Low Birth Weight Prevalence 2008

Low birth weight prevalence shows the percentage of newborns weighing less than 2,500 grams at birth.

157 data points••Global Coverage•Share of babies born with a low birthweight, 2020•

Interactive Map

Loading interactive map...

Complete Data Rankings

Rank
Actions
1
India flag
India
30.517 %
2
Bangladesh flag
Bangladesh
24.717 %
3
Comoros flag
Comoros
24.641 %
4
Guinea-Bissau flag
Guinea-Bissau
22.728 %
5
Nepal flag
Nepal
21.611 %
6
Philippines flag
Philippines
21.052 %
7
Senegal flag
Senegal
19.935 %
8
Liberia flag
Liberia
19.755 %
9
Madagascar flag
Madagascar
19.632 %
10
Mauritius flag
Mauritius
19.453 %
11
Burkina Faso flag
Burkina Faso
19.42 %
12
Côte d'Ivoire flag
Côte d'Ivoire
19.31 %
13
Sri Lanka flag
Sri Lanka
18.852 %
14
Papua New Guinea flag
Papua New Guinea
18.666 %
15
Mozambique flag
Mozambique
18.636 %
16
Benin flag
Benin
17.92 %
17
Botswana flag
Botswana
17.871 %
18
Laos flag
Laos
17.305 %
19
Timor-Leste flag
Timor-Leste
16.992 %
20
Morocco flag
Morocco
16.869 %
21
South Africa flag
South Africa
16.788 %
22
Guyana flag
Guyana
16.761 %
23
Namibia flag
Namibia
16.177 %
24
Jordan flag
Jordan
16.068 %
25
Angola flag
Angola
16.053 %
26
Malawi flag
Malawi
15.93 %
27
Central African Republic flag
Central African Republic
15.607 %
28
Trinidad and Tobago flag
Trinidad and Tobago
15.579 %
29
Eritrea flag
Eritrea
15.522 %
30
Togo flag
Togo
15.509 %
31
Saint Lucia flag
Saint Lucia
15.48 %
32
Ghana flag
Ghana
15.347 %
33
Burundi flag
Burundi
15.286 %
34
Suriname flag
Suriname
15.174 %
35
Gabon flag
Gabon
15.117 %
36
Bahamas flag
Bahamas
15.023 %
37
Lesotho flag
Lesotho
14.778 %
38
Antigua and Barbuda flag
Antigua and Barbuda
14.757 %
39
Turkey flag
Turkey
14.638 %
40
Jamaica flag
Jamaica
14.539 %
41
Guatemala flag
Guatemala
14.249 %
42
Gambia flag
Gambia
13.943 %
43
Maldives flag
Maldives
13.797 %
44
Palau flag
Palau
13.669 %
45
United Arab Emirates flag
United Arab Emirates
13.408 %
46
Oman flag
Oman
13.344 %
47
Cambodia flag
Cambodia
13.24 %
48
Solomon Islands flag
Solomon Islands
13.174 %
49
Cameroon flag
Cameroon
13.017 %
50
Brunei Darussalam flag
Brunei Darussalam
12.886 %
51
Zimbabwe flag
Zimbabwe
12.67 %
52
Malaysia flag
Malaysia
12.638 %
53
Myanmar flag
Myanmar
12.574 %
54
Vanuatu flag
Vanuatu
12.529 %
55
Zambia flag
Zambia
12.384 %
56
Seychelles flag
Seychelles
12.248 %
57
Lebanon flag
Lebanon
12.2 %
58
Sierra Leone flag
Sierra Leone
12.086 %
59
Congo flag
Congo
12.079 %
60
Honduras flag
Honduras
12.054 %
61
Bhutan flag
Bhutan
11.786 %
62
Kuwait flag
Kuwait
11.573 %
63
Congo, Democratic Republic of the flag
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
11.533 %
64
Dominican Republic flag
Dominican Republic
11.467 %
65
Ecuador flag
Ecuador
11.151 %
66
Bahrain flag
Bahrain
11.097 %
67
Panama flag
Panama
11.094 %
68
Belize flag
Belize
11.071 %
69
Japan flag
Japan
11.016 %
70
Kenya flag
Kenya
11.004 %
71
Nicaragua flag
Nicaragua
11 %
72
Tanzania flag
Tanzania
10.97 %
73
Azerbaijan flag
Azerbaijan
10.947 %
74
Eswatini flag
Eswatini
10.709 %
75
Bulgaria flag
Bulgaria
10.671 %
76
Indonesia flag
Indonesia
10.654 %
77
Iraq flag
Iraq
10.636 %
78
Thailand flag
Thailand
10.631 %
79
Singapore flag
Singapore
10.586 %
80
Sao Tome and Principe flag
Sao Tome and Principe
10.474 %
81
El Salvador flag
El Salvador
10.453 %
82
Greece flag
Greece
10.433 %
83
Colombia flag
Colombia
10.23 %
84
Mexico flag
Mexico
10.12 %
85
Paraguay flag
Paraguay
10.046 %
86
Qatar flag
Qatar
9.859 %
87
Romania flag
Romania
9.725 %
88
State of Palestine flag
State of Palestine
9.593 %
89
Israel flag
Israel
9.582 %
90
Tajikistan flag
Tajikistan
9.559 %
91
Kiribati flag
Kiribati
9.397 %
92
Spain flag
Spain
9.213 %
93
Rwanda flag
Rwanda
9.046 %
94
Peru flag
Peru
8.943 %
95
Andorra flag
Andorra
8.933 %
96
Venezuela flag
Venezuela
8.905 %
97
Bolivia flag
Bolivia
8.51 %
98
Costa Rica flag
Costa Rica
8.435 %
99
Vietnam flag
Vietnam
8.404 %
100
Hungary flag
Hungary
8.395 %
101
Brazil flag
Brazil
8.252 %
102
Armenia flag
Armenia
8.203 %
103
Uruguay flag
Uruguay
8.192 %
104
North Macedonia flag
North Macedonia
8.121 %
105
United States flag
United States
8.058 %
106
Tunisia flag
Tunisia
7.987 %
107
Portugal flag
Portugal
7.948 %
108
France flag
France
7.55 %
109
Fiji flag
Fiji
7.391 %
110
Slovakia flag
Slovakia
7.309 %
111
Argentina flag
Argentina
7.29 %
112
United Kingdom flag
United Kingdom
7.232 %
113
Luxembourg flag
Luxembourg
7.23 %
114
Russia flag
Russia
7.228 %
115
Monaco flag
Monaco
7.199 %
116
Cuba flag
Cuba
7.159 %
117
Belgium flag
Belgium
7.035 %
118
Czech Republic flag
Czech Republic
7.019 %
119
Italy flag
Italy
6.874 %
120
Malta flag
Malta
6.836 %
121
Algeria flag
Algeria
6.82 %
122
Germany flag
Germany
6.806 %
123
Austria flag
Austria
6.781 %
124
Georgia flag
Georgia
6.678 %
125
Kyrgyzstan flag
Kyrgyzstan
6.622 %
126
Republic of Moldova flag
Republic of Moldova
6.49 %
127
Montenegro flag
Montenegro
6.382 %
128
Mongolia flag
Mongolia
6.354 %
129
Switzerland flag
Switzerland
6.342 %
130
Australia flag
Australia
6.326 %
131
Netherlands flag
Netherlands
6.286 %
132
New Zealand flag
New Zealand
6.069 %
133
Canada flag
Canada
6.04 %
134
Slovenia flag
Slovenia
6.031 %
135
Albania flag
Albania
5.972 %
136
Serbia flag
Serbia
5.934 %
137
Ukraine flag
Ukraine
5.931 %
138
Kazakhstan flag
Kazakhstan
5.926 %
139
Chile flag
Chile
5.826 %
140
Poland flag
Poland
5.825 %
141
South Korea flag
South Korea
5.759 %
142
Uzbekistan flag
Uzbekistan
5.732 %
143
China flag
China
5.271 %
144
Turkmenistan flag
Turkmenistan
5.21 %
145
Denmark flag
Denmark
5.203 %
146
Ireland flag
Ireland
5.166 %
147
Bosnia and Herzegovina flag
Bosnia and Herzegovina
5.122 %
148
Belarus flag
Belarus
5.046 %
149
Croatia flag
Croatia
4.97 %
150
Norway flag
Norway
4.839 %
151
Lithuania flag
Lithuania
4.659 %
152
Latvia flag
Latvia
4.649 %
153
Estonia flag
Estonia
4.4 %
154
Sweden flag
Sweden
4.233 %
155
Finland flag
Finland
4.136 %
156
San Marino flag
San Marino
3.953 %
157
Iceland flag
Iceland
3.738 %

↑Top 10 Countries

  1. #1India flagIndia
  2. #2Bangladesh flagBangladesh
  3. #3Comoros flagComoros
  4. #4Guinea-Bissau flagGuinea-Bissau
  5. #5Nepal flagNepal
  6. #6Philippines flagPhilippines
  7. #7Senegal flagSenegal
  8. #8Liberia flagLiberia
  9. #9Madagascar flagMadagascar
  10. #10Mauritius flagMauritius

Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.

↓Bottom 10 Countries

  1. #157Iceland flagIceland
  2. #156San Marino flagSan Marino
  3. #155Finland flagFinland
  4. #154Sweden flagSweden
  5. #153Estonia flagEstonia
  6. #152Latvia flagLatvia
  7. #151Lithuania flagLithuania
  8. #150Norway flagNorway
  9. #149Croatia flagCroatia
  10. #148Belarus flagBelarus

Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.

Analysis & Context

In 2008, India recorded the highest Low Birth Weight Prevalence at 30.52%, while the global range for this metric spanned from 3.74% to 30.52%. The global average for low birth weight prevalence was 11.08%, providing a critical benchmark for assessing individual country performance.

Economic and Health Infrastructure Impacts on Low Birth Weight

The prevalence of low birth weight in countries such as India at 30.52%, Bangladesh at 24.72%, and Comoros at 24.64% highlights significant disparities often linked to economic and health infrastructure challenges. These nations frequently encounter issues such as inadequate maternal healthcare, malnutrition, and limited access to prenatal care. Such conditions are exacerbated in regions with insufficient healthcare funding, leading to higher incidences of low birth weight.

Conversely, countries with robust healthcare systems, such as Iceland at 3.74% and San Marino at 3.95%, showcase the effectiveness of comprehensive prenatal care and nutritional programs. These countries benefit from extensive healthcare networks that support maternal health, thereby reducing the prevalence of low birth weight babies.

Geographical and Socioeconomic Factors

Geographical and socioeconomic factors also play a crucial role in the prevalence of low birth weight. In Sub-Saharan Africa, countries like Guinea-Bissau with a prevalence of 22.73% and Senegal at 19.93% demonstrate higher rates, often attributed to rural populations and limited healthcare access. The geographical isolation and socio-economic status in these regions impede access to healthcare facilities, contributing to higher incidences of low birth weight.

In contrast, Nordic countries such as Finland with 4.14% and Sweden at 4.23% benefit from centralized healthcare systems and higher socioeconomic standards, ensuring better maternal care and nutrition.

Year-over-Year Trends and Changes

Analyzing year-over-year changes, the data indicates a slight average decrease of -0.01% globally, reflecting incremental improvements. Notable decreases were observed in Timor-Leste with a -1.8% change and India with -0.8%, signifying efforts in these regions to improve maternal health services and nutrition programs.

Conversely, countries like Kuwait experienced a +1.7% increase, possibly due to lifestyle changes and healthcare challenges. Jordan and the United Arab Emirates also saw increases, indicating areas where healthcare policy improvements may be necessary to reverse this trend.

Policy Implications and Future Directions

Addressing low birth weight prevalence requires targeted policy interventions focusing on maternal health improvement and poverty alleviation. Nations with high prevalence rates, such as Nepal at 21.61% and Philippines at 21.05%, need to prioritize healthcare access and education to reduce these statistics.

  • Investing in maternal nutrition programs can directly impact birth weights.
  • Enhancing healthcare infrastructure in rural and underserved areas will improve prenatal care availability.
  • Policy shifts towards integrated healthcare systems can bridge gaps in maternal health services.

Ultimately, reducing low birth weight prevalence is critical for improving infant health outcomes and long-term developmental prospects, necessitating a multifaceted approach tailored to each country's unique challenges.

Frequently Asked Questions About Low Birth Weight Prevalence in 2008

Which country had the highest prevalence of low birth weight in 2008?

India had the highest prevalence of low birth weight in 2008, with 30.52% of newborns weighing less than 2,500 grams.

Which country had the lowest prevalence of low birth weight in 2008?

Iceland had the lowest prevalence of low birth weight in 2008, with 3.74% of newborns weighing less than 2,500 grams.

What was the average prevalence of low birth weight across countries in 2008?

The average prevalence of low birth weight across the 157 countries in 2008 was 11.08%.

What was the median prevalence of low birth weight in 2008?

The median prevalence of low birth weight in 2008 was 10.59%.

Which countries were in the top 3 for low birth weight prevalence in 2008?

The top 3 countries for low birth weight prevalence in 2008 were India (30.52%), Bangladesh (24.72%), and Comoros (24.64%).

What is the range of low birth weight prevalence among countries in 2008?

The range of low birth weight prevalence among countries in 2008 was from 3.74% in Iceland to 30.52% in India.

Insights by country

1

Colombia

In 2008, Colombia had a Low Birth Weight Prevalence of 10.230216 %, ranking #83 out of 157 countries. This prevalence is notably higher than the global average, indicating significant public health challenges. Factors contributing to this statistic include socioeconomic disparities, limited access to healthcare in rural areas, and maternal nutrition issues, which are prevalent in various regions of Colombia.

2

Morocco

In 2008, Morocco ranked #20 globally for Low Birth Weight Prevalence, with a rate of 16.868866 %. This prevalence is notably higher than the global average, indicating significant health challenges within the country. Key drivers for this statistic include limited access to quality prenatal care and socioeconomic factors that affect maternal nutrition and health.

3

Latvia

In 2008, Latvia had a Low Birth Weight Prevalence of 4.6487126 %, ranking #152 out of 157 countries. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating significant public health challenges. Contributing factors include Latvia's economic difficulties post-independence, which have affected maternal health services, and demographic trends such as a declining birth rate and an aging population.

4

Monaco

In 2008, Monaco reported a Low Birth Weight Prevalence of 7.1990438 %, ranking #115 out of 157 countries. This prevalence is notably higher than the global average, indicating potential health challenges within its population. Contributing factors include Monaco's unique demographic profile, characterized by a high proportion of older parents and limited space for healthcare facilities, which may impact prenatal care accessibility.

5

Luxembourg

In 2008, Luxembourg had a Low Birth Weight Prevalence of 7.2299337 %, ranking #113 out of 157 countries. This figure is higher than the global average, indicating challenges in maternal and infant health. Contributing factors include Luxembourg's high levels of economic prosperity, which may lead to lifestyle choices affecting prenatal care, and a diverse population that may experience varying health outcomes.

6

Denmark

In 2008, Denmark had a Low Birth Weight Prevalence of 5.202848 %, ranking #145 out of 157 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, indicating potential health concerns for newborns in the country. Factors contributing to this prevalence include Denmark's high rates of cesarean deliveries and maternal age, as well as socioeconomic conditions that can affect prenatal care and health outcomes.

7

Malaysia

In 2008, Malaysia recorded a Low Birth Weight Prevalence of 12.638466 %, ranking #52 out of 157 countries. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating a significant public health concern. Contributing factors include socioeconomic disparities, maternal nutrition, and access to prenatal care, which can affect birth outcomes. Additionally, urbanization and lifestyle changes have impacted maternal health, further influencing low birth weight rates in the country.

8

Kuwait

Kuwait ranked #62 globally for Low Birth Weight Prevalence in 2008, with a rate of 11.572599 %. This figure is higher than the global average, indicating potential health challenges in maternal and infant care. Contributing factors include Kuwait's rapid urbanization and lifestyle changes, which can impact prenatal health, as well as a reliance on imported healthcare solutions that may not fully address local needs.

9

Jamaica

In 2008, Jamaica had a Low Birth Weight Prevalence of 14.53946 %, ranking #40 out of 157 countries. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating significant public health challenges. Contributing factors include limited access to prenatal care, socio-economic disparities, and maternal nutrition issues, all of which impact birth outcomes in the country.

10

Japan

In 2008, Japan had a Low Birth Weight Prevalence of 11.015884 %, ranking #69 out of 157 countries. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating potential health concerns among newborns. Contributing factors include Japan's aging population and low fertility rates, which can lead to increased instances of low birth weight due to maternal health challenges and socioeconomic pressures.

Data Source

Share of babies born with a low birthweight, 2020

Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive data and visualizations on global development issues, including health, education, and economic indicators. The dataset on the share of babies born with low birthweight in 2020 offers country-level statistics that highlight variations in maternal and infant health outcomes across different regions.

Visit Data Source

Historical Data by Year

Explore Low Birth Weight Prevalence data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.

More Health Facts