Low Birth Weight Prevalence 2010

Low birth weight prevalence shows the percentage of newborns weighing less than 2,500 grams at birth.

157 data points••Global Coverage•Share of babies born with a low birthweight, 2020•

Interactive Map

Loading interactive map...

Complete Data Rankings

Rank
Actions
1
India flag
India
29.999 %
2
Bangladesh flag
Bangladesh
24.493 %
3
Comoros flag
Comoros
24.386 %
4
Guinea-Bissau flag
Guinea-Bissau
22.24 %
5
Nepal flag
Nepal
21.256 %
6
Philippines flag
Philippines
21.127 %
7
Liberia flag
Liberia
19.718 %
8
Madagascar flag
Madagascar
19.576 %
9
Senegal flag
Senegal
19.487 %
10
Mauritius flag
Mauritius
19.311 %
11
Burkina Faso flag
Burkina Faso
19.259 %
12
Côte d'Ivoire flag
Côte d'Ivoire
19.255 %
13
Papua New Guinea flag
Papua New Guinea
18.845 %
14
Sri Lanka flag
Sri Lanka
18.656 %
15
Mozambique flag
Mozambique
18.351 %
16
Benin flag
Benin
17.707 %
17
Botswana flag
Botswana
17.607 %
18
Laos flag
Laos
17.262 %
19
Guyana flag
Guyana
16.882 %
20
Timor-Leste flag
Timor-Leste
16.733 %
21
South Africa flag
South Africa
16.703 %
22
Morocco flag
Morocco
16.493 %
23
Jordan flag
Jordan
16.492 %
24
Namibia flag
Namibia
16.078 %
25
Angola flag
Angola
15.85 %
26
Malawi flag
Malawi
15.829 %
27
Trinidad and Tobago flag
Trinidad and Tobago
15.749 %
28
Saint Lucia flag
Saint Lucia
15.73 %
29
Central African Republic flag
Central African Republic
15.668 %
30
Eritrea flag
Eritrea
15.441 %
31
Suriname flag
Suriname
15.426 %
32
Togo flag
Togo
15.3 %
33
Burundi flag
Burundi
15.186 %
34
Bahamas flag
Bahamas
15.169 %
35
Ghana flag
Ghana
15.108 %
36
Gabon flag
Gabon
15.078 %
37
Antigua and Barbuda flag
Antigua and Barbuda
14.942 %
38
Lesotho flag
Lesotho
14.768 %
39
Jamaica flag
Jamaica
14.467 %
40
Turkey flag
Turkey
14.361 %
41
Guatemala flag
Guatemala
14.348 %
42
Maldives flag
Maldives
13.804 %
43
Gambia flag
Gambia
13.793 %
44
United Arab Emirates flag
United Arab Emirates
13.722 %
45
Palau flag
Palau
13.698 %
46
Oman flag
Oman
13.332 %
47
Solomon Islands flag
Solomon Islands
13.214 %
48
Brunei Darussalam flag
Brunei Darussalam
13.046 %
49
Cambodia flag
Cambodia
12.985 %
50
Cameroon flag
Cameroon
12.946 %
51
Malaysia flag
Malaysia
12.83 %
52
Myanmar flag
Myanmar
12.665 %
53
Vanuatu flag
Vanuatu
12.619 %
54
Zimbabwe flag
Zimbabwe
12.411 %
55
Honduras flag
Honduras
12.302 %
56
Seychelles flag
Seychelles
12.295 %
57
Zambia flag
Zambia
12.21 %
58
Lebanon flag
Lebanon
12.141 %
59
Kuwait flag
Kuwait
11.97 %
60
Congo flag
Congo
11.836 %
61
Dominican Republic flag
Dominican Republic
11.791 %
62
Bhutan flag
Bhutan
11.742 %
63
Sierra Leone flag
Sierra Leone
11.728 %
64
Bahrain flag
Bahrain
11.396 %
65
Congo, Democratic Republic of the flag
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
11.292 %
66
Belize flag
Belize
11.168 %
67
Ecuador flag
Ecuador
11.051 %
68
Japan flag
Japan
11.033 %
69
Azerbaijan flag
Azerbaijan
10.947 %
70
Panama flag
Panama
10.926 %
71
Nicaragua flag
Nicaragua
10.904 %
72
Kenya flag
Kenya
10.871 %
73
Bulgaria flag
Bulgaria
10.807 %
74
Tanzania flag
Tanzania
10.744 %
75
Iraq flag
Iraq
10.709 %
76
Eswatini flag
Eswatini
10.676 %
77
Greece flag
Greece
10.665 %
78
Singapore flag
Singapore
10.618 %
79
Indonesia flag
Indonesia
10.599 %
80
Sao Tome and Principe flag
Sao Tome and Principe
10.562 %
81
Thailand flag
Thailand
10.551 %
82
El Salvador flag
El Salvador
10.427 %
83
Colombia flag
Colombia
10.371 %
84
Mexico flag
Mexico
10.151 %
85
Paraguay flag
Paraguay
10.036 %
86
Qatar flag
Qatar
9.872 %
87
State of Palestine flag
State of Palestine
9.72 %
88
Romania flag
Romania
9.602 %
89
Israel flag
Israel
9.494 %
90
Kiribati flag
Kiribati
9.417 %
91
Tajikistan flag
Tajikistan
9.414 %
92
Spain flag
Spain
9.37 %
93
Rwanda flag
Rwanda
9.189 %
94
Andorra flag
Andorra
9.033 %
95
Venezuela flag
Venezuela
8.936 %
96
Peru flag
Peru
8.627 %
97
Costa Rica flag
Costa Rica
8.478 %
98
Hungary flag
Hungary
8.427 %
99
Bolivia flag
Bolivia
8.412 %
100
Brazil flag
Brazil
8.291 %
101
Armenia flag
Armenia
8.253 %
102
Portugal flag
Portugal
8.152 %
103
North Macedonia flag
North Macedonia
8.143 %
104
United States flag
United States
8.119 %
105
Uruguay flag
Uruguay
8.089 %
106
Tunisia flag
Tunisia
8.035 %
107
Vietnam flag
Vietnam
8.023 %
108
France flag
France
7.544 %
109
Fiji flag
Fiji
7.403 %
110
Slovakia flag
Slovakia
7.396 %
111
Luxembourg flag
Luxembourg
7.392 %
112
Argentina flag
Argentina
7.248 %
113
Russia flag
Russia
7.235 %
114
United Kingdom flag
United Kingdom
7.193 %
115
Cuba flag
Cuba
7.184 %
116
Czech Republic flag
Czech Republic
7.166 %
117
Monaco flag
Monaco
7.136 %
118
Belgium flag
Belgium
7.016 %
119
Italy flag
Italy
6.99 %
120
Malta flag
Malta
6.907 %
121
Algeria flag
Algeria
6.863 %
122
Germany flag
Germany
6.854 %
123
Georgia flag
Georgia
6.819 %
124
Austria flag
Austria
6.745 %
125
Kyrgyzstan flag
Kyrgyzstan
6.508 %
126
Republic of Moldova flag
Republic of Moldova
6.506 %
127
Montenegro flag
Montenegro
6.384 %
128
Australia flag
Australia
6.369 %
129
Switzerland flag
Switzerland
6.363 %
130
Netherlands flag
Netherlands
6.167 %
131
Canada flag
Canada
6.143 %
132
Slovenia flag
Slovenia
6.108 %
133
New Zealand flag
New Zealand
6.054 %
134
Mongolia flag
Mongolia
6.038 %
135
South Korea flag
South Korea
5.995 %
136
Serbia flag
Serbia
5.991 %
137
Albania flag
Albania
5.98 %
138
Chile flag
Chile
5.975 %
139
Ukraine flag
Ukraine
5.957 %
140
Kazakhstan flag
Kazakhstan
5.816 %
141
Poland flag
Poland
5.796 %
142
Uzbekistan flag
Uzbekistan
5.786 %
143
Ireland flag
Ireland
5.344 %
144
China flag
China
5.183 %
145
Denmark flag
Denmark
5.155 %
146
Bosnia and Herzegovina flag
Bosnia and Herzegovina
5.145 %
147
Turkmenistan flag
Turkmenistan
5.053 %
148
Belarus flag
Belarus
5.024 %
149
Croatia flag
Croatia
5.011 %
150
Norway flag
Norway
4.794 %
151
Lithuania flag
Lithuania
4.686 %
152
Latvia flag
Latvia
4.61 %
153
Estonia flag
Estonia
4.455 %
154
Sweden flag
Sweden
4.231 %
155
Finland flag
Finland
4.127 %
156
San Marino flag
San Marino
4.001 %
157
Iceland flag
Iceland
3.77 %

↑Top 10 Countries

  1. #1India flagIndia
  2. #2Bangladesh flagBangladesh
  3. #3Comoros flagComoros
  4. #4Guinea-Bissau flagGuinea-Bissau
  5. #5Nepal flagNepal
  6. #6Philippines flagPhilippines
  7. #7Liberia flagLiberia
  8. #8Madagascar flagMadagascar
  9. #9Senegal flagSenegal
  10. #10Mauritius flagMauritius

Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.

↓Bottom 10 Countries

  1. #157Iceland flagIceland
  2. #156San Marino flagSan Marino
  3. #155Finland flagFinland
  4. #154Sweden flagSweden
  5. #153Estonia flagEstonia
  6. #152Latvia flagLatvia
  7. #151Lithuania flagLithuania
  8. #150Norway flagNorway
  9. #149Croatia flagCroatia
  10. #148Belarus flagBelarus

Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.

Analysis & Context

In 2010, India had the highest Low Birth Weight Prevalence at nearly 30%, while Iceland recorded the lowest at approximately 3.77%. The global range of low birth weight prevalence spanned from 3.77% to 30.00% across 157 countries. The average prevalence worldwide was 11.06%, providing a critical benchmark for understanding the distribution of this health indicator.

Socioeconomic Factors Influencing High Prevalence

The data highlights a significant disparity in Low Birth Weight Prevalence between countries, particularly reflecting socioeconomic conditions. Countries like India (29.99%), Bangladesh (24.49%), and Comoros (24.38%) exhibit some of the highest rates. These nations often face challenges such as poverty, limited access to healthcare, and nutritional deficiencies, which are well-documented contributors to low birth weight.

Conversely, countries with robust healthcare systems and higher living standards, such as Iceland (3.77%) and San Marino (4.00%), show the lowest prevalence. These nations benefit from comprehensive maternal health services and higher nutritional awareness, which significantly reduce the risk of low birth weight.

Geographical and Environmental Influences

Geographical location and environmental conditions also play a crucial role in low birth weight statistics. For instance, countries in South Asia like Nepal (21.25%) and the Philippines (21.13%) are among the top ten with high prevalence. These regions often experience natural challenges such as monsoons and floods, which can disrupt food supply and healthcare access, further impacting birth outcomes.

In contrast, Nordic countries such as Sweden (4.23%) and Finland (4.13%) benefit from stable climates and developed infrastructure, facilitating consistent access to healthcare and nutrition, thereby lowering the prevalence of low birth weight.

Year-over-Year Trends and Significant Changes

The year-over-year data indicates minimal average changes globally, with a negligible average change of -0.01%. However, some countries experienced notable shifts. Jordan saw the largest increase of 0.23% (1.4%), which may reflect changes in healthcare policies or economic conditions impacting maternal care.

On the other hand, India registered a decrease of 0.26% (-0.8%), suggesting possible improvements in healthcare access or nutritional interventions. Similarly, Guinea-Bissau and Senegal reported decreases of 0.24% and 0.21% respectively, indicating progress in addressing factors contributing to low birth weight.

Policy Implications and Future Directions

The disparities in Low Birth Weight Prevalence underscore the need for targeted policy interventions. Countries with high prevalence rates must prioritize maternal health programs, improve nutritional standards, and enhance healthcare accessibility. For instance, policies focused on prenatal care and nutritional support in India and Bangladesh could significantly reduce their prevalence rates.

Moreover, successful strategies from countries with low prevalence, such as those in the Nordics, could serve as models. Implementing comprehensive maternal health policies and ensuring stable healthcare funding are crucial steps toward reducing low birth weight prevalence globally.

Frequently Asked Questions About Low Birth Weight Prevalence in 2010

Which country had the highest prevalence of low birth weight in 2010?

India had the highest prevalence of low birth weight in 2010, with 30% of newborns weighing less than 2,500 grams.

Which country had the lowest prevalence of low birth weight in 2010?

Iceland had the lowest prevalence of low birth weight in 2010, with 3.77% of newborns weighing less than 2,500 grams.

What was the average prevalence of low birth weight across countries in 2010?

The average prevalence of low birth weight across the 157 countries in 2010 was 11.06%.

What was the median prevalence of low birth weight in 2010?

The median prevalence of low birth weight in 2010 was 10.6%.

Which countries were in the top 10 for low birth weight prevalence in 2010?

The top 10 countries for low birth weight prevalence in 2010 were India, Bangladesh, Comoros, Guinea-Bissau, Nepal, Philippines, Liberia, Madagascar, Senegal, and Mauritius.

Which countries were in the bottom 10 for low birth weight prevalence in 2010?

The bottom 10 countries for low birth weight prevalence in 2010 were Iceland, San Marino, Finland, Sweden, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway, Croatia, and Belarus.

Insights by country

1

Lesotho

In 2010, Lesotho had a Low Birth Weight Prevalence of 14.768033 %, ranking #38 out of 157 countries. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating significant health challenges. Contributing factors include high rates of poverty and malnutrition, compounded by the impact of HIV/AIDS, which affects maternal health and nutrition in the country.

2

Japan

In 2010, Japan had a Low Birth Weight Prevalence of 11.033009 %, ranking #68 out of 157 countries. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating challenges in maternal and infant health. Contributing factors include Japan's aging population, which often leads to higher rates of low birth weight due to increased maternal age, and the country's unique healthcare policies that may not fully address these demographic shifts.

3

Denmark

In 2010, Denmark had a Low Birth Weight Prevalence of 5.1546664 %, ranking #145 out of 157 countries. This figure is higher than the global average, indicating potential health challenges within the population. Contributing factors may include the country's focus on maternal health policies, access to healthcare, and socioeconomic conditions that influence pregnancy outcomes.

4

Lebanon

In 2010, Lebanon recorded a Low Birth Weight Prevalence of 12.140975 %, ranking #58 out of 157 countries. This figure is above the global average, indicating a significant health concern in the region. Contributing factors include ongoing economic challenges, which affect maternal health services, and the impact of regional conflicts that disrupt healthcare access and prenatal care. Additionally, demographic trends such as urbanization may also influence birth weight outcomes.

5

Jordan

In 2010, Jordan had a Low Birth Weight Prevalence of 16.491919 %, ranking #23 out of 157 countries. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating significant health challenges. Contributing factors include economic constraints and limited access to healthcare services, particularly in rural areas, which affect maternal nutrition and prenatal care.

6

Malawi

In 2010, Malawi had a Low Birth Weight Prevalence of 15.829339 %, ranking #26 out of 157 countries. This prevalence is notably higher than the global average, which indicates a significant public health concern. Contributing factors include high rates of maternal malnutrition and limited access to healthcare services, which are exacerbated by economic challenges and a high prevalence of diseases such as HIV/AIDS.

7

Singapore

In 2010, Singapore had a Low Birth Weight Prevalence of 10.617559 %, ranking #78 out of 157 countries. This figure is higher than the global average, reflecting challenges that the nation faces in maternal health. Contributing factors include the high cost of living, which can lead to delayed pregnancies and a focus on career over family, as well as the urban environment that may limit access to prenatal care for some populations.

8

Zimbabwe

In 2010, Zimbabwe had a Low Birth Weight Prevalence of 12.411165 %, ranking #54 out of 157 countries. This prevalence is notably higher than the global average, indicating significant public health challenges. Contributing factors include economic instability, limited access to healthcare, and high rates of malnutrition among pregnant women, all of which adversely affect maternal and infant health outcomes.

9

Fiji

In 2010, Fiji had a Low Birth Weight Prevalence of 7.4026356 %, ranking #109 out of 157 countries. This figure is higher than the global average, indicating challenges in maternal health compared to many other nations. Contributing factors include limited access to healthcare services in rural areas and socioeconomic disparities that affect nutrition and prenatal care.

10

Bolivia

In 2010, Bolivia had a Low Birth Weight Prevalence of 8.412333 %, ranking #99 out of 157 countries. This prevalence is higher than the global average, indicating significant health challenges. Contributing factors include Bolivia's economic constraints, which limit access to quality prenatal care, and high rates of maternal malnutrition, particularly in rural areas. Additionally, geographic barriers in mountainous regions hinder healthcare delivery, exacerbating the issue.

Data Source

Share of babies born with a low birthweight, 2020

Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive data and visualizations on global development issues, including health, education, and economic indicators. The dataset on the share of babies born with low birthweight in 2020 offers country-level statistics that highlight variations in maternal and infant health outcomes across different regions.

Visit Data Source

Historical Data by Year

Explore Low Birth Weight Prevalence data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.

More Health Facts