Low Birth Weight Rate 2008
Low birth weight rate highlights newborns under 2,500 grams, affecting survival and health outcomes.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | India | 30.517 % | |
2 | Bangladesh | 24.717 % | |
3 | Comoros | 24.641 % | |
4 | Guinea-Bissau | 22.728 % | |
5 | Nepal | 21.611 % | |
6 | Philippines | 21.052 % | |
7 | Senegal | 19.935 % | |
8 | Liberia | 19.755 % | |
9 | Madagascar | 19.632 % | |
10 | Mauritius | 19.453 % | |
11 | Burkina Faso | 19.42 % | |
12 | Côte d'Ivoire | 19.31 % | |
13 | Sri Lanka | 18.852 % | |
14 | Papua New Guinea | 18.666 % | |
15 | Mozambique | 18.636 % | |
16 | Benin | 17.92 % | |
17 | Botswana | 17.871 % | |
18 | Laos | 17.305 % | |
19 | Timor-Leste | 16.992 % | |
20 | Morocco | 16.869 % | |
21 | South Africa | 16.788 % | |
22 | Guyana | 16.761 % | |
23 | Namibia | 16.177 % | |
24 | Jordan | 16.068 % | |
25 | Angola | 16.053 % | |
26 | Malawi | 15.93 % | |
27 | Central African Republic | 15.607 % | |
28 | Trinidad and Tobago | 15.579 % | |
29 | Eritrea | 15.522 % | |
30 | Togo | 15.509 % | |
31 | Saint Lucia | 15.48 % | |
32 | Ghana | 15.347 % | |
33 | Burundi | 15.286 % | |
34 | Suriname | 15.174 % | |
35 | Gabon | 15.117 % | |
36 | Bahamas | 15.023 % | |
37 | Lesotho | 14.778 % | |
38 | Antigua and Barbuda | 14.757 % | |
39 | Turkey | 14.638 % | |
40 | Jamaica | 14.539 % | |
41 | Guatemala | 14.249 % | |
42 | Gambia | 13.943 % | |
43 | Maldives | 13.797 % | |
44 | Palau | 13.669 % | |
45 | United Arab Emirates | 13.408 % | |
46 | Oman | 13.344 % | |
47 | Cambodia | 13.24 % | |
48 | Solomon Islands | 13.174 % | |
49 | Cameroon | 13.017 % | |
50 | Brunei Darussalam | 12.886 % | |
51 | Zimbabwe | 12.67 % | |
52 | Malaysia | 12.638 % | |
53 | Myanmar | 12.574 % | |
54 | Vanuatu | 12.529 % | |
55 | Zambia | 12.384 % | |
56 | Seychelles | 12.248 % | |
57 | Lebanon | 12.2 % | |
58 | Sierra Leone | 12.086 % | |
59 | Congo | 12.079 % | |
60 | Honduras | 12.054 % | |
61 | Bhutan | 11.786 % | |
62 | Kuwait | 11.573 % | |
63 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 11.533 % | |
64 | Dominican Republic | 11.467 % | |
65 | Ecuador | 11.151 % | |
66 | Bahrain | 11.097 % | |
67 | Panama | 11.094 % | |
68 | Belize | 11.071 % | |
69 | Japan | 11.016 % | |
70 | Kenya | 11.004 % | |
71 | Nicaragua | 11 % | |
72 | Tanzania | 10.97 % | |
73 | Azerbaijan | 10.947 % | |
74 | Eswatini | 10.709 % | |
75 | Bulgaria | 10.671 % | |
76 | Indonesia | 10.654 % | |
77 | Iraq | 10.636 % | |
78 | Thailand | 10.631 % | |
79 | Singapore | 10.586 % | |
80 | Sao Tome and Principe | 10.474 % | |
81 | El Salvador | 10.453 % | |
82 | Greece | 10.433 % | |
83 | Colombia | 10.23 % | |
84 | Mexico | 10.12 % | |
85 | Paraguay | 10.046 % | |
86 | Qatar | 9.859 % | |
87 | Romania | 9.725 % | |
88 | State of Palestine | 9.593 % | |
89 | Israel | 9.582 % | |
90 | Tajikistan | 9.559 % | |
91 | Kiribati | 9.397 % | |
92 | Spain | 9.213 % | |
93 | Rwanda | 9.046 % | |
94 | Peru | 8.943 % | |
95 | Andorra | 8.933 % | |
96 | Venezuela | 8.905 % | |
97 | Bolivia | 8.51 % | |
98 | Costa Rica | 8.435 % | |
99 | Vietnam | 8.404 % | |
100 | Hungary | 8.395 % | |
101 | Brazil | 8.252 % | |
102 | Armenia | 8.203 % | |
103 | Uruguay | 8.192 % | |
104 | North Macedonia | 8.121 % | |
105 | United States | 8.058 % | |
106 | Tunisia | 7.987 % | |
107 | Portugal | 7.948 % | |
108 | France | 7.55 % | |
109 | Fiji | 7.391 % | |
110 | Slovakia | 7.309 % | |
111 | Argentina | 7.29 % | |
112 | United Kingdom | 7.232 % | |
113 | Luxembourg | 7.23 % | |
114 | Russia | 7.228 % | |
115 | Monaco | 7.199 % | |
116 | Cuba | 7.159 % | |
117 | Belgium | 7.035 % | |
118 | Czech Republic | 7.019 % | |
119 | Italy | 6.874 % | |
120 | Malta | 6.836 % | |
121 | Algeria | 6.82 % | |
122 | Germany | 6.806 % | |
123 | Austria | 6.781 % | |
124 | Georgia | 6.678 % | |
125 | Kyrgyzstan | 6.622 % | |
126 | Republic of Moldova | 6.49 % | |
127 | Montenegro | 6.382 % | |
128 | Mongolia | 6.354 % | |
129 | Switzerland | 6.342 % | |
130 | Australia | 6.326 % | |
131 | Netherlands | 6.286 % | |
132 | New Zealand | 6.069 % | |
133 | Canada | 6.04 % | |
134 | Slovenia | 6.031 % | |
135 | Albania | 5.972 % | |
136 | Serbia | 5.934 % | |
137 | Ukraine | 5.931 % | |
138 | Kazakhstan | 5.926 % | |
139 | Chile | 5.826 % | |
140 | Poland | 5.825 % | |
141 | South Korea | 5.759 % | |
142 | Uzbekistan | 5.732 % | |
143 | China | 5.271 % | |
144 | Turkmenistan | 5.21 % | |
145 | Denmark | 5.203 % | |
146 | Ireland | 5.166 % | |
147 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 5.122 % | |
148 | Belarus | 5.046 % | |
149 | Croatia | 4.97 % | |
150 | Norway | 4.839 % | |
151 | Lithuania | 4.659 % | |
152 | Latvia | 4.649 % | |
153 | Estonia | 4.4 % | |
154 | Sweden | 4.233 % | |
155 | Finland | 4.136 % | |
156 | San Marino | 3.953 % | |
157 | Iceland | 3.738 % |
- #1
India
- #2
Bangladesh
- #3
Comoros
- #4
Guinea-Bissau
- #5
Nepal
- #6
Philippines
- #7
Senegal
- #8
Liberia
- #9
Madagascar
- #10
Mauritius
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #157
Iceland
- #156
San Marino
- #155
Finland
- #154
Sweden
- #153
Estonia
- #152
Latvia
- #151
Lithuania
- #150
Norway
- #149
Croatia
- #148
Belarus
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2008, India recorded the highest Low Birth Weight Rate at 30.52%, while Iceland had the lowest at 3.74%. The global range of this critical health indicator highlights significant disparities in newborn health across countries. The average Low Birth Weight Rate worldwide was 11.08%, providing a benchmark for understanding how individual countries compare to global norms.
Economic and Health System Factors
Economic status and the robustness of healthcare systems are significant factors influencing the Low Birth Weight Rate. Countries like India and Bangladesh, with rates of 30.52% and 24.72% respectively, often face challenges such as limited access to healthcare, poor maternal nutrition, and high levels of poverty, which contribute to higher incidences of low birth weight. In contrast, nations like Iceland and Finland, with rates of 3.74% and 4.14%, benefit from advanced healthcare systems and robust social support structures, which help ensure better prenatal care and maternal health.
Regional Disparities and Cultural Influences
Geographical and cultural factors also play a role in the prevalence of low birth weight. In regions such as South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa, where countries like Nepal and Guinea-Bissau report rates of 21.61% and 22.73%, cultural practices and dietary habits may influence maternal health. These areas may also experience higher rates of teenage pregnancies and inadequate prenatal care, which are associated with increased risks of low birth weight.
Policy Impact and Improvements
Policy interventions can significantly impact the Low Birth Weight Rate. For instance, countries that have invested in maternal health programs and nutrition initiatives often see positive outcomes. Morocco, which witnessed a decrease of 0.20% in its low birth weight rate, reflects the potential effectiveness of such policies. Conversely, nations like Kuwait and Jordan, which saw increases of 0.19% and 0.17% respectively, may need to reassess their current health policies to better address maternal and infant health needs.
Year-over-Year Trends and Movements
Analyzing year-over-year changes provides insights into ongoing trends and the effectiveness of interventions. Timor-Leste experienced the most significant decrease in low birth weight rate by 0.31%, indicating improvements in healthcare access or nutritional interventions. In contrast, India saw a smaller decrease of 0.26%, suggesting that while progress is being made, challenges remain. On the other hand, countries like Saint Lucia experienced an increase of 0.15%, which may indicate emerging health challenges or the need for more targeted interventions.
The disparities in Low Birth Weight Rate across the globe in 2008 highlight the multifaceted nature of healthcare and the importance of tailored health policies. By understanding the economic, cultural, and policy-related factors behind these numbers, countries can better address the root causes of low birth weight and improve outcomes for newborns worldwide.
Frequently Asked Questions About Low Birth Weight Rate in 2008
Which country had the highest low birth weight rate in 2008?
India had the highest low birth weight rate in 2008, with 30.52%.
What was the lowest low birth weight rate recorded in 2008?
The lowest low birth weight rate in 2008 was recorded in Iceland, with 3.74%.
What was the average low birth weight rate across all countries in 2008?
The average low birth weight rate across all countries in 2008 was 11.08%.
Which countries were in the top 3 for low birth weight rates in 2008?
The top 3 countries for low birth weight rates in 2008 were India (30.52%), Bangladesh (24.72%), and Comoros (24.64%).
What was the median low birth weight rate among countries in 2008?
The median low birth weight rate among countries in 2008 was 10.59%.
How many countries were included in the dataset for low birth weight rates in 2008?
The dataset for low birth weight rates in 2008 included 157 countries.
Insights by country
Congo
In 2008, Congo had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 12.07877414 %, ranking #59 out of 157 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, indicating potential health challenges for newborns in the region. Contributing factors include limited access to healthcare, high rates of maternal malnutrition, and ongoing socio-economic instability, which impact maternal health and nutrition.
Senegal
In 2008, Senegal had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 19.93457473 %, ranking #7 out of 157 countries. This rate is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a serious public health concern. Contributing factors include limited access to prenatal care, high rates of maternal malnutrition, and socioeconomic challenges that affect healthcare infrastructure.
Namibia
In 2008, Namibia had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 16.17653405 %, ranking #23 out of 157 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, highlighting significant health challenges within the nation. Contributing factors include limited access to prenatal care, high rates of maternal malnutrition, and socioeconomic disparities that affect health outcomes. Additionally, Namibia's unique geographic landscape can complicate healthcare delivery, particularly in remote areas.
Turkmenistan
In 2008, Turkmenistan had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 5.210105563 %, ranking #144 out of 157 countries. This rate is higher than the global average, indicating potential health challenges in maternal and infant care. Contributing factors include limited access to healthcare services, particularly in rural areas, and economic constraints that affect nutritional standards for expectant mothers.
Spain
In 2008, Spain had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 9.213274033 %, ranking #92 out of 157 countries. This rate is higher than the European average, indicating potential public health concerns in maternal and infant care. Contributing factors include Spain's aging population and economic challenges that may impact prenatal care access and maternal nutrition.
Portugal
In 2008, Portugal had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 7.948374647 %, ranking #107 out of 157 countries. This rate is higher than the global average, indicating potential health concerns among newborns in the country. Contributing factors include Portugal's economic challenges and public health policies that may not fully address maternal health and prenatal care.
Bahrain
Bahrain ranked #66 globally with a low birth weight rate of 11.09676514 % in 2008. This rate is higher than the global average, indicating potential health concerns for newborns in the region. Contributing factors include Bahrain's high population density and economic challenges that may affect maternal health, such as limited access to prenatal care and rising living costs.
Palau
In 2008, Palau had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 13.66890976 %, ranking #44 out of 157 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, indicating potential health challenges for newborns in the region. Contributing factors include limited access to comprehensive prenatal care and the impact of lifestyle-related health issues among expectant mothers in Palau.
Sri Lanka
Sri Lanka had a **Low Birth Weight Rate** of **18.8519547 %** in 2008, ranking **#13 out of 157 countries**. This rate is notably higher than the global average, indicating significant health challenges in maternal and infant care. Contributing factors include limited access to healthcare services in rural areas and socio-economic disparities that affect nutrition and prenatal care.
Tajikistan
Tajikistan ranked #90 globally with a Low Birth Weight Rate of 9.559279386 % in 2008. This rate is notably higher than the global average, indicating challenges in maternal health and nutrition. Contributing factors include limited access to healthcare services, economic instability, and high levels of poverty, which affect maternal and infant health outcomes in the country.
Data Source
Low-birthweight babies (% of births)
The World Bank provides global development data, including statistics on low-birthweight babies as a percentage of total births. This dataset offers insights into maternal and child health across various countries, highlighting public health challenges and trends.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Low Birth Weight Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.