/dL | |
169 | Guinea | 2.7 mg/dL | |
170 | Guinea-Bissau | 2.7 mg/dL | |
171 | Liberia | 2.7 mg/dL | |
172 | Madagascar | 2.7 mg/dL | |
173 | Mozambique | 2.7 mg/dL | |
174 | Namibia | 2.7 mg/dL | |
175 | Sao Tome and Principe | 2.7 mg/dL | |
176 | Senegal | 2.7 mg/dL | |
177 | Sierra Leone | 2.7 mg/dL | |
178 | Togo | 2.7 mg/dL | |
179 | Zambia | 2.7 mg/dL | |
180 | Chad | 2.6 mg/dL | |
181 | Ethiopia | 2.6 mg/dL | |
182 | Kenya | 2.6 mg/dL | |
183 | Mali | 2.6 mg/dL | |
184 | Niger | 2.6 mg/dL | |
185 | Uganda | 2.6 mg/dL | |
186 | Burundi | 2.5 mg/dL | |
187 | Burkina Faso | 2.4 mg/dL | |
188 | Lesotho | 2.4 mg/dL | |
189 | Nigeria | 2.4 mg/dL | |
190 | Rwanda | 2.4 mg/dL | |
191 | Malawi | 2.2 mg/dL |
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #191
Malawi
- #190
Rwanda
- #189
Nigeria
- #188
Lesotho
- #187
Burkina Faso
- #186
Burundi
- #185
Uganda
- #184
Niger
- #183
Mali
- #182
Kenya
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2003, Lithuania, Malaysia, Serbia, and Latvia led the world with the highest Average Non-HDL Cholesterol Levels at 4.1 mg/dL. The global range for this metric spanned from 2.2 mg/dL to 4.1 mg/dL. The global average stood at 3.40 mg/dL, providing a benchmark for assessing cardiovascular health risks across different nations.
Economic Development and Cholesterol Levels
The data from 2003 reveals a distinct pattern where countries with higher economic development tend to exhibit elevated non-HDL cholesterol levels. For instance, nations such as Germany and Norway both reported levels of 4 mg/dL. These countries have advanced healthcare systems and higher standards of living, which often correlate with diets richer in fats and processed foods, contributing to higher cholesterol.
In contrast, countries with lower economic development, such as Malawi with a level of 2.2 mg/dL and Nigeria at 2.4 mg/dL, typically have diets that are lower in saturated fats due to economic constraints, leading to lower cholesterol levels. This suggests a link between economic affluence and dietary habits that influence cholesterol levels.
Geographic and Cultural Influences
Geographic and cultural factors also play a significant role in shaping non-HDL cholesterol levels. The Baltic region, represented by Lithuania and Latvia with levels of 4.1 mg/dL, reflects dietary traditions rich in dairy and meat products. Similarly, Serbia and Croatia, both at 4 mg/dL, share similar dietary influences.
Conversely, African nations such as Rwanda and Burundi, with levels of 2.4 mg/dL and 2.5 mg/dL respectively, maintain traditional diets that are high in plant-based foods and lower in animal fats. These dietary patterns contribute to lower cholesterol levels and reflect the influence of regional food availability and cultural practices.
Year-over-Year Changes and Health Policies
While the average global non-HDL cholesterol level remained stable with an average change of -0.00 mg/dL (-0.0%), some countries experienced notable shifts. Thailand, Uzbekistan, and Nepal each saw an increase of +0.10 mg/dL, reflecting dietary shifts and increasing urbanization that often lead to higher consumption of processed foods.
On the other hand, Lithuania and Serbia recorded decreases of -0.10 mg/dL, suggesting possible public health interventions or changes in dietary guidelines aimed at reducing cardiovascular risk. These variations highlight the impact of national health policies and the importance of monitoring dietary trends.
Implications for Public Health
The disparities in non-HDL cholesterol levels across countries underscore the need for tailored public health strategies. Nations with higher levels, such as those in Europe, may benefit from policies promoting healthier dietary choices and physical activity. Conversely, countries with lower levels, primarily in Africa, should focus on maintaining these beneficial dietary patterns while addressing other health challenges.
Understanding these patterns is critical for global health organizations aiming to reduce cardiovascular diseases. The data suggests that economic, cultural, and policy factors all contribute to the cholesterol profiles observed in 2003, providing a foundation for targeted interventions.
Frequently Asked Questions About Average Non-HDL Cholesterol Levels in 2003
Which country had the highest average non-HDL cholesterol level in 2003?
Lithuania had the highest average non-HDL cholesterol level in 2003, with a value of 4.1 mg/dL.
What was the average non-HDL cholesterol level across all countries in 2003?
The average non-HDL cholesterol level across all countries in 2003 was 3.4 mg/dL.
Which country had the lowest average non-HDL cholesterol level in 2003?
Malawi had the lowest average non-HDL cholesterol level in 2003, with a value of 2.2 mg/dL.
What was the median non-HDL cholesterol level among countries in 2003?
The median non-HDL cholesterol level among countries in 2003 was 3.5 mg/dL.
How many countries were included in the dataset for average non-HDL cholesterol levels in 2003?
The dataset for average non-HDL cholesterol levels in 2003 included 191 countries.
What is the range of average non-HDL cholesterol levels in the dataset for 2003?
The range of average non-HDL cholesterol levels in the dataset for 2003 spans from 2.2 mg/dL in Malawi to 4.1 mg/dL in Lithuania.
Insights by country
Australia
In 2003, Australia ranked #39 globally with an average non-HDL cholesterol level of 3.8 mg/dL. This level is lower than that of neighboring New Zealand, which reflects the impact of dietary habits and healthcare policies on cholesterol management. Australia’s relatively high standard of living, combined with public health initiatives focused on nutrition and lifestyle, contributes to these cholesterol levels, highlighting the nation's commitment to preventive health measures.
Bangladesh
In 2003, Bangladesh had an average non-HDL cholesterol level of 3.1 mg/dL, ranking #135 out of 191 countries. This level is significantly lower than the global average, indicating potential health implications for the population. Contributing factors include a predominantly rural lifestyle, dietary practices that may limit cholesterol intake, and limited access to healthcare resources, which can affect overall health monitoring and management.
Yemen
In 2003, Yemen ranked #101 globally with an average non-HDL cholesterol level of 3.5 mg/dL. This figure is notably lower than many countries, reflecting dietary habits and economic conditions that influence health metrics. Yemen's ongoing conflict and economic challenges have limited access to healthcare and nutrition education, contributing to the country's health profile.
Argentina
In 2003, Argentina ranked #38 globally with an average Non-HDL Cholesterol Level of 3.8 mg/dL. This level is relatively low compared to countries like the United States, which has higher cholesterol averages. Contributing factors to Argentina's cholesterol levels include dietary habits influenced by its beef-centric cuisine and varying access to healthcare resources across urban and rural areas.
Mexico
In 2003, Mexico ranked #32 globally with an average Non-HDL Cholesterol Level of 3.9 mg/dL. This level is lower than that of the top-ranked country, Japan, indicating a relatively moderate cholesterol profile. Contributing factors to this statistic include Mexico's dietary patterns, which are influenced by traditional cuisine, and ongoing public health initiatives aimed at addressing cardiovascular health.
Cuba
Cuba ranked #102 globally for Average Non-HDL Cholesterol Levels in 2003, with a value of 3.4 mg/dL. This figure is relatively low compared to many countries, indicating a diet that may be lower in saturated fats, typical of many Caribbean nations. Factors contributing to this statistic include Cuba's unique food supply constraints due to economic policies and trade restrictions, which have influenced dietary patterns and health outcomes.
Canada
In 2003, Canada had an average non-HDL cholesterol level of 3.7 mg/dL, ranking #63 out of 191 countries. This level is relatively moderate when compared to top-ranked countries known for their heart health, such as Japan, which typically reports lower cholesterol levels. Contributing factors to Canada's cholesterol statistics include its diverse diet, which is influenced by a mix of cultural cuisines, and the country's robust healthcare policies promoting cardiovascular health awareness.
Nicaragua
Nicaragua ranked #108 globally in 2003 for Average Non-HDL Cholesterol Levels, with a value of 3.4 mg/dL. This level is notably lower than many countries in the Americas, reflecting regional health disparities. Contributing factors include Nicaragua's economic challenges, which limit access to healthcare and nutritional education, as well as dietary habits that may prioritize lower cholesterol intake.
Philippines
The Philippines ranked #85 globally in 2003 with an average Non-HDL Cholesterol Level of 3.6 mg/dL. This figure is lower than many neighboring Southeast Asian countries, reflecting dietary habits and lifestyle choices prevalent in the region. Contributing factors include the country's reliance on rice-based diets and the prevalence of physical activity in rural areas, which may influence cholesterol levels.
Bosnia and Herzegovina
In 2003, Bosnia and Herzegovina ranked #78 globally for Average Non-HDL Cholesterol Levels, with a value of 3.6 mg/dL. This level is notably lower than many Western European countries, reflecting regional health disparities. Contributing factors include the country's transitional economy and public health challenges following the 1990s conflict, which have impacted lifestyle and dietary habits.
Data Source
Average non-HDL cholesterol levels | Our World in Data
Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive global data on various topics, including health, economics, and environment. The dataset on average non-HDL cholesterol levels offers country-level statistics to help understand trends and disparities in cardiovascular health.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Average Non-HDL Cholesterol Levels data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.