Low Birth Weight Rate 2013
Low birth weight rate highlights newborns under 2,500 grams, affecting survival and health outcomes.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | India | 29.224 % | |
2 | Bangladesh | 24.178 % | |
3 | Comoros | 23.994 % | |
4 | Guinea-Bissau | 21.526 % | |
5 | Philippines | 21.175 % | |
6 | Nepal | 20.749 % | |
7 | Liberia | 19.672 % | |
8 | Madagascar | 19.436 % | |
9 | Papua New Guinea | 19.078 % | |
10 | Mauritius | 19.041 % | |
11 | Côte d'Ivoire | 19.016 % | |
12 | Burkina Faso | 18.987 % | |
13 | Senegal | 18.898 % | |
14 | Sri Lanka | 18.383 % | |
15 | Mozambique | 18.03 % | |
16 | Benin | 17.35 % | |
17 | Jordan | 17.184 % | |
18 | Botswana | 17.174 % | |
19 | Laos | 17.164 % | |
20 | Timor-Leste | 17.03 % | |
21 | Guyana | 17.019 % | |
22 | South Africa | 16.61 % | |
23 | Central African Republic | 16.091 % | |
24 | Trinidad and Tobago | 15.996 % | |
25 | Saint Lucia | 15.984 % | |
26 | Morocco | 15.947 % | |
27 | Malawi | 15.823 % | |
28 | Namibia | 15.808 % | |
29 | Suriname | 15.784 % | |
30 | Angola | 15.605 % | |
31 | Eritrea | 15.362 % | |
32 | Bahamas | 15.309 % | |
33 | Antigua and Barbuda | 15.141 % | |
34 | Burundi | 15.036 % | |
35 | Togo | 14.948 % | |
36 | Gabon | 14.851 % | |
37 | Ghana | 14.793 % | |
38 | Lesotho | 14.763 % | |
39 | Guatemala | 14.449 % | |
40 | Jamaica | 14.279 % | |
41 | United Arab Emirates | 13.92 % | |
42 | Turkey | 13.839 % | |
43 | Maldives | 13.833 % | |
44 | Gambia | 13.666 % | |
45 | Palau | 13.662 % | |
46 | Oman | 13.316 % | |
47 | Brunei Darussalam | 13.277 % | |
48 | Solomon Islands | 13.235 % | |
49 | Malaysia | 13.108 % | |
50 | Cameroon | 12.825 % | |
51 | Vanuatu | 12.791 % | |
52 | Myanmar | 12.661 % | |
53 | Kuwait | 12.645 % | |
54 | Honduras | 12.638 % | |
55 | Cambodia | 12.547 % | |
56 | Seychelles | 12.359 % | |
57 | Dominican Republic | 12.271 % | |
58 | Lebanon | 12.258 % | |
59 | Zimbabwe | 12.111 % | |
60 | Zambia | 11.966 % | |
61 | Bhutan | 11.694 % | |
62 | Bahrain | 11.686 % | |
63 | Congo | 11.552 % | |
64 | Belize | 11.308 % | |
65 | Sierra Leone | 11.212 % | |
66 | Japan | 11.059 % | |
67 | Bulgaria | 11.034 % | |
68 | Greece | 11.013 % | |
69 | Azerbaijan | 10.994 % | |
70 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 10.916 % | |
71 | Ecuador | 10.851 % | |
72 | Iraq | 10.795 % | |
73 | Kenya | 10.708 % | |
74 | Sao Tome and Principe | 10.7 % | |
75 | Singapore | 10.656 % | |
76 | Panama | 10.656 % | |
77 | Nicaragua | 10.651 % | |
78 | Eswatini | 10.55 % | |
79 | Colombia | 10.53 % | |
80 | Thailand | 10.511 % | |
81 | Indonesia | 10.434 % | |
82 | Tanzania | 10.389 % | |
83 | El Salvador | 10.369 % | |
84 | Mexico | 10.159 % | |
85 | Paraguay | 10.01 % | |
86 | Qatar | 9.911 % | |
87 | State of Palestine | 9.901 % | |
88 | Spain | 9.569 % | |
89 | Romania | 9.435 % | |
90 | Israel | 9.345 % | |
91 | Rwanda | 9.325 % | |
92 | Kiribati | 9.232 % | |
93 | Tajikistan | 9.217 % | |
94 | Andorra | 9.198 % | |
95 | Venezuela | 8.998 % | |
96 | Costa Rica | 8.541 % | |
97 | Portugal | 8.452 % | |
98 | Hungary | 8.447 % | |
99 | Brazil | 8.383 % | |
100 | Armenia | 8.289 % | |
101 | Bolivia | 8.256 % | |
102 | North Macedonia | 8.198 % | |
103 | Peru | 8.194 % | |
104 | United States | 8.166 % | |
105 | Tunisia | 8.121 % | |
106 | Uruguay | 7.991 % | |
107 | Luxembourg | 7.561 % | |
108 | Slovakia | 7.548 % | |
109 | France | 7.533 % | |
110 | Vietnam | 7.454 % | |
111 | Fiji | 7.417 % | |
112 | Czech Republic | 7.365 % | |
113 | Argentina | 7.262 % | |
114 | Russia | 7.262 % | |
115 | Cuba | 7.198 % | |
116 | Italy | 7.147 % | |
117 | United Kingdom | 7.107 % | |
118 | Monaco | 7.015 % | |
119 | Malta | 6.997 % | |
120 | Georgia | 6.975 % | |
121 | Algeria | 6.958 % | |
122 | Belgium | 6.957 % | |
123 | Germany | 6.857 % | |
124 | Austria | 6.647 % | |
125 | Republic of Moldova | 6.512 % | |
126 | Australia | 6.434 % | |
127 | South Korea | 6.388 % | |
128 | Switzerland | 6.383 % | |
129 | Montenegro | 6.366 % | |
130 | Kyrgyzstan | 6.353 % | |
131 | Canada | 6.289 % | |
132 | Slovenia | 6.228 % | |
133 | Chile | 6.207 % | |
134 | Serbia | 6.076 % | |
135 | Netherlands | 6.01 % | |
136 | New Zealand | 6.003 % | |
137 | Albania | 5.964 % | |
138 | Ukraine | 5.963 % | |
139 | Uzbekistan | 5.877 % | |
140 | Poland | 5.781 % | |
141 | Kazakhstan | 5.633 % | |
142 | Mongolia | 5.587 % | |
143 | Ireland | 5.499 % | |
144 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 5.17 % | |
145 | China | 5.093 % | |
146 | Denmark | 5.055 % | |
147 | Croatia | 5.055 % | |
148 | Belarus | 5.04 % | |
149 | Turkmenistan | 4.826 % | |
150 | Norway | 4.696 % | |
151 | Lithuania | 4.692 % | |
152 | Latvia | 4.511 % | |
153 | Estonia | 4.455 % | |
154 | Sweden | 4.214 % | |
155 | Finland | 4.135 % | |
156 | San Marino | 4.108 % | |
157 | Iceland | 3.834 % |
- #1
India
- #2
Bangladesh
- #3
Comoros
- #4
Guinea-Bissau
- #5
Philippines
- #6
Nepal
- #7
Liberia
- #8
Madagascar
- #9
Papua New Guinea
- #10
Mauritius
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #157
Iceland
- #156
San Marino
- #155
Finland
- #154
Sweden
- #153
Estonia
- #152
Latvia
- #151
Lithuania
- #150
Norway
- #149
Turkmenistan
- #148
Belarus
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2013, India had the highest Low Birth Weight Rate at 29.22%, while Iceland reported the lowest at 3.83%. This data reflects a significant global range in low birth weight rates, highlighting disparities in maternal and child health across countries. The global average low birth weight rate was 11.03%, indicating that a notable portion of newborns worldwide were affected by this health concern.
Economic Factors and Low Birth Weight Rates
Economic conditions play a crucial role in influencing low birth weight rates. Countries with higher rates, such as India and Bangladesh with rates of 29.22% and 24.18% respectively, often face challenges related to poverty, malnutrition, and limited access to healthcare. In contrast, wealthier nations with robust healthcare systems, like Iceland and Sweden with rates of 3.83% and 4.21% respectively, tend to have lower incidences of low birth weight. These disparities underscore the impact of economic resources on maternal health and prenatal care.
Geographic and Demographic Influences
Geographic and demographic factors also contribute to variations in low birth weight rates. Many of the countries with higher rates, such as Comoros and Guinea-Bissau with rates of 23.99% and 21.53% respectively, are located in regions with limited healthcare infrastructure. Geographic isolation and demographic challenges, including high fertility rates and young maternal ages, exacerbate these issues. Conversely, countries like Finland and Norway, with rates of 4.13% and 4.70%, benefit from advanced healthcare systems and lower fertility rates, contributing to better maternal and infant health outcomes.
Policy and Healthcare Access
Policy decisions and access to healthcare significantly influence low birth weight rates. Nations with comprehensive maternal health policies and universal healthcare, such as Estonia and Latvia, reporting rates of 4.46% and 4.51%, demonstrate the positive impact of policy on health outcomes. In contrast, countries like Nepal and Liberia, with rates of 20.75% and 19.67%, often face challenges in implementing effective healthcare policies due to resource constraints and political instability. Improving healthcare access and policy effectiveness could lead to significant reductions in low birth weight rates in these regions.
Year-over-Year Trends and Notable Changes
Examining year-over-year changes reveals important trends in low birth weight rates. Notably, India experienced the largest decrease, with its rate falling by 0.27% to 29.22%, potentially reflecting improvements in healthcare and nutrition. Similarly, Guinea-Bissau saw a reduction of 0.24%, indicating progress despite ongoing challenges. Conversely, Kuwait experienced the most significant increase of 0.24%, suggesting areas for policy and health system improvement. These shifts highlight the dynamic nature of health outcomes and the importance of sustained policy efforts to address low birth weight issues globally.
Frequently Asked Questions About Low Birth Weight Rate in 2013
Which country had the highest low birth weight rate in 2013?
India had the highest low birth weight rate in 2013, with 29.22%.
Which country had the lowest low birth weight rate in 2013?
Iceland had the lowest low birth weight rate in 2013, with 3.83%.
What was the average low birth weight rate across countries in 2013?
The average low birth weight rate across countries in 2013 was 11.03%.
What was the median low birth weight rate among countries in 2013?
The median low birth weight rate among countries in 2013 was 10.53%.
Which countries were in the top 10 for low birth weight rates in 2013?
The top 10 countries for low birth weight rates in 2013 were India, Bangladesh, Comoros, Guinea-Bissau, Philippines, Nepal, Liberia, Madagascar, Papua New Guinea, and Mauritius.
How many countries were included in the low birth weight rate dataset for 2013?
The low birth weight rate dataset for 2013 included 157 countries.
Insights by country
Poland
In 2013, Poland had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 5.781247034 %, ranking #140 out of 157 countries. This rate is higher than the European average, indicating potential health concerns for newborns in the region. Contributing factors include economic disparities, access to prenatal care, and lifestyle choices that impact maternal health.
Papua New Guinea
Papua New Guinea had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 19.07830001 % in 2013, ranking #9 out of 157 countries. This rate is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a pressing public health concern. Contributing factors include limited access to healthcare services, high rates of maternal malnutrition, and socioeconomic challenges that affect prenatal care.
Monaco
In 2013, Monaco had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 7.014874455 %, ranking #118 out of 157 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, indicating potential health concerns among newborns. Contributing factors include Monaco's high population density and limited space for healthcare facilities, which may impact prenatal care accessibility and maternal health services.
Morocco
In 2013, Morocco had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 15.94713046 %, ranking #26 out of 157 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, indicating potential challenges in maternal health care. Contributing factors include socioeconomic disparities and limited access to quality prenatal care, which can adversely affect birth outcomes in the country.
Mongolia
Mongolia's Low Birth Weight Rate in 2013 was 5.586908058 %, ranking it #142 out of 157 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, indicating challenges in maternal health and nutrition. Contributing factors include Mongolia's vast geography, which can hinder access to healthcare services, and economic constraints that affect food security and prenatal care.
Lebanon
In 2013, Lebanon had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 12.25772043 %, ranking #58 out of 157 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, indicating potential health challenges. Contributing factors include the country's ongoing economic difficulties and limited access to healthcare services, which can adversely affect maternal and infant health outcomes.
Burkina Faso
In 2013, Burkina Faso had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 18.98745966 %, ranking #12 out of 157 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, indicating significant public health challenges. Contributing factors include limited access to healthcare, high rates of malnutrition among pregnant women, and economic instability that affects maternal health services.
Qatar
In 2013, Qatar had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 9.911184666 %, ranking #86 out of 157 countries. This rate is relatively higher than some of its Gulf neighbors, indicating potential health challenges. Contributing factors include the country's rapid economic development, which has led to increased maternal age and lifestyle changes affecting prenatal health.
Albania
In 2013, Albania had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 5.963545557 %, ranking #137 out of 157 countries. This rate is higher than the global average, indicating potential health challenges for newborns in the region. Contributing factors include economic constraints and limited access to prenatal care, which can affect maternal health and nutrition.
Bulgaria
Bulgaria's Low Birth Weight Rate in 2013 was 11.03400834 %, ranking it #67 out of 157 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, indicating potential health challenges for newborns in the country. Contributing factors include Bulgaria's economic struggles, which impact maternal health services, and a declining birth rate that may lead to increased healthcare risks during pregnancy.
Data Source
Low-birthweight babies (% of births)
The World Bank provides global development data, including statistics on low-birthweight babies as a percentage of total births. This dataset offers insights into maternal and child health across various countries, highlighting public health challenges and trends.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Low Birth Weight Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.