Low Birth Weight Prevalence 2001

Low birth weight prevalence shows the percentage of newborns weighing less than 2,500 grams at birth.

157 data points••Global Coverage•Share of babies born with a low birthweight, 2020•

Interactive Map

Loading interactive map...

Complete Data Rankings

Rank
Actions
1
India flag
India
32.272 %
2
Bangladesh flag
Bangladesh
25.602 %
3
Comoros flag
Comoros
25.402 %
4
Guinea-Bissau flag
Guinea-Bissau
24.22 %
5
Nepal flag
Nepal
22.296 %
6
Senegal flag
Senegal
21.857 %
7
Philippines flag
Philippines
20.665 %
8
Burkina Faso flag
Burkina Faso
20.17 %
9
Madagascar flag
Madagascar
20.009 %
10
Mauritius flag
Mauritius
19.466 %
11
Liberia flag
Liberia
19.429 %
12
Côte d'Ivoire flag
Côte d'Ivoire
19.395 %
13
Sri Lanka flag
Sri Lanka
19.322 %
14
Mozambique flag
Mozambique
19.293 %
15
Timor-Leste flag
Timor-Leste
18.994 %
16
Benin flag
Benin
18.725 %
17
Morocco flag
Morocco
18.188 %
18
Botswana flag
Botswana
18.135 %
19
Papua New Guinea flag
Papua New Guinea
18.094 %
20
Laos flag
Laos
17.614 %
21
Angola flag
Angola
17.246 %
22
South Africa flag
South Africa
17.176 %
23
Malawi flag
Malawi
16.448 %
24
Namibia flag
Namibia
16.423 %
25
Guyana flag
Guyana
16.377 %
26
Eritrea flag
Eritrea
15.943 %
27
Ghana flag
Ghana
15.778 %
28
Togo flag
Togo
15.731 %
29
Turkey flag
Turkey
15.672 %
30
Burundi flag
Burundi
15.6 %
31
Central African Republic flag
Central African Republic
15.299 %
32
Trinidad and Tobago flag
Trinidad and Tobago
15.113 %
33
Lesotho flag
Lesotho
14.992 %
34
Gabon flag
Gabon
14.991 %
35
Jordan flag
Jordan
14.865 %
36
Jamaica flag
Jamaica
14.833 %
37
Bahamas flag
Bahamas
14.662 %
38
Cambodia flag
Cambodia
14.527 %
39
Saint Lucia flag
Saint Lucia
14.501 %
40
Gambia flag
Gambia
14.376 %
41
Suriname flag
Suriname
14.314 %
42
Antigua and Barbuda flag
Antigua and Barbuda
14.137 %
43
Maldives flag
Maldives
13.984 %
44
Guatemala flag
Guatemala
13.962 %
45
Sierra Leone flag
Sierra Leone
13.699 %
46
Oman flag
Oman
13.478 %
47
Palau flag
Palau
13.398 %
48
Cameroon flag
Cameroon
13.285 %
49
Zambia flag
Zambia
13.016 %
50
Solomon Islands flag
Solomon Islands
12.918 %
51
Zimbabwe flag
Zimbabwe
12.889 %
52
United Arab Emirates flag
United Arab Emirates
12.881 %
53
Congo flag
Congo
12.764 %
54
Brunei Darussalam flag
Brunei Darussalam
12.384 %
55
Lebanon flag
Lebanon
12.379 %
56
Congo, Democratic Republic of the flag
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
12.335 %
57
Bhutan flag
Bhutan
12.294 %
58
Myanmar flag
Myanmar
12.198 %
59
Vanuatu flag
Vanuatu
12.172 %
60
Malaysia flag
Malaysia
12.156 %
61
Seychelles flag
Seychelles
12.107 %
62
Tanzania flag
Tanzania
11.889 %
63
Kenya flag
Kenya
11.629 %
64
Honduras flag
Honduras
11.541 %
65
Panama flag
Panama
11.505 %
66
Ecuador flag
Ecuador
11.474 %
67
Nicaragua flag
Nicaragua
11.388 %
68
Japan flag
Japan
11.186 %
69
Eswatini flag
Eswatini
11.038 %
70
Thailand flag
Thailand
11.014 %
71
Azerbaijan flag
Azerbaijan
10.994 %
72
Belize flag
Belize
10.902 %
73
Indonesia flag
Indonesia
10.821 %
74
Bulgaria flag
Bulgaria
10.538 %
75
Romania flag
Romania
10.498 %
76
Singapore flag
Singapore
10.497 %
77
El Salvador flag
El Salvador
10.444 %
78
Iraq flag
Iraq
10.383 %
79
Dominican Republic flag
Dominican Republic
10.376 %
80
Kuwait flag
Kuwait
10.29 %
81
Bahrain flag
Bahrain
10.227 %
82
Sao Tome and Principe flag
Sao Tome and Principe
10.14 %
83
Peru flag
Peru
10.081 %
84
Tajikistan flag
Tajikistan
10.049 %
85
Mexico flag
Mexico
9.988 %
86
Israel flag
Israel
9.934 %
87
Paraguay flag
Paraguay
9.892 %
88
Greece flag
Greece
9.867 %
89
Qatar flag
Qatar
9.864 %
90
Colombia flag
Colombia
9.749 %
91
Vietnam flag
Vietnam
9.682 %
92
Kiribati flag
Kiribati
9.251 %
93
State of Palestine flag
State of Palestine
9.093 %
94
Rwanda flag
Rwanda
9.036 %
95
Spain flag
Spain
8.915 %
96
Bolivia flag
Bolivia
8.851 %
97
Armenia flag
Armenia
8.784 %
98
Venezuela flag
Venezuela
8.751 %
99
Andorra flag
Andorra
8.726 %
100
Hungary flag
Hungary
8.521 %
101
Uruguay flag
Uruguay
8.438 %
102
Costa Rica flag
Costa Rica
8.365 %
103
Brazil flag
Brazil
8.046 %
104
North Macedonia flag
North Macedonia
8.036 %
105
United States flag
United States
7.869 %
106
Tunisia flag
Tunisia
7.828 %
107
France flag
France
7.573 %
108
Russia flag
Russia
7.549 %
109
United Kingdom flag
United Kingdom
7.513 %
110
Argentina flag
Argentina
7.412 %
111
Mongolia flag
Mongolia
7.397 %
112
Monaco flag
Monaco
7.363 %
113
Fiji flag
Fiji
7.288 %
114
Portugal flag
Portugal
7.282 %
115
Slovakia flag
Slovakia
7.214 %
116
Belgium flag
Belgium
7.142 %
117
Kyrgyzstan flag
Kyrgyzstan
7.138 %
118
Cuba flag
Cuba
7.082 %
119
Luxembourg flag
Luxembourg
7.004 %
120
Austria flag
Austria
6.939 %
121
Algeria flag
Algeria
6.798 %
122
Germany flag
Germany
6.759 %
123
Netherlands flag
Netherlands
6.744 %
124
Republic of Moldova flag
Republic of Moldova
6.637 %
125
Czech Republic flag
Czech Republic
6.611 %
126
Malta flag
Malta
6.584 %
127
Italy flag
Italy
6.581 %
128
Kazakhstan flag
Kazakhstan
6.533 %
129
Montenegro flag
Montenegro
6.422 %
130
Switzerland flag
Switzerland
6.25 %
131
Australia flag
Australia
6.245 %
132
Ukraine flag
Ukraine
6.169 %
133
New Zealand flag
New Zealand
6.156 %
134
Georgia flag
Georgia
6.106 %
135
Poland flag
Poland
5.995 %
136
Serbia flag
Serbia
5.943 %
137
Slovenia flag
Slovenia
5.884 %
138
Turkmenistan flag
Turkmenistan
5.79 %
139
Canada flag
Canada
5.726 %
140
Albania flag
Albania
5.72 %
141
China flag
China
5.698 %
142
Uzbekistan flag
Uzbekistan
5.513 %
143
Denmark flag
Denmark
5.429 %
144
Chile flag
Chile
5.342 %
145
Belarus flag
Belarus
5.28 %
146
Latvia flag
Latvia
5.13 %
147
Bosnia and Herzegovina flag
Bosnia and Herzegovina
5.071 %
148
South Korea flag
South Korea
5.061 %
149
Croatia flag
Croatia
5.057 %
150
Norway flag
Norway
5.042 %
151
Ireland flag
Ireland
4.823 %
152
Lithuania flag
Lithuania
4.688 %
153
Estonia flag
Estonia
4.452 %
154
Finland flag
Finland
4.311 %
155
Sweden flag
Sweden
4.303 %
156
San Marino flag
San Marino
3.923 %
157
Iceland flag
Iceland
3.602 %

↑Top 10 Countries

  1. #1India flagIndia
  2. #2Bangladesh flagBangladesh
  3. #3Comoros flagComoros
  4. #4Guinea-Bissau flagGuinea-Bissau
  5. #5Nepal flagNepal
  6. #6Senegal flagSenegal
  7. #7Philippines flagPhilippines
  8. #8Burkina Faso flagBurkina Faso
  9. #9Madagascar flagMadagascar
  10. #10Mauritius flagMauritius

Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.

↓Bottom 10 Countries

  1. #157Iceland flagIceland
  2. #156San Marino flagSan Marino
  3. #155Sweden flagSweden
  4. #154Finland flagFinland
  5. #153Estonia flagEstonia
  6. #152Lithuania flagLithuania
  7. #151Ireland flagIreland
  8. #150Norway flagNorway
  9. #149Croatia flagCroatia
  10. #148South Korea flagSouth Korea

Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.

Analysis & Context

India recorded the highest Low Birth Weight Prevalence in 2001 with a rate of 32.27%, while the global range spanned from 3.60% to 32.27%. The global average for low birth weight prevalence in 2001 was 11.20%, providing a benchmark for evaluating individual country performances.

Socioeconomic Factors and High Prevalence in South Asia

The data reveals a significant concentration of high Low Birth Weight Prevalence in South Asian countries. India leads with the highest prevalence at 32.27%, followed by Bangladesh at 25.60% and Nepal at 22.30%. These figures are substantially above the global average of 11.20%. The high prevalence in these regions can be attributed to socioeconomic factors such as poverty, inadequate prenatal care, and malnutrition. These countries often struggle with healthcare infrastructure, which can exacerbate maternal health issues leading to lower birth weights.

Geographic Disparities and Health Infrastructure

Geographic disparities are evident when comparing regions with robust healthcare systems to those without. Sub-Saharan Africa also shows higher rates, with countries like Comoros (25.40%) and Guinea-Bissau (24.22%) reflecting significant challenges in healthcare delivery and nutrition. In contrast, countries with advanced healthcare systems such as Iceland (3.60%), Sweden (4.30%), and Finland (4.31%) show much lower prevalence rates. These disparities underscore the importance of healthcare access and quality in managing birth outcomes.

Economic Development and Birth Outcomes

Economic development plays a crucial role in birth outcomes. In countries such as South Korea and Iceland, low birth weight prevalence is minimal at 5.06% and 3.60% respectively, reflecting their higher GDP per capita and better healthcare systems. Conversely, countries like Burkina Faso (20.17%) and Madagascar (20.01%) with lower economic development face higher rates. Improved economic conditions often lead to better nutrition, healthcare access, and education, which are critical in reducing low birth weight prevalence.

Policy Interventions and Global Health Initiatives

Policy interventions can significantly influence low birth weight prevalence. Countries with comprehensive maternal health policies and programs tend to have lower prevalence rates. For instance, the Nordic countries, which are among those with the lowest rates, have well-established healthcare policies focusing on maternal and child health. Global health initiatives aimed at reducing maternal and child mortality have also played a role in improving outcomes in many developing countries, although challenges remain. The data from 2001 highlights the need for continued investment and policy focus to address the underlying causes of low birth weight across different regions.

In conclusion, the data from 2001 underscores the complex interplay between socioeconomic factors, healthcare infrastructure, economic development, and policy interventions in determining Low Birth Weight Prevalence. Addressing these issues requires a multifaceted approach tailored to the specific needs and challenges of each country.

Frequently Asked Questions About Low Birth Weight Prevalence in 2001

Which country had the highest prevalence of low birth weight in 2001?

India had the highest prevalence of low birth weight in 2001, with 32.27% of newborns weighing less than 2,500 grams at birth.

Which country had the lowest prevalence of low birth weight in 2001?

Iceland had the lowest prevalence of low birth weight in 2001, with 3.6% of newborns weighing less than 2,500 grams at birth.

What was the average prevalence of low birth weight across countries in 2001?

The average prevalence of low birth weight across the 157 countries in 2001 was 11.2%.

What was the median prevalence of low birth weight in 2001?

The median prevalence of low birth weight in 2001 was 10.38%.

Which countries were in the top 3 for low birth weight prevalence in 2001?

The top 3 countries for low birth weight prevalence in 2001 were India (32.27%), Bangladesh (25.6%), and Comoros (25.4%).

What is the range of low birth weight prevalence among countries in 2001?

The range of low birth weight prevalence among countries in 2001 was from 3.6% in Iceland to 32.27% in India.

Insights by country

1

Bhutan

In 2001, Bhutan had a Low Birth Weight Prevalence of 12.294036 %, ranking #57 out of 157 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, indicating significant health challenges within the nation. Contributing factors include Bhutan's rugged terrain, which can limit access to healthcare facilities, and ongoing economic development issues that affect maternal nutrition and healthcare access.

2

Finland

In 2001, Finland had a Low Birth Weight Prevalence of 4.3106885 %, ranking #154 out of 157 countries. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating potential challenges in maternal health compared to many developed nations. Contributing factors include Finland's relatively high rate of preterm births and socioeconomic disparities that affect access to healthcare services, particularly in rural areas.

3

Kenya

In 2001, Kenya had a Low Birth Weight Prevalence of 11.629028 %, ranking #63 out of 157 countries. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating significant public health challenges. Contributing factors include limited access to quality prenatal care, high rates of maternal malnutrition, and socioeconomic disparities that affect healthcare access. Additionally, rural areas often experience higher prevalence rates due to inadequate health infrastructure.

4

South Korea

In 2001, South Korea had a Low Birth Weight Prevalence of 5.0610237 %, ranking #148 out of 157 countries. This figure is notably higher than some neighboring countries, indicating potential public health concerns. Contributing factors include South Korea's rapid economic development, which has led to lifestyle changes and increased maternal age at childbirth, both of which are associated with higher low birth weight rates.

5

Azerbaijan

Azerbaijan ranked #71 globally with a Low Birth Weight Prevalence of 10.99351 % in 2001. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating potential health challenges within the country. Contributing factors include economic transitions following independence and limited access to maternal healthcare services, which can impact birth outcomes.

6

Gambia

In 2001, Gambia had a Low Birth Weight Prevalence of 14.376005 %, ranking #40 out of 157 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, indicating significant public health challenges. Contributing factors include limited access to healthcare services, high levels of poverty, and nutritional deficiencies among pregnant women, which are prevalent in the country.

7

Lebanon

In 2001, Lebanon had a Low Birth Weight Prevalence of 12.3786335 %, ranking #55 out of 157 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, indicating potential health challenges faced by newborns in the region. Contributing factors include Lebanon's ongoing economic instability and the impact of conflict on healthcare access, which can adversely affect maternal health and nutrition.

8

Belarus

In 2001, Belarus had a Low Birth Weight Prevalence of 5.2797904 %, ranking #145 out of 157 countries. This figure is higher than the global average, reflecting significant health challenges in maternal and child care. Contributing factors include Belarus's economic transition post-Soviet Union, which affected healthcare access and quality, alongside demographic trends such as lower birth rates and higher rates of smoking among pregnant women.

9

Zimbabwe

In 2001, Zimbabwe had a Low Birth Weight Prevalence of 12.8892145 %, ranking #51 out of 157 countries. This prevalence is notably higher than many neighboring countries, indicating significant public health challenges. Contributing factors include economic instability, which affects maternal health services, and a high prevalence of HIV/AIDS, impacting pregnancy outcomes.

10

Mauritius

In 2001, Mauritius had a Low Birth Weight Prevalence of 19.465933 %, ranking #10 out of 157 countries. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating significant public health challenges. Contributing factors include socioeconomic disparities and limited access to maternal healthcare services, which impact the nutritional status of pregnant women in the country.

Data Source

Share of babies born with a low birthweight, 2020

Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive data and visualizations on global development issues, including health, education, and economic indicators. The dataset on the share of babies born with low birthweight in 2020 offers country-level statistics that highlight variations in maternal and infant health outcomes across different regions.

Visit Data Source

Historical Data by Year

Explore Low Birth Weight Prevalence data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.

More Health Facts