Low Birth Weight Rate 2017
Low birth weight rate highlights newborns under 2,500 grams, affecting survival and health outcomes.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | India | 28.086 % | |
2 | Comoros | 23.471 % | |
3 | Bangladesh | 23.47 % | |
4 | Philippines | 21.089 % | |
5 | Guinea-Bissau | 20.429 % | |
6 | Nepal | 20.125 % | |
7 | Liberia | 19.808 % | |
8 | Papua New Guinea | 19.295 % | |
9 | Madagascar | 19.043 % | |
10 | Mauritius | 18.791 % | |
11 | Burkina Faso | 18.681 % | |
12 | Côte d'Ivoire | 18.533 % | |
13 | Timor-Leste | 18.169 % | |
14 | Jordan | 18.134 % | |
15 | Sri Lanka | 18.129 % | |
16 | Senegal | 17.987 % | |
17 | Mozambique | 17.847 % | |
18 | Guyana | 17.148 % | |
19 | Botswana | 16.968 % | |
20 | Laos | 16.941 % | |
21 | Benin | 16.839 % | |
22 | South Africa | 16.628 % | |
23 | Central African Republic | 16.363 % | |
24 | Trinidad and Tobago | 16.232 % | |
25 | Suriname | 16.192 % | |
26 | Saint Lucia | 16.19 % | |
27 | Malawi | 15.755 % | |
28 | Namibia | 15.627 % | |
29 | Angola | 15.531 % | |
30 | Bahamas | 15.423 % | |
31 | Antigua and Barbuda | 15.315 % | |
32 | Morocco | 15.253 % | |
33 | Eritrea | 15.243 % | |
34 | Burundi | 14.916 % | |
35 | Gabon | 14.68 % | |
36 | Lesotho | 14.636 % | |
37 | Ghana | 14.56 % | |
38 | Togo | 14.535 % | |
39 | Guatemala | 14.484 % | |
40 | Jamaica | 13.964 % | |
41 | United Arab Emirates | 13.935 % | |
42 | Maldives | 13.779 % | |
43 | Kuwait | 13.66 % | |
44 | Palau | 13.547 % | |
45 | Brunei Darussalam | 13.507 % | |
46 | Malaysia | 13.469 % | |
47 | Gambia | 13.454 % | |
48 | Turkey | 13.245 % | |
49 | Oman | 13.238 % | |
50 | Solomon Islands | 13.23 % | |
51 | Vanuatu | 12.992 % | |
52 | Honduras | 12.894 % | |
53 | Dominican Republic | 12.872 % | |
54 | Cameroon | 12.627 % | |
55 | Myanmar | 12.512 % | |
56 | Lebanon | 12.474 % | |
57 | Seychelles | 12.406 % | |
58 | Bahrain | 12.094 % | |
59 | Zimbabwe | 12.015 % | |
60 | Cambodia | 11.886 % | |
61 | Congo | 11.687 % | |
62 | Zambia | 11.569 % | |
63 | Bhutan | 11.524 % | |
64 | Belize | 11.461 % | |
65 | Greece | 11.298 % | |
66 | Bulgaria | 11.233 % | |
67 | Japan | 11.16 % | |
68 | Azerbaijan | 11.047 % | |
69 | Sao Tome and Principe | 10.924 % | |
70 | Iraq | 10.851 % | |
71 | Singapore | 10.795 % | |
72 | Sierra Leone | 10.792 % | |
73 | Colombia | 10.758 % | |
74 | Ecuador | 10.724 % | |
75 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 10.428 % | |
76 | Panama | 10.391 % | |
77 | Thailand | 10.383 % | |
78 | Eswatini | 10.357 % | |
79 | Kenya | 10.336 % | |
80 | Nicaragua | 10.294 % | |
81 | El Salvador | 10.27 % | |
82 | State of Palestine | 10.161 % | |
83 | Mexico | 10.154 % | |
84 | Indonesia | 10.107 % | |
85 | Paraguay | 9.953 % | |
86 | Tanzania | 9.95 % | |
87 | Qatar | 9.946 % | |
88 | Spain | 9.603 % | |
89 | Rwanda | 9.369 % | |
90 | Andorra | 9.311 % | |
91 | Venezuela | 9.152 % | |
92 | Israel | 9.123 % | |
93 | Romania | 9.088 % | |
94 | Kiribati | 9.03 % | |
95 | Tajikistan | 8.944 % | |
96 | Portugal | 8.729 % | |
97 | Costa Rica | 8.615 % | |
98 | Brazil | 8.602 % | |
99 | Hungary | 8.376 % | |
100 | Armenia | 8.298 % | |
101 | North Macedonia | 8.253 % | |
102 | United States | 8.204 % | |
103 | Tunisia | 8.188 % | |
104 | Bolivia | 8.047 % | |
105 | Uruguay | 7.869 % | |
106 | Peru | 7.764 % | |
107 | Slovakia | 7.704 % | |
108 | Luxembourg | 7.666 % | |
109 | Czech Republic | 7.521 % | |
110 | France | 7.481 % | |
111 | Fiji | 7.42 % | |
112 | Argentina | 7.331 % | |
113 | Russia | 7.292 % | |
114 | Georgia | 7.222 % | |
115 | Italy | 7.196 % | |
116 | Cuba | 7.13 % | |
117 | Malta | 7.091 % | |
118 | Algeria | 7.087 % | |
119 | South Korea | 6.973 % | |
120 | United Kingdom | 6.934 % | |
121 | Belgium | 6.841 % | |
122 | Monaco | 6.821 % | |
123 | Vietnam | 6.756 % | |
124 | Germany | 6.753 % | |
125 | Chile | 6.583 % | |
126 | Australia | 6.495 % | |
127 | Republic of Moldova | 6.494 % | |
128 | Canada | 6.475 % | |
129 | Austria | 6.458 % | |
130 | Switzerland | 6.404 % | |
131 | Slovenia | 6.28 % | |
132 | Montenegro | 6.276 % | |
133 | Kyrgyzstan | 6.16 % | |
134 | Serbia | 6.155 % | |
135 | Uzbekistan | 6.01 % | |
136 | Albania | 5.945 % | |
137 | New Zealand | 5.912 % | |
138 | Netherlands | 5.801 % | |
139 | Ukraine | 5.727 % | |
140 | Poland | 5.694 % | |
141 | Ireland | 5.54 % | |
142 | Kazakhstan | 5.426 % | |
143 | Mongolia | 5.179 % | |
144 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 5.153 % | |
145 | Belarus | 5.106 % | |
146 | Croatia | 5.03 % | |
147 | China | 4.982 % | |
148 | Denmark | 4.9 % | |
149 | Lithuania | 4.66 % | |
150 | Norway | 4.536 % | |
151 | Turkmenistan | 4.519 % | |
152 | Latvia | 4.348 % | |
153 | San Marino | 4.207 % | |
154 | Estonia | 4.182 % | |
155 | Sweden | 4.157 % | |
156 | Finland | 4.111 % | |
157 | Iceland | 3.927 % |
- #1
India
- #2
Comoros
- #3
Bangladesh
- #4
Philippines
- #5
Guinea-Bissau
- #6
Nepal
- #7
Liberia
- #8
Papua New Guinea
- #9
Madagascar
- #10
Mauritius
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #157
Iceland
- #156
Finland
- #155
Sweden
- #154
Estonia
- #153
San Marino
- #152
Latvia
- #151
Turkmenistan
- #150
Norway
- #149
Lithuania
- #148
Denmark
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2017, India had the highest Low Birth Weight Rate at 28.09%, while globally, rates ranged from 3.93% to 28.09%. The worldwide average low birth weight rate was 10.97%, reflecting a significant public health challenge as low birth weight impacts survival and health outcomes.
Economic Factors Influencing Low Birth Weight Rates
Economic conditions play a significant role in the prevalence of low birth weight rates across countries. India, leading with a rate of 28.09%, and Bangladesh, with 23.47%, both face economic challenges that affect maternal health services. Limited access to prenatal care, nutritional deficiencies, and high rates of poverty contribute to these high rates. Conversely, Iceland and Finland report rates of 3.93% and 4.11% respectively, benefiting from robust healthcare systems and higher standards of living, which ensure better maternal and infant health services.
Geographic and Demographic Influences
Geographic and demographic factors also influence low birth weight rates. For instance, Comoros and Guinea-Bissau, with rates of 23.47% and 20.43% respectively, face geographic isolation and demographic pressures such as high fertility rates, which can strain resources and healthcare services. In contrast, Nordic countries like Sweden and Norway, with rates of 4.16% and 4.54%, benefit from lower population densities and comprehensive healthcare policies that prioritize maternal and child health.
Policy and Healthcare Infrastructure
The disparity in low birth weight rates is also shaped by national healthcare policies and infrastructure. Countries with lower rates, such as Denmark at 4.90%, have well-established maternal healthcare services and policies promoting prenatal care. These countries invest in healthcare infrastructure, ensuring widespread access to essential services. In contrast, nations like Nepal with a rate of 20.13% face challenges in healthcare delivery, often due to limited infrastructure and resources, which directly impacts maternal and neonatal health outcomes.
Year-over-Year Trends and Significant Changes
Analyzing year-over-year changes reveals important trends. While the average global change was a decrease of 0.02%, some countries experienced notable shifts. Kuwait and Jordan saw increases of 0.25%, indicating potential areas of concern in healthcare access or nutritional shifts. On the other hand, Guinea-Bissau and India showed decreases of 0.30% and 0.28%, possibly reflecting improvements in healthcare initiatives or nutritional programs. Such changes underscore the dynamic nature of health metrics and the impact of targeted interventions.
In summary, the Low Birth Weight Rate in 2017 highlights stark contrasts driven by economic, geographic, and policy factors. While countries like India and Bangladesh grapple with high rates due to systemic challenges, nations such as Iceland and Sweden illustrate the benefits of comprehensive healthcare systems. Understanding these patterns is crucial for developing effective strategies to reduce low birth weight rates globally.
Frequently Asked Questions About Low Birth Weight Rate in 2017
Which country had the highest low birth weight rate in 2017?
India had the highest low birth weight rate in 2017, with 28.09%.
Which country had the lowest low birth weight rate in 2017?
Iceland had the lowest low birth weight rate in 2017, with 3.93%.
What was the average low birth weight rate across countries in 2017?
The average low birth weight rate across countries in 2017 was 10.97%.
What was the median low birth weight rate among countries in 2017?
The median low birth weight rate among countries in 2017 was 10.34%.
Which countries were in the top 3 for the highest low birth weight rates in 2017?
The top 3 countries with the highest low birth weight rates in 2017 were India (28.09%), Comoros (23.47%), and Bangladesh (23.47%).
How many countries were included in the low birth weight rate dataset for 2017?
The dataset for low birth weight rates in 2017 included 157 countries.
Insights by country
Cameroon
In 2017, Cameroon had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 12.62741624 %, ranking #54 out of 157 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, indicating potential health risks for newborns in the country. Contributing factors include limited access to healthcare, high rates of maternal malnutrition, and socioeconomic challenges that affect prenatal care.
Sierra Leone
Sierra Leone had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 10.79180421 % in 2017, ranking #72 out of 157 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, indicating significant health challenges. Contributing factors include limited access to quality prenatal care, high rates of maternal malnutrition, and the lingering effects of the Ebola outbreak, which strained health systems and resources in the country.
Georgia
In 2017, Georgia had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 7.221720662 %, ranking #114 out of 157 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, reflecting challenges in maternal health and access to quality prenatal care. Factors contributing to this statistic include economic constraints and a healthcare system that struggles with resource allocation, impacting the overall health of mothers and infants.
Oman
In 2017, Oman had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 13.23782297 %, ranking #49 out of 157 countries. This rate is higher than the global average, suggesting challenges in maternal health compared to many developed nations. Contributing factors include Oman’s ongoing efforts to improve healthcare access and the socioeconomic conditions impacting maternal nutrition and prenatal care.
Australia
In 2017, Australia had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 6.494630549 %, ranking #126 out of 157 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, indicating potential public health concerns. Factors contributing to this statistic include socio-economic disparities, maternal health issues, and access to prenatal care, which can vary significantly across different regions of the country.
Mexico
In 2017, Mexico had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 10.15418834 %, ranking #83 out of 157 countries. This rate is higher than the global average, indicating potential challenges in maternal health and infant care compared to countries with lower rates such as Japan. Contributing factors include socioeconomic disparities, limited access to healthcare in rural areas, and nutritional deficiencies among pregnant women, which can adversely affect birth outcomes.
Vanuatu
In 2017, Vanuatu had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 12.99164224 %, ranking #51 out of 157 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, indicating potential health challenges for newborns in the region. Contributing factors include limited access to healthcare services, economic constraints, and the impact of natural disasters on maternal health and nutrition in this island nation.
Palau
In 2017, Palau had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 13.5466434 %, ranking #44 out of 157 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, indicating potential health challenges for newborns in the region. Contributing factors include limited access to healthcare services and nutritional deficiencies among pregnant women, which are compounded by Palau's geographic isolation and reliance on imported food supplies.
China
In 2017, China had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 4.981858305 %, ranking #147 out of 157 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, indicating challenges in maternal and infant health. Contributing factors include rapid urbanization, which can lead to inadequate prenatal care, and the lingering effects of the one-child policy, impacting family planning and healthcare access.
Namibia
In 2017, Namibia had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 15.62707749 %, ranking #28 out of 157 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, indicating significant public health challenges. Key drivers of this statistic include high maternal malnutrition rates, limited access to healthcare services, and socioeconomic disparities that affect pregnant women in rural areas.
Data Source
Low-birthweight babies (% of births)
The World Bank provides global development data, including statistics on low-birthweight babies as a percentage of total births. This dataset offers insights into maternal and child health across various countries, highlighting public health challenges and trends.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Low Birth Weight Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.