Low Birth Weight Rate 2011
Low birth weight rate highlights newborns under 2,500 grams, affecting survival and health outcomes.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | India | 29.744 % | |
2 | Bangladesh | 24.393 % | |
3 | Comoros | 24.245 % | |
4 | Guinea-Bissau | 21.995 % | |
5 | Philippines | 21.166 % | |
6 | Nepal | 21.08 % | |
7 | Liberia | 19.697 % | |
8 | Madagascar | 19.543 % | |
9 | Senegal | 19.286 % | |
10 | Mauritius | 19.228 % | |
11 | Côte d'Ivoire | 19.209 % | |
12 | Burkina Faso | 19.167 % | |
13 | Papua New Guinea | 18.926 % | |
14 | Sri Lanka | 18.551 % | |
15 | Mozambique | 18.224 % | |
16 | Benin | 17.595 % | |
17 | Botswana | 17.445 % | |
18 | Laos | 17.239 % | |
19 | Guyana | 16.936 % | |
20 | Jordan | 16.728 % | |
21 | Timor-Leste | 16.724 % | |
22 | South Africa | 16.662 % | |
23 | Morocco | 16.305 % | |
24 | Namibia | 15.996 % | |
25 | Trinidad and Tobago | 15.826 % | |
26 | Saint Lucia | 15.823 % | |
27 | Malawi | 15.814 % | |
28 | Angola | 15.77 % | |
29 | Central African Republic | 15.752 % | |
30 | Suriname | 15.552 % | |
31 | Eritrea | 15.412 % | |
32 | Bahamas | 15.217 % | |
33 | Togo | 15.172 % | |
34 | Burundi | 15.132 % | |
35 | Gabon | 15.021 % | |
36 | Antigua and Barbuda | 15.017 % | |
37 | Ghana | 14.986 % | |
38 | Lesotho | 14.77 % | |
39 | Jamaica | 14.409 % | |
40 | Guatemala | 14.395 % | |
41 | Turkey | 14.189 % | |
42 | United Arab Emirates | 13.824 % | |
43 | Maldives | 13.815 % | |
44 | Gambia | 13.749 % | |
45 | Palau | 13.688 % | |
46 | Oman | 13.34 % | |
47 | Solomon Islands | 13.229 % | |
48 | Brunei Darussalam | 13.131 % | |
49 | Malaysia | 12.926 % | |
50 | Cameroon | 12.909 % | |
51 | Cambodia | 12.845 % | |
52 | Myanmar | 12.682 % | |
53 | Vanuatu | 12.672 % | |
54 | Honduras | 12.426 % | |
55 | Seychelles | 12.322 % | |
56 | Zimbabwe | 12.275 % | |
57 | Kuwait | 12.178 % | |
58 | Lebanon | 12.155 % | |
59 | Zambia | 12.127 % | |
60 | Dominican Republic | 11.954 % | |
61 | Bhutan | 11.733 % | |
62 | Congo | 11.726 % | |
63 | Sierra Leone | 11.544 % | |
64 | Bahrain | 11.518 % | |
65 | Belize | 11.216 % | |
66 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 11.172 % | |
67 | Japan | 11.043 % | |
68 | Ecuador | 10.984 % | |
69 | Azerbaijan | 10.956 % | |
70 | Bulgaria | 10.88 % | |
71 | Nicaragua | 10.835 % | |
72 | Panama | 10.834 % | |
73 | Kenya | 10.815 % | |
74 | Greece | 10.796 % | |
75 | Iraq | 10.746 % | |
76 | Eswatini | 10.643 % | |
77 | Singapore | 10.626 % | |
78 | Tanzania | 10.626 % | |
79 | Sao Tome and Principe | 10.603 % | |
80 | Indonesia | 10.557 % | |
81 | Thailand | 10.535 % | |
82 | Colombia | 10.43 % | |
83 | El Salvador | 10.408 % | |
84 | Mexico | 10.162 % | |
85 | Paraguay | 10.025 % | |
86 | Qatar | 9.884 % | |
87 | State of Palestine | 9.78 % | |
88 | Romania | 9.548 % | |
89 | Spain | 9.447 % | |
90 | Israel | 9.446 % | |
91 | Kiribati | 9.39 % | |
92 | Tajikistan | 9.344 % | |
93 | Rwanda | 9.253 % | |
94 | Andorra | 9.089 % | |
95 | Venezuela | 8.956 % | |
96 | Costa Rica | 8.499 % | |
97 | Peru | 8.478 % | |
98 | Hungary | 8.438 % | |
99 | Bolivia | 8.364 % | |
100 | Brazil | 8.312 % | |
101 | Armenia | 8.273 % | |
102 | Portugal | 8.253 % | |
103 | North Macedonia | 8.157 % | |
104 | United States | 8.14 % | |
105 | Tunisia | 8.064 % | |
106 | Uruguay | 8.053 % | |
107 | Vietnam | 7.83 % | |
108 | France | 7.54 % | |
109 | Luxembourg | 7.471 % | |
110 | Slovakia | 7.449 % | |
111 | Fiji | 7.404 % | |
112 | Argentina | 7.242 % | |
113 | Czech Republic | 7.24 % | |
114 | Russia | 7.239 % | |
115 | Cuba | 7.194 % | |
116 | United Kingdom | 7.168 % | |
117 | Monaco | 7.113 % | |
118 | Italy | 7.049 % | |
119 | Belgium | 7.001 % | |
120 | Malta | 6.94 % | |
121 | Algeria | 6.893 % | |
122 | Georgia | 6.872 % | |
123 | Germany | 6.866 % | |
124 | Austria | 6.719 % | |
125 | Republic of Moldova | 6.506 % | |
126 | Kyrgyzstan | 6.458 % | |
127 | Australia | 6.394 % | |
128 | Montenegro | 6.38 % | |
129 | Switzerland | 6.37 % | |
130 | Canada | 6.191 % | |
131 | Slovenia | 6.151 % | |
132 | South Korea | 6.121 % | |
133 | Netherlands | 6.113 % | |
134 | Chile | 6.047 % | |
135 | New Zealand | 6.04 % | |
136 | Serbia | 6.02 % | |
137 | Albania | 5.975 % | |
138 | Ukraine | 5.963 % | |
139 | Mongolia | 5.876 % | |
140 | Uzbekistan | 5.817 % | |
141 | Poland | 5.79 % | |
142 | Kazakhstan | 5.761 % | |
143 | Ireland | 5.42 % | |
144 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 5.156 % | |
145 | China | 5.15 % | |
146 | Denmark | 5.126 % | |
147 | Croatia | 5.03 % | |
148 | Belarus | 5.02 % | |
149 | Turkmenistan | 4.977 % | |
150 | Norway | 4.766 % | |
151 | Lithuania | 4.695 % | |
152 | Latvia | 4.584 % | |
153 | Estonia | 4.467 % | |
154 | Sweden | 4.228 % | |
155 | Finland | 4.127 % | |
156 | San Marino | 4.036 % | |
157 | Iceland | 3.789 % |
- #1
India
- #2
Bangladesh
- #3
Comoros
- #4
Guinea-Bissau
- #5
Philippines
- #6
Nepal
- #7
Liberia
- #8
Madagascar
- #9
Senegal
- #10
Mauritius
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #157
Iceland
- #156
San Marino
- #155
Finland
- #154
Sweden
- #153
Estonia
- #152
Latvia
- #151
Lithuania
- #150
Norway
- #149
Turkmenistan
- #148
Belarus
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2011, the country with the highest Low Birth Weight Rate was India, with a rate of 29.74%, while the global range spanned from 3.79% to 29.74%. The average low birth weight rate across the 157 countries with available data was 11.05%, providing a crucial benchmark for evaluating newborn health outcomes worldwide.
Economic Development and Birth Weight
The disparity in Low Birth Weight Rates can often be attributed to differences in economic development. Countries with higher rates, such as India at 29.74% and Bangladesh at 24.39%, typically face economic challenges that impact healthcare access and nutrition. These nations often struggle with poverty, which can lead to inadequate maternal nutrition and healthcare services, contributing to higher rates of low birth weight.
Conversely, countries with lower rates, like Iceland at 3.79% and San Marino at 4.04%, benefit from robust healthcare systems and higher socioeconomic standards. These conditions enable better prenatal care and maternal nutrition, significantly reducing the incidence of low birth weight.
Geographic and Demographic Influences
Geographic and demographic factors also play a significant role in low birth weight rates. In Sub-Saharan Africa, countries such as Comoros with a rate of 24.24% and Guinea-Bissau at 21.99% face challenges including limited healthcare infrastructure and high fertility rates, which can exacerbate the risk of low birth weight.
In contrast, Northern European countries like Finland with a rate of 4.13% and Sweden at 4.23% have lower fertility rates and better access to maternal healthcare, contributing to healthier birth outcomes. These regions often employ comprehensive healthcare policies that support maternal and child health, effectively minimizing low birth weight incidences.
Policy Impact on Low Birth Weight
Government policies significantly influence birth weight outcomes. For example, countries such as Norway with a low birth weight rate of 4.77% benefit from well-implemented social welfare systems that ensure access to healthcare and nutrition for pregnant women. These policies can be pivotal in preventing low birth weight by addressing prenatal care and maternal health comprehensively.
In contrast, nations like Philippines with a rate of 21.17% may face policy challenges, such as underfunded healthcare systems and inadequate maternal health programs, which can lead to higher rates of low birth weight. Improving healthcare policies and increasing funding for maternal health can thus be crucial steps in reducing low birth weight rates in these countries.
Year-over-Year Changes and Their Implications
Analyzing year-over-year changes reveals dynamic shifts in low birth weight rates. Notably, India experienced a decrease of 0.26% (-0.9%), indicative of potential improvements in maternal health initiatives or economic conditions. Similarly, Guinea-Bissau and Senegal saw reductions of 0.25% (-1.1%) and 0.20% (-1.0%) respectively, suggesting positive developments in healthcare or nutritional support.
On the other hand, countries like Jordan and Kuwait experienced increases of 0.24% (1.4%) and 0.21% (1.7%) respectively. These increases may reflect economic or social challenges, such as rising healthcare costs or changes in dietary habits, that could negatively impact maternal and child health.
Understanding these trends is crucial for policymakers and healthcare providers aiming to address and reduce low birth weight rates globally. By identifying and targeting the underlying causes of these changes, countries can develop effective strategies to improve birth outcomes and enhance newborn health.
Frequently Asked Questions About Low Birth Weight Rate in 2011
Which country had the highest low birth weight rate in 2011?
India had the highest low birth weight rate in 2011, with 29.74%.
What was the lowest low birth weight rate recorded in 2011?
The lowest low birth weight rate in 2011 was recorded in Iceland, at 3.79%.
What was the average low birth weight rate across all countries in 2011?
The average low birth weight rate across all 157 countries in 2011 was 11.05%.
Which countries were in the top 3 for low birth weight rates in 2011?
The top 3 countries for low birth weight rates in 2011 were India (29.74%), Bangladesh (24.39%), and Comoros (24.24%).
What was the median low birth weight rate in 2011?
The median low birth weight rate in 2011 was 10.6%.
How many countries were included in the low birth weight rate dataset for 2011?
The dataset for low birth weight rates in 2011 included 157 countries.
Insights by country
Israel
In 2011, Israel had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 9.446194102 %, ranking #90 out of 157 countries. This rate is higher than the global average, indicating potential health challenges for newborns in the region. Contributing factors include socioeconomic disparities and access to prenatal care, which can affect maternal health and nutrition.
San Marino
In 2011, San Marino had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 4.035659601 %, ranking #156 out of 157 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, indicating potential health challenges within the population. Contributing factors include San Marino's small population size, which can lead to variability in health outcomes, and limited access to specialized maternal healthcare services compared to larger nations.
Andorra
In 2011, Andorra had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 9.088524209 %, ranking #94 out of 157 countries. This rate is higher than many neighboring countries, reflecting regional health challenges. Contributing factors include Andorra's unique geographical position, which can limit access to specialized maternal healthcare, and its small population size, which may affect health service availability and maternal nutrition.
Bahrain
Bahrain's Low Birth Weight Rate in 2011 was 11.51760398 %, ranking it #64 out of 157 countries. This rate is higher than the global average, indicating potential health challenges for newborns in the region. Contributing factors include Bahrain's relatively high prevalence of maternal health issues and lifestyle-related conditions, such as obesity, which can adversely affect pregnancy outcomes.
Ireland
In 2011, Ireland had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 5.419517609 %, ranking #143 out of 157 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, indicating potential challenges in maternal health and neonatal care. Contributing factors include Ireland's relatively high rates of smoking and alcohol consumption during pregnancy, as well as socioeconomic disparities that can affect access to healthcare services.
Cambodia
In 2011, Cambodia had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 12.84517656 %, ranking #51 out of 157 countries. This rate is notably higher than some neighboring countries, indicating a significant public health challenge. Contributing factors include limited access to healthcare services, malnutrition among pregnant women, and socioeconomic disparities that affect maternal health. Addressing these issues is crucial for improving birth outcomes and overall child health in Cambodia.
Algeria
In 2011, Algeria had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 6.893100385 %, ranking #121 out of 157 countries. This rate is higher than the global average, indicating potential public health challenges. Factors contributing to this statistic include limited access to healthcare services in rural areas and socioeconomic disparities that affect maternal nutrition and health.
Indonesia
In 2011, Indonesia had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 10.55663545 %, ranking #80 out of 157 countries. This rate is higher than the global average, indicating significant public health challenges. Contributing factors include limited access to prenatal care, nutritional deficiencies among pregnant women, and socioeconomic disparities that affect maternal health. Addressing these issues is crucial for improving birth outcomes and overall child health in the country.
Argentina
In 2011, Argentina had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 7.241716576 %, ranking #112 out of 157 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, indicating challenges in maternal health and access to prenatal care. Contributing factors include socioeconomic disparities and regional health service availability, which can affect the nutrition and healthcare access of pregnant women.
Jordan
In 2011, Jordan had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 16.72814682 %, ranking #20 out of 157 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, which highlights significant health challenges within the nation. Contributing factors include limited access to healthcare services, particularly in rural areas, and socioeconomic conditions that affect maternal nutrition and healthcare during pregnancy.
Data Source
Low-birthweight babies (% of births)
The World Bank provides global development data, including statistics on low-birthweight babies as a percentage of total births. This dataset offers insights into maternal and child health across various countries, highlighting public health challenges and trends.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Low Birth Weight Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.