Low Birth Weight Rate 2012

Low birth weight rate highlights newborns under 2,500 grams, affecting survival and health outcomes.

157 data points••Global Coverage•Low-birthweight babies (% of births)•

Interactive Map

Loading interactive map...

Complete Data Rankings

Rank
Actions
1
India flag
India
29.489 %
2
Bangladesh flag
Bangladesh
24.29 %
3
Comoros flag
Comoros
24.119 %
4
Guinea-Bissau flag
Guinea-Bissau
21.766 %
5
Philippines flag
Philippines
21.183 %
6
Nepal flag
Nepal
20.914 %
7
Liberia flag
Liberia
19.68 %
8
Madagascar flag
Madagascar
19.499 %
9
Mauritius flag
Mauritius
19.131 %
10
Côte d'Ivoire flag
Côte d'Ivoire
19.124 %
11
Senegal flag
Senegal
19.096 %
12
Burkina Faso flag
Burkina Faso
19.072 %
13
Papua New Guinea flag
Papua New Guinea
19.001 %
14
Sri Lanka flag
Sri Lanka
18.461 %
15
Mozambique flag
Mozambique
18.115 %
16
Benin flag
Benin
17.476 %
17
Botswana flag
Botswana
17.296 %
18
Laos flag
Laos
17.204 %
19
Guyana flag
Guyana
16.981 %
20
Jordan flag
Jordan
16.958 %
21
Timor-Leste flag
Timor-Leste
16.837 %
22
South Africa flag
South Africa
16.633 %
23
Morocco flag
Morocco
16.123 %
24
Trinidad and Tobago flag
Trinidad and Tobago
15.912 %
25
Saint Lucia flag
Saint Lucia
15.906 %
26
Namibia flag
Namibia
15.904 %
27
Central African Republic flag
Central African Republic
15.888 %
28
Malawi flag
Malawi
15.816 %
29
Angola flag
Angola
15.683 %
30
Suriname flag
Suriname
15.669 %
31
Eritrea flag
Eritrea
15.383 %
32
Bahamas flag
Bahamas
15.264 %
33
Burundi flag
Burundi
15.085 %
34
Antigua and Barbuda flag
Antigua and Barbuda
15.082 %
35
Togo flag
Togo
15.059 %
36
Gabon flag
Gabon
14.933 %
37
Ghana flag
Ghana
14.885 %
38
Lesotho flag
Lesotho
14.772 %
39
Guatemala flag
Guatemala
14.426 %
40
Jamaica flag
Jamaica
14.345 %
41
Turkey flag
Turkey
14.012 %
42
United Arab Emirates flag
United Arab Emirates
13.891 %
43
Maldives flag
Maldives
13.823 %
44
Gambia flag
Gambia
13.704 %
45
Palau flag
Palau
13.68 %
46
Oman flag
Oman
13.339 %
47
Solomon Islands flag
Solomon Islands
13.233 %
48
Brunei Darussalam flag
Brunei Darussalam
13.206 %
49
Malaysia flag
Malaysia
13.018 %
50
Cameroon flag
Cameroon
12.87 %
51
Vanuatu flag
Vanuatu
12.731 %
52
Cambodia flag
Cambodia
12.701 %
53
Myanmar flag
Myanmar
12.681 %
54
Honduras flag
Honduras
12.54 %
55
Kuwait flag
Kuwait
12.403 %
56
Seychelles flag
Seychelles
12.343 %
57
Lebanon flag
Lebanon
12.198 %
58
Zimbabwe flag
Zimbabwe
12.169 %
59
Dominican Republic flag
Dominican Republic
12.117 %
60
Zambia flag
Zambia
12.047 %
61
Bhutan flag
Bhutan
11.719 %
62
Congo flag
Congo
11.62 %
63
Bahrain flag
Bahrain
11.607 %
64
Sierra Leone flag
Sierra Leone
11.364 %
65
Belize flag
Belize
11.262 %
66
Japan flag
Japan
11.05 %
67
Congo, Democratic Republic of the flag
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
11.045 %
68
Azerbaijan flag
Azerbaijan
10.973 %
69
Bulgaria flag
Bulgaria
10.961 %
70
Ecuador flag
Ecuador
10.916 %
71
Greece flag
Greece
10.911 %
72
Iraq flag
Iraq
10.774 %
73
Kenya flag
Kenya
10.761 %
74
Nicaragua flag
Nicaragua
10.749 %
75
Panama flag
Panama
10.744 %
76
Sao Tome and Principe flag
Sao Tome and Principe
10.65 %
77
Singapore flag
Singapore
10.638 %
78
Eswatini flag
Eswatini
10.598 %
79
Thailand flag
Thailand
10.52 %
80
Tanzania flag
Tanzania
10.506 %
81
Indonesia flag
Indonesia
10.5 %
82
Colombia flag
Colombia
10.481 %
83
El Salvador flag
El Salvador
10.39 %
84
Mexico flag
Mexico
10.16 %
85
Paraguay flag
Paraguay
10.021 %
86
Qatar flag
Qatar
9.899 %
87
State of Palestine flag
State of Palestine
9.839 %
88
Spain flag
Spain
9.512 %
89
Romania flag
Romania
9.497 %
90
Israel flag
Israel
9.398 %
91
Kiribati flag
Kiribati
9.312 %
92
Rwanda flag
Rwanda
9.295 %
93
Tajikistan flag
Tajikistan
9.279 %
94
Andorra flag
Andorra
9.142 %
95
Venezuela flag
Venezuela
8.982 %
96
Costa Rica flag
Costa Rica
8.52 %
97
Hungary flag
Hungary
8.447 %
98
Portugal flag
Portugal
8.357 %
99
Brazil flag
Brazil
8.343 %
100
Peru flag
Peru
8.331 %
101
Bolivia flag
Bolivia
8.312 %
102
Armenia flag
Armenia
8.283 %
103
North Macedonia flag
North Macedonia
8.18 %
104
United States flag
United States
8.154 %
105
Tunisia flag
Tunisia
8.092 %
106
Uruguay flag
Uruguay
8.022 %
107
Vietnam flag
Vietnam
7.64 %
108
France flag
France
7.539 %
109
Luxembourg flag
Luxembourg
7.526 %
110
Slovakia flag
Slovakia
7.5 %
111
Fiji flag
Fiji
7.415 %
112
Czech Republic flag
Czech Republic
7.306 %
113
Russia flag
Russia
7.251 %
114
Argentina flag
Argentina
7.25 %
115
Cuba flag
Cuba
7.197 %
116
United Kingdom flag
United Kingdom
7.142 %
117
Italy flag
Italy
7.103 %
118
Monaco flag
Monaco
7.068 %
119
Belgium flag
Belgium
6.981 %
120
Malta flag
Malta
6.969 %
121
Algeria flag
Algeria
6.924 %
122
Georgia flag
Georgia
6.921 %
123
Germany flag
Germany
6.868 %
124
Austria flag
Austria
6.687 %
125
Republic of Moldova flag
Republic of Moldova
6.512 %
126
Australia flag
Australia
6.416 %
127
Kyrgyzstan flag
Kyrgyzstan
6.405 %
128
Switzerland flag
Switzerland
6.379 %
129
Montenegro flag
Montenegro
6.376 %
130
South Korea flag
South Korea
6.252 %
131
Canada flag
Canada
6.24 %
132
Slovenia flag
Slovenia
6.192 %
133
Chile flag
Chile
6.127 %
134
Netherlands flag
Netherlands
6.06 %
135
Serbia flag
Serbia
6.049 %
136
New Zealand flag
New Zealand
6.023 %
137
Albania flag
Albania
5.97 %
138
Ukraine flag
Ukraine
5.97 %
139
Uzbekistan flag
Uzbekistan
5.847 %
140
Poland flag
Poland
5.785 %
141
Mongolia flag
Mongolia
5.724 %
142
Kazakhstan flag
Kazakhstan
5.697 %
143
Ireland flag
Ireland
5.471 %
144
Bosnia and Herzegovina flag
Bosnia and Herzegovina
5.164 %
145
China flag
China
5.121 %
146
Denmark flag
Denmark
5.093 %
147
Croatia flag
Croatia
5.047 %
148
Belarus flag
Belarus
5.027 %
149
Turkmenistan flag
Turkmenistan
4.901 %
150
Norway flag
Norway
4.734 %
151
Lithuania flag
Lithuania
4.696 %
152
Latvia flag
Latvia
4.549 %
153
Estonia flag
Estonia
4.466 %
154
Sweden flag
Sweden
4.222 %
155
Finland flag
Finland
4.13 %
156
San Marino flag
San Marino
4.07 %
157
Iceland flag
Iceland
3.81 %

↑Top 10 Countries

  1. #1India flagIndia
  2. #2Bangladesh flagBangladesh
  3. #3Comoros flagComoros
  4. #4Guinea-Bissau flagGuinea-Bissau
  5. #5Philippines flagPhilippines
  6. #6Nepal flagNepal
  7. #7Liberia flagLiberia
  8. #8Madagascar flagMadagascar
  9. #9Mauritius flagMauritius
  10. #10Côte d'Ivoire flagCôte d'Ivoire

Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.

↓Bottom 10 Countries

  1. #157Iceland flagIceland
  2. #156San Marino flagSan Marino
  3. #155Finland flagFinland
  4. #154Sweden flagSweden
  5. #153Estonia flagEstonia
  6. #152Latvia flagLatvia
  7. #151Lithuania flagLithuania
  8. #150Norway flagNorway
  9. #149Turkmenistan flagTurkmenistan
  10. #148Belarus flagBelarus

Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.

Analysis & Context

In 2012, India recorded the highest Low Birth Weight Rate at 29.49%, while Iceland had the lowest at 3.81%. The global range highlights significant disparities in newborn health across countries. The average low birth weight rate globally was 11.04%, providing a baseline for evaluating national health outcomes.

Socioeconomic Factors Influencing Low Birth Weight

The economic status of a country plays a crucial role in determining its low birth weight rate. Countries like India and Bangladesh, with rates of 29.49% and 24.29% respectively, often face challenges such as poverty and limited access to healthcare, which can contribute to higher incidences of low birth weight. In contrast, nations like Iceland and Finland with rates of 3.81% and 4.13%, benefit from robust healthcare systems and higher socioeconomic standards. These disparities underscore the importance of economic development and public health infrastructure in improving birth outcomes.

Geographic and Demographic Influences

Geographic and demographic factors significantly impact the low birth weight rates. In many developing countries, particularly in Asia and Africa, high rates are prevalent. For instance, Comoros and Guinea-Bissau have rates of 24.12% and 21.77% respectively. These regions often face challenges related to nutrition, maternal health, and education. Conversely, Northern European countries such as Sweden and Norway, with rates of 4.22% and 4.73%, benefit from comprehensive prenatal care and supportive policies for maternal health, highlighting the impact of regional healthcare strategies.

Policy and Healthcare Interventions

Effective policies and healthcare interventions can significantly reduce low birth weight rates. Countries with successful interventions typically have lower rates. For example, Estonia and Latvia, with rates of 4.47% and 4.55%, have implemented comprehensive maternal and child health programs that emphasize prenatal care and nutrition. These initiatives are critical in reducing the prevalence of low birth weight and improving overall health outcomes. In contrast, countries with less effective healthcare policies, such as Liberia and Madagascar with rates of 19.68% and 19.50%, continue to struggle with higher incidences.

Year-over-Year Trends and Their Implications

The year-over-year data reveals modest changes in low birth weight rates, with an average global decrease of -0.01%. Notable reductions were observed in India and Guinea-Bissau, with declines of -0.25% and -0.23% respectively, reflecting efforts to improve maternal healthcare and nutrition. Conversely, Jordan and Kuwait experienced increases of +0.23% and +0.22%. These increases may be attributed to shifts in healthcare focus or economic challenges impacting maternal well-being. Understanding these trends is vital for policymakers aiming to implement targeted interventions to reduce low birth weight rates.

Overall, the data from 2012 underscores the complex interplay of socioeconomic, geographic, and policy-related factors in influencing low birth weight rates globally. Countries with lower rates often have strong healthcare systems and supportive policies, while those with higher rates face significant challenges that require targeted interventions to improve maternal and newborn health outcomes.

Frequently Asked Questions About Low Birth Weight Rate in 2012

Which country had the highest low birth weight rate in 2012?

India had the highest low birth weight rate in 2012, with 29.49%.

Which country had the lowest low birth weight rate in 2012?

Iceland had the lowest low birth weight rate in 2012, with 3.81%.

What was the average low birth weight rate across all countries in 2012?

The average low birth weight rate across all countries in 2012 was 11.04%.

What was the median low birth weight rate in 2012?

The median low birth weight rate in 2012 was 10.52%.

How many countries were included in the 2012 low birth weight rate dataset?

The dataset included 157 countries in 2012.

What was the low birth weight rate for Bangladesh in 2012?

Bangladesh had a low birth weight rate of 24.29% in 2012, making it the second-highest in the dataset.

Insights by country

1

Estonia

In 2012, Estonia had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 4.465961674 %, ranking #153 out of 157 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, indicating potential concerns in maternal and infant health. Contributing factors include Estonia's relatively high rates of smoking among pregnant women and economic disparities that may affect access to prenatal care.

2

India

In 2012, India had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 29.48871031 %, ranking #1 out of 157 countries. This rate is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a critical public health challenge. Contributing factors include high levels of maternal malnutrition, socioeconomic disparities, and inadequate access to quality prenatal care, which disproportionately affect rural and impoverished populations across the country.

3

Czech Republic

The Czech Republic had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 7.306469851 % in 2012, ranking #112 out of 157 countries. This rate is higher than the global average, indicating potential concerns in maternal health and prenatal care. Factors contributing to this statistic include the country's robust healthcare system, which emphasizes prenatal care, yet challenges such as economic disparities and lifestyle choices may still impact birth outcomes.

4

Monaco

In 2012, Monaco had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 7.068371369 %, ranking #118 out of 157 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, indicating potential health challenges for newborns in the region. Contributing factors include Monaco's high population density and economic focus on luxury and tourism, which may impact maternal health services and prenatal care accessibility.

5

Mauritius

In 2012, Mauritius had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 19.13070053 %, ranking #9 out of 157 countries. This rate is significantly higher than the global average, highlighting concerns about maternal health and nutrition in the region. Contributing factors include socioeconomic challenges, limited access to healthcare services, and dietary deficiencies among pregnant women, which impact fetal development.

6

Luxembourg

In 2012, Luxembourg had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 7.526157244 %, ranking #109 out of 157 countries. This rate is higher than the global average, indicating potential health challenges for newborns in the country. Contributing factors include Luxembourg's high level of urbanization, which can impact prenatal care access, and a diverse population that may experience varying health outcomes.

7

Bulgaria

Bulgaria ranked #69 globally in 2012 with a Low Birth Weight Rate of 10.9605936 %. This figure is notably higher than many neighboring countries, indicating potential health challenges within the population. Contributing factors include socioeconomic issues, such as limited access to prenatal care and higher rates of smoking among pregnant women, which can adversely affect birth outcomes.

8

Liberia

In 2012, Liberia had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 19.6799741 %, ranking #7 out of 157 countries. This rate is significantly higher than the global average, indicating severe health challenges within the nation. Contributing factors include limited access to healthcare, high rates of malnutrition among pregnant women, and the lasting impacts of civil conflict on health infrastructure.

9

Finland

In 2012, Finland had a Low Birth Weight Rate of 4.129864926 %, ranking #155 out of 157 countries. This rate is higher than the global average, indicating potential challenges in maternal and infant health. Contributing factors include Finland's robust healthcare system, which emphasizes prenatal care, but also highlights disparities in access among certain demographics, particularly among immigrant populations.

10

Eritrea

Eritrea ranked #31 globally for Low Birth Weight Rate in 2012, with a rate of 15.3834843 %. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating significant health challenges in the region. Factors contributing to this rate include limited access to healthcare services, nutritional deficiencies among pregnant women, and the impacts of ongoing socio-economic instability.

Data Source

Low-birthweight babies (% of births)

The World Bank provides global development data, including statistics on low-birthweight babies as a percentage of total births. This dataset offers insights into maternal and child health across various countries, highlighting public health challenges and trends.

Visit Data Source

Historical Data by Year

Explore Low Birth Weight Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.

More Health Facts