Low Birth Weight Rate 2019
Low birth weight rate highlights newborns under 2,500 grams, affecting survival and health outcomes.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | India | 27.621 % | |
2 | Comoros | 23.174 % | |
3 | Bangladesh | 23.144 % | |
4 | Philippines | 21.103 % | |
5 | Liberia | 19.869 % | |
6 | Nepal | 19.844 % | |
7 | Guinea-Bissau | 19.832 % | |
8 | Papua New Guinea | 19.356 % | |
9 | Madagascar | 18.819 % | |
10 | Mauritius | 18.716 % | |
11 | Jordan | 18.662 % | |
12 | Burkina Faso | 18.534 % | |
13 | Côte d'Ivoire | 18.354 % | |
14 | Timor-Leste | 18.239 % | |
15 | Sri Lanka | 18.023 % | |
16 | Mozambique | 17.789 % | |
17 | Senegal | 17.488 % | |
18 | Guyana | 17.163 % | |
19 | Botswana | 16.863 % | |
20 | Laos | 16.803 % | |
21 | South Africa | 16.638 % | |
22 | Benin | 16.561 % | |
23 | Suriname | 16.373 % | |
24 | Central African Republic | 16.344 % | |
25 | Trinidad and Tobago | 16.275 % | |
26 | Saint Lucia | 16.244 % | |
27 | Malawi | 15.643 % | |
28 | Namibia | 15.6 % | |
29 | Angola | 15.541 % | |
30 | Bahamas | 15.404 % | |
31 | Antigua and Barbuda | 15.356 % | |
32 | Eritrea | 15.189 % | |
33 | Morocco | 14.921 % | |
34 | Burundi | 14.83 % | |
35 | Gabon | 14.662 % | |
36 | Lesotho | 14.514 % | |
37 | Guatemala | 14.488 % | |
38 | Ghana | 14.455 % | |
39 | Togo | 14.36 % | |
40 | Kuwait | 14.14 % | |
41 | United Arab Emirates | 13.933 % | |
42 | Jamaica | 13.775 % | |
43 | Maldives | 13.723 % | |
44 | Malaysia | 13.684 % | |
45 | Brunei Darussalam | 13.602 % | |
46 | Palau | 13.528 % | |
47 | Gambia | 13.309 % | |
48 | Oman | 13.239 % | |
49 | Solomon Islands | 13.235 % | |
50 | Dominican Republic | 13.223 % | |
51 | Vanuatu | 13.046 % | |
52 | Honduras | 13.02 % | |
53 | Turkey | 13.005 % | |
54 | Lebanon | 12.566 % | |
55 | Cameroon | 12.542 % | |
56 | Myanmar | 12.487 % | |
57 | Seychelles | 12.451 % | |
58 | Bahrain | 12.332 % | |
59 | Congo | 11.893 % | |
60 | Zimbabwe | 11.891 % | |
61 | Cambodia | 11.577 % | |
62 | Belize | 11.534 % | |
63 | Bhutan | 11.451 % | |
64 | Greece | 11.373 % | |
65 | Zambia | 11.355 % | |
66 | Bulgaria | 11.31 % | |
67 | Japan | 11.253 % | |
68 | Sao Tome and Principe | 11.048 % | |
69 | Azerbaijan | 11.038 % | |
70 | Singapore | 10.897 % | |
71 | Colombia | 10.887 % | |
72 | Iraq | 10.853 % | |
73 | Ecuador | 10.668 % | |
74 | Sierra Leone | 10.497 % | |
75 | Panama | 10.312 % | |
76 | Thailand | 10.311 % | |
77 | State of Palestine | 10.299 % | |
78 | Eswatini | 10.256 % | |
79 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 10.239 % | |
80 | El Salvador | 10.231 % | |
81 | Nicaragua | 10.164 % | |
82 | Mexico | 10.155 % | |
83 | Kenya | 10.08 % | |
84 | Indonesia | 9.973 % | |
85 | Qatar | 9.954 % | |
86 | Paraguay | 9.954 % | |
87 | Tanzania | 9.777 % | |
88 | Spain | 9.62 % | |
89 | Rwanda | 9.385 % | |
90 | Andorra | 9.364 % | |
91 | Venezuela | 9.264 % | |
92 | Kiribati | 9.03 % | |
93 | Israel | 9.028 % | |
94 | Romania | 8.901 % | |
95 | Portugal | 8.85 % | |
96 | Tajikistan | 8.793 % | |
97 | Brazil | 8.671 % | |
98 | Costa Rica | 8.671 % | |
99 | Hungary | 8.327 % | |
100 | Armenia | 8.274 % | |
101 | North Macedonia | 8.273 % | |
102 | United States | 8.238 % | |
103 | Tunisia | 8.217 % | |
104 | Bolivia | 7.966 % | |
105 | Uruguay | 7.825 % | |
106 | Slovakia | 7.783 % | |
107 | Luxembourg | 7.723 % | |
108 | Czech Republic | 7.579 % | |
109 | Peru | 7.568 % | |
110 | France | 7.444 % | |
111 | Fiji | 7.404 % | |
112 | Argentina | 7.358 % | |
113 | Georgia | 7.347 % | |
114 | South Korea | 7.294 % | |
115 | Russia | 7.274 % | |
116 | Italy | 7.203 % | |
117 | Algeria | 7.16 % | |
118 | Malta | 7.15 % | |
119 | Cuba | 7.083 % | |
120 | United Kingdom | 6.86 % | |
121 | Monaco | 6.82 % | |
122 | Belgium | 6.782 % | |
123 | Chile | 6.756 % | |
124 | Germany | 6.721 % | |
125 | Canada | 6.574 % | |
126 | Australia | 6.533 % | |
127 | Republic of Moldova | 6.47 % | |
128 | Vietnam | 6.445 % | |
129 | Switzerland | 6.413 % | |
130 | Austria | 6.355 % | |
131 | Slovenia | 6.282 % | |
132 | Montenegro | 6.239 % | |
133 | Serbia | 6.18 % | |
134 | Kyrgyzstan | 6.075 % | |
135 | Albania | 5.967 % | |
136 | New Zealand | 5.874 % | |
137 | Uzbekistan | 5.807 % | |
138 | Ukraine | 5.725 % | |
139 | Netherlands | 5.697 % | |
140 | Poland | 5.631 % | |
141 | Ireland | 5.601 % | |
142 | Kazakhstan | 5.336 % | |
143 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 5.145 % | |
144 | Belarus | 5.116 % | |
145 | Croatia | 5.003 % | |
146 | Mongolia | 4.987 % | |
147 | China | 4.963 % | |
148 | Denmark | 4.836 % | |
149 | Lithuania | 4.597 % | |
150 | Norway | 4.472 % | |
151 | Turkmenistan | 4.364 % | |
152 | Latvia | 4.268 % | |
153 | San Marino | 4.236 % | |
154 | Estonia | 4.171 % | |
155 | Sweden | 4.131 % | |
156 | Finland | 4.082 % | |
157 | Iceland | 3.971 % |
- #1
India
- #2
Comoros
- #3
Bangladesh
- #4
Philippines
- #5
Liberia
- #6
Nepal
- #7
Guinea-Bissau
- #8
Papua New Guinea
- #9
Madagascar
- #10
Mauritius
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #157
Iceland
- #156
Finland
- #155
Sweden
- #154
Estonia
- #153
San Marino
- #152
Latvia
- #151
Turkmenistan
- #150
Norway
- #149
Lithuania
- #148
Denmark
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2019, the country with the highest Low Birth Weight Rate was India, with a rate of 27.62%, while the global range spanned from a minimum of 3.97% to a maximum of 27.62%. The global average for Low Birth Weight Rate in 2019 was 10.93%, providing a critical benchmark for assessing the health outcomes of newborns worldwide.
Economic Factors and Low Birth Weight Rate
The economic conditions of a country significantly influence its Low Birth Weight Rate. Countries with limited resources and high poverty levels, such as India and Bangladesh, exhibit some of the highest rates, at 27.62% and 23.14%, respectively. These nations often face challenges like inadequate healthcare access and nutritional deficiencies, which can lead to higher incidences of low birth weight. Conversely, countries with robust economies and comprehensive healthcare systems, such as Finland and Sweden, show some of the lowest rates, at 4.08% and 4.13%, respectively. These nations benefit from better prenatal care and maternal health services, which contribute to healthier birth outcomes.
Geographical and Demographic Influences
Geographical and demographic factors also play a crucial role in determining the Low Birth Weight Rate. Island nations like Comoros and Mauritius have rates of 23.17% and 18.72%, respectively, potentially due to limited access to healthcare infrastructure and services. In contrast, Nordic countries such as Iceland and Denmark have rates of 3.97% and 4.83%, facilitated by their advanced healthcare systems and lower population density, which allow for more personalized and effective maternal care.
Policy Impact on Birth Weight Outcomes
Government policies and healthcare initiatives can significantly impact Low Birth Weight Rates. Countries like Nepal and Philippines, with rates of 19.84% and 21.10%, may benefit from targeted interventions aimed at improving maternal nutrition and healthcare access. In contrast, countries with proactive healthcare policies, such as Norway and Estonia, have successfully maintained low rates of 4.47% and 4.17%. These nations often implement comprehensive prenatal care programs and public health campaigns focusing on maternal and infant health, which contribute to better birth outcomes.
Year-over-Year Trends and Notable Changes
The year-over-year trends in Low Birth Weight Rates reveal important shifts. Guinea-Bissau saw the most significant decrease, with a reduction of 0.30%, indicating potential improvements in healthcare access or nutritional programs. In contrast, countries like Jordan and Kuwait experienced increases of 0.27% and 0.24%, respectively. These changes might reflect varying economic conditions or healthcare policy adjustments that require further investigation to understand their impact on maternal and infant health.
Understanding the factors that influence Low Birth Weight Rates is essential for developing effective interventions and policies. By examining economic conditions, geographical influences, and policy impacts, stakeholders can better address the challenges associated with low birth weight and improve health outcomes for newborns globally.
Frequently Asked Questions About Low Birth Weight Rate in 2019
Which country had the highest low birth weight rate in 2019?
India had the highest low birth weight rate in 2019, with 27.62%.
Which country had the lowest low birth weight rate in 2019?
Iceland had the lowest low birth weight rate in 2019, at 3.97%.
What was the average low birth weight rate across countries in 2019?
The average low birth weight rate across countries in 2019 was 10.93%.
What was the median low birth weight rate in 2019?
The median low birth weight rate in 2019 was 10.24%.
Which countries were in the top 3 for low birth weight rates in 2019?
The top 3 countries for low birth weight rates in 2019 were India (27.62%), Comoros (23.17%), and Bangladesh (23.14%).
What was the range of low birth weight rates among countries in 2019?
The range of low birth weight rates among countries in 2019 was from 3.97% in Iceland to 27.62% in India.
Insights by country
Georgia
In 2019, Georgia had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 7.347129187 %, ranking #113 out of 157 countries. This rate is higher than many of its regional neighbors, indicating potential public health concerns. Contributing factors include economic challenges, limited access to prenatal care, and varying maternal health education, which may affect birth outcomes in the country.
Argentina
In 2019, Argentina had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 7.358161142 %, ranking #112 out of 157 countries. This rate is relatively higher than some neighboring countries, indicating potential challenges in maternal and infant health services. Contributing factors include economic disparities, access to healthcare, and varying levels of education among expectant mothers, which can influence nutrition and prenatal care.
Croatia
In 2019, Croatia had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 5.002799493 %, ranking #145 out of 157 countries. This figure is higher than the global average, indicating potential health challenges for newborns in the country. Contributing factors include Croatia's economic conditions and healthcare access, which can impact maternal health and prenatal care quality.
Solomon Islands
In 2019, the Solomon Islands had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 13.23473631 %, ranking #49 out of 157 countries. This rate is higher than the global average, indicating potential health challenges for newborns in the region. Contributing factors include limited access to healthcare services, which can affect maternal health, and a high prevalence of malnutrition among pregnant women, exacerbated by economic constraints and geographic isolation.
Liberia
In 2019, Liberia had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 19.86875088 %, ranking #5 out of 157 countries. This rate is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting serious public health challenges. Key drivers include limited access to maternal healthcare, high rates of poverty, and the lasting impacts of civil conflict, which have hindered economic stability and healthcare infrastructure.
Australia
In 2019, Australia had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 6.533125137%, ranking #126 out of 157 countries. This rate is notably higher than many of its regional neighbors, indicating potential public health concerns. Contributing factors may include socioeconomic disparities, access to prenatal care, and maternal health issues, which can affect birth outcomes across various demographics in Australia.
Saint Lucia
In 2019, Saint Lucia had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 16.24411633 %, ranking #26 out of 157 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, indicating potential public health challenges. Contributing factors include limited access to prenatal care and socioeconomic conditions that affect maternal nutrition and health.
Papua New Guinea
Papua New Guinea has a Low Birth Weight Rate of 19.35636573 % in 2019, ranking #8 out of 157 countries. This rate is significantly higher than the global average, indicating serious public health challenges. Contributing factors include limited access to healthcare, high rates of maternal malnutrition, and economic instability, which affect prenatal care and nutrition for expectant mothers.
Sri Lanka
Sri Lanka has a Low Birth Weight Rate of 18.0234842 % in 2019, ranking #15 out of 157 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, indicating significant health challenges. Contributing factors include inadequate maternal nutrition, limited access to healthcare in rural areas, and socio-economic disparities that affect prenatal care. Addressing these issues is critical for improving overall maternal and infant health outcomes in the country.
Belgium
In 2019, Belgium had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 6.782403938 %, ranking #122 out of 157 countries. This rate is higher than the European average, indicating potential public health concerns. Contributing factors include Belgium's diverse demographic landscape and varying access to prenatal care, which can affect birth outcomes across different regions.
Data Source
Low-birthweight babies (% of births)
The World Bank provides global development data, including statistics on low-birthweight babies as a percentage of total births. This dataset offers insights into maternal and child health across various countries, highlighting public health challenges and trends.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Low Birth Weight Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.