Average Non-HDL Cholesterol Levels 2004
Average non-HDL cholesterol levels indicate heart disease risk and vary across countries.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Lithuania | 4.1 mg/dL | |
2 | Malaysia | 4.1 mg/dL | |
3 | Serbia | 4.1 mg/dL | |
4 | Andorra | 4 mg/dL | |
5 | Austria | 4 mg/dL | |
6 | Bulgaria | 4 mg/dL | |
7 | Costa Rica | 4 mg/dL | |
8 | Fiji | 4 mg/dL | |
9 | Kuwait | 4 mg/dL | |
10 | Latvia | 4 mg/dL | |
11 | Lebanon | 4 mg/dL | |
12 | Malta | 4 mg/dL | |
13 | Norway | 4 mg/dL | |
14 | Seychelles | 4 mg/dL | |
15 | Colombia | 3.9 mg/dL | |
16 | Cook Islands | 3.9 mg/dL | |
17 | Croatia | 3.9 mg/dL | |
18 | Czech Republic | 3.9 mg/dL | |
19 | Ecuador | 3.9 mg/dL | |
20 | Estonia | 3.9 mg/dL | |
21 | France | 3.9 mg/dL | |
22 | Germany | 3.9 mg/dL | |
23 | Honduras | 3.9 mg/dL | |
24 | Hungary | 3.9 mg/dL | |
25 | Iran | 3.9 mg/dL | |
26 | Jordan | 3.9 mg/dL | |
27 | Mexico | 3.9 mg/dL | |
28 | Montenegro | 3.9 mg/dL | |
29 | New Zealand | 3.9 mg/dL | |
30 | North Macedonia | 3.9 mg/dL | |
31 | Slovenia | 3.9 mg/dL | |
32 | Switzerland | 3.9 mg/dL | |
33 | Thailand | 3.9 mg/dL | |
34 | Ukraine | 3.9 mg/dL | |
35 | United Kingdom | 3.9 mg/dL | |
36 | Argentina | 3.8 mg/dL | |
37 | Brunei Darussalam | 3.8 mg/dL | |
38 | Chile | 3.8 mg/dL | |
39 | Cyprus | 3.8 mg/dL | |
40 | Denmark | 3.8 mg/dL | |
41 | Finland | 3.8 mg/dL | |
42 | Iceland | 3.8 mg/dL | |
43 | Iraq | 3.8 mg/dL | |
44 | Italy | 3.8 mg/dL | |
45 | Luxembourg | 3.8 mg/dL | |
46 | Nauru | 3.8 mg/dL | |
47 | Panama | 3.8 mg/dL | |
48 | Poland | 3.8 mg/dL | |
49 | Qatar | 3.8 mg/dL | |
50 | Singapore | 3.8 mg/dL | |
51 | Slovakia | 3.8 mg/dL | |
52 | Tonga | 3.8 mg/dL | |
53 | United Arab Emirates | 3.8 mg/dL | |
54 | Venezuela | 3.8 mg/dL | |
55 | Albania | 3.7 mg/dL | |
56 | Australia | 3.7 mg/dL | |
57 | Bahrain | 3.7 mg/dL | |
58 | Belarus | 3.7 mg/dL | |
59 | Belgium | 3.7 mg/dL | |
60 | Brazil | 3.7 mg/dL | |
61 | Canada | 3.7 mg/dL | |
62 | El Salvador | 3.7 mg/dL | |
63 | Ireland | 3.7 mg/dL | |
64 | Israel | 3.7 mg/dL | |
65 | Mauritius | 3.7 mg/dL | |
66 | Netherlands | 3.7 mg/dL | |
67 | Oman | 3.7 mg/dL | |
68 | Portugal | 3.7 mg/dL | |
69 | Romania | 3.7 mg/dL | |
70 | Samoa | 3.7 mg/dL | |
71 | Spain | 3.7 mg/dL | |
72 | Sweden | 3.7 mg/dL | |
73 | Tuvalu | 3.7 mg/dL | |
74 | Uruguay | 3.7 mg/dL | |
75 | Algeria | 3.6 mg/dL | |
76 | Bahamas | 3.6 mg/dL | |
77 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 3.6 mg/dL | |
78 | Egypt | 3.6 mg/dL | |
79 | Greece | 3.6 mg/dL | |
80 | Marshall Islands | 3.6 mg/dL | |
81 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 3.6 mg/dL | |
82 | Palau | 3.6 mg/dL | |
83 | Paraguay | 3.6 mg/dL | |
84 | Philippines | 3.6 mg/dL | |
85 | Russia | 3.6 mg/dL | |
86 | South Korea | 3.6 mg/dL | |
87 | Syrian Arab Republic | 3.6 mg/dL | |
88 | United States | 3.6 mg/dL | |
89 | Dominica | 3.5 mg/dL | |
90 | Guatemala | 3.5 mg/dL | |
91 | Japan | 3.5 mg/dL | |
92 | Libya | 3.5 mg/dL | |
93 | Republic of Moldova | 3.5 mg/dL | |
94 | Niue | 3.5 mg/dL | |
95 | Papua New Guinea | 3.5 mg/dL | |
96 | Peru | 3.5 mg/dL | |
97 | Saudi Arabia | 3.5 mg/dL | |
98 | Solomon Islands | 3.5 mg/dL | |
99 | Turkey | 3.5 mg/dL | |
100 | Vanuatu | 3.5 mg/dL | |
101 | Yemen | 3.5 mg/dL | |
102 | Cuba | 3.4 mg/dL | |
103 | Dominican Republic | 3.4 mg/dL | |
104 | Guyana | 3.4 mg/dL | |
105 | India | 3.4 mg/dL | |
106 | Mongolia | 3.4 mg/dL | |
107 | Nicaragua | 3.4 mg/dL | |
108 | North Korea | 3.4 mg/dL | |
109 | Suriname | 3.4 mg/dL | |
110 | Trinidad and Tobago | 3.4 mg/dL | |
111 | Antigua and Barbuda | 3.3 mg/dL | |
112 | Azerbaijan | 3.3 mg/dL | |
113 | Belize | 3.3 mg/dL | |
114 | Bolivia | 3.3 mg/dL | |
115 | Grenada | 3.3 mg/dL | |
116 | Haiti | 3.3 mg/dL | |
117 | Jamaica | 3.3 mg/dL | |
118 | Kiribati | 3.3 mg/dL | |
119 | Maldives | 3.3 mg/dL | |
120 | Morocco | 3.3 mg/dL | |
121 | Myanmar | 3.3 mg/dL | |
122 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 3.3 mg/dL | |
123 | Saint Lucia | 3.3 mg/dL | |
124 | Tunisia | 3.3 mg/dL | |
125 | Turkmenistan | 3.3 mg/dL | |
126 | Armenia | 3.2 mg/dL | |
127 | Barbados | 3.2 mg/dL | |
128 | Bhutan | 3.2 mg/dL | |
129 | China | 3.2 mg/dL | |
130 | Kazakhstan | 3.2 mg/dL | |
131 | Pakistan | 3.2 mg/dL | |
132 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 3.2 mg/dL | |
133 | South Africa | 3.2 mg/dL | |
134 | Uzbekistan | 3.2 mg/dL | |
135 | Afghanistan | 3.1 mg/dL | |
136 | Bangladesh | 3.1 mg/dL | |
137 | Timor-Leste | 3.1 mg/dL | |
138 | Indonesia | 3.1 mg/dL | |
139 | Kyrgyzstan | 3.1 mg/dL | |
140 | Laos | 3.1 mg/dL | |
141 | Nepal | 3.1 mg/dL | |
142 | Sri Lanka | 3.1 mg/dL | |
143 | Vietnam | 3.1 mg/dL | |
144 | Cambodia | 3 mg/dL | |
145 | Djibouti | 3 mg/dL | |
146 | Gabon | 3 mg/dL | |
147 | Georgia | 3 mg/dL | |
148 | Ghana | 3 mg/dL | |
149 | Congo | 2.9 mg/dL | |
150 | Gambia | 2.9 mg/dL | |
151 | Mauritania | 2.9 mg/dL | |
152 | Somalia | 2.9 mg/dL | |
153 | Tajikistan | 2.9 mg/dL | |
154 | Tanzania | 2.9 mg/dL | |
155 | Zimbabwe | 2.9 mg/dL | |
156 | Angola | 2.8 mg/dL | |
157 | Botswana | 2.8 mg/dL | |
158 | Cameroon | 2.8 mg/dL | |
159 | Cabo Verde | 2.8 mg/dL | |
160 | Central African Republic | 2.8 mg/dL | |
161 | Comoros | 2.8 mg/dL | |
162 | Equatorial Guinea | 2.8 mg/dL | |
163 | Eritrea | 2.8 mg/dL | |
164 | Mozambique | 2.8 mg/dL | |
165 | Namibia | 2.8 mg/dL | |
166 | Sudan | 2.8 mg/dL | |
167 | Benin | 2.7 mg/dL | |
168 | Côte d'Ivoire | 2.7 mg/dL | |
169 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 2.7 mg/dL | |
170 | Eswatini | 2.7 mg/dL | |
171 | Guinea | 2.7 mg/dL | |
172 | Guinea-Bissau | 2.7 mg/dL | |
173 | Liberia | 2.7 mg/dL | |
174 | Madagascar | 2.7 mg/dL | |
175 | Sao Tome and Principe | 2.7 mg/dL | |
176 | Senegal | 2.7 mg/dL | |
177 | Sierra Leone | 2.7 mg/dL | |
178 | Togo | 2.7 mg/dL | |
179 | Zambia | 2.7 mg/dL | |
180 | Burundi | 2.6 mg/dL | |
181 | Chad | 2.6 mg/dL | |
182 | Ethiopia | 2.6 mg/dL | |
183 | Kenya | 2.6 mg/dL | |
184 | Mali | 2.6 mg/dL | |
185 | Niger | 2.6 mg/dL | |
186 | Uganda | 2.6 mg/dL | |
187 | Burkina Faso | 2.5 mg/dL | |
188 | Lesotho | 2.4 mg/dL | |
189 | Nigeria | 2.4 mg/dL | |
190 | Rwanda | 2.4 mg/dL | |
191 | Malawi | 2.2 mg/dL |
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #191
Malawi
- #190
Rwanda
- #189
Nigeria
- #188
Lesotho
- #187
Burkina Faso
- #186
Uganda
- #185
Niger
- #184
Mali
- #183
Kenya
- #182
Ethiopia
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2004, the countries with the highest Average Non-HDL Cholesterol Levels were Lithuania, Serbia, and Malaysia, each recording levels of 4.1 mg/dL. The global range for Average Non-HDL Cholesterol Levels spanned from a minimum of 2.20 mg/dL in Malawi to a maximum of 4.10 mg/dL. The global average stood at 3.39 mg/dL, providing a baseline for comparison across the 191 countries with available data.
Geographic and Economic Influences on Cholesterol Levels
The disparity in Average Non-HDL Cholesterol Levels across countries in 2004 can be partly attributed to geographic and economic factors. Many of the countries with the highest levels, such as Austria and Norway (both at 4 mg/dL), are high-income nations where diets tend to be richer in saturated fats and processed foods. These dietary habits contribute to elevated cholesterol levels. Conversely, countries like Malawi and Nigeria, with levels of 2.20 mg/dL and 2.40 mg/dL respectively, reflect lower averages typical of less affluent countries where diets are often less reliant on processed foods and more plant-based.
Demographic Patterns and Health Outcomes
Demographic factors also play a significant role in shaping Average Non-HDL Cholesterol Levels. For instance, countries with younger populations, such as Rwanda and Burkina Faso (both with levels around 2.4-2.5 mg/dL), tend to have lower cholesterol levels, which correlates with lower rates of heart disease. In contrast, countries like Bulgaria and Kuwait (both at 4 mg/dL) with older populations may experience higher cholesterol levels due to age-related metabolic changes.
Year-over-Year Changes and Influencing Factors
Year-over-year changes in cholesterol levels highlight important health trends. In 2004, countries such as Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Timor-Leste saw increases of 0.10 mg/dL, potentially due to changes in diet or increased urbanization leading to more sedentary lifestyles. Meanwhile, significant decreases were observed in countries like Germany, Hungary, and the United Kingdom (all with decreases of 0.10 mg/dL), which may reflect successful public health initiatives aimed at reducing cardiovascular risk through improved dietary guidelines and increased physical activity.
Public Health Policies and Their Impact
Public health policies have a profound impact on national cholesterol levels. Countries like Switzerland and New Zealand saw decreases in average cholesterol levels, which may be attributed to comprehensive health campaigns promoting heart health. These campaigns often include public awareness about the dangers of high cholesterol, dietary interventions, and increased accessibility to health screenings. In contrast, countries lacking such robust health frameworks may not see similar improvements, as reflected in the stable or increasing cholesterol levels in certain regions.
Overall, the analysis of Average Non-HDL Cholesterol Levels in 2004 reveals a complex interplay of economic, demographic, and policy-driven factors influencing global health outcomes. Understanding these patterns is crucial for tailoring public health strategies to effectively combat cardiovascular diseases worldwide.
Frequently Asked Questions About Average Non-HDL Cholesterol Levels in 2004
Which country had the highest average non-HDL cholesterol level in 2004?
Lithuania had the highest average non-HDL cholesterol level in 2004, with 4.1 mg/dL.
What was the average non-HDL cholesterol level across all countries in 2004?
The average non-HDL cholesterol level across all countries in 2004 was 3.39 mg/dL.
Which country had the lowest average non-HDL cholesterol level in 2004?
Malawi had the lowest average non-HDL cholesterol level in 2004, with 2.2 mg/dL.
What was the median non-HDL cholesterol level among countries in 2004?
The median non-HDL cholesterol level among countries in 2004 was 3.5 mg/dL.
What is the range of average non-HDL cholesterol levels in 2004?
The range of average non-HDL cholesterol levels in 2004 was from 2.2 mg/dL in Malawi to 4.1 mg/dL in Lithuania.
Which countries were in the top 3 for highest average non-HDL cholesterol levels in 2004?
The top 3 countries for highest average non-HDL cholesterol levels in 2004 were Lithuania, Serbia, and Malaysia, all with 4.1 mg/dL.
Insights by country
Botswana
In 2004, Botswana had an average non-HDL cholesterol level of 2.8 mg/dL, ranking #157 out of 191 countries. This level is notably lower than many neighboring countries, indicating a potential area of health concern. Contributing factors include Botswana's economic challenges and healthcare access disparities, which can influence dietary habits and overall health management.
Croatia
In 2004, Croatia ranked #17 globally with an average Non-HDL Cholesterol Level of 3.9 mg/dL. This figure is notably lower than that of many neighboring countries, reflecting a healthier lipid profile. Contributing factors to this statistic include Croatia's Mediterranean diet, which emphasizes fresh fruits, vegetables, and fish, as well as a growing awareness of cardiovascular health among its population.
Netherlands
In 2004, the Netherlands ranked #67 globally with an average Non-HDL Cholesterol level of 3.7 mg/dL. This level is relatively low compared to the highest-ranked country, which has significantly lower cholesterol levels. Contributing factors include the Dutch diet, which emphasizes healthy fats and a high intake of fruits and vegetables, as well as effective public health policies promoting cardiovascular health.
Slovakia
In 2004, Slovakia had an average non-HDL cholesterol level of 3.8 mg/dL, ranking #51 out of 191 countries. This level is relatively low compared to many Western nations, indicating a potential advantage in cardiovascular health. Contributing factors include Slovakia's traditional diet, which is often rich in fruits and vegetables, as well as a growing awareness of health and wellness in the population.
Oman
In 2004, Oman had an average non-HDL cholesterol level of 3.7 mg/dL, ranking #66 out of 191 countries. This level is relatively low compared to many nations, indicating a healthier lipid profile among its population. Contributing factors include Oman's traditional diet, which is rich in fish and low in saturated fats, as well as ongoing public health initiatives aimed at promoting nutritional awareness.
Timor-Leste
In 2004, Timor-Leste ranked #142 globally with an average non-HDL cholesterol level of 3.1 mg/dL. This figure is notably lower than many countries, reflecting health challenges faced in the region. Contributing factors include limited access to healthcare services and a reliance on traditional diets, which may lack diversity in essential nutrients.
Libya
In 2004, Libya had an average non-HDL cholesterol level of 3.5 mg/dL, ranking #93 out of 191 countries. This figure is relatively low compared to many global averages, indicating a potential area of concern for public health. Contributing factors include Libya's dietary habits influenced by traditional Mediterranean cuisine, which is often lower in saturated fats, alongside a healthcare system that has historically focused on preventive measures.
Samoa
Samoa ranked #74 globally in 2004 with an average non-HDL cholesterol level of 3.7 mg/dL. This level is notably lower than the global average, indicating a relatively healthier lipid profile compared to many other nations. Contributing factors include Samoa's traditional diet, which is rich in fish and root vegetables, and ongoing public health initiatives aimed at reducing cardiovascular disease risks.
Austria
In 2004, Austria ranked #5 globally for Average Non-HDL Cholesterol Levels, with a value of 4 mg/dL. This figure is notably lower than the global average, reflecting Austria's strong healthcare system and public health initiatives focused on cardiovascular health. Contributing factors include a diet rich in healthy fats and a high standard of living, which promote better overall health outcomes compared to many other countries.
Tanzania
Tanzania's Average Non-HDL Cholesterol Levels in 2004 were 2.9 mg/dL, ranking it #155 out of 191 countries. This level is notably lower than the global average, indicating potential public health challenges related to cardiovascular health. Contributing factors include limited access to healthcare, dietary habits influenced by economic conditions, and a high prevalence of infectious diseases, which can overshadow chronic health issues.
Data Source
Average non-HDL cholesterol levels | Our World in Data
Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive global data on various topics, including health, economics, and environment. The dataset on average non-HDL cholesterol levels offers country-level statistics to help understand trends and disparities in cardiovascular health.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Average Non-HDL Cholesterol Levels data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.