Average Non-HDL Cholesterol Levels 2001
Average non-HDL cholesterol levels indicate heart disease risk and vary across countries.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 |  Lithuania | 4.2 mg/dL | |
2 |  Serbia | 4.2 mg/dL | |
3 |  Andorra | 4.1 mg/dL | |
4 |  Austria | 4.1 mg/dL | |
5 |  Bulgaria | 4.1 mg/dL | |
6 |  Germany | 4.1 mg/dL | |
7 |  Kuwait | 4.1 mg/dL | |
8 |  Latvia | 4.1 mg/dL | |
9 |  Malta | 4.1 mg/dL | |
10 |  New Zealand | 4.1 mg/dL | |
11 |  Norway | 4.1 mg/dL | |
12 |  Switzerland | 4.1 mg/dL | |
13 |  Costa Rica | 4 mg/dL | |
14 |  Croatia | 4 mg/dL | |
15 |  Czech Republic | 4 mg/dL | |
16 |  Fiji | 4 mg/dL | |
17 |  France | 4 mg/dL | |
18 |  Hungary | 4 mg/dL | |
19 |  Iceland | 4 mg/dL | |
20 |  Jordan | 4 mg/dL | |
21 |  Lebanon | 4 mg/dL | |
22 |  Malaysia | 4 mg/dL | |
23 |  Montenegro | 4 mg/dL | |
24 |  North Macedonia | 4 mg/dL | |
25 |  Seychelles | 4 mg/dL | |
26 |  United Kingdom | 4 mg/dL | |
27 |  Belgium | 3.9 mg/dL | |
28 |  Colombia | 3.9 mg/dL | |
29 |  Cook Islands | 3.9 mg/dL | |
30 |  Cyprus | 3.9 mg/dL | |
31 |  Denmark | 3.9 mg/dL | |
32 |  Ecuador | 3.9 mg/dL | |
33 |  Estonia | 3.9 mg/dL | |
34 |  Finland | 3.9 mg/dL | |
35 |  Honduras | 3.9 mg/dL | |
36 |  Iran | 3.9 mg/dL | |
37 |  Italy | 3.9 mg/dL | |
38 |  Luxembourg | 3.9 mg/dL | |
39 |  Mexico | 3.9 mg/dL | |
40 |  Nauru | 3.9 mg/dL | |
41 |  Netherlands | 3.9 mg/dL | |
42 |  Poland | 3.9 mg/dL | |
43 |  Qatar | 3.9 mg/dL | |
44 |  Slovakia | 3.9 mg/dL | |
45 |  Slovenia | 3.9 mg/dL | |
46 |  Ukraine | 3.9 mg/dL | |
47 |  Argentina | 3.8 mg/dL | |
48 |  Australia | 3.8 mg/dL | |
49 |  Bahrain | 3.8 mg/dL | |
50 |  Belarus | 3.8 mg/dL | |
51 |  Canada | 3.8 mg/dL | |
52 |  Chile | 3.8 mg/dL | |
53 |  Iraq | 3.8 mg/dL | |
54 |  Ireland | 3.8 mg/dL | |
55 |  Israel | 3.8 mg/dL | |
56 |  Oman | 3.8 mg/dL | |
57 |  Panama | 3.8 mg/dL | |
58 |  Singapore | 3.8 mg/dL | |
59 |  Spain | 3.8 mg/dL | |
60 |  Sweden | 3.8 mg/dL | |
61 |  Thailand | 3.8 mg/dL | |
62 |  Tonga | 3.8 mg/dL | |
63 |  Tuvalu | 3.8 mg/dL | |
64 |  United Arab Emirates | 3.8 mg/dL | |
65 |  Venezuela | 3.8 mg/dL | |
66 |  Albania | 3.7 mg/dL | |
67 |  Brazil | 3.7 mg/dL | |
68 |  Brunei Darussalam | 3.7 mg/dL | |
69 |  El Salvador | 3.7 mg/dL | |
70 |  Greece | 3.7 mg/dL | |
71 |  Marshall Islands | 3.7 mg/dL | |
72 |  Mauritius | 3.7 mg/dL | |
73 |  Palau | 3.7 mg/dL | |
74 |  Portugal | 3.7 mg/dL | |
75 |  Romania | 3.7 mg/dL | |
76 |  Russia | 3.7 mg/dL | |
77 |  Samoa | 3.7 mg/dL | |
78 |  Syrian Arab Republic | 3.7 mg/dL | |
79 |  Uruguay | 3.7 mg/dL | |
80 |  Algeria | 3.6 mg/dL | |
81 |  Bahamas | 3.6 mg/dL | |
82 |  Bosnia and Herzegovina | 3.6 mg/dL | |
83 |  Egypt | 3.6 mg/dL | |
84 |  Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 3.6 mg/dL | |
85 |  Republic of Moldova | 3.6 mg/dL | |
86 |  Paraguay | 3.6 mg/dL | |
87 |  Philippines | 3.6 mg/dL | |
88 |  South Korea | 3.6 mg/dL | |
89 |  United States | 3.6 mg/dL | |
90 |  Dominica | 3.5 mg/dL | |
91 |  Guatemala | 3.5 mg/dL | |
92 |  Japan | 3.5 mg/dL | |
93 |  Libya | 3.5 mg/dL | |
94 |  Niue | 3.5 mg/dL | |
95 |  Papua New Guinea | 3.5 mg/dL | |
96 |  Peru | 3.5 mg/dL | |
97 |  Saudi Arabia | 3.5 mg/dL | |
98 |  Solomon Islands | 3.5 mg/dL | |
99 |  Turkey | 3.5 mg/dL | |
100 |  Vanuatu | 3.5 mg/dL | |
101 |  Bolivia | 3.4 mg/dL | |
102 |  Cuba | 3.4 mg/dL | |
103 |  Dominican Republic | 3.4 mg/dL | |
104 |  Guyana | 3.4 mg/dL | |
105 |  India | 3.4 mg/dL | |
106 |  Kiribati | 3.4 mg/dL | |
107 |  Mongolia | 3.4 mg/dL | |
108 |  Nicaragua | 3.4 mg/dL | |
109 |  North Korea | 3.4 mg/dL | |
110 |  Suriname | 3.4 mg/dL | |
111 |  Trinidad and Tobago | 3.4 mg/dL | |
112 |  Tunisia | 3.4 mg/dL | |
113 |  Yemen | 3.4 mg/dL | |
114 |  Antigua and Barbuda | 3.3 mg/dL | |
115 |  Armenia | 3.3 mg/dL | |
116 |  Azerbaijan | 3.3 mg/dL | |
117 |  Grenada | 3.3 mg/dL | |
118 |  Haiti | 3.3 mg/dL | |
119 |  Jamaica | 3.3 mg/dL | |
120 |  Morocco | 3.3 mg/dL | |
121 |  Myanmar | 3.3 mg/dL | |
122 |  Saint Kitts and Nevis | 3.3 mg/dL | |
123 |  Turkmenistan | 3.3 mg/dL | |
124 |  Belize | 3.2 mg/dL | |
125 |  Bhutan | 3.2 mg/dL | |
126 |  Kazakhstan | 3.2 mg/dL | |
127 |  Maldives | 3.2 mg/dL | |
128 |  Pakistan | 3.2 mg/dL | |
129 |  Saint Lucia | 3.2 mg/dL | |
130 |  South Africa | 3.2 mg/dL | |
131 |  Afghanistan | 3.1 mg/dL | |
132 |  Bangladesh | 3.1 mg/dL | |
133 |  Barbados | 3.1 mg/dL | |
134 |  China | 3.1 mg/dL | |
135 |  Georgia | 3.1 mg/dL | |
136 |  Kyrgyzstan | 3.1 mg/dL | |
137 |  Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 3.1 mg/dL | |
138 |  Sri Lanka | 3.1 mg/dL | |
139 |  Uzbekistan | 3.1 mg/dL | |
140 |  Cambodia | 3 mg/dL | |
141 |  Djibouti | 3 mg/dL | |
142 |  Timor-Leste | 3 mg/dL | |
143 |  Gabon | 3 mg/dL | |
144 |  Indonesia | 3 mg/dL | |
145 |  Laos | 3 mg/dL | |
146 |  Nepal | 3 mg/dL | |
147 |  Vietnam | 3 mg/dL | |
148 |  Congo | 2.9 mg/dL | |
149 |  Ghana | 2.9 mg/dL | |
150 |  Mauritania | 2.9 mg/dL | |
151 |  Tajikistan | 2.9 mg/dL | |
152 |  Angola | 2.8 mg/dL | |
153 |  Botswana | 2.8 mg/dL | |
154 |  Equatorial Guinea | 2.8 mg/dL | |
155 |  Eritrea | 2.8 mg/dL | |
156 |  Gambia | 2.8 mg/dL | |
157 |  Somalia | 2.8 mg/dL | |
158 |  Sudan | 2.8 mg/dL | |
159 |  Tanzania | 2.8 mg/dL | |
160 |  Zimbabwe | 2.8 mg/dL | |
161 |  Benin | 2.7 mg/dL | |
162 |  Cameroon | 2.7 mg/dL | |
163 |  Cabo Verde | 2.7 mg/dL | |
164 |  Central African Republic | 2.7 mg/dL | |
165 |  Comoros | 2.7 mg/dL | |
166 |  Côte d'Ivoire | 2.7 mg/dL | |
167 |  Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 2.7 mg/dL | |
168 |  Eswatini | 2.7 mg/dL | |
169 |  Guinea | 2.7 mg/dL | |
170 |  Guinea-Bissau | 2.7 mg/dL | |
171 |  Liberia | 2.7 mg/dL | |
172 |  Mozambique | 2.7 mg/dL | |
173 |  Namibia | 2.7 mg/dL | |
174 |  Senegal | 2.7 mg/dL | |
175 |  Sierra Leone | 2.7 mg/dL | |
176 |  Zambia | 2.7 mg/dL | |
177 |  Chad | 2.6 mg/dL | |
178 |  Ethiopia | 2.6 mg/dL | |
179 |  Kenya | 2.6 mg/dL | |
180 |  Madagascar | 2.6 mg/dL | |
181 |  Mali | 2.6 mg/dL | |
182 |  Sao Tome and Principe | 2.6 mg/dL | |
183 |  Togo | 2.6 mg/dL | |
184 |  Uganda | 2.6 mg/dL | |
185 |  Burundi | 2.5 mg/dL | |
186 |  Niger | 2.5 mg/dL | |
187 |  Burkina Faso | 2.4 mg/dL | |
188 |  Lesotho | 2.4 mg/dL | |
189 |  Nigeria | 2.4 mg/dL | |
190 |  Rwanda | 2.4 mg/dL | |
191 |  Malawi | 2.2 mg/dL |
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #191Malawi
- #190Rwanda
- #189Nigeria
- #188Lesotho
- #187Burkina Faso
- #186Niger
- #185Burundi
- #184Uganda
- #183Togo
- #182Sao Tome and Principe
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2001, Serbia and Lithuania had the highest Average Non-HDL Cholesterol Levels at 4.2 mg/dL, while Malawi reported the lowest at 2.2 mg/dL. The global range for this metric in 2001 spanned from 2.20 to 4.20 mg/dL. The average non-HDL cholesterol level worldwide was 3.41 mg/dL, with a median of 3.50 mg/dL, indicating moderate variation across the 191 countries with available data.
Economic Influence on Non-HDL Cholesterol Levels
The distribution of Average Non-HDL Cholesterol Levels in 2001 highlights a correlation between economic status and cholesterol levels. High-income countries such as Switzerland and Germany reported elevated levels of 4.1 mg/dL, suggesting that diets rich in saturated fats, often associated with higher economic capacity, could contribute to these figures. Conversely, lower-income countries like Malawi and Burkina Faso exhibited significantly lower levels of 2.2 mg/dL and 2.4 mg/dL respectively. These figures might reflect limited access to high-fat foods and an emphasis on traditional diets that are lower in cholesterol.
Geographic and Lifestyle Factors
Geographic and lifestyle factors also play a crucial role in determining cholesterol levels. In Europe, countries like Serbia and Lithuania showed the highest average levels at 4.2 mg/dL. This can be attributed to dietary habits prevalent in Eastern Europe, which often include high consumption of red meats and dairy products. Meanwhile, African nations such as Nigeria and Rwanda, with average levels of 2.4 mg/dL, often maintain diets rich in vegetables and grains, contributing to lower cholesterol levels.
Policy and Public Health Interventions
Public health policies have a significant impact on national cholesterol levels. Countries like Norway and Germany, both reporting levels of 4.1 mg/dL, have implemented policies that encourage physical activity and a balanced diet. These efforts aim to mitigate the high cholesterol levels associated with their wealthier populations. On the other hand, countries with limited healthcare resources, such as Lesotho and Niger, with levels of 2.4 mg/dL and 2.5 mg/dL respectively, may not have the same capacity for widespread health interventions, resulting in naturally lower cholesterol levels due to less processed food consumption.
Demographic Trends and Cholesterol Levels
Demographics also influence cholesterol levels, with age and urbanization playing pivotal roles. Younger populations, as seen in Kenya and Burundi (both at 2.6 mg/dL), often have lower cholesterol levels due to higher physical activity levels and less exposure to processed foods. In contrast, aging populations in countries like Malta and Andorra, both reporting 4.1 mg/dL, may face increased cholesterol levels due to lifestyle changes and reduced physical activity. Urbanization further exacerbates this trend, with urban populations having greater access to processed foods that contribute to higher cholesterol levels.
The analysis of Average Non-HDL Cholesterol Levels in 2001 reveals a complex interplay of economic, geographic, policy, and demographic factors. Understanding these patterns is crucial for developing targeted interventions to manage cholesterol levels globally and reduce the risk of heart disease.
Frequently Asked Questions About Average Non-HDL Cholesterol Levels in 2001
Which country had the highest average non-HDL cholesterol level in 2001?
Serbia had the highest average non-HDL cholesterol level in 2001, with 4.2 mg/dL.
Which country had the lowest average non-HDL cholesterol level in 2001?
Malawi had the lowest average non-HDL cholesterol level in 2001, with 2.2 mg/dL.
What was the average non-HDL cholesterol level across all countries in 2001?
The average non-HDL cholesterol level across all countries in 2001 was 3.41 mg/dL.
What was the median non-HDL cholesterol level among countries in 2001?
The median non-HDL cholesterol level among countries in 2001 was 3.5 mg/dL.
How many countries were included in the dataset for average non-HDL cholesterol levels in 2001?
The dataset included 191 countries for average non-HDL cholesterol levels in 2001.
Which countries were in the top 10 for highest average non-HDL cholesterol levels in 2001?
The top 10 countries for highest average non-HDL cholesterol levels in 2001 were Serbia, Lithuania, Bulgaria, Kuwait, Latvia, Andorra, Switzerland, Norway, Germany, and Malta.
Insights by country
Botswana
In 2001, Botswana ranked #153 globally with an average non-HDL cholesterol level of 2.8 mg/dL. This figure is notably lower than many countries, indicating potential health challenges related to cardiovascular diseases. Contributing factors include Botswana's economic conditions, which influence dietary habits, and a high prevalence of HIV/AIDS that affects overall health management in the population.
Malta
In 2001, Malta ranked #9 globally for Average Non-HDL Cholesterol Levels, with a value of 4.1 mg/dL. This level is notably lower than many countries, reflecting Malta's Mediterranean diet rich in fruits, vegetables, and healthy fats. Additionally, the country's healthcare policies emphasize preventive care, contributing to better overall cardiovascular health among its population.
Cuba
Cuba ranked #102 globally in 2001 for Average Non-HDL Cholesterol Levels, with a value of 3.4 mg/dL. This figure is notably lower than the global average, which reflects the country's unique dietary habits and healthcare policies. The Cuban government has long prioritized public health initiatives and access to healthcare, which may contribute to lower cholesterol levels compared to many other nations.
Turkmenistan
In 2001, Turkmenistan ranked #123 globally with an average non-HDL cholesterol level of 3.3 mg/dL. This level is notably lower than that of many neighboring countries, indicating potential health implications for the population. Factors contributing to this statistic include the country's limited access to diverse food sources and a diet heavily reliant on traditional staples, which may influence overall cholesterol levels.
Indonesia
In 2001, Indonesia ranked #143 globally with an average non-HDL cholesterol level of 3 mg/dL. This figure is notably lower than many of its regional neighbors, reflecting dietary habits and healthcare access. Contributing factors include the country's diverse diet, which is rich in carbohydrates and lower in saturated fats, as well as varying levels of health awareness and medical infrastructure across different regions.
Sweden
In 2001, Sweden ranked #60 globally with an average Non-HDL Cholesterol Level of 3.8 mg/dL. This level is lower than the global average, indicating a relatively healthy lipid profile compared to many other countries. Contributing factors include Sweden's robust healthcare system, emphasis on public health education, and a diet rich in healthy fats from fish and plant sources.
Uganda
In 2001, Uganda ranked #184 globally with an average non-HDL cholesterol level of 2.6 mg/dL. This figure is notably lower than many neighboring countries, reflecting a broader trend of low cholesterol levels in East Africa. Contributing factors include dietary habits predominantly based on plant-based foods and limited access to processed foods, which can elevate cholesterol levels.
Afghanistan
In 2001, Afghanistan had an average Non-HDL Cholesterol level of 3.1 mg/dL, ranking #131 out of 191 countries. This figure is notably lower than many countries in the region, which often experience higher cholesterol levels due to dietary habits. Contributing factors to Afghanistan's low cholesterol levels include its predominantly agrarian economy, limited access to processed foods, and ongoing conflict, which affects overall health and nutrition.
Poland
In 2001, Poland had an average Non-HDL Cholesterol Level of 3.9 mg/dL, ranking #42 out of 191 countries. This level is relatively low compared to many Western European nations, which often report higher cholesterol levels due to dietary habits. Contributing factors to Poland's cholesterol levels include a traditional diet that emphasizes whole foods and lower consumption of processed fats, alongside a growing awareness of health and nutrition in the early 2000s.
Equatorial Guinea
In 2001, Equatorial Guinea had an average non-HDL cholesterol level of 2.8 mg/dL, ranking #154 out of 191 countries. This level is notably lower than the global average, indicating potential health concerns related to dietary habits and lifestyle. Contributing factors include the country's reliance on oil exports, which shapes economic conditions and influences public health policies, as well as limited access to healthcare resources.
Data Source
Average non-HDL cholesterol levels | Our World in Data
Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive global data on various topics, including health, economics, and environment. The dataset on average non-HDL cholesterol levels offers country-level statistics to help understand trends and disparities in cardiovascular health.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Average Non-HDL Cholesterol Levels data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.