Low Birth Weight Prevalence 2009
Low birth weight prevalence shows the percentage of newborns weighing less than 2,500 grams at birth.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | India | 30.255 % | |
2 | Bangladesh | 24.598 % | |
3 | Comoros | 24.519 % | |
4 | Guinea-Bissau | 22.485 % | |
5 | Nepal | 21.439 % | |
6 | Philippines | 21.09 % | |
7 | Liberia | 19.736 % | |
8 | Senegal | 19.7 % | |
9 | Madagascar | 19.604 % | |
10 | Mauritius | 19.386 % | |
11 | Burkina Faso | 19.345 % | |
12 | Côte d'Ivoire | 19.286 % | |
13 | Sri Lanka | 18.761 % | |
14 | Papua New Guinea | 18.758 % | |
15 | Mozambique | 18.489 % | |
16 | Benin | 17.813 % | |
17 | Botswana | 17.754 % | |
18 | Laos | 17.29 % | |
19 | Timor-Leste | 16.834 % | |
20 | Guyana | 16.827 % | |
21 | South Africa | 16.75 % | |
22 | Morocco | 16.681 % | |
23 | Jordan | 16.265 % | |
24 | Namibia | 16.137 % | |
25 | Angola | 15.946 % | |
26 | Malawi | 15.87 % | |
27 | Trinidad and Tobago | 15.655 % | |
28 | Central African Republic | 15.624 % | |
29 | Saint Lucia | 15.614 % | |
30 | Eritrea | 15.477 % | |
31 | Togo | 15.412 % | |
32 | Suriname | 15.299 % | |
33 | Burundi | 15.238 % | |
34 | Ghana | 15.231 % | |
35 | Gabon | 15.109 % | |
36 | Bahamas | 15.106 % | |
37 | Antigua and Barbuda | 14.851 % | |
38 | Lesotho | 14.769 % | |
39 | Turkey | 14.51 % | |
40 | Jamaica | 14.506 % | |
41 | Guatemala | 14.3 % | |
42 | Gambia | 13.862 % | |
43 | Maldives | 13.799 % | |
44 | Palau | 13.688 % | |
45 | United Arab Emirates | 13.577 % | |
46 | Oman | 13.331 % | |
47 | Solomon Islands | 13.2 % | |
48 | Cambodia | 13.116 % | |
49 | Cameroon | 12.981 % | |
50 | Brunei Darussalam | 12.966 % | |
51 | Malaysia | 12.736 % | |
52 | Myanmar | 12.623 % | |
53 | Vanuatu | 12.571 % | |
54 | Zimbabwe | 12.555 % | |
55 | Zambia | 12.296 % | |
56 | Seychelles | 12.27 % | |
57 | Honduras | 12.175 % | |
58 | Lebanon | 12.156 % | |
59 | Congo | 11.951 % | |
60 | Sierra Leone | 11.904 % | |
61 | Kuwait | 11.764 % | |
62 | Bhutan | 11.761 % | |
63 | Dominican Republic | 11.63 % | |
64 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 11.414 % | |
65 | Bahrain | 11.256 % | |
66 | Belize | 11.117 % | |
67 | Ecuador | 11.106 % | |
68 | Japan | 11.026 % | |
69 | Panama | 11.011 % | |
70 | Nicaragua | 10.96 % | |
71 | Azerbaijan | 10.946 % | |
72 | Kenya | 10.937 % | |
73 | Tanzania | 10.857 % | |
74 | Bulgaria | 10.734 % | |
75 | Eswatini | 10.698 % | |
76 | Iraq | 10.671 % | |
77 | Indonesia | 10.631 % | |
78 | Singapore | 10.61 % | |
79 | Thailand | 10.59 % | |
80 | Greece | 10.541 % | |
81 | Sao Tome and Principe | 10.517 % | |
82 | El Salvador | 10.444 % | |
83 | Colombia | 10.302 % | |
84 | Mexico | 10.139 % | |
85 | Paraguay | 10.045 % | |
86 | Qatar | 9.865 % | |
87 | State of Palestine | 9.658 % | |
88 | Romania | 9.654 % | |
89 | Israel | 9.538 % | |
90 | Tajikistan | 9.486 % | |
91 | Kiribati | 9.416 % | |
92 | Spain | 9.287 % | |
93 | Rwanda | 9.115 % | |
94 | Andorra | 8.979 % | |
95 | Venezuela | 8.919 % | |
96 | Peru | 8.785 % | |
97 | Bolivia | 8.459 % | |
98 | Costa Rica | 8.456 % | |
99 | Hungary | 8.411 % | |
100 | Brazil | 8.273 % | |
101 | Armenia | 8.231 % | |
102 | Vietnam | 8.22 % | |
103 | Uruguay | 8.138 % | |
104 | North Macedonia | 8.129 % | |
105 | United States | 8.094 % | |
106 | Portugal | 8.051 % | |
107 | Tunisia | 8.012 % | |
108 | France | 7.548 % | |
109 | Fiji | 7.395 % | |
110 | Slovakia | 7.349 % | |
111 | Luxembourg | 7.317 % | |
112 | Argentina | 7.264 % | |
113 | Russia | 7.231 % | |
114 | United Kingdom | 7.212 % | |
115 | Cuba | 7.169 % | |
116 | Monaco | 7.165 % | |
117 | Czech Republic | 7.094 % | |
118 | Belgium | 7.028 % | |
119 | Italy | 6.932 % | |
120 | Malta | 6.873 % | |
121 | Algeria | 6.839 % | |
122 | Germany | 6.833 % | |
123 | Austria | 6.766 % | |
124 | Georgia | 6.754 % | |
125 | Kyrgyzstan | 6.56 % | |
126 | Republic of Moldova | 6.501 % | |
127 | Montenegro | 6.384 % | |
128 | Switzerland | 6.353 % | |
129 | Australia | 6.346 % | |
130 | Netherlands | 6.227 % | |
131 | Mongolia | 6.198 % | |
132 | Canada | 6.091 % | |
133 | Slovenia | 6.067 % | |
134 | New Zealand | 6.064 % | |
135 | Albania | 5.981 % | |
136 | Serbia | 5.962 % | |
137 | Ukraine | 5.947 % | |
138 | Chile | 5.903 % | |
139 | South Korea | 5.876 % | |
140 | Kazakhstan | 5.872 % | |
141 | Poland | 5.807 % | |
142 | Uzbekistan | 5.758 % | |
143 | Ireland | 5.259 % | |
144 | China | 5.224 % | |
145 | Denmark | 5.18 % | |
146 | Turkmenistan | 5.131 % | |
147 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 5.13 % | |
148 | Belarus | 5.031 % | |
149 | Croatia | 4.99 % | |
150 | Norway | 4.818 % | |
151 | Lithuania | 4.673 % | |
152 | Latvia | 4.629 % | |
153 | Estonia | 4.432 % | |
154 | Sweden | 4.233 % | |
155 | Finland | 4.131 % | |
156 | San Marino | 3.972 % | |
157 | Iceland | 3.754 % |
- #1
India
- #2
Bangladesh
- #3
Comoros
- #4
Guinea-Bissau
- #5
Nepal
- #6
Philippines
- #7
Liberia
- #8
Senegal
- #9
Madagascar
- #10
Mauritius
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #157
Iceland
- #156
San Marino
- #155
Finland
- #154
Sweden
- #153
Estonia
- #152
Latvia
- #151
Lithuania
- #150
Norway
- #149
Croatia
- #148
Belarus
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2009, India had the highest Low Birth Weight Prevalence at 30.25%, while Iceland had the lowest at 3.75%. This metric measures the percentage of newborns weighing less than 2,500 grams at birth. The global average for low birth weight prevalence was 11.07%, with a median value of 10.59% across 157 countries.
Economic Factors and Low Birth Weight Prevalence
Economic conditions play a significant role in the prevalence of low birth weight. Countries with the highest rates, such as India at 30.25% and Bangladesh at 24.60%, often face challenges like poverty and limited access to healthcare, which can contribute to higher rates of low birth weight. In contrast, countries with robust economies and healthcare systems, such as Iceland and San Marino, show significantly lower rates of 3.75% and 3.97%, respectively. Economic stability often translates to better maternal nutrition and healthcare access, reducing the incidence of low birth weight.
Geographic and Demographic Influences
Geographic and demographic factors also influence low birth weight prevalence. For instance, Comoros and Guinea-Bissau have high prevalence rates of 24.52% and 22.49%, respectively, which can be attributed to their geographic isolation and limited healthcare infrastructure. In contrast, Nordic countries such as Finland and Sweden benefit from comprehensive healthcare systems and healthy lifestyle practices, resulting in lower prevalence rates of 4.13% and 4.23%.
Policy Impact on Low Birth Weight Rates
Effective health policies can significantly impact low birth weight prevalence. Countries like Norway and Estonia, with rates of 4.82% and 4.43%, respectively, have implemented comprehensive maternal and child health programs that focus on prenatal care and education. These policies help ensure that expectant mothers receive the necessary support and information, leading to healthier birth outcomes. Conversely, countries with less effective maternal health policies, such as Nepal and Philippines, have higher prevalence rates of 21.44% and 21.09%.
Year-over-Year Trends and Changes
The year-over-year data reveals interesting trends in low birth weight prevalence. Overall, there was a negligible average change of -0.01% globally. However, some countries experienced significant shifts. India saw the largest decrease, dropping by 0.26%, which may reflect improvements in healthcare access and maternal nutrition. Other countries with notable decreases include Guinea-Bissau at -0.24% and Senegal at -0.23%. On the other hand, countries like Jordan and Kuwait experienced increases of 0.20% and 0.19%, respectively, possibly due to changes in healthcare policies or demographic shifts that require further investigation.
Frequently Asked Questions About Low Birth Weight Prevalence in 2009
Which country had the highest prevalence of low birth weight in 2009?
India had the highest prevalence of low birth weight in 2009, with 30.25% of newborns weighing less than 2,500 grams.
Which country had the lowest prevalence of low birth weight in 2009?
Iceland had the lowest prevalence of low birth weight in 2009, with 3.75% of newborns weighing less than 2,500 grams.
What was the average prevalence of low birth weight across countries in 2009?
The average prevalence of low birth weight across the 157 countries in the dataset for 2009 was 11.07%.
What was the median prevalence of low birth weight in 2009?
The median prevalence of low birth weight in 2009 was 10.59%.
Which countries were in the top 10 for low birth weight prevalence in 2009?
The top 10 countries for low birth weight prevalence in 2009 were India, Bangladesh, Comoros, Guinea-Bissau, Nepal, Philippines, Liberia, Senegal, Madagascar, and Mauritius.
Which countries were in the bottom 10 for low birth weight prevalence in 2009?
The bottom 10 countries for low birth weight prevalence in 2009 were Iceland, San Marino, Finland, Sweden, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway, Croatia, and Belarus.
Insights by country
Saint Lucia
In 2009, Saint Lucia had a Low Birth Weight Prevalence of 15.614216 %, ranking #29 out of 157 countries. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating potential public health concerns. Contributing factors include limited access to prenatal care and socioeconomic challenges that affect maternal health, which are critical in a small island developing state like Saint Lucia.
South Africa
In 2009, South Africa had a Low Birth Weight Prevalence of 16.75032 %, ranking #21 out of 157 countries. This rate is significantly higher than the global average, indicating persistent health challenges in the region. Contributing factors include socioeconomic disparities, limited access to quality prenatal care, and high rates of maternal malnutrition, which disproportionately affect vulnerable populations within the country.
Belize
In 2009, Belize had a Low Birth Weight Prevalence of 11.117372 %, ranking #66 out of 157 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, indicating potential challenges in maternal health. Contributing factors include limited access to healthcare services and socioeconomic disparities that affect nutrition and prenatal care in the region.
Venezuela
In 2009, Venezuela had a Low Birth Weight Prevalence of 8.91908 %, ranking #95 out of 157 countries. This figure is higher than the global average, indicating challenges in maternal health and nutrition. Contributing factors include the country's ongoing economic crisis, which has severely impacted healthcare access and the availability of nutritious food for expectant mothers.
Myanmar
In 2009, Myanmar had a Low Birth Weight Prevalence of 12.623168 %, ranking #52 out of 157 countries. This prevalence is notably higher than the global average, indicating a significant public health concern. Contributing factors include limited access to healthcare services, high rates of malnutrition among pregnant women, and socio-economic challenges that affect maternal health. Addressing these issues is crucial for improving birth outcomes in Myanmar.
Italy
In 2009, Italy's Low Birth Weight Prevalence was 6.932114 %, ranking it #119 out of 157 countries. This figure is higher than the global average, indicating potential health concerns within the population. Contributing factors include Italy's aging demographic, which can lead to increased health risks during pregnancy, as well as regional disparities in healthcare access that may affect maternal and infant health outcomes.
Spain
In 2009, Spain had a Low Birth Weight Prevalence of 9.287046 %, ranking #92 out of 157 countries. This prevalence is higher than the global average, indicating potential challenges in maternal and infant health relative to other nations. Contributing factors include Spain's aging population and socioeconomic disparities, which can affect access to prenatal care and health education for expectant mothers.
Ireland
In 2009, Ireland had a Low Birth Weight Prevalence of 5.259197 %, ranking #143 out of 157 countries. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating potential health concerns within the population. Contributing factors include socioeconomic disparities and access to prenatal care, which can significantly impact maternal health and birth outcomes in Ireland.
Comoros
In 2009, Comoros had a Low Birth Weight Prevalence of 24.519377 %, ranking #3 out of 157 countries. This prevalence is significantly higher than the global average, indicating serious health challenges. Contributing factors include limited access to healthcare, high rates of poverty, and nutritional deficiencies among pregnant women in the region.
Tunisia
Tunisia recorded a Low Birth Weight Prevalence of 8.011565 % in 2009, ranking #107 out of 157 countries. This figure is higher than the global average, indicating potential health challenges for newborns in the region. Contributing factors include limited access to prenatal care and socioeconomic disparities that affect maternal nutrition and health.
Data Source
Share of babies born with a low birthweight, 2020
Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive data and visualizations on global development issues, including health, education, and economic indicators. The dataset on the share of babies born with low birthweight in 2020 offers country-level statistics that highlight variations in maternal and infant health outcomes across different regions.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Low Birth Weight Prevalence data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.