Low Birth Weight Prevalence 2013

Low birth weight prevalence shows the percentage of newborns weighing less than 2,500 grams at birth.

157 data points••Global Coverage•Share of babies born with a low birthweight, 2020•

Interactive Map

Loading interactive map...

Complete Data Rankings

Rank
Actions
1
India flag
India
29.224 %
2
Bangladesh flag
Bangladesh
24.178 %
3
Comoros flag
Comoros
23.994 %
4
Guinea-Bissau flag
Guinea-Bissau
21.526 %
5
Philippines flag
Philippines
21.175 %
6
Nepal flag
Nepal
20.749 %
7
Liberia flag
Liberia
19.672 %
8
Madagascar flag
Madagascar
19.436 %
9
Papua New Guinea flag
Papua New Guinea
19.078 %
10
Mauritius flag
Mauritius
19.041 %
11
Côte d'Ivoire flag
Côte d'Ivoire
19.016 %
12
Burkina Faso flag
Burkina Faso
18.987 %
13
Senegal flag
Senegal
18.898 %
14
Sri Lanka flag
Sri Lanka
18.383 %
15
Mozambique flag
Mozambique
18.03 %
16
Benin flag
Benin
17.35 %
17
Jordan flag
Jordan
17.184 %
18
Botswana flag
Botswana
17.174 %
19
Laos flag
Laos
17.164 %
20
Timor-Leste flag
Timor-Leste
17.03 %
21
Guyana flag
Guyana
17.019 %
22
South Africa flag
South Africa
16.61 %
23
Central African Republic flag
Central African Republic
16.091 %
24
Trinidad and Tobago flag
Trinidad and Tobago
15.996 %
25
Saint Lucia flag
Saint Lucia
15.984 %
26
Morocco flag
Morocco
15.947 %
27
Malawi flag
Malawi
15.823 %
28
Namibia flag
Namibia
15.808 %
29
Suriname flag
Suriname
15.784 %
30
Angola flag
Angola
15.605 %
31
Eritrea flag
Eritrea
15.362 %
32
Bahamas flag
Bahamas
15.309 %
33
Antigua and Barbuda flag
Antigua and Barbuda
15.141 %
34
Burundi flag
Burundi
15.036 %
35
Togo flag
Togo
14.948 %
36
Gabon flag
Gabon
14.851 %
37
Ghana flag
Ghana
14.793 %
38
Lesotho flag
Lesotho
14.763 %
39
Guatemala flag
Guatemala
14.449 %
40
Jamaica flag
Jamaica
14.279 %
41
United Arab Emirates flag
United Arab Emirates
13.92 %
42
Turkey flag
Turkey
13.839 %
43
Maldives flag
Maldives
13.833 %
44
Gambia flag
Gambia
13.666 %
45
Palau flag
Palau
13.662 %
46
Oman flag
Oman
13.316 %
47
Brunei Darussalam flag
Brunei Darussalam
13.277 %
48
Solomon Islands flag
Solomon Islands
13.235 %
49
Malaysia flag
Malaysia
13.108 %
50
Cameroon flag
Cameroon
12.825 %
51
Vanuatu flag
Vanuatu
12.791 %
52
Myanmar flag
Myanmar
12.661 %
53
Kuwait flag
Kuwait
12.645 %
54
Honduras flag
Honduras
12.638 %
55
Cambodia flag
Cambodia
12.547 %
56
Seychelles flag
Seychelles
12.359 %
57
Dominican Republic flag
Dominican Republic
12.271 %
58
Lebanon flag
Lebanon
12.258 %
59
Zimbabwe flag
Zimbabwe
12.111 %
60
Zambia flag
Zambia
11.966 %
61
Bhutan flag
Bhutan
11.694 %
62
Bahrain flag
Bahrain
11.686 %
63
Congo flag
Congo
11.552 %
64
Belize flag
Belize
11.308 %
65
Sierra Leone flag
Sierra Leone
11.212 %
66
Japan flag
Japan
11.059 %
67
Bulgaria flag
Bulgaria
11.034 %
68
Greece flag
Greece
11.013 %
69
Azerbaijan flag
Azerbaijan
10.994 %
70
Congo, Democratic Republic of the flag
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
10.916 %
71
Ecuador flag
Ecuador
10.851 %
72
Iraq flag
Iraq
10.795 %
73
Kenya flag
Kenya
10.708 %
74
Sao Tome and Principe flag
Sao Tome and Principe
10.7 %
75
Singapore flag
Singapore
10.656 %
76
Panama flag
Panama
10.656 %
77
Nicaragua flag
Nicaragua
10.651 %
78
Eswatini flag
Eswatini
10.55 %
79
Colombia flag
Colombia
10.53 %
80
Thailand flag
Thailand
10.511 %
81
Indonesia flag
Indonesia
10.434 %
82
Tanzania flag
Tanzania
10.389 %
83
El Salvador flag
El Salvador
10.369 %
84
Mexico flag
Mexico
10.159 %
85
Paraguay flag
Paraguay
10.01 %
86
Qatar flag
Qatar
9.911 %
87
State of Palestine flag
State of Palestine
9.901 %
88
Spain flag
Spain
9.569 %
89
Romania flag
Romania
9.435 %
90
Israel flag
Israel
9.345 %
91
Rwanda flag
Rwanda
9.325 %
92
Kiribati flag
Kiribati
9.232 %
93
Tajikistan flag
Tajikistan
9.217 %
94
Andorra flag
Andorra
9.198 %
95
Venezuela flag
Venezuela
8.998 %
96
Costa Rica flag
Costa Rica
8.541 %
97
Portugal flag
Portugal
8.452 %
98
Hungary flag
Hungary
8.447 %
99
Brazil flag
Brazil
8.383 %
100
Armenia flag
Armenia
8.289 %
101
Bolivia flag
Bolivia
8.256 %
102
North Macedonia flag
North Macedonia
8.198 %
103
Peru flag
Peru
8.194 %
104
United States flag
United States
8.166 %
105
Tunisia flag
Tunisia
8.121 %
106
Uruguay flag
Uruguay
7.991 %
107
Luxembourg flag
Luxembourg
7.561 %
108
Slovakia flag
Slovakia
7.548 %
109
France flag
France
7.533 %
110
Vietnam flag
Vietnam
7.454 %
111
Fiji flag
Fiji
7.417 %
112
Czech Republic flag
Czech Republic
7.365 %
113
Argentina flag
Argentina
7.262 %
114
Russia flag
Russia
7.262 %
115
Cuba flag
Cuba
7.198 %
116
Italy flag
Italy
7.147 %
117
United Kingdom flag
United Kingdom
7.107 %
118
Monaco flag
Monaco
7.015 %
119
Malta flag
Malta
6.997 %
120
Georgia flag
Georgia
6.975 %
121
Algeria flag
Algeria
6.958 %
122
Belgium flag
Belgium
6.957 %
123
Germany flag
Germany
6.857 %
124
Austria flag
Austria
6.647 %
125
Republic of Moldova flag
Republic of Moldova
6.512 %
126
Australia flag
Australia
6.434 %
127
South Korea flag
South Korea
6.388 %
128
Switzerland flag
Switzerland
6.383 %
129
Montenegro flag
Montenegro
6.366 %
130
Kyrgyzstan flag
Kyrgyzstan
6.353 %
131
Canada flag
Canada
6.289 %
132
Slovenia flag
Slovenia
6.228 %
133
Chile flag
Chile
6.207 %
134
Serbia flag
Serbia
6.076 %
135
Netherlands flag
Netherlands
6.01 %
136
New Zealand flag
New Zealand
6.003 %
137
Albania flag
Albania
5.964 %
138
Ukraine flag
Ukraine
5.963 %
139
Uzbekistan flag
Uzbekistan
5.877 %
140
Poland flag
Poland
5.781 %
141
Kazakhstan flag
Kazakhstan
5.633 %
142
Mongolia flag
Mongolia
5.587 %
143
Ireland flag
Ireland
5.499 %
144
Bosnia and Herzegovina flag
Bosnia and Herzegovina
5.17 %
145
China flag
China
5.093 %
146
Denmark flag
Denmark
5.055 %
147
Croatia flag
Croatia
5.055 %
148
Belarus flag
Belarus
5.04 %
149
Turkmenistan flag
Turkmenistan
4.826 %
150
Norway flag
Norway
4.696 %
151
Lithuania flag
Lithuania
4.692 %
152
Latvia flag
Latvia
4.511 %
153
Estonia flag
Estonia
4.455 %
154
Sweden flag
Sweden
4.214 %
155
Finland flag
Finland
4.135 %
156
San Marino flag
San Marino
4.108 %
157
Iceland flag
Iceland
3.834 %

↑Top 10 Countries

  1. #1India flagIndia
  2. #2Bangladesh flagBangladesh
  3. #3Comoros flagComoros
  4. #4Guinea-Bissau flagGuinea-Bissau
  5. #5Philippines flagPhilippines
  6. #6Nepal flagNepal
  7. #7Liberia flagLiberia
  8. #8Madagascar flagMadagascar
  9. #9Papua New Guinea flagPapua New Guinea
  10. #10Mauritius flagMauritius

Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.

↓Bottom 10 Countries

  1. #157Iceland flagIceland
  2. #156San Marino flagSan Marino
  3. #155Finland flagFinland
  4. #154Sweden flagSweden
  5. #153Estonia flagEstonia
  6. #152Latvia flagLatvia
  7. #151Lithuania flagLithuania
  8. #150Norway flagNorway
  9. #149Turkmenistan flagTurkmenistan
  10. #148Belarus flagBelarus

Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.

Analysis & Context

In 2013, India recorded the highest Low Birth Weight Prevalence at 29.22%, while the global range spanned from 3.83% to 29.22%. The global average for low birth weight prevalence was 11.03%, providing a crucial benchmark for understanding the health challenges faced by newborns worldwide.

Economic Factors Driving High Prevalence

The economic landscape of a country plays a significant role in the prevalence of low birth weight. In countries like India and Bangladesh, where low birth weight prevalence is notably high at 29.22% and 24.18% respectively, economic challenges often correlate with inadequate maternal nutrition and healthcare access. These factors are well-documented contributors to low birth weight. In contrast, countries with stronger economies and healthcare systems, such as Iceland and Finland, demonstrate much lower prevalence rates of 3.83% and 4.13%, respectively.

Geographic and Demographic Influences

Geographic and demographic factors also influence low birth weight prevalence. In Comoros and Guinea-Bissau, with prevalence rates of 23.99% and 21.53%, the combination of remote locations and limited healthcare infrastructure poses significant challenges. These countries often face logistical barriers in delivering healthcare services to pregnant women, exacerbating the risk of low birth weight. Conversely, nations like Sweden and Norway, with rates of 4.21% and 4.70%, benefit from robust healthcare systems and comprehensive maternal care policies.

Policy Impact on Low Birth Weight Reduction

Government policies aimed at improving maternal health can significantly reduce low birth weight prevalence. Countries such as Nepal and Philippines, with high prevalence rates of 20.75% and 21.18%, have initiated programs to enhance maternal nutrition and healthcare access. These initiatives are vital in addressing the high percentages and improving neonatal outcomes. In contrast, nations with lower prevalence, like Estonia and Latvia, at 4.46% and 4.51%, benefit from established health policies ensuring prenatal care and education.

Year-Over-Year Trends and Notable Changes

The average global change in low birth weight prevalence from previous years was a slight decrease of -0.01% (-0.1%), indicating overall stability. However, specific countries experienced significant shifts. Kuwait saw an increase of 0.24% (1.9%), highlighting potential areas for policy intervention. Conversely, India and Guinea-Bissau experienced decreases of -0.27% (-0.9%) and -0.24% (-1.1%), respectively, suggesting effective health interventions. Notably, Vietnam achieved a reduction of -0.19% (-2.4%), showcasing the impact of targeted healthcare improvements.

Understanding the factors influencing low birth weight prevalence is crucial for global health policy development. Economic conditions, geographic accessibility, and effective health policies are key determinants. By analyzing data and trends, countries can strategize to reduce low birth weight rates, ultimately improving neonatal health outcomes worldwide.

Frequently Asked Questions About Low Birth Weight Prevalence in 2013

Which country had the highest prevalence of low birth weight in 2013?

India had the highest prevalence of low birth weight in 2013, with 29.22% of newborns weighing less than 2,500 grams.

Which country had the lowest prevalence of low birth weight in 2013?

Iceland had the lowest prevalence of low birth weight in 2013, with 3.83% of newborns weighing less than 2,500 grams.

What was the average prevalence of low birth weight across countries in 2013?

The average prevalence of low birth weight across the 157 countries in 2013 was 11.03%.

What was the median prevalence of low birth weight in 2013?

The median prevalence of low birth weight in 2013 was 10.53%.

Which countries were in the top 3 for low birth weight prevalence in 2013?

The top 3 countries for low birth weight prevalence in 2013 were India (29.22%), Bangladesh (24.18%), and Comoros (23.99%).

What was the range of low birth weight prevalence in 2013?

In 2013, the range of low birth weight prevalence was from 3.83% in Iceland to 29.22% in India.

Insights by country

1

Tunisia

Tunisia ranked #105 out of 157 countries in 2013 for Low Birth Weight Prevalence, with a rate of 8.120923 %. This figure is higher than the global average, indicating challenges in maternal health compared to countries with better healthcare systems. Contributing factors include economic constraints, which limit access to quality prenatal care, and regional disparities in healthcare services that affect rural populations disproportionately.

2

Malaysia

In 2013, Malaysia reported a Low Birth Weight Prevalence of 13.107508 %, ranking #49 out of 157 countries. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating potential health challenges within the population. Contributing factors include socioeconomic disparities, access to maternal healthcare, and nutritional deficiencies among pregnant women, which can affect fetal development and birth outcomes.

3

Iceland

In 2013, Iceland had a Low Birth Weight Prevalence of 3.8342316 %, ranking #157 out of 157 countries. This prevalence is notably higher than many of its Nordic neighbors, which typically report lower rates due to robust healthcare systems. Factors contributing to this statistic in Iceland include geographical isolation, which may affect access to specialized maternal health services, and a relatively small population that can lead to variability in health outcomes.

4

Dominican Republic

The Dominican Republic ranked #57 globally for Low Birth Weight Prevalence in 2013, with a rate of 12.271315 %. This figure is higher than the global average, indicating a significant public health concern. Contributing factors include limited access to prenatal care and socioeconomic challenges that affect maternal health, particularly in rural areas where healthcare resources are scarce.

5

Andorra

In 2013, Andorra had a Low Birth Weight Prevalence of 9.198481 %, ranking #94 out of 157 countries. This figure is higher than the global average, indicating potential health challenges compared to better-performing nations. Contributing factors may include Andorra's small population size, which can lead to variability in health outcomes, as well as limited healthcare resources in a mountainous region that affects prenatal care accessibility.

6

Bolivia

In 2013, Bolivia had a Low Birth Weight Prevalence of 8.255839 %, ranking #101 out of 157 countries. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating challenges in maternal health and nutrition. Contributing factors include Bolivia's high rates of poverty and limited access to healthcare services, particularly in rural areas, which can impact prenatal care and nutrition for expectant mothers.

7

Malawi

In 2013, Malawi had a Low Birth Weight Prevalence of 15.822638 %, ranking #27 out of 157 countries. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating significant health challenges within the nation. Contributing factors include high rates of maternal malnutrition, limited access to healthcare, and economic constraints that affect prenatal care. Additionally, Malawi's agricultural dependency often leads to food insecurity, exacerbating health outcomes for expectant mothers.

8

Vanuatu

In 2013, Vanuatu had a Low Birth Weight Prevalence of 12.790633 %, ranking #51 out of 157 countries. This prevalence is higher than the global average, indicating potential health challenges within the region. Contributing factors include limited access to healthcare services in remote areas and economic constraints that affect maternal nutrition and prenatal care.

9

State of Palestine

In 2013, the State of Palestine recorded a Low Birth Weight Prevalence of 9.900857 %, ranking #87 out of 157 countries. This prevalence is higher than the global average, indicating potential health challenges in maternal and infant care. Contributing factors include limited access to healthcare services due to ongoing political instability and economic constraints, which can adversely affect prenatal nutrition and healthcare access.

10

Cuba

Cuba's Low Birth Weight Prevalence in 2013 was 7.1975527 %, ranking #115 out of 157 countries. This figure is notably higher than that of neighboring countries like the Dominican Republic, which has implemented robust maternal health programs. Key drivers of Cuba's low birth weight rates include its comprehensive healthcare system, which emphasizes prenatal care, and socio-economic conditions that support maternal nutrition and education.

Data Source

Share of babies born with a low birthweight, 2020

Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive data and visualizations on global development issues, including health, education, and economic indicators. The dataset on the share of babies born with low birthweight in 2020 offers country-level statistics that highlight variations in maternal and infant health outcomes across different regions.

Visit Data Source

Historical Data by Year

Explore Low Birth Weight Prevalence data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.

More Health Facts