Low Birth Weight Rate 2012
Low birth weight rate highlights newborns under 2,500 grams, affecting survival and health outcomes.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | India | 29.489 % | |
2 | Bangladesh | 24.29 % | |
3 | Comoros | 24.119 % | |
4 | Guinea-Bissau | 21.766 % | |
5 | Philippines | 21.183 % | |
6 | Nepal | 20.914 % | |
7 | Liberia | 19.68 % | |
8 | Madagascar | 19.499 % | |
9 | Mauritius | 19.131 % | |
10 | Côte d'Ivoire | 19.124 % | |
11 | Senegal | 19.096 % | |
12 | Burkina Faso | 19.072 % | |
13 | Papua New Guinea | 19.001 % | |
14 | Sri Lanka | 18.461 % | |
15 | Mozambique | 18.115 % | |
16 | Benin | 17.476 % | |
17 | Botswana | 17.296 % | |
18 | Laos | 17.204 % | |
19 | Guyana | 16.981 % | |
20 | Jordan | 16.958 % | |
21 | Timor-Leste | 16.837 % | |
22 | South Africa | 16.633 % | |
23 | Morocco | 16.123 % | |
24 | Trinidad and Tobago | 15.912 % | |
25 | Saint Lucia | 15.906 % | |
26 | Namibia | 15.904 % | |
27 | Central African Republic | 15.888 % | |
28 | Malawi | 15.816 % | |
29 | Angola | 15.683 % | |
30 | Suriname | 15.669 % | |
31 | Eritrea | 15.383 % | |
32 | Bahamas | 15.264 % | |
33 | Burundi | 15.085 % | |
34 | Antigua and Barbuda | 15.082 % | |
35 | Togo | 15.059 % | |
36 | Gabon | 14.933 % | |
37 | Ghana | 14.885 % | |
38 | Lesotho | 14.772 % | |
39 | Guatemala | 14.426 % | |
40 | Jamaica | 14.345 % | |
41 | Turkey | 14.012 % | |
42 | United Arab Emirates | 13.891 % | |
43 | Maldives | 13.823 % | |
44 | Gambia | 13.704 % | |
45 | Palau | 13.68 % | |
46 | Oman | 13.339 % | |
47 | Solomon Islands | 13.233 % | |
48 | Brunei Darussalam | 13.206 % | |
49 | Malaysia | 13.018 % | |
50 | Cameroon | 12.87 % | |
51 | Vanuatu | 12.731 % | |
52 | Cambodia | 12.701 % | |
53 | Myanmar | 12.681 % | |
54 | Honduras | 12.54 % | |
55 | Kuwait | 12.403 % | |
56 | Seychelles | 12.343 % | |
57 | Lebanon | 12.198 % | |
58 | Zimbabwe | 12.169 % | |
59 | Dominican Republic | 12.117 % | |
60 | Zambia | 12.047 % | |
61 | Bhutan | 11.719 % | |
62 | Congo | 11.62 % | |
63 | Bahrain | 11.607 % | |
64 | Sierra Leone | 11.364 % | |
65 | Belize | 11.262 % | |
66 | Japan | 11.05 % | |
67 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 11.045 % | |
68 | Azerbaijan | 10.973 % | |
69 | Bulgaria | 10.961 % | |
70 | Ecuador | 10.916 % | |
71 | Greece | 10.911 % | |
72 | Iraq | 10.774 % | |
73 | Kenya | 10.761 % | |
74 | Nicaragua | 10.749 % | |
75 | Panama | 10.744 % | |
76 | Sao Tome and Principe | 10.65 % | |
77 | Singapore | 10.638 % | |
78 | Eswatini | 10.598 % | |
79 | Thailand | 10.52 % | |
80 | Tanzania | 10.506 % | |
81 | Indonesia | 10.5 % | |
82 | Colombia | 10.481 % | |
83 | El Salvador | 10.39 % | |
84 | Mexico | 10.16 % | |
85 | Paraguay | 10.021 % | |
86 | Qatar | 9.899 % | |
87 | State of Palestine | 9.839 % | |
88 | Spain | 9.512 % | |
89 | Romania | 9.497 % | |
90 | Israel | 9.398 % | |
91 | Kiribati | 9.312 % | |
92 | Rwanda | 9.295 % | |
93 | Tajikistan | 9.279 % | |
94 | Andorra | 9.142 % | |
95 | Venezuela | 8.982 % | |
96 | Costa Rica | 8.52 % | |
97 | Hungary | 8.447 % | |
98 | Portugal | 8.357 % | |
99 | Brazil | 8.343 % | |
100 | Peru | 8.331 % | |
101 | Bolivia | 8.312 % | |
102 | Armenia | 8.283 % | |
103 | North Macedonia | 8.18 % | |
104 | United States | 8.154 % | |
105 | Tunisia | 8.092 % | |
106 | Uruguay | 8.022 % | |
107 | Vietnam | 7.64 % | |
108 | France | 7.539 % | |
109 | Luxembourg | 7.526 % | |
110 | Slovakia | 7.5 % | |
111 | Fiji | 7.415 % | |
112 | Czech Republic | 7.306 % | |
113 | Russia | 7.251 % | |
114 | Argentina | 7.25 % | |
115 | Cuba | 7.197 % | |
116 | United Kingdom | 7.142 % | |
117 | Italy | 7.103 % | |
118 | Monaco | 7.068 % | |
119 | Belgium | 6.981 % | |
120 | Malta | 6.969 % | |
121 | Algeria | 6.924 % | |
122 | Georgia | 6.921 % | |
123 | Germany | 6.868 % | |
124 | Austria | 6.687 % | |
125 | Republic of Moldova | 6.512 % | |
126 | Australia | 6.416 % | |
127 | Kyrgyzstan | 6.405 % | |
128 | Switzerland | 6.379 % | |
129 | Montenegro | 6.376 % | |
130 | South Korea | 6.252 % | |
131 | Canada | 6.24 % | |
132 | Slovenia | 6.192 % | |
133 | Chile | 6.127 % | |
134 | Netherlands | 6.06 % | |
135 | Serbia | 6.049 % | |
136 | New Zealand | 6.023 % | |
137 | Albania | 5.97 % | |
138 | Ukraine | 5.97 % | |
139 | Uzbekistan | 5.847 % | |
140 | Poland | 5.785 % | |
141 | Mongolia | 5.724 % | |
142 | Kazakhstan | 5.697 % | |
143 | Ireland | 5.471 % | |
144 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 5.164 % | |
145 | China | 5.121 % | |
146 | Denmark | 5.093 % | |
147 | Croatia | 5.047 % | |
148 | Belarus | 5.027 % | |
149 | Turkmenistan | 4.901 % | |
150 | Norway | 4.734 % | |
151 | Lithuania | 4.696 % | |
152 | Latvia | 4.549 % | |
153 | Estonia | 4.466 % | |
154 | Sweden | 4.222 % | |
155 | Finland | 4.13 % | |
156 | San Marino | 4.07 % | |
157 | Iceland | 3.81 % |
- #1
India
- #2
Bangladesh
- #3
Comoros
- #4
Guinea-Bissau
- #5
Philippines
- #6
Nepal
- #7
Liberia
- #8
Madagascar
- #9
Mauritius
- #10
Côte d'Ivoire
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #157
Iceland
- #156
San Marino
- #155
Finland
- #154
Sweden
- #153
Estonia
- #152
Latvia
- #151
Lithuania
- #150
Norway
- #149
Turkmenistan
- #148
Belarus
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2012, India recorded the highest Low Birth Weight Rate at 29.49%, while Iceland had the lowest at 3.81%. The global range highlights significant disparities in newborn health across countries. The average low birth weight rate globally was 11.04%, providing a baseline for evaluating national health outcomes.
Socioeconomic Factors Influencing Low Birth Weight
The economic status of a country plays a crucial role in determining its low birth weight rate. Countries like India and Bangladesh, with rates of 29.49% and 24.29% respectively, often face challenges such as poverty and limited access to healthcare, which can contribute to higher incidences of low birth weight. In contrast, nations like Iceland and Finland with rates of 3.81% and 4.13%, benefit from robust healthcare systems and higher socioeconomic standards. These disparities underscore the importance of economic development and public health infrastructure in improving birth outcomes.
Geographic and Demographic Influences
Geographic and demographic factors significantly impact the low birth weight rates. In many developing countries, particularly in Asia and Africa, high rates are prevalent. For instance, Comoros and Guinea-Bissau have rates of 24.12% and 21.77% respectively. These regions often face challenges related to nutrition, maternal health, and education. Conversely, Northern European countries such as Sweden and Norway, with rates of 4.22% and 4.73%, benefit from comprehensive prenatal care and supportive policies for maternal health, highlighting the impact of regional healthcare strategies.
Policy and Healthcare Interventions
Effective policies and healthcare interventions can significantly reduce low birth weight rates. Countries with successful interventions typically have lower rates. For example, Estonia and Latvia, with rates of 4.47% and 4.55%, have implemented comprehensive maternal and child health programs that emphasize prenatal care and nutrition. These initiatives are critical in reducing the prevalence of low birth weight and improving overall health outcomes. In contrast, countries with less effective healthcare policies, such as Liberia and Madagascar with rates of 19.68% and 19.50%, continue to struggle with higher incidences.
Year-over-Year Trends and Their Implications
The year-over-year data reveals modest changes in low birth weight rates, with an average global decrease of -0.01%. Notable reductions were observed in India and Guinea-Bissau, with declines of -0.25% and -0.23% respectively, reflecting efforts to improve maternal healthcare and nutrition. Conversely, Jordan and Kuwait experienced increases of +0.23% and +0.22%. These increases may be attributed to shifts in healthcare focus or economic challenges impacting maternal well-being. Understanding these trends is vital for policymakers aiming to implement targeted interventions to reduce low birth weight rates.
Overall, the data from 2012 underscores the complex interplay of socioeconomic, geographic, and policy-related factors in influencing low birth weight rates globally. Countries with lower rates often have strong healthcare systems and supportive policies, while those with higher rates face significant challenges that require targeted interventions to improve maternal and newborn health outcomes.
Frequently Asked Questions About Low Birth Weight Rate in 2012
Which country had the highest low birth weight rate in 2012?
India had the highest low birth weight rate in 2012, with 29.49%.
Which country had the lowest low birth weight rate in 2012?
Iceland had the lowest low birth weight rate in 2012, with 3.81%.
What was the average low birth weight rate across all countries in 2012?
The average low birth weight rate across all countries in 2012 was 11.04%.
What was the median low birth weight rate in 2012?
The median low birth weight rate in 2012 was 10.52%.
How many countries were included in the 2012 low birth weight rate dataset?
The dataset included 157 countries in 2012.
What was the low birth weight rate for Bangladesh in 2012?
Bangladesh had a low birth weight rate of 24.29% in 2012, making it the second-highest in the dataset.
Insights by country
Estonia
In 2012, Estonia had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 4.465961674 %, ranking #153 out of 157 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, indicating potential concerns in maternal and infant health. Contributing factors include Estonia's relatively high rates of smoking among pregnant women and economic disparities that may affect access to prenatal care.
India
In 2012, India had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 29.48871031 %, ranking #1 out of 157 countries. This rate is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a critical public health challenge. Contributing factors include high levels of maternal malnutrition, socioeconomic disparities, and inadequate access to quality prenatal care, which disproportionately affect rural and impoverished populations across the country.
Czech Republic
The Czech Republic had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 7.306469851 % in 2012, ranking #112 out of 157 countries. This rate is higher than the global average, indicating potential concerns in maternal health and prenatal care. Factors contributing to this statistic include the country's robust healthcare system, which emphasizes prenatal care, yet challenges such as economic disparities and lifestyle choices may still impact birth outcomes.
Monaco
In 2012, Monaco had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 7.068371369 %, ranking #118 out of 157 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, indicating potential health challenges for newborns in the region. Contributing factors include Monaco's high population density and economic focus on luxury and tourism, which may impact maternal health services and prenatal care accessibility.
Mauritius
In 2012, Mauritius had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 19.13070053 %, ranking #9 out of 157 countries. This rate is significantly higher than the global average, highlighting concerns about maternal health and nutrition in the region. Contributing factors include socioeconomic challenges, limited access to healthcare services, and dietary deficiencies among pregnant women, which impact fetal development.
Luxembourg
In 2012, Luxembourg had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 7.526157244 %, ranking #109 out of 157 countries. This rate is higher than the global average, indicating potential health challenges for newborns in the country. Contributing factors include Luxembourg's high level of urbanization, which can impact prenatal care access, and a diverse population that may experience varying health outcomes.
Bulgaria
Bulgaria ranked #69 globally in 2012 with a Low Birth Weight Rate of 10.9605936 %. This figure is notably higher than many neighboring countries, indicating potential health challenges within the population. Contributing factors include socioeconomic issues, such as limited access to prenatal care and higher rates of smoking among pregnant women, which can adversely affect birth outcomes.
Liberia
In 2012, Liberia had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 19.6799741 %, ranking #7 out of 157 countries. This rate is significantly higher than the global average, indicating severe health challenges within the nation. Contributing factors include limited access to healthcare, high rates of malnutrition among pregnant women, and the lasting impacts of civil conflict on health infrastructure.
Finland
In 2012, Finland had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 4.129864926 %, ranking #155 out of 157 countries. This rate is higher than the global average, indicating potential challenges in maternal and infant health. Contributing factors include Finland's robust healthcare system, which emphasizes prenatal care, but also highlights disparities in access among certain demographics, particularly among immigrant populations.
Eritrea
Eritrea ranked #31 globally for Low Birth Weight Rate in 2012, with a rate of 15.3834843 %. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating significant health challenges in the region. Factors contributing to this rate include limited access to healthcare services, nutritional deficiencies among pregnant women, and the impacts of ongoing socio-economic instability.
Data Source
Low-birthweight babies (% of births)
The World Bank provides global development data, including statistics on low-birthweight babies as a percentage of total births. This dataset offers insights into maternal and child health across various countries, highlighting public health challenges and trends.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Low Birth Weight Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.