Low Birth Weight Rate 2004
Low birth weight rate highlights newborns under 2,500 grams, affecting survival and health outcomes.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | India | 31.576 % | |
2 | Bangladesh | 25.325 % | |
3 | Comoros | 25.077 % | |
4 | Guinea-Bissau | 23.622 % | |
5 | Nepal | 22.143 % | |
6 | Senegal | 21.015 % | |
7 | Philippines | 20.899 % | |
8 | Madagascar | 19.935 % | |
9 | Liberia | 19.832 % | |
10 | Burkina Faso | 19.82 % | |
11 | Mauritius | 19.558 % | |
12 | Côte d'Ivoire | 19.372 % | |
13 | Sri Lanka | 19.159 % | |
14 | Mozambique | 19.088 % | |
15 | Timor-Leste | 18.467 % | |
16 | Benin | 18.392 % | |
17 | Papua New Guinea | 18.338 % | |
18 | Botswana | 18.212 % | |
19 | Morocco | 17.678 % | |
20 | Laos | 17.435 % | |
21 | South Africa | 17.058 % | |
22 | Angola | 16.668 % | |
23 | Guyana | 16.51 % | |
24 | Namibia | 16.3 % | |
25 | Malawi | 16.246 % | |
26 | Eritrea | 15.779 % | |
27 | Ghana | 15.675 % | |
28 | Togo | 15.64 % | |
29 | Burundi | 15.494 % | |
30 | Jordan | 15.466 % | |
31 | Central African Republic | 15.445 % | |
32 | Trinidad and Tobago | 15.294 % | |
33 | Turkey | 15.217 % | |
34 | Gabon | 15.016 % | |
35 | Saint Lucia | 14.879 % | |
36 | Lesotho | 14.862 % | |
37 | Bahamas | 14.795 % | |
38 | Jamaica | 14.7 % | |
39 | Suriname | 14.688 % | |
40 | Antigua and Barbuda | 14.398 % | |
41 | Gambia | 14.196 % | |
42 | Guatemala | 14.097 % | |
43 | Cambodia | 13.943 % | |
44 | Maldives | 13.876 % | |
45 | Palau | 13.569 % | |
46 | Oman | 13.472 % | |
47 | Cameroon | 13.165 % | |
48 | Solomon Islands | 13.046 % | |
49 | United Arab Emirates | 12.99 % | |
50 | Sierra Leone | 12.95 % | |
51 | Zimbabwe | 12.825 % | |
52 | Zambia | 12.753 % | |
53 | Brunei Darussalam | 12.566 % | |
54 | Congo | 12.546 % | |
55 | Lebanon | 12.425 % | |
56 | Myanmar | 12.345 % | |
57 | Malaysia | 12.342 % | |
58 | Vanuatu | 12.325 % | |
59 | Seychelles | 12.24 % | |
60 | Bhutan | 12.051 % | |
61 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 12.024 % | |
62 | Honduras | 11.756 % | |
63 | Tanzania | 11.477 % | |
64 | Panama | 11.424 % | |
65 | Kenya | 11.352 % | |
66 | Ecuador | 11.335 % | |
67 | Nicaragua | 11.234 % | |
68 | Japan | 11.085 % | |
69 | Azerbaijan | 10.97 % | |
70 | Belize | 10.915 % | |
71 | Dominican Republic | 10.905 % | |
72 | Eswatini | 10.88 % | |
73 | Thailand | 10.839 % | |
74 | Kuwait | 10.811 % | |
75 | Indonesia | 10.754 % | |
76 | Bahrain | 10.577 % | |
77 | Bulgaria | 10.547 % | |
78 | Singapore | 10.542 % | |
79 | Iraq | 10.5 % | |
80 | El Salvador | 10.491 % | |
81 | Sao Tome and Principe | 10.277 % | |
82 | Romania | 10.189 % | |
83 | Greece | 10.114 % | |
84 | Mexico | 10.062 % | |
85 | Paraguay | 10.05 % | |
86 | Colombia | 9.977 % | |
87 | Qatar | 9.878 % | |
88 | Tajikistan | 9.849 % | |
89 | Israel | 9.81 % | |
90 | Peru | 9.623 % | |
91 | State of Palestine | 9.328 % | |
92 | Kiribati | 9.315 % | |
93 | Vietnam | 9.091 % | |
94 | Spain | 9.016 % | |
95 | Rwanda | 8.94 % | |
96 | Venezuela | 8.848 % | |
97 | Andorra | 8.817 % | |
98 | Bolivia | 8.753 % | |
99 | Uruguay | 8.445 % | |
100 | Armenia | 8.437 % | |
101 | Hungary | 8.43 % | |
102 | Costa Rica | 8.414 % | |
103 | Brazil | 8.154 % | |
104 | North Macedonia | 8.098 % | |
105 | United States | 7.939 % | |
106 | Tunisia | 7.891 % | |
107 | France | 7.588 % | |
108 | Portugal | 7.565 % | |
109 | Argentina | 7.486 % | |
110 | United Kingdom | 7.385 % | |
111 | Russia | 7.368 % | |
112 | Fiji | 7.347 % | |
113 | Monaco | 7.313 % | |
114 | Slovakia | 7.274 % | |
115 | Cuba | 7.107 % | |
116 | Luxembourg | 7.084 % | |
117 | Belgium | 7.078 % | |
118 | Mongolia | 6.972 % | |
119 | Kyrgyzstan | 6.928 % | |
120 | Austria | 6.874 % | |
121 | Algeria | 6.79 % | |
122 | Czech Republic | 6.785 % | |
123 | Germany | 6.759 % | |
124 | Italy | 6.691 % | |
125 | Malta | 6.689 % | |
126 | Netherlands | 6.542 % | |
127 | Republic of Moldova | 6.525 % | |
128 | Montenegro | 6.407 % | |
129 | Georgia | 6.348 % | |
130 | Switzerland | 6.291 % | |
131 | Australia | 6.29 % | |
132 | Kazakhstan | 6.223 % | |
133 | New Zealand | 6.098 % | |
134 | Ukraine | 6.029 % | |
135 | Slovenia | 5.966 % | |
136 | Poland | 5.925 % | |
137 | Serbia | 5.915 % | |
138 | Canada | 5.857 % | |
139 | Albania | 5.851 % | |
140 | Uzbekistan | 5.622 % | |
141 | Chile | 5.553 % | |
142 | Turkmenistan | 5.54 % | |
143 | China | 5.524 % | |
144 | South Korea | 5.34 % | |
145 | Denmark | 5.334 % | |
146 | Belarus | 5.181 % | |
147 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 5.101 % | |
148 | Croatia | 4.992 % | |
149 | Norway | 4.95 % | |
150 | Ireland | 4.918 % | |
151 | Latvia | 4.883 % | |
152 | Lithuania | 4.705 % | |
153 | Estonia | 4.397 % | |
154 | Sweden | 4.271 % | |
155 | Finland | 4.216 % | |
156 | San Marino | 3.921 % | |
157 | Iceland | 3.662 % |
- #1
India
- #2
Bangladesh
- #3
Comoros
- #4
Guinea-Bissau
- #5
Nepal
- #6
Senegal
- #7
Philippines
- #8
Madagascar
- #9
Liberia
- #10
Burkina Faso
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #157
Iceland
- #156
San Marino
- #155
Finland
- #154
Sweden
- #153
Estonia
- #152
Lithuania
- #151
Latvia
- #150
Ireland
- #149
Norway
- #148
Croatia
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2004, India recorded the highest Low Birth Weight Rate at 31.58%, while Iceland had the lowest at 3.66%. The global range of low birth weight rates spanned from these extremes, highlighting significant disparities in newborn health outcomes worldwide. The average low birth weight rate across 157 countries was 11.16%, with a median of 10.50%, underscoring the global challenge in addressing factors influencing newborn health.
Socioeconomic Factors and Low Birth Weight
Socioeconomic conditions play a crucial role in the Low Birth Weight Rate, as evidenced by the data from countries like India and Bangladesh, which reported rates of 31.58% and 25.32% respectively. These countries face significant challenges such as poverty, limited access to healthcare, and inadequate maternal nutrition, which contribute to higher incidences of low birth weight. In contrast, nations with robust healthcare systems and higher living standards, like Iceland and San Marino, reported much lower rates of 3.66% and 3.92% respectively, reflecting the positive impact of economic stability and healthcare accessibility.
Geographic and Regional Patterns
Geographic disparities are evident in the low birth weight statistics. South Asian countries, including India and Nepal, show higher rates, such as 22.14% in Nepal, indicating regional challenges related to healthcare infrastructure and maternal health education. African countries like Senegal and Guinea-Bissau also feature prominently with rates of 21.02% and 23.62% respectively, suggesting a need for targeted interventions to improve maternal and infant health services in these regions.
Impact of Healthcare Policies
Healthcare policies significantly influence Low Birth Weight Rates. Countries like Sweden and Finland, with rates of 4.27% and 4.22% respectively, benefit from comprehensive maternal care programs and prenatal services, contributing to their lower rates. In contrast, nations with under-resourced healthcare systems often struggle to provide adequate prenatal care, resulting in higher rates. This disparity highlights the importance of policy-driven healthcare improvements to reduce low birth weight incidences.
Year-over-Year Changes and Trends
The year-over-year analysis reveals interesting trends, with an average global change of -0.02%, or -0.1%. Notably, Kuwait and Jordan experienced increases of 0.18%, reflecting potential challenges in maintaining healthcare standards or changes in reporting practices. Conversely, countries like Senegal and Timor-Leste saw decreases of -0.29% and -0.26% respectively, possibly indicating successful interventions or improved healthcare access. India, despite having the highest rate, showed a decrease of -0.25%, suggesting incremental progress in addressing the issue.
In summary, the Low Birth Weight Rate in 2004 highlights the intersection of socioeconomic status, geographic location, healthcare policy, and year-over-year trends in shaping newborn health outcomes. Addressing these factors through targeted policies and improved healthcare access remains critical for reducing low birth weight rates globally.
Frequently Asked Questions About Low Birth Weight Rate in 2004
Which country had the highest low birth weight rate in 2004?
India had the highest low birth weight rate in 2004, with 31.58%.
Which country had the lowest low birth weight rate in 2004?
Iceland had the lowest low birth weight rate in 2004, with 3.66%.
What was the average low birth weight rate among countries in 2004?
The average low birth weight rate among the countries in 2004 was 11.16%.
What was the median low birth weight rate in 2004?
The median low birth weight rate in 2004 was 10.5%.
Which countries were in the top 10 for low birth weight rates in 2004?
The top 10 countries for low birth weight rates in 2004 were India, Bangladesh, Comoros, Guinea-Bissau, Nepal, Senegal, Philippines, Madagascar, Liberia, and Burkina Faso.
How many countries were included in the low birth weight rate dataset for 2004?
The dataset for low birth weight rates in 2004 included 157 countries.
Insights by country
Vietnam
In 2004, Vietnam had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 9.091009171 %, ranking #93 out of 157 countries. This rate is higher than the global average, indicating significant health challenges compared to many countries. Contributing factors include limited access to quality prenatal care, nutritional deficiencies among pregnant women, and socioeconomic disparities that affect maternal health. Addressing these issues is crucial for improving overall child health outcomes in Vietnam.
Rwanda
In 2004, Rwanda had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 8.940331933 %, ranking #95 out of 157 countries. This rate is higher than the global average, indicating challenges in maternal and child health. Factors contributing to this statistic include limited access to healthcare services, malnutrition among pregnant women, and the aftermath of the 1994 genocide, which has had lasting impacts on the country's healthcare infrastructure.
Ukraine
In 2004, Ukraine had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 6.029076028 %, ranking #134 out of 157 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, indicating significant public health challenges. Contributing factors include economic instability and limited access to prenatal care, which have historically affected maternal health and infant outcomes in Ukraine.
North Macedonia
In 2004, North Macedonia had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 8.098263322 %, ranking #104 out of 157 countries. This rate is higher than the global average, indicating potential health concerns within the population. Contributing factors include socioeconomic challenges, limited access to prenatal care, and a relatively high prevalence of smoking among pregnant women in the country.
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranked #61 globally for Low Birth Weight Rate in 2004, with a rate of 12.02378995 %. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating significant health challenges in maternal and infant care. Contributing factors include widespread poverty, limited access to healthcare services, and high rates of malnutrition among pregnant women in the country.
United Kingdom
The United Kingdom had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 7.385226742 % in 2004, ranking #110 out of 157 countries. This rate is higher than many European neighbors, indicating potential public health concerns. Contributing factors include socioeconomic disparities, access to prenatal care, and maternal health policies that vary across regions within the UK.
Tajikistan
Tajikistan had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 9.849055993 % in 2004, ranking #88 out of 157 countries. This rate is higher than the global average, indicating challenges in maternal and infant health. Contributing factors include limited access to healthcare services, high rates of poverty, and nutritional deficiencies among pregnant women, which are prevalent in the region.
Antigua and Barbuda
In 2004, Antigua and Barbuda had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 14.39827449 %, ranking #40 out of 157 countries. This rate is significantly higher than the global average, indicating potential health challenges within the population compared to lower rates observed in countries like Japan. Factors contributing to this statistic include limited access to comprehensive prenatal care and socioeconomic conditions that may affect maternal health, particularly in rural areas.
Estonia
In 2004, Estonia had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 4.397267313 %, ranking #153 out of 157 countries. This rate is higher than the global average, indicating potential health challenges for newborns in the country. Contributing factors include Estonia's post-Soviet transition, which has affected healthcare access and maternal health services, as well as economic pressures that can impact prenatal care.
Comoros
In 2004, Comoros had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 25.07739343 %, ranking #3 out of 157 countries. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a pressing public health issue. Contributing factors include limited access to healthcare services, high rates of maternal malnutrition, and economic challenges that affect prenatal care.
Data Source
Low-birthweight babies (% of births)
The World Bank provides global development data, including statistics on low-birthweight babies as a percentage of total births. This dataset offers insights into maternal and child health across various countries, highlighting public health challenges and trends.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Low Birth Weight Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.